Slog - The Stranger's Blog

Line Out

The Music Blog

« War is Peace, and Density is S... | Dept. of Brand Names »

Tuesday, July 25, 2006

Bob Casey: “Take Your Check And Shove It!”

Posted by on July 25 at 15:55 PM

bobcasey.jpg

A couple of months ago I sent a big, fat check to Bob Casey, the Dem running against Sen. Rick Santorum in Pennsylvania. It was the maximum personal contribution, or $2100. I wrote about sending Casey that check, and encouraged readers of Savage Love to support to Casey. This didn’t sit well with some Savage Love readers—Casey, they pointed out, is anti-choice, and why didn’t I have a problem with that?

Yes, yes: Bob Casey is opposed to abortion. But electing Casey will take out Rick “Frothy Mix” Santorum, a much more rabidly antichoice senator. Frothy Mix doesn’t think you should be able to choose masturbation, for crying out loud. Moreover, electing Casey could help Democrats take back the Senate, which will go a long way toward protecting choice, abortion rights, and other sexual freedoms—despite Casey’s stance on choice. Electing one or two pro-life Dems is the price we’re going to have to pay to put reliably pro-choice Dems in positions of power all over the Senate. So casting a vote for Casey, or sending a contribution to Casey, is a pragmatic, progressive, pro-choice bankshot.

The Casey campaign was grateful for my support. The day my check arrived at Casey HQ a staffer called to thank me for the dough and invited me to a Casey event taking place the same night in Seattle. Casey was going to be in town and I was personally invited to come meet Casey and get my picture taken with the candidate. I skipped the event, which turned out to be a mistake. Because it looks like I’m not going to be getting any more invites to Casey campaign events.

Jake Perry, finance director for Bob Casey, just called to tell me that Bob Casey is returning my check.

Here’s Jake: “We appreciate your willingness to support Bob, but my higher ups… people above me… they think that we may wind up spending more, you know, money then the contribution is worth. But we appreciate your willingness to support us.”

Uh… you’re welcome, I guess.

Jake explained that the Casey campaign is worried that Santorum’s flying monkeys—not their words—will spot my name on their campaign finance reports and raise holy hell about Casey taking money from me. I am, after all, the man who successfully smeared Santorum with santorum, the frothy mix of lube and fecal matter that is sometimes the byproduct of anal sex. (Still the #1 result when you Google “santorum.”) The Casey camp feels—perhaps rightly—that taking my money may result in their having to spend more than $2100 of staff time debating the merits of Savage Love and SpreadingSantorum.com with Sen. ManOnDog if the Santorum camp decided to make an issue of Casey’s connection to me.

So my $2100 check is in the mail. Or it’s in the mail again, I should say, but this time it’s heading from PA to WA. Perry did suggest some other groups in Pennsylvania that could use the money—you know, independent groups and Dem orgs that are working to defeat Santorum but that aren’t affiliated with Bob Casey or his campaign. That way Casey could benefit from my money without having to, you know, associate himself with the likes of me.

Huh.

While I’m a little miffed about Casey sending my check back—who wouldn`t be?—I am going to send the $2100 to a group working to defeat Rick Santorum. How could I not? I’ve asked my readers, who are overwhelmingly pro-choice, to be pragmatic and swallow hard and support Bob Casey in November. So I’m going to have to swallow hard and support Bob Casey whether he wants me to or not. So Bob Casey doesn’t want to take my dirty money—or doesn’t want to be seen taking my dirty money. So what? I still want Casey to see him beat the lube-and-fecal-matter-splattered pants off Rick Santorum this November. So I’m sending the $2100 Casey spurned to Philadelphians Against Santorum. (For the record: PAS is not one of the groups that Perry suggested.)

This is the first time a politician has ever sent back a check. John Kerry cashed my check, Ned Lamont cashed my check, Darcy Burner cashed my check—no problemo. But if I wanna keep sending money to mainstream politicians it looks like I’m going to have to form a political action committee (PAC) to fudge the source of the funds. Bob Casey may not take check from me, but maybe he’ll take one from my Fudge PAC.


CommentsRSS icon

INVITATED! I can't stop laughing.


Why does everyone always pick up on th e typos?

So now you're $2100 dollars richer... congratulations. Would it really have mad a difference?

Insulted? No, you should be honored by this recognition of your notoriety.

In any case, you are to be commended for your rational and pragmatic response.

Lame, lame, lame. This is Pennsylvania, not Mississippi.


Whoops, didn't read through...

Money maybe better spent then...

As much as I agree that this is insulting, I think that they were only making a pragmatic choice. No need to give Senator Frothy Mix any hand hold he can use to side track the issues at hand, since he is already trailing by a significant margin in polls. Just my 2 cents...

I wrote that pretty fast—I'm surprised there's only one big typo in it. Corrected now, thanks for pointing it out.

"Philadelphians Against Santorum?" Philadelphians should know that there is no avoiding the occasional visit from the senator...

I hate to see it, but I can understand it. The GOP has such nasty fucking bastards in their leadership, and their rank and file are such jealous retards. The Dem running against Ney in Ohio got smeared for doing an interview with a "crossdressing lesbian" and "transgender-king"

The evil lesbian in question? Rachel Maddow of "The Rachel Maddow Show" on Air America - one of the brightest, most articulate people in the media today.

It would be just like the Santorum folks to sidetrack any meaningful debate and/or discussion over some bullshit about a "Leftist Homosexual Sex Counselor" or "Former Drag Queen Anal Festishist"

This is what we're stuck with until we can kick the bastard Retardlican party to the curb.

Brought to you by the party that was going to "change the tone in Washington."

I think they made the right decision, actually - donations from anyone who has an automatic soapbox from which they can conduct anything that can be interpreted as campaign advocacy are a grey area indeed. Should your columns edge over from making fun of Senator Frothy to actually advocating votes for Casey, then those could be considered in-kind contributions to the campaign, which would put you over the limit with the $2100 donation.

Journalists - even journalists writing filthy sex columns - have to be careful about political advocacy. Ask that dickhead Kirby Wilbur about that.

First, a geography lesson: Pennsylvania is essentially Philadelphia and Pittsburgh with a whole lotta Mississippi, Alabama and other red states stuck right there in the middle.

Second, your comparison of Casey returning your check to other politicians accepting it is invalid. Lamont, Kerry et al are/were not running against candidates who you attacked personally. Yeah, yeah Rick Santorum is a politician and in the public spotlight and it therefore a frequent target of criticism. That comes with the territory. But, rather than simply taking on Santorum’s politics, you went out and created a family name association that is disgusting. I’m glad I’m not his kids listening to the kids in school talk about that one. It’s one thing to say you don’t like that he’s anti-abortion, etc. It’s another thing to tar an entire family (think of the children!) with something so foul.

Casey’s got enough issues to deal with in the campaign against a formidable opponent and GOP leader with major party support. It makes sense to me that he didn’t want to give his opponent an opportunity to move the subject off the issues and onto something completely irrelevant to the campaign.

Lastly, stop being so fucking sensitive. At least they had the courtesy to call you and discuss it. The campaign could have easily just sent it back with no explanation and written you off as some stupid sex columnist. The fact that they spent valuable time talking about your lousy $2,100 dollars should be taken as a compliment on the influence of your column on the campaign.

Shame it won't influence my parents who are still gonna vote for Sen. Rick.

Fudge PAC. Heh heh. (snicker)

Oh. God. Help Me. FudgePAC? Please, please make it so.

Oh my, I completely missed the implications of "Fudge PAC" until just now.

There's more than one typo. You'll find another one in the second to last paragraph.

Great typing skills, Dan! I was laughing because of your wit, timing, and dashing good looks. Keep on!

Uh, PA Native? Santorum says lots of horrible, disgusting things about gay people—gay couples in particular, and gay couples who want to marry in particular cubed. My kid has to listen to that shit too—the insults, the "threats to the foundations of our society," the "attack on the American family," the comparisons of gay marriage to terrorism.

So, yeah, it's a shame for Santorum's kids. It's a shame for our kids too, for all the kids being raised by gay and lesbian couples. Estimates put that number at up to 10,000,000 kids—there are a lot more kids are being raised by same-sex parents than there are kids growing up with the last name Santorum. It's relatively rare, actually—read all about it at SpreadingSantorum.com.

PA Native: You've just described just about every state in the union -- Big City A, Big City B and a sea of rural red. But other non-Southern states are somehow bright enough to not vote for the American Taliban. What the hell's wrong with Pennsylvania?

(P.S. The typo police need to get laid.)


Yes, will people please stop pointing out grammer and typos? Posts about them are much more annoying than the typos and grammar errors themselves.

Thank you.

The image of being "tarred" with santorum is almost as good as Fudge PAC.

so if i contribue to Fudge PAC, the group dedicated to unseating rabid anti-gays, does that make me a Fudge PACker?

I love it! Yes Yes Yes!

If my last name were Santorum, I'd want to change it anyway... who wants to be associated with that rabid nut? Face it, the name Santorum had already become associated with nasty scum long before the meme.

There's already plenty of people who read Savage Love but wouldn't want anyone to know they do. Or get caught reading the Stranger. Or having gay sex. Not to mention having a blog.

So this campaign contribution is just one of many things that makes Dan Savage the absolute nexus of secret shame for so many people.

Perhaps everyone who doesn't love you in public adores you in the darkest recesses of their hearts.

I would so give money to the Fudge PAC!!

It's been a long time since I was a kid, but I don't remember us ever talking about anal sex around the playground. Let alone the frothy mix of lube and fecal matter that is sometimes the byproduct of anal sex. While times have changed, I really don't think they've changed THAT much.

Pull the stick out, PA Native. And make sure to wipe it down. No one wants to see your Santorumy stick.

I can't stop laughing.

And not about the typos.

Don't be so naive Catalina. Kids know (and talk about) a lot more than you apparently think they do.

And Dan, there's a difference between the political issues you cite and the definition you applied to Santorum.

I wish Sen. Heinz's plane hadn't crashed. We'd have been able to avoid all of this time wasting bullshit.

uh, PA native!!! Santorum's kids are home schooled, thusly never have to endure other kids talkin' 'bout their daddy's name being associated with butt sex byproduct. they probably hang out with other homeschooled kids from conservative catholic homes. mmkay?

Fags
United
Demanding
Gay
Equality
PAC

Sorry, PA. Not buying it. Santorum smears me—my good name, as it were—when he compares gay marriage to terrorism, claims that gay couples are attacking families (as opposed to starting them), and insists that a loving gay relationship is somehow immoral.

Those are personal attacks, PA. Santorum and his talibani allies are attacking gay people and families, for crying out loud—and our kids, most of whom will grow up to be straight. I don't think Santorum should get to attack me personally, and from a much larger bully pulpit, and then hide behind "civiil discourse! civil discourse! and what about my kids!" when I take a swing back at him.

You know, this is part of what hamstrings the Dems. Republicans go for the jugular, they attack, and then we sit around worrying about how they'll feel—or how their kids will feel—if we respond in kind. Sorry, not me. Go after my ass, Senator, and I'll come after yours.

Hey Dan,

I totally agree with you about the need to take back the Senate even if all of the D's we elect aren't pro choice. And I agree that it will overall be much better for choice. But I have to disagree with this, "Electing one or two pro-life Dems is the price we’re going to have to pay to put reliably pro-choice Dems in positions of power all over the Senate." We'll be putting one of the most anti-choice Dems in the country in the most powerful position in the Senate (assuming there isn't a leadership fight). Yeah, Reid is less batshit crazy than Frist (last time I checked, he never used a highly edited video as a diagnostic tool). Still, he is an anti-choice Mormon.

Reid has also been a great Sen. Min. Leader, as I hope you would agree. And while the he will be the leader of the Senate, think of all the Dems heading up various committees. And I do not doubt that Reid will defer to the will of the majority of the Dems in the Senate, just as the one or two pro-choice Rs in the Senate now are constantly grabbing ankles for the anti-choice R majority.

Oh please, Native - don't try to pull the "children are much wiser than we know" crap with me. I spend a good amount of time with two children and I have never heard them speak of either Santorum the politician or Santorum the byproduct. And they go to Lowell!

Besides, even if the playground buzz these days is all about the buttlove, so what? I went to school with kids whose last names resembled the words "douchebag", "fucker", "titties" and "shitter" and guess what their nicknames were? (My last name is somewhat similar to the nickname of a legendary male porn star. Something I didn't appreciate until college) It's this sort of thing that makes us such interestingly neurotic adults.

Stop scraping the bottom of the barrel and trying to pass it off as virtue. Santorum is a prick, and deserves every bit of contempt he gets.

Three cheers for Dan having a rational view on how this stuff works. Let's all hope Casey wins, even if he won't take Dan's check.

Just a quick note for those who read Geni's comment above: because Dan regularly engages in "news, opinion and commentary" in his articles, and does so within the context of publications which do the same, he's a part of the media under federal election law, and as a result he can endorse who ever he wants as often as he wants without ever creating an in-kind contribution, just like a newspaper publisher.

Ah, politics! It's based on public perception. . .

On a different note, but slightly related, I wonder if Santorum is in favor of his aide telling everyone her favorite tv show is gay!

See the Hill's 50 most beautiful list.

Fags
United
Demanding
Gay
Equality
PAC

I'm so down for Fudge PAC. Let me know if I can help.
Good work, Dan.

Not to spoil anyones fun, but it could also be "Families United Demanding Gay Equality" PAC

Oh, great.

Casey takes money from Abramoff's partners without arching the eyebrow even a little, a disbarred New York lawyer with a criminal record for attempted larceny and patronizing a 16-year-old prostitute, and hasn't seen a lobbyist dollar he doesn't like and he returned your check?

Getting rid of Santorum is key this year, but who will rid us of Casey in 6 years?

Bob Casey is afraid that Santorum's people will spot your name on his donor list and raise hell? That's just silly.

What about the fact that both Casey and Santorum take money from over 200 of the same PACs? HMOs, defense contractors, pharmaceutical companies, all sorts of organizations- they give money to BOTH SIDES? Why doesn't Bob Casey care about that? I would think that would be a more reasonable thing to fear, when you're trying to differentiate yourself from an incumbent, to not have your strings pulled by the same corporate donors.

But that's just me.

Casey won't win a close race against a well-funded candidate unless he gets grassroots support from groups like Philly Against Santorum. I'd argue that PAS will put your money to better use.

Thank you for your generosity, your commitment to taking back, and your entertaining column.

J.R. King
Volunteer, Philadelphians Against Santorum

Dan,

There are many more reasons some of us will NOT support Bob Casey other than him being anti-choice. Casey is also anti stem cell research, pro-war, anti gay adoption rights, pro death penalty, anti gun safety laws, pro flag burning amendment, pro patriot act, pro Alito, and against separation of church and state.

It's fine if you want to support him but please don't act like the only some Democrats won't is that he's anti-choice. I cannot bring myself to vote for such a right-winger just because he's running against Santorum. I'd rather wait 6 years and replace him with a real Democrat.

Dave in Philly, we're talking the lesser of two evils here. Despite the stuff you've mentioned about Casey, Santorum is WORSE. He's righter-winger. ??

Let's face it, the progressive folks in Pennsylvania have a choice between Scylla and Charibdis with Bob the DINO and Senator Shitslick. I just wish you would not use the term "pro-life" since many of them don't give a shit what happens to the kid once he/she is born, as is evidenced by the pro-war, pro-capital punishment, pro-gun, anti-stem cell research, anti-programs-to-help-the-oor, etc., fuckwads who scream about the sanctity of life.

I can think of exactly one time Mr. Culture of Life El Smirko (aka GWB) has defended the life of someone who was already born, and that was someone who had been in a persistent vegetative state for 15 fucking years when he intervened.

I'm not happy about Casey giving the money back, but I'm kind of tired of Pennsylvanians who are as liberal as I am pretending that their views can win the state of Pennsylvania. If someone with the same views I have ever ran for a state-wide office in PA he'd be lucky to get 30% of the vote. I don't agree with Casey on a lot of things, but most of the people on this blog wouldn't agree with the average Pennsylvanian on a lot of things, either.

As much as I'd love Pennsylvania to be as liberal as one of the more North Eastern states, the fact is that it just isn't, and unfortunatly it will take many years before that changes.

PA Native: in case you don't remember, Pennsylvania ended up being a blue state in the last election...

I just heard about this from my boss and immediately got all fired up and scrambled to the computer to read all about it.
Shockingly, Mr. Savage, your take on it has calmed me down.
Yes, Casey's a bit of a douche, but you're right. And I think the organization getting your money will surely be much more appreciative than a political family fat-cat.
Because I'm a creature of logic and kindness, I don't like Casey's politics. I really, really, really don't want to vote for him. But I will. And not only because you told me to. Though that helps me feel a little less dirty about it.
Courtlyn

PS. Steve Porter in 2006
How 'bout taking on Fat Phil English, another evil PA politician? We've got loads of them (and not the loads like we mean when we say "Santorum").

Hi all... speaking of local politics, this is a shout out to any voter living in the City of Detroit. When you go to the polls to vote in the primary on Tuesday, PLEASE consider casting your vote for Judge Rudy Serra to retain his seat on the 36th District Court. Judge Serra was appointed by Governor Jennifer Granholm and he is the first openly gay man to be appointed to serve as a member of the judiciary. Judge Rudy is backed by many progressive Democrats, but will be strongly (and wrongly) challenged in the primary by I believe 5 evangelical or otherwise "religious" lawyers who want him off the bench because of his sexual orientation ONLY. That is the only "beef" these challengers have vocalized about him. He has proven himself to be a fine, intelligent, fair and honest judge and he truly deserves the support of everyone who desires those qualities in persons sitting on the 36th district court bench. Thank you for your consideration of this request. Remember - Vote to Retain Judge Rudy Serra as 36th District Court Judge in Detroit, Michigan.

I see that you don't have the balls to stand up to Casey or your Party Leadership and say, "How about picking candidates that support our values.

A Casey victory will only hurt the Democratic Party long wrong. I would have sent the money to Santorum and said I hope you defeat the spineless Casey.

Casey isn't going to help you guys persuade Pennsylvanians to accept the Democratic Party agenda. In the battle of ideas Conservative Casey isn't the guy you want advancing your cause.

Comments Closed

In order to combat spam, we are no longer accepting comments on this post (or any post more than 45 days old).