Happy to Pander
The Democrats are in a tizzy because Mike McGavick attended a rally yesterday to support the renewed GOP push for an amendment to the Constitution against flag burning.
It’s a silly amendment. (And certainly raises 1st Amendment issues.)
The Dem’s beef is that in an article in yesterday’s PI about the GOP’s desperate election season attempt to divert attention away from serious issues (the $400 billion deficit, Iraq, gas prices, NSA spying, corruption) w demagogue issues like gay marriage and flag burning, McGavick said: “The frustration people feel is a reflection of deeper partisanship that has prevented things from getting things done.”
The D’s point being, if McGavick is so frustrated w gross partisanship, why is he pandering w an off-point, divisively partisan issue like flag burning.
It’s a good question, and it certainly outs McGavick as talking out of both sides of his mouth.
I’ve got a call out to McGavick’s campaign to ask them what’s up, but I’ll take a shot at answering the question myself: McGavick, unlike Cantwell, is happy to throw a bone to his base.
let's see:
Strike 1 - gay marriage amendment
Strike 2 - estate tax amendment
... Strike 3 coming down the pike, 33 percent deadenders!
then you're OUT!