It's not like The Stranger broke into anyone's homes or trespassed on private property when taking those pictures.

Those campaign signs are for public consumption, much like Christmas decorations and if my memory serves, The Stranger also ran similar pictures of Christine Gregoire signs.

I'm heartened that at least half of us have a sense of decency. It's in bad taste to publish the addresses. Even if someone just throws an egg - it could be that a young Obama supporter tending her ailing Republican grandmother has to clean it up.
It's a matter of being nice to people in general, and respecting their opinions as you feel that they must respect yours.

Republicans= fucking whiner crybabies. They were losers on the way up, and now they're being losers on the way down. Enjoy the political wilderness, bitches!

This is retarded.

Let me get this right. Say that I'm a thug, and I'm inclined to violence toward people/property with Rossi or McCain yard signs. I need the Stranger to publish addresses for me? Like I couldn't drive over to Bellevue and find Rossi signs all by myself without the Stranger hit piece?

Or say I'm not a violent guy. Reading this Stranger hit piece is supposed to incite me to drive over to Bellevue and commit violent acts? Even though I already drive past dozens of houses a day with Rossi or McCain signs, and have managed to do so without violence?

Sure, I thought the article was a bit crass. But it isn't like those homeowners were trying to disguise their political leanings. Like the Stranger violated some great personal secret. They have big signs in their yards. They want people to know who they support. Now more people know.

What maroons. If I wanted to find homes with McCain/Palin signs (which I don't), I'd drive over to Windermere. I don't need The Stranger providing pointers.

I'll also note that Republicans had no problem with this when Michelle Malkin was staked outside of Graeme Frost's house.

Umm, guys, you might want to check the addresses before you completely lose your shit. Next time don't be so gullible.

Jay Andrew Allen is right. If you had also told us whether or not these Republicans also had granite countertops, then no harm done. Sadly, however, you failed to do your job, and now we all have to do it for you. Happy now?

The only down side I see to this is that now more conservative fuckwad trolls will hang around the Slog for couple of weeks after the election, spewing bile and being ignored.

I think I hear a waaaaaaaaaambulance coming.

I dont' think it was right to publish the addresses. Picture of the house? Sure. Addresses? No. It encourages voter intimidation.

If a right-wing paper in Georgia published all the addresses of those homes with Obama signs, I think we Obama supporters would go berserk. I know I would.

Good GOD why would ANY sane person want to know where a McCain or Rossi supporter lives? It's like wanting to know where the freshest, warmest, smelliest pool of vomit is.

Voter intimidation? Oh, please.

You stupid fucking Seattle hipsters think you're all so fucking hip just because you're hip. Well, listen here, punk-ass hipsters, I can see right through you. So there!

Go Knuckledragger/Cousinfucker in 2012!

This comment by aloysius on Instapundit is my favorite:

"Not too worry. The readers of this birdcage liner are only interested in the perverted personals and the ads for erotica. No more than 100 people will read that article and none of them have the attention span to remember it a day later. I have a theory that the kiddos that wrote the article drove around to their parents' houses and took the pictures. Word to the wise conservatives-- take your children to church and let Mom stay home to watch them or this could be your sick child writing an article putting you in danger."

The idea of a paper being run by sick children is pretty sweet. Empty bottles of cough syrup and tums wrappers scattered in the hall way; soiled laundry wadded up in the corners; oatmeal baths for those afflicted with chicken pox and, every once in a while, they put out a paper.

Neither.

Instead I'd suggest, "Yes, it's a sophomoric and pointless demonstration of the staff's First Amendment right to be assholes."