Slog News & Arts

Line Out

Music & Nightlife

« The Pre-Post-Mortem | "God-Damn, America!" »

Monday, October 27, 2008

The Source

posted by on October 27 at 12:35 PM

From where comes Wall Street Journal’s big idea, “The Europeanization of America”?

So where is the new Obama administration likely to take us? Seven things seem certain:

* The U.S. military will withdraw from Iraq quickly and substantially, regardless of conditions on the ground or the obvious consequence of emboldening terrorists there and around the globe.
* Protectionism will become our national trade policy; free trade agreements with other nations will be reduced and limited.
* Income taxes will rise on middle- and upper-income people and businesses, and individuals will pay much higher Social Security taxes, all to carry out the new president’s goals of “spreading the wealth around.”
* Federal government spending will substantially increase. The new Obama proposals come to more than $300 billion annually, for education, health care, energy, environmental and many other programs, in addition to whatever is needed to meet our economic challenges. Mr. Obama proposes more than a 10% annual spending growth increase, considerably higher than under the first President Bush (6.7%), Bill Clinton (3.3%) or George W. Bush (6.4%).
* Federal regulation of the economy will expand, on everything from financial management companies to electricity generation and personal energy use.
* The power of labor unions will substantially increase, beginning with repeal of secret ballot voting to decide on union representation.
* Free speech will be curtailed through the reimposition of the Fairness Doctrine to limit the conservative talk radio that so irritates the liberal establishment.

These policy changes will be the beginning of the Europeanization of America.

From where? Maybe from here

…Obama is being attacked not because he is black, but because he represents the Europeanization of the American democracy.

And here

The real rupture in American politics is in the area of the Republican party. The exact location of this break is between its working-class base and the top layer of its professional/business elites. The break is not an isolated event but a part of the larger transformation of American politics—its current Europeanization. Obama’s rise to power is also a consequence of this process. The result of Obama’s presidency will be an increase of the government’s role in the management of civil society; as for the break in the GOP, the result will be an American political system that has three parts: the Dems, the Republicans, and the far right. Or put another way: Obama, McCain, and Palin.

It’s possible.

RSS icon Comments

1

god willing.

Posted by Carollani | October 27, 2008 12:56 PM
2

Well, the absolute mess made of everything from health care to our infrastructure to two badly run wars, one of which wasn't even needed, is proof we can do without Republicans.
Senator Ted Steven's guilty verdict is just more proof the Republican's don't deserve power.

Posted by Vince | October 27, 2008 1:02 PM
3

Amazing that of the seven things of which the WSJ is certain, six or seven of them will likely never come to pass.

Posted by whatevernevermind | October 27, 2008 1:05 PM
4

The WSJ sounds more like Fox News every day. Murdoch said he wasn't going to make big changes in editorial policy. Right.

Posted by inkweary | October 27, 2008 1:08 PM
5

Europe is neat. I'm all for becoming Europe.

Posted by Abby | October 27, 2008 1:27 PM
6

Actually the "European" system exists in Japan, Australia, Canada, too.

IOW the "European" system they are wailing about is the system the whole industrialized world has, except for USA pretty much.

It's called social democracy, maybe you
ve heard of it? NAtionalized health care, free college tuition, more distributionist taxes, but still basically (a) capitalist and (b) democratic.

So yeah let's please cop to this I am very tired of wussy liberals running away from what they really believe in, yes, we're for Europeanizing America and Japanizing it and fuck yeah we're going to have their kind of national health care soon.

In other words, WSJ is correct and our answer should be fuckin' A!

Posted by PC | October 27, 2008 1:37 PM
7

oh noz, we're going to be SWEDEN! heaven forfend!

Posted by max solomon | October 27, 2008 1:45 PM
8

Could someone explain why an open ballot is pro-union? I guess it allows the union organizers to pressure people into voting for them, but it seems like the inverse is also true, that business owners can use those votes against their employees.

Posted by keshmeshi | October 27, 2008 1:53 PM
9

Damn Sweden with its....uh....happy, educated, healthy, well-off people.

WTF THE FUCK IS WRONG WITH SWEDEN?! WHY DO THEY HATE FREEDOM?!? AND MONEY?!? WHYYYYYYY?!?! PLEASE DON'T LET US GET LIKE THAT!

Posted by Original Monique | October 27, 2008 2:01 PM
10

@8, excactly correct about voting for Unions, big business wants to know which of it's employees are trying to unionize.

But, I love how the WSJ does not substantiate a single claim they make.

Posted by Cato the Younger Younger | October 27, 2008 2:24 PM
11

@9: and its pretty pretty soccer players, of which one of my favorites is looking likely to be playing here in the spring.

Posted by Abby | October 27, 2008 2:36 PM
12

Europeanization is the new Africanization.

Posted by Jay | October 27, 2008 3:35 PM
13

Uhm, not to be an annoyance, but in the Netherlands healthcare has been largely privatized (not really an improvement so far), college fees are up, unemployment benefits are down... It used to be a social democracy, but it's been dismantled pretty much over the last 10 to 15 years. Other european countries are following suit.
So... Europeans are complaining that things are "Americanizing", Americans are afraid that they will be Europeanized?

Gimme a break.

Posted by M'thew | October 28, 2008 1:33 AM

Comments Closed

Comments are closed on this post.