Slog News & Arts

Line Out

Music & Nightlife

« Live Blogging the Hideous Publ... | "The Post will happily name ev... »

Wednesday, February 13, 2008

Another Reason to Love Her

posted by on February 13 at 11:51 AM

This is last week’s news, but it’s still circulating around the tubes, and since it’s a fairly obscure British lit prize, I’m going to repeat it here:

Zadie Smith refused to award a literary prize because she felt that none of the books were worth celebrating. Here’s the money quote from her statement:

The little Willesden Herald Prize is only about good writing, and it turns out that a prize faithfully recognizing this imperative must also face the fact that good writing is actually very rare. For let us be honest again: it is sometimes too easy, and too tempting, to blame everything that we hate in contemporary writing on the bookstores, on the corporate publishers, on incompetent editors and corrupt PR departments – and God knows, they all have their part to play. But we also have our part to play. We also have to work out how to write better and read better. We have to really scour this internet to find the writing we love, and then we have to be able to recognize its quality. We cannot love something solely because it has been ignored. It must also be worthy of our attention.

Another bit, where she refers to the fact that most literary prizes “are are really about brand consolidation for beer companies, phone companies, coffee companies and even frozen food companies,” is pretty genius, too. I’ve always loved her books, but I will love Zadie Smith forever for this.

RSS icon Comments

1

Good for her! I too heart Z. Smith. Literary prizes aren't races where, no matter how slow the competitors, a winner can be declared. I will be eager to read the work of someone who does win the prize since I am now aware that excellence in writing will be honored rather than just the best story of the bunch.

Posted by Printer | February 13, 2008 12:06 PM
2

Zadie Smith's name (and book White Teeth) have been popping up in papers/blogs/conversations LIKE CRAZY these past couple of weeks. I've even seen an unusually high number of people reading her book on the bus lately. I liked the book and have read it a few times, but wasn't it published in 2000? And her new on in '05? I kinda wish that the literary circle would [for lack of me thinking of any other way to put it] move on from her and begin focusing on new fantastically accessible authors.

Posted by *gong* | February 13, 2008 12:51 PM
3

@2: Who are these new, fantastically accessible authors? Do tell, and I'll stop re-reading White Teeth!

Posted by bkwrm | February 13, 2008 4:03 PM
4

Maybe she's right, maybe she's wrong, but she's fucking pretentious as hell. I hate people like that. I've liked her books - but probably won't bother reading another.

Posted by Ed | February 13, 2008 6:30 PM

Comments Closed

In order to combat spam, we are no longer accepting comments on this post (or any post more than 14 days old).