<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Slog - Comments on Another Reason to Love Her</title>
<link>http://slog.thestranger.com/2008/02/another_reason_to_love_her</link>
<description>This is last week&apos;s news, but it&apos;s still circulating around the tubes, and since it&apos;s a fairly obscure British lit prize, I&apos;m going to repeat it here: Zadie Smith refused to award a literary prize because she felt that none of the books were worth celebrating. Here&apos;s the money quote from her statement: The little Willesden Herald Prize is only about good writing, and it turns out that a prize faithfully recognizing this imperative must also face the fact that good writing is actually very rare. For let us be honest again: it is sometimes too easy, and too tempting,...</description>
<copyright>Copyright 2008</copyright>
<pubDate>Wed, 13 Feb 2008 11:51:13 -0800</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Wed, 13 Feb 2008 18:30:36 -0800</lastBuildDate>
<generator>http://www.movabletype.org/?v=3.34</generator>
<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs> 

<item>
<title>Comment by Printer</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>Good for her!  I too heart Z. Smith.  Literary prizes aren't races where, no matter how slow the competitors, a winner can be declared.  I will be eager to read the work of someone who does win the prize since I am now aware that excellence in writing will be honored rather than just the best story of the bunch.  </p>]]></description>
<author>Printer</author>
<link>http://slog.thestranger.com/2008/02/another_reason_to_love_her#c936496</link>
<guid>http://slog.thestranger.com/2008/02/another_reason_to_love_her#c936496</guid>
<category>Books</category>
<pubDate>Wed, 13 Feb 2008 12:06:13 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by *gong*</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>Zadie Smith's name (and book <i>White Teeth</i>) have been popping up in papers/blogs/conversations LIKE CRAZY these past couple of weeks.  I've even seen an unusually high number of people reading her book on the bus lately.  I liked the book and have read it a few times, but wasn't it published in 2000?  And her new on in '05?  I kinda wish that the literary circle would [for lack of me thinking of any other way to put it] move on from her and begin focusing on new fantastically accessible authors.</p>]]></description>
<author>*gong*</author>
<link>http://slog.thestranger.com/2008/02/another_reason_to_love_her#c936688</link>
<guid>http://slog.thestranger.com/2008/02/another_reason_to_love_her#c936688</guid>
<category>Books</category>
<pubDate>Wed, 13 Feb 2008 12:51:30 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by bkwrm</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>@2: Who are these new, fantastically accessible authors? Do tell, and I'll stop re-reading White Teeth!</p>]]></description>
<author>bkwrm</author>
<link>http://slog.thestranger.com/2008/02/another_reason_to_love_her#c937360</link>
<guid>http://slog.thestranger.com/2008/02/another_reason_to_love_her#c937360</guid>
<category>Books</category>
<pubDate>Wed, 13 Feb 2008 16:03:47 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Ed</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>Maybe she's right, maybe she's wrong, but she's fucking pretentious as hell.  I hate people like that.  I've liked her books - but probably won't bother reading another.</p>]]></description>
<author>Ed</author>
<link>http://slog.thestranger.com/2008/02/another_reason_to_love_her#c937719</link>
<guid>http://slog.thestranger.com/2008/02/another_reason_to_love_her#c937719</guid>
<category>Books</category>
<pubDate>Wed, 13 Feb 2008 18:30:36 -0800</pubDate>
</item>


</channel>
</rss>