Slog - The Stranger's Blog

Line Out

The Music Blog

« Playing It By Ear | Would These Faces Lie? »

Monday, June 5, 2006

SIFF News: New Reviews, and a Wee Update

Posted by on June 5 at 13:57 PM

This weekend was a leisurely one for me, having limited my intake to a modest one movie per diem. Those were: Lunacy (demented, yes, and I liked the Benito Cereno conceit, but the animation was unimaginative and overall it felt excessively earnest—I could have done without the post-orgy lecture extolling the virtues of blasphemy); Into Great Silence, about which more below; The Puffy Chair (eminently watchable and quite funny, though more than anything else I kept thinking that it would’ve been perfect for the university film series I used to program) plus David Russo’s I Am (Not) Van Gogh, which was great. Especially the fish.

greatsilence.jpg

Into Great Silence, pictured above, is one of the longest movies in the festival (at 164 minutes, it’s bested only by the multi-part marathons The Century of the Self, The Line of Beauty, and A Lion in the House). There are a few missteps, but I really enjoyed it (capsule review here). Its illustration of the monkish life didn’t exactly make me want to quit my job and take vows of poverty and chastity, but it did make me want to clean my apartment. The next screening is Wednesday at 4 pm at the Harvard Exit.

Yet another reason I can’t quite credit claims that violent movies don’t affect behavior: I’ve become dangerously obsessed with crossword puzzles since watching Wordplay, a movie I didn’t even particularly like. (Note to self: mother-of-pearl=nacre, you idiot! I’m so pathetic, I can’t even finish a Monday.)

And one last new review: Sa-Kwa (which has been translated as “Sorry Apple”—a much better title, I think, even though it doesn’t make immediate sense). It screens next weekend at Pacific Place and Tuesday the 13th at the Harvard Exit.

Finally, if you read our SIFF Notes grid and tried to go to a very poor South African film called Cape of Good Hope at 2 pm today, I’m sorry. That seems to have been a mistaken holdover from last year’s grid.


CommentsRSS icon

The animation in Lunacy was "unimaginative?!?!?" I don't know what movies you see, but I have never before seen self-slicing steaks, hundreds of roaming cattle tongues, animated pig's eyes, the mortar between prison walls turning to meat, and dancing beef puppets on a toy theater stage. Disturbing yes, neauseating certainly, but UNIMAGINATIVE? Absolutely not.

I stand by "unimaginative." Have you seen Svankmajer's other films? The tongues and eyeballs and brains and other varieties of familiar grossness in Lunacy all moved with exactly the same pulsing, flopping rhythm; had exactly the same relation to the main character's psyche (that is, if they had any relation at all); and never substantively engaged with the arc of the plot. I liked some of the sequences (the ones that involved meats squeezing into spaces, primarily), but it certainly looked like a lot of work for not much payoff.

I think I've seen all Svankmajer's films, and enjoy them very much. I recall other films with animated meat sequences, but never with such a potent effect. The meat marches forward, ever forward, with a kind of blind willfulness. You don't know where it's going but it just keeps going, into the walls, into a clock, into the toy theatre. It's so gross, so visceral and so HUMAN. And it's integral to the vision of the film, to the endless effort to reconcile spirit and flesh, as is abundantly clear when our two villans have their eyes and limbs removed at the end of the film, but still, somehow, retain their willful faith in their philosophies. I found the animation very compelling and very powerful, and I'm surprised that you can so readily dismiss it.

Comments Closed

In order to combat spam, we are no longer accepting comments on this post (or any post more than 45 days old).