Slog - The Stranger's Blog

Line Out

The Music Blog

« SPIN Sale Almost a Done Deal | There is Justice in the Univer... »

Wednesday, March 1, 2006

Jyllands-Posten Publishes a Manifesto

Posted by on March 1 at 13:53 PM

Jyllands-Posten, the Danish paper that published the 12 Muhammed cartoons, printed this manifesto today.

MANIFESTO: Together facing the new totalitarianism

After having overcome fascism, Nazism, and Stalinism, the world now faces a new totalitarian global threat: Islamism.

We, writers, journalists, intellectuals, call for resistance to religious totalitarianism and for the promotion of freedom, equal opportunity and secular values for all.

The recent events, which occurred after the publication of drawings of Muhammed in European newspapers, have revealed the necessity of the struggle for these universal values. This struggle will not be won by arms, but in the ideological field. It is not a clash of civilisations nor an antagonism of West and East that we are witnessing, but a global struggle that confronts democrats and theocrats.

Like all totalitarianisms, Islamism is nurtured by fears and frustrations. The hate preachers bet on these feelings in order to form battalions destined to impose a liberticidal and unegalitarian world. But we clearly and firmly state: nothing, not even despair, justifies the choice of obscurantism, totalitarianism and hatred. Islamism is a reactionary ideology which kills equality, freedom and secularism wherever it is present. Its success can only lead to a world of domination: man’s domination of woman, the Islamists’ domination of all the others. To counter this, we must assure universal rights to oppressed or discriminated people.

We reject cultural relativism, which consists in accepting that men and women of Muslim culture should be deprived of the right to equality, freedom and secular values in the name of respect for cultures and traditions. We refuse to renounce our critical spirit out of fear of being accused of “Islamophobia”, an unfortunate concept which confuses criticism of Islam as a religion with stigmatisation of its believers.

We plead for the universality of freedom of expression, so that a critical spirit may be exercised on all continents, against all abuses and all dogmas.

We appeal to democrats and free spirits of all countries that our century should be one of Enlightenment, not of obscurantism.

Check out the folks who signed this manifesto…

Ayaan Hirsi Ali
Chahla Chafiq
Caroline Fourest
Bernard-Henri Lévy
Irshad Manji
Mehdi Mozaffari
Maryam Namazie
Taslima Nasreen
Salman Rushdie
Antoine Sfeir
Philippe Val
Ibn Warraq

Since you can’t really accuse the folks on this list of being a bunch of racists, I wonder what the white folks who are constantly making excuses for Islamofasicsts will accuse them of?


CommentsRSS icon

self-hatred?

having hard-to-spell names?

Being (secretly) Jewish.

This issue has made for some strange bed fellows. that is nature of being a true proponent of free speach. Like an ACLU lawyer representing a nazis right to have a parade (I've always wanted to be a fly on the wall during one of those consultations). I don't think there is anything wrong with recognizing that a lot of folks waving the free speach banner on this issue actually just hate muslims and are not so quick to rally to the cause of free speach when the culprits are, oh say, European governments who jail their citizens for publishing revisionist views of the holocaust. Consistency on free speach issues would give the defenders of the Danish cartoonists rights a lot more credibility in their condemnation of the mullahs that are literally asking for heads to roll. We should stand up to them, but not with a forked tongue.

I can't speak for white people or any fascist apologist, but I would say the manifesto is guilty only of stacking the premise.

My profound respect for Rushdie in particular doesn't change my reaction, which largely comprises a sort of confusion over what, exactly, they are asking of me.

Oppose totalitarianism? Rock on. No brainer.
Choose democracy over theocracy? Sure, anyday, though democracy is somewhat illusory and imperfect, too.
Reject cultural relativism? Well, there's a line to be drawn somewhere there, but I'd probably go as far as the description they provide.

But then it gets less certain. They seem to ask that I distinguish between criticising "Islam as a religion" and "stigmatisation of its believers." As a gay man, I see that as about as hypocritical as the religious nuts who claim to love me, but hate "what I do." I criticise all religion, and will not hold a special court for Islam as differentiated from all the other fucked up religious traditions. They seem to ask that I equate "Islamism" with "totalitarianism," which I do not.

Basically, it seems like some people want to pick a fight and ask me to join in. Maybe they say "they started it," and maybe they did.

No thanks. I can pick my own fights.

How about accusing them of missing the point? As if Islamism and us foreign policy have absolutely nothing to do with each other. As if western Europe and the US have a long and venerable tradition of peacefully promoting enlightenment values in the Middle East, a tradition that unruly Arabs ungratefully and uncouthly reject with their shameful fanaticism. As if a dozen people "plead[ing] for the universality of freedom of expression" will mean a damn thing to the people in Palestine, Iraq, or Afghanistan.

I know, let's use military might and liberate those poor uncivilized masses from the crazy Islamofascists...like we did in Afghanistan. Remember? Boy, we sure did make Afghanistan better! I hear Iraq is just about to become better too. God bless America!

God bless Xutech!

Dan,

I have great respect for you as a sex-advice columnist, as well as for your advocacy of gay rights. But when it comes to other political issues, you never cease to amaze me. I remember your support for the Iraq war very well.

Does it not strike you even a bit as odd that the whole cartoon controversy and the media coverage of it is such a slam dunk against the "Islamofascists"?

As other comments have said before, there would be nothing wrong with a petition against totalitarianism, and in support of the freedoms and rights we deem so fundumental to our culture, if it weren't for the little issue that the same Jyllands-Posten previously refused to run cartoons that ridiculed Jesus. What do we know about this danish paper? Not much, and you have to go to counterpunch to find out that it is closely connected to blatant islamophobes who advocate the utter military obliteration of Palestinians.

Not so clear-cut after all, is it?

Read more here:
http://counterpunch.org/sugg02142006.html

Comments Closed

In order to combat spam, we are no longer accepting comments on this post (or any post more than 45 days old).