Slog - The Stranger's Blog

Line Out

The Music Blog

« Supreme Injustice | More Casey v. Savage Press »

Friday, July 28, 2006

Who Needs Marriage?

Posted by on July 28 at 6:51 AM

A new group has jumped into the marriage wars: Beyond Marriage.

The time has come to reframe the narrow terms of the marriage debate in the United States. Conservatives are seeking to enshrine discrimination in the U.S. Constitution through the Federal Marriage Amendment. But their opposition to same-sex marriage is only one part of a broader pro-marriage, “family values” agenda that includes abstinence-only sex education, stringent divorce laws, coercive marriage promotion policies directed toward women on welfare, and attacks on reproductive freedom. Moreover, a thirty-year political assault on the social safety net has left households with more burdens and constraints and fewer resources.

Meanwhile, the LGBT movement has recently focused on marriage equality as a stand-alone issue. While this strategy may secure rights and benefits for some LGBT families, it has left us isolated and vulnerable to a virulent backlash. We must respond to the full scope of the conservative marriage agenda by building alliances across issues and constituencies. Our strategies must be visionary, creative, and practical to counter the right’s powerful and effective use of marriage as a “wedge” issue that pits one group against another. The struggle for marriage rights should be part of a larger effort to strengthen the stability and security of diverse households and families. To that end, we advocate…

Click here to find out what Beyond Marriage is advocating.


CommentsRSS icon

No, thanks.

There's some value to the Beyond Marriage position. My position remains, the State should get out of the Marriage Business entirely.

Sachi: I agree completely. Wish there were more of us. Good on ya.

What's not to like about it? Why do we as a society have to be forced into molds that were developed when we only lived to be 40 and the church was basically the only civilizing/governing force?


The only problem I have with the agenda is that it is an entire platform, and thus defies any comparison to a struggle for equal rights.

I read the platform, and I agree with it up to and excluding any resemblance it bears to classic Libertariansism. It simply fails to address in any significant way how this platform might help me or my family sometime before we're all dead.

Maybe the Beyond Marriage folks could get their platform adopted as a plank by a political party, then we'd have some candidates to choose from who share the platform. Then in 100 years or so, if the U.S. still exists as a viable entity, some of this shit might have happened.

there might be a lot of us. it's the first time i've ever heard the idea (sorry, i've been out of town for awhile). i love it though - civil unions from the state, and marriage from one's church, and optional, of course.

It's a bit disappointing that the wording seems to preclude we average straight folk from being signatories.

BC - yes, that was one of my primary concerns when I read it. The issue of getting the State out of the Marriage Business is one that needs to be created and then marketed (have to be practical and blunt here) so that ALL citizens can get behind the idea. Perhaps the American Taliban won't ever go for an idea that would strip it of possible power, but let's get something that fair-minded people of all persuasions, not just LGBT people, can go along with.

In California, the domestic partnership law ALREADY covers some of this ground. It is not limited to queer couples - it also permits straight couples in specific circumstances to enter into partnerships, rather than marriages. These couples have state rights that are essentially the same as the state rights that married couples have (I think there are some differences; I am not an expert in the area), but of course, just as with any gay couple who has entered a civil union or domestic partnership, the federal rights of marriage are not available.

Anyway, I'd like to see this effort continued. It's just not there yet, IMHO.

Comments Closed

In order to combat spam, we are no longer accepting comments on this post (or any post more than 45 days old).