Slog News & Arts

Line Out

Music & Nightlife

« Media Bias Watch | Re: Ethics and Elections Commi... »

Wednesday, May 7, 2008

The Seahawk Squawk Box

posted by on May 7 at 16:09 PM

September is a long ways off, but the Seahawks are going to have to start moving quick to figure out who the hell is going to be in our receiving corps this year.

The Hawks have a lot of x-factors on the offense next season. The brittle Deion Branch is on medical leave for at least the first month of the season, if not longer, and Bobby Engram, the Seahawks ONLY reliable receiver is holding out for more money. And then there’s this breakdown of our receivers from the PI:

Courtney Taylor did not practice, so the show of available hands was down to Nate Burleson, Jordan Kent, Ben Obomanu, Logan Payne and just-signed Joel Filani. Remove Burleson from the group and the remaining foursome has combined for a total of 12 NFL receptions. All by Obomanu. All last season.

It might be the worst idea ever, but I think the Hawks should just say “fuck it” and go with a young and untested group of receivers. Sure, Burleson has all the catching ability of an amputee and just about everyone else on the receiver depth chart hasn’t, y’know, done much other than warm the bench, but what else or we gonna do? Sure, we can—and should—give Engram more money, but I say we make Seneca Wallace a receiver. He’s too small to ever be an effective quarterback, but he’s fast as hell. And, if he can throw the ball, he’s got to be able to catch it, right?

Finally, there’s also a big question mark in our backfield next season. Julius Jones was never very impressive in Dallas, but click here for a good breakdown of why Jones MIGHT work out.

qwest.jpg

RSS icon Comments

1

Wallace?! Are you kidding me? If he were such a great receiver, we'd have stopped pretending he's a quarterback a long time ago.

Deion Branch is due for another great season and Nate Burleson is incredible. With reliable running backs keeping the Defense honest, we'll be ready for a great air game.

Posted by six shooter | May 7, 2008 4:26 PM
2

logan "major" payne will be the next young star of the WR corps. put this in an envelope and save for next fall.

Posted by chops | May 7, 2008 4:27 PM
3

REGULATORS!!!! MOUNT UP!

Posted by nate dogg | May 7, 2008 4:28 PM
4

@1 Holmgren said that he wasn't using Wallace as a receiver because he was scared that he would be injured, and that there wasn't a good safety net for Hasselbeck if that happened.

Posted by vooodooo84 | May 7, 2008 4:36 PM
5

Our front office are a bunch of morons; WRs drafted? 0

Posted by Bellevue Ave | May 7, 2008 4:41 PM
6

I'd love to see Seneca get more involved, but then everyone would copy me and get a #15 jersey.

Posted by John | May 7, 2008 4:42 PM
7

i still can't believe the stranger is discussing professional sports. please stop it & return to disparaging all sports.

Posted by max solomon | May 7, 2008 4:42 PM
8

@4 Holmgren may have said that, but he's full of shit. I think they like Wallace, they recognize he's a great athlete, but he's too much of an every-position guy and not good enough at any one position.

Besides, he's too short to be a QB.

Posted by six shooter | May 7, 2008 4:46 PM
9

@7 - ok, we won't include you in the Green River Killers fan club for the Seattle footie team then.

Posted by Will in Seattle | May 7, 2008 4:47 PM
10

As a lifelong Cowboy, I wasted years having Jones stashed on my keeper team promising myself that "this is the year he turns it around". If there was any team in the league thatw as going to sign him it was the Hawks. The only two good games Jones played in his career were against the Hawks and the Seattle fans are already used to rooting for a soft RB who hits the hole and falls down.

Have fun rooting for him this season, suckers...

Posted by Clint | May 7, 2008 4:48 PM
11

I meant to say, "Cowboy fan".. I never actually played for the Dallas Cowboys.

Posted by Clint | May 7, 2008 4:49 PM
12

@5

three receivers drafted from 06-07.
one rookie picked up in FA in 07.

they don't need more receivers.

young guns. mount up indeed.

Posted by chops | May 7, 2008 4:55 PM
13

@7 I simply scroll past all the Currently Hanging posts without bitching because they exist. Just Sayin'

Posted by Mike of Renton | May 7, 2008 5:23 PM
14

chops, thats a sunk cost and should have no bearing in future decision making and assessed needs. if there is a hole in receiving why isnt that being rectified?

Posted by Bellevue Ave | May 7, 2008 5:25 PM
15

A receiving corp is only as good as the offensive line and QB. The QB is good and the offensive will be improved. I say go with the youngsters.

Posted by Chalupa | May 7, 2008 5:32 PM
16

We upgraded the O-line, we drafted a tight end who can block and some monster redneck fullback who can also block, and we have the pieces for a decent two-back running game. As long as we're not going to be forced to rely on the passing game exclusively, I say give the kids a chance.

Posted by Hernandez | May 7, 2008 7:11 PM
17

I agree about using Seneca at WR. If he's so talented, let him show us what he can do.

Posted by Lloyd Clydesdale | May 7, 2008 7:38 PM
18

Engram will get what he wants. Good for him. With Jackson gone, Engram had a career year last year. Now with Hackett gone, the Hawks really need Engram to step up again.

Posted by Mathli69 | May 7, 2008 9:14 PM
19

manningham couldve been ours!

Posted by Bellevue Ave | May 7, 2008 11:05 PM
20

bellevue,

it's not a sunk cost. i'm saying there's no "hole" and they believe they've got a good group of young receivers. you don't need to draft at every position every year.

ruskell could be wrong, but we'll have to see.

Posted by chops | May 8, 2008 10:49 AM
21

Don't Fuckin Care.

Posted by NaFun | May 8, 2008 11:44 AM

Comments Closed

In order to combat spam, we are no longer accepting comments on this post (or any post more than 14 days old).