Slog: News & Arts

RSS icon Comments on Polls, Polls, Polls

1

Clinton *is* gaining on McCain:

http://hominidviews.com/?p=1490

and Obama is gaining, but more slowly:

http://hominidviews.com/?p=1491

This is after Obama's been bludgeoned with Rev. Wright continuously for the past few weeks, of course. (It's effectively derailed the "he's a Muslim!" criticisms, however...)

But in the general election, the *best* way that the Democrats can defeat the Republicans is by providing a perceptibly different choice to the public. So who provides that against a 71-year-old Republican hawk? A 60-year-old Democrat hawk with a record of cozying up to Republicans? Or a 46-year-old Democrat with a more consistent anti-war record?

Posted by bma | May 1, 2008 11:55 AM
2

Actually, the analysis of the details of the polls show that it hurt her more than him, in the end.

Look at her negatives on almost any issue ...

Reality has a pro-Obama bias.

Posted by Will in Seattle | May 1, 2008 12:07 PM
3

The thing about all these polls is that they are all the same from a year ago. Last spring when McCain and Clinton where both the frontrunners, all the polls showed them in the same position as now. The polls all showed Obama getting whooped by McCain. Now, just like with all the Primaries and Caucuses, Obama keeps moving up. It is tough for HRC to say she has the advantage in the polls when nothing has changed in over a year, she has done all this campaigning, but hasn't moved up (or down). That should be a red flag if she expects suddenly she can move past McCain.

Posted by polls | May 1, 2008 12:12 PM
4

they're cute together.

Posted by kim | May 1, 2008 12:39 PM
5

I keep seeing poll after poll showing Obama performing better than Clinton in states like Oregon, Wisconsin, New Jersey (a state CLinton WON for chrissakes!) and many others. In fact there is even polling that has Clinton behind McCain in usualy automatic blue states like Wisconsin. So How come you only show polls that the Clinton camp is highlighting? Also, how about the 3 illinois supers, one Texas super and one former Clinton super that Obama picked up today? Since supers are HRCs only slim chance shouldnt the news be that she is losing that battle badly when she needs to win it in a landslide? Nope, guess not, just whatever narartive keeps this long-over race alive in the minds of those who hate reality... cary on!

Posted by longball | May 1, 2008 1:00 PM
6

I'd rather see McCain win and destroy any hope the people have in Republicans than see Clinton win and trash everything the Democrats I know stand for.
At least McCain wears his R for all to see. If he plays dirty, it's even expected of him. We don't need Democrats like Clinton.

Posted by randomguy | May 1, 2008 1:18 PM
7

Should've been Hillary, not Clinton in the previous post.

Posted by arandomdude | May 1, 2008 1:20 PM
8

You can feel love...

Posted by Andy Niable | May 1, 2008 2:01 PM
9

Clinton/Obama 2008! Feel it!

Posted by Big Sven | May 1, 2008 4:33 PM

Comments Closed

In order to combat spam, we are no longer accepting comments on this post (or any post more than 45 days old).