2008 Just Kidding
posted by March 3 at 9:45 AM
onThat Sunday Washington Post opinion piece that infuriated feminist bloggers? The editor of the piece tells Politico it was meant in jest:
“If it insulted people, that was not the intent,” Outlook editor John Pomfret told me this morning, calling the piece “tongue-in-cheek.”
That’s not the only Post opinion piece that upset people on Sunday. There was also this, by Linda Hirschman:
Black voters of all socioeconomic classes are voting for the black candidate. Men are voting for the male candidate regardless of race or class. But even though this is also a year with the first major female presidential candidate, women are split every way they can be. They’re the only voting bloc not voting their bloc.
Comments
So we all are just too stiff to see the joke? They really need to work on their humor writing.
It didn't strike me as she was serious. I guess I was right.
So, women are the only ones using their brains to pick their candidate instead of just automatically voting for the person who looks like themselves?
If a humor piece outrages people (regular readers, at that), it has missed the mark.
She's kinda picking and choosing her voting blocs there.
Wow. Does this sound familiar to anyone? Big Sven? ECB?
From the second article:
Bullshit it was a joke. That woman has a long history of writing anti-feminist nonsense. She blamed feminists for the alleged ugliness and surliness of flight attendants. My cousin is a flight attendant, and while she may be a bitch, she's also smokin' hot.
Writing tongue in cheek is one way to assure it will go over the head of feminists like EB et al, as this one surely did (see earlier shitstorm). If there's one thing fems don't have, in addition to sex appeal, it's a sense of humor.
I'll say it again: any study, ANY survey result that claims people vote a certain way based on race or class or gender is bullshit.
Also, #8, you're a dickhead. Fuck off and die.
It's like an Internet argument, but in print. As soon as the criticism comes out, the original arguer claims that she did it all for laughs...
Reading the online comments at WaPo (yes, that was me on there too) most people don't buy this lame excuse.
But hey, that's just reality talking.
Dear Greg: Name calling, death threat, no actual thought. Ever think of applying for a Stranger writer's job?
@8... have you read any of the author's earlier work? The theme of this most recent article is pretty much in keeping with many of her other pieces. Unless practically her entire body of work to date has been an unacknowledged joke, I'm pretty sure this article was not "tongue-in-cheek."
So all those black men who vote for Hilary are what then?
Comments Closed
In order to combat spam, we are no longer accepting comments on this post (or any post more than 14 days old).