Slog News & Arts

Line Out

Music & Nightlife

« Re: Obama and Clinton: Compare... | Zipcar Responds »

Thursday, February 28, 2008

The Police Contract Clusterfuck

posted by on February 28 at 18:20 PM

Seattle Police Department officers, already weary from a drawn-out contract negotiation process, are seething over a move by the Mayor’s office to circumvent the Seattle Police Officers’ Guild (SPOG). Additionally, Guild President Rich O’Neil says SPOG will be filing an unfair labor practice complaint tomorrow. SPOG got their way the last time they filed a labor complaint—to prevent the Office of Professional Accountability Review Board (OPARB) from receiving unredacted police files, effectively crippling OPARB. Now, the Guild is screaming about what O’Neil refers to as “union busting.”

Yesterday, several of the department’s assistant police chiefs—who are not represented by SPOG—showed up at the department’s four precincts during roll call, on behalf of the Mayor’s Office, and passed out a document outlining the city’s salary increase offer. All of the Guild’s representatives were in a training that day, and not immediately available when they were contacted about what was happening.

According to O’Neil,officers were so outraged at the South Precinct, one officer threw packets of Kool-Aid on the ground in front of an Assistant Chief and screamed, “We’re not drinking your Kool-Aid!”

While the mayor’s move was a gutsy one—bringing the contract proposal directly to officers in the hopes they’d urge push their leadership to settle on a contract—it appears to have backfired and SPOG may end up with even more power at the bargaining table.

Officers, outraged by the mayor’s move, appear to be rallying around SPOG, even though they don’t seem displeased with the offer on the table. “The money’s not bad, really,” says one officer, who asked not to be named. However, he says, “We have a guild to represent us. That’s their job. [The city] circumvented the system because they didn’t like bargaining with [SPOG]. Everybody feels like it’s a slap in the face.”

It appears officers are primarily upset with the principle of the mayor’s move, rather than the details of the contract. However, there are still a few sticking points. Although O’Neil claims the Guild was close to a “blockbuster deal” with the city, sources familiar with the bargaining process disagree.

One of SPOG’s major objections was to one of the mayor’s 29 Points for improving police accountability. The current SPD contract requires internal investigations into misconduct to be completed within 180 days, which has allowed several officers to escape punishment. The City wants to remove the 180-day window, and have investigation be at the discretion of OPA’s director.

According to O’Neil, that’s just not going to happen. “There’s no amount of money we’re ever going to agree to for that,” he says. “There has to be some end to an investigation.” O’Neil claims the city asked the Guild to sit down at the bargaining table without a mediator, and see if things could be worked out. However, O’Neil says the city requested confidentiality for the discussions, something he feels was broken when the city distributed contract offers to officers.

O’Neil claims he’s privately received apologies from negotiators, but, he says, “I had someone in the mayor’s office say they never agreed to confidentiality. When they’re on the stand under oath when we file our unfair labor practice [complaint], we’ll see.” However, O’Neil adds, “[The City] can call this off with a phone call.”

For now, the Guild and the city aren’t talking, but according to the officer I spoke with earlier today, things need to get back on track or the city—and department—are going to have an even bigger problem on their hands.

There’s like 50 officers [who have] put in to transfer to other departments if the contract doesn’t come in,” the officer says. “The ship is sinking here. They’ve got to settle something. On top of that, the officer says there’s growing resentment in the Department. “Why go out and police if every time I contact someone, I’m going to be considered a racist, or something?” [Officers] are going ‘I’m going to work in Bellevue or the county where everybody likes each other.’ Nobody wants to work in Seattle.”

RSS icon Comments

1

"i'm going to work for a racist chief in bellevue so i can whack me some innocent non-white peoples and not have to get censured for it."

Posted by holz | February 28, 2008 6:38 PM
2

Hey officers, on your way out of Seattle, please don't forget to take the SPOG with you.

Thanks.

Posted by packratt | February 28, 2008 6:47 PM
3

Seriously though... These police officers moan about how they aren't paid enough, but then when the city goes and offers to pay them a PROFESSIONAL'S salary ($90,000 a YEAR!) on the condition that they'll be expected to BEHAVE like PROFESSIONALS... THEY REFUSE?!?

Sorry, no pity here, if you want to go work for an employer that doesn't care about how you act or perform your job, then go... because we don't want you here.

If I told my boss I wanted a 33.9% raise on the condition that I wouldn't be held accountable if I did something wrong, I'd be laughed out of my job.

Common sense seems to have eluded some people.

Posted by Packratt | February 28, 2008 7:15 PM
4

33.9% ??


Which body orifice did you pull that figure out from PackedRatt?

Take a look at the numbers and you'll see that the magic ** 90 THOUSAND DOLLAR ** number just doesn't show up.


I've worked here for twenty years, and even with several HUNDRED hours of overtime in a year don't make 90 grand.

Posted by sniff | February 28, 2008 8:08 PM
5

12 year veteran officer salary under proposed contract:
Current Salary $72,072
2008 Salary $80,072
2010 Salary $89,250

Are you saying the city's offer doesn't say that?(and think, that doesn't include overtime, I'm a network engineer and I don't make that much and I don't get overtime, just to give you some perspective).

Let me ask, though, if that's not enough to convince you and you fellow officers to accept the 29 accountability recommendations, is there anything that would?

Posted by Packratt | February 28, 2008 8:23 PM
6

The City will prevail in this labor dispute through attrition. Employers often break the law to achieve larger strategic goals during union negotiations, and the SPOG leadership is freaking out because they know it. Funny to hear complaints of "ULP" from an organization that had no problem kicking the crap out of unionists in our streets nearly ten years ago.

Posted by tpn | February 28, 2008 8:30 PM
7

I'd love to see the money grubbing, no accountability accepting officers leave town. We don't need thugs like that roaming the street arresting blacks for 'contempt of cop', etc. I won't cry about less bored, overpaid officers sitting around to bust people for jaywalking.

Can you imagine other civil servants acting like this? Firemen, judges ("I don't have to explain why he's guilty!"), postal workers, hell even garbage men are more accountable for their actions. When is the last time a city rioted because of a sanitation worker abusing authority?

Posted by Anon | February 28, 2008 9:48 PM
8

@2 - i agree, would the last officer leaving please turn the lights out at SPOG?

Oh, and give us back our video cams so we can keep taping you when you cross the line, k?

Posted by Will in Seattle | February 28, 2008 11:40 PM
9


Looks like it's time for me to bring back the "I support the police strike bumper stickers"!


Posted by K X One | February 28, 2008 11:52 PM
10

Oh no, they have to accept real accountability measures if they want their pay raise?!

Cry me a fucking river, SPD. The misconduct of your officers is widely reported and yet few of the offending officers are ever disciplined.

You want to make better money? Grow the fuck up and start acting like professionals. I have NO sympathy for whiny police officers on this issue. Real accountability is needed, and needed now.

Posted by Hernandez | February 29, 2008 8:34 AM
11

Spog and the fire fighters union lunge at any chance to be offended...which is funny since they think they are tough enough to hold those jobs.

Posted by TheTruthHurths | February 29, 2008 9:00 AM
12

but unions are good for workers right?

Posted by Bellevue Ave | February 29, 2008 9:24 AM

Comments Closed

In order to combat spam, we are no longer accepting comments on this post (or any post more than 14 days old).