Slog News & Arts

Line Out

Music & Nightlife

« The Romney Press Conference | Imagine Microwave Oven Acciden... »

Monday, November 19, 2007

O They Will Know We Are Christians…

posted by on November 19 at 14:11 PM

…but our sister-in-law-bangin’ sex scandals.

The 80-year-old leader of a suburban Atlanta megachurch is at the center of a sex scandal of biblical dimensions: He slept with his brother’s wife and fathered a child by her. Members of Archbishop Earl Paulk’s family stood at the pulpit of the Cathedral of the Holy Spirit at Chapel Hill Harvester Church a few Sundays ago and revealed the secret exposed by a recent court-ordered paternity test.

In truth, this is not the first—or even the second—sex scandal to engulf Paulk and the independent, charismatic church. But this time, he could be in trouble with the law for lying under oath about the affair.

The living proof of that lie is 34-year-old D.E. Paulk, who for years was known publicly as Earl Paulk’s nephew…. D.E. Paulk said he did not learn the secret of his parentage until the paternity test. “I was disappointed, and I was surprised,” he said.

A judge ordered the test at the request of the Cobb County district attorney’s office and the Georgia Bureau of Investigation, which are investigating Earl Paulk for possible perjury and false-swearing charges stemming from a lawsuit.

The archbishop, his brother and the church are being sued by former church employee Mona Brewer, who says Earl Paulk manipulated her into an affair from 1989 to 2003 by telling her it was her only path to salvation. Earl Paulk admitted to the affair in front of the church last January.

In a 2006 deposition stemming from the lawsuit, the archbishop said under oath that the only woman he had ever had sex with outside of his marriage was Brewer. But the paternity test said otherwise.

Thanks to Slog tipper Will.

RSS icon Comments

1

Yee-haw!!1

Posted by Mr. Poe | November 19, 2007 2:22 PM
2

I thought you were supposed to wait until your brother was dead before having sex with his wife, but I may be confused.

Posted by Greg | November 19, 2007 2:22 PM
3

Will in Seattle actually.

So, last check shows:

Alaska - not a good place for priests

Atlanta - ditto.

Sigh.

Posted by Will in Seattle | November 19, 2007 2:22 PM
4

OK, call me crazy, but isn't this a bit of a stupid thing to go after a man for perjury on? He admitted to having sex with the woman who's claiming he coerced her into that affair. It seems the only other women claiming he had sex with them were in the 92 law suit.

So why order a paternity test in this case?

I'm not seeing the logic or the reasoning here.

Posted by Phelix | November 19, 2007 2:28 PM
5

I wonder what the woman's argument was in the original lawsuit? *We shall further demonstrate, your honor, that sexual intercourse with Rev Paulk was not in fact Ms. Brewer's only path to salvation. First witness for the devense: Jehova.*

Posted by kinaidos | November 19, 2007 2:30 PM
6

What a great way to get laid 'the path to salvation is in my pants'

Posted by Heather | November 19, 2007 2:32 PM
7

yeah -- i don't get it either. then again, i don't get that "the whisky bar" with the girl, the knife and the money. maybe i have to go there to get it.

Posted by infrequent | November 19, 2007 2:43 PM
8

Ha, ha, ha! Stupid bible molesters!

Posted by Madge-YoursoakingINIT! | November 19, 2007 2:46 PM
9

P Z Myers asked if megachurch a synonym for sex scandal. I think it'd be more useful if we christened a sexual position with the name.

Posted by Liz | November 20, 2007 10:27 AM

Comments Closed

In order to combat spam, we are no longer accepting comments on this post (or any post more than 14 days old).