Slog - The Stranger's Blog

Line Out

The Music Blog

« Posted From the Safety of a Ma... | O Frabjous Day! »

Monday, August 14, 2006

My Interest in the Casey Campaign

Posted by on August 14 at 14:49 PM

Well, well, well. It appears that Bob Casey was for taking my money before he was against it.

For those of you just tuning in: Bob Casey is the Dem running against Republican U.S. Senator Rick Santorum in Pennsylvania. I slipped a little of that ITMFA cash Casey’s way—$2000 bucks worth—and Casey campaign called to thank me, and invited me to a Casey fundraiser in Seattle to meet Bob. Since the Casey folks called me at work I’m thinking they had some idea about what I do for a living.

Anyway, about two months after I sent the check I got a call from a Casey staffer. They didn’t want my dirty money after all. They were terrified that Rick Santorum would spot my name on Casey’s campaign finance reports. So thanks but no thanks, they told me. They just couldn’t risk having Casey’s name linked with mine. (Like it wound up being here, here, here, here, and here.)

Last week this letter arrived in the mail with a check:

caseyscan.jpg

Well… gee. “Per our conversation.” Can you feel the love? On the phone Casey’s campaign staffer thanked me over and over again for my support and personally expressed regret about having to return my money. But when it came time to pop my money in the mail? I barely get three words.

But here’s the thing that shocked me: My check wasn’t in the envelope, the one I sent Casey, the check they couldn’t in good conscience cash. Enclosed instead was a check made out to me from the Casey campaign. I checked with my bank and what do you know? Bob Casey took my money after all: Casey cashed the check I sent him on June 7, 2006. (I deposited Casey’s check in my account last week, and sent a check on to Philadelphians Against Santorum, a group that’s not so much working to elect Casey as defeat Santorum.)

Well, I’m outraged. Is Bob Casey a… a… flip-flopper? He took my money—he cashed my check and spent the two grand on God only knows what—and then sent it back. Flip-flop, flip-flop.

Look, Bob, if you don’t want my money, fine—give it back. But give all of it back, not just the $2000 but the interest as well. After all, you enjoyed my money—money that wasn’t yours, money you didn’t want—for eight long weeks. So what else was it if it wasn’t a loan? At an annual interest rate of 38%—if that rate is good enough for Visa, then it’s good enough for me—I figure you owe me $127.

You can either send me a check, Bob, or send it directly to Philadelphians Against Santorum.


CommentsRSS icon

Yuo need to learn to pay your credit card bills on time.

Well, at least Dan doesn't have a problem with speling.

Oh for god's sake, Dan, get over it.

You got a refund, a phone call, and a short hand-written note from his staff. Heaven forbid the Casey campaign concentrate on something like winning an election instead of appeasing one cranky out of state donor.

aside from that -- who in their right mind is paying a 38% APR for a credit card?

So what exactly are you trying to do here? Because I don't think any of this is getting Santorum out of office.

I agree with Levi, maybe we should keep our voices down.

I don't think you should keep your voice down, and you can hoot and holler all you want about this - but what exactly do you think happens in a campaign mailroom? I'm bettin' that some unpaid intern opened a bunch of mail, shook out the checks, filled out the minimum possible paperwork, and bundled 'em together to take them to the bank. Weeks ago. When you said they were returning your check you didn't actually think they had had the foresight to set your check aside should they ever need to return it...right? You knew they were just returning the *amount* of your check. Cause expecting them to do otherwise would either mean that they were 1) unbelievably slow in cashing checks on time, or 2) psychic.

Qwitcher fucking whining fer christ sake!

If it were my campaign, I'd happily pay princess Savage a $127 if it would get him to shut up.

Unlikely.

Dan, federal campaign finance rules these days more or less require campaigns to deposit any and all contributions unless they believe it's not legal. Otherwise, they have to deposit it and then refund the contribution if it's too much or they just don't want it. You can't just mail back a check or hang on to it (for more than 10 days).

Still, the timing is weird. They would have to report receiving it anyways, even if they refunded it. I have no real desire to wade through 1300 pages of their June quarterly to see if you're there or not but you probably are. Annoyingly, Senate campaigns aren't required to file electronically so that makes searching problematic.

Comments Closed

In order to combat spam, we are no longer accepting comments on this post (or any post more than 45 days old).