Slog - The Stranger's Blog

Line Out

The Music Blog

« Rainbow's End | It's On TV Tonight! »

Monday, June 12, 2006

Monster Cars

Posted by on June 12 at 13:13 PM

In an effort to explain why the Disney/Pixar animated film Cars only made millions of dollars instead of a gazillion dollars, the Box Office Guru writes:

One reason Cars did not surge higher may have been that the marketplace has suffered through a glut of computer animated films this year. Not long ago, the arrival of a digital toon was an event as it only happened once or twice a year. Nowadays with weaker entries like Doogal and The Wild hitting theaters, and more studios jumping into the game, the novelty has worn thin. Over the Hedge and Ice Age have been satisfying families over the past two months grossing a stellar $322M combined. Also not helping matters was the film’s lengthy 116-minute running time which is considerably longer than the typical 90-minute length that most young kids are used to sitting through.

The length? Too much competition? Creative exhaustion? How about this guru: A whole lot of us are no mood to celebrate—to laugh at, to laugh with—the very machines that have turned Iraq into a death factory. Disney should have stuck with cute toys and lovable animals—cars can never be anything but political.


CommentsRSS icon

Cars guzzle gas and fuck over air quality, plus they are dangerous: Pixar's movie is dedicated to Joe Ranft, who co-directed, but I wonder if the dedication will mention he was killed in a car accident.

I didn't see it it yet, but the trailers make it look like cheap pandering to the NASCAR belt, designed with lines of Happy Meal toys already in mind.

Good children's movies have an element of intellegence, unfortunately from every preview I have seen, this movie seems to altogether lack that critical ingredient.

Fuck ebert and roeper, they don't know shit.

2 years ago this would have done better. Before 9-11 this would have done really well. But with gas over 3 bucks, who wants to celebrate a bunch of happy-go-lucky cars?

My God, you hippies come unglued for the most ridiculous reasons. How about this theory: what if the movie just sucks?
Naw, what was I thinking. It must be a massive geopolitical entertainment revolt centered around the war. Go back to grad school, Chuck, you make more sense to those people.

Not so much Iraq (America loves a good slaughter), but the price of gasoline is the true factor (yes, of course, they're linked, but since most Americans think that humans & dinosaurs co-existed, I'm only talking about their admittedly limited perception.) Americans' attitude towards their cars are undergoing a radical shift, something that's never really happened before. The character of the car is deep in our psyche, as an extension (or mask) of our personalities. The money & energy put into them was always focused on it's improvement ('car toys') or 'health' (new brakes, etc.) Now Americans have to think about the actual energy to keep them running. Cars are now money hogs, and that don't sit right w/ Mr & Mrs SixPack. It's like you now have to pay your SO for sex & the sex has gotten worse with no signs of improvement. This is just a sign of things to come, and it should prove to be interesting...

I think Pixar's arrogance and lack of imagination is demonstrated by the way they baldly steal ideas from other films and then good-naturedly parody and respectfully reference only Pixar movies.

Cars begins with a blatant ripoff Tom Cruise's smoke-blinded race through a wreck-strewn track from Days of Thunder, without the slightest hint that they are either paying homage or doing a send up. Then they proceed to lift the entire plot from Doc Hollywood, as many reviewers have mentioned.

The credits include car-world versions of Toy Story, Monsters Inc and A Bug's Life, with the message that it is all in good fun.

The credits don't thank anybody outside Pixar whose material they lifted.

Pixar sees other people's work as nothing more than raw material to be consumed by them at will (If anyone else had made The Incredibles they would have at least said thanks to the Fantastic Four) while their short list of five or six feature films is treated like it is the whole world's cinemagraphic cannon, to be reinterpreted and quoted endlessly.

Pixar will keep fucking up like this until they get a really major bomb and then dump the tired crew responsible for every damn one of their films. They need completely new writers, not just the odd new director every once in a while.

(Finding Nemo is the exception -- the Heart of Darkness/Apocalypse Now plotline done in reverse was brilliant)

cars can never be anything but political

charles, i beg to differ with four little words:

chitty, chitty, bang, bang.

MUDEDE Wrote:
".....cars can never be anything but political."

How wrong you are, Mr. Mudede. Cars
can be art too. Perhaps you and
Ms. Graves should see for yourselves:

http://www.greenwood-phinney.com/pages/special_events/carshow.asp

---Jensen

Boo-fucking-hoo. I can't fathom how $62.8M is a disapointing number.

I always wait for DVD on pixar movies anyways.

Everyone I know who saw the movie, loved it.

I'm looking forward to Monster House - tix are only $5 to see it early this Sunday at the Film Festival!

"I am the NIGHTRIDER"-Mad Max

I look into the future and I see
Road Warrior
The so called war for oil is but a scratch on the surface

Um, maybe it's because it's being marketed as a kids' movie, but it's full of all this faux nostalgia BS about old cars and small towns and Route 66 that means precisely dick to kids? So it's BORING to most kids, and most adults don't go to the theater to see animated movies because it's much more pleasant to see them at home without the hordes of bored kids.

Or maybe it's some deep-seated geopolitical philosophical thing.

Um, OK.

yes, cars was an abysmal failure. you can't find the toy cars at any stores... because nobody wants them and the stores wisely decided to stop stocking them and leave the shelves empty so everyone has a place to set their drink while they shop. and biggest openings don't mean jackshit if they aren't bigger than the predicted $big# some pencil pusher crams up the wall street ticker hole. and you're all a bunch of cynical bores for bitching about knicking old plots... talent borrows / genius steals. leave us alone and go watch south park reruns.

Comments Closed

In order to combat spam, we are no longer accepting comments on this post (or any post more than 45 days old).