Slog - The Stranger's Blog

Line Out

The Music Blog

« The Miracle of Life, in an All... | End Station »

Tuesday, May 30, 2006

Is Reichert for Repealing the 14th Amendment?

Posted by on May 30 at 13:59 PM

As Postman has quite thoroughly chronicled, the state Republican Party this weekend adopted an eyebrow-raising immigration policy that would deny citizenship to babies born in the United States — but only if those babies are born to illegal immigrants. Nevermind the 14th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution, which states:

All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside.

And nevermind Hispanic voters, who the Republican party has been trying to court. Also: nevermind this state’s Republican Attorney General, Rob McKenna, who says the idea of stripping American-born babies of their citizenship is flatly unconstitutional; nevermind Republican Senate candidate Mike McGavick, who doesn’t support the idea; and nevermind that the Republicans’ leader in the state senate, Mike Hewitt of Walla Walla, says “the party over-reached on this one.” Nevermind all of this, says the state Republican Party, as it eagerly presses to strip immigrant babies of their citizenship rights.

And who else is endorsing this unconstitutional agenda? Apparently Republican Congressman Dave Reichert, who Postman queried about the issue on Sunday:

Congressman Dave Reichert told me yesterday that he is willing to consider a proposal that would end automatic citizenship for babies born here. “It makes sense to me. This is people taking advantage of the system,” he said. Reichert said that he has heard stories of pregnant Mexican women “just moments before the baby is born crossing the border and having the baby in a parking lot … then claiming they can’t leave because their baby is a citizen.”

State Attorney General Rob McKenna, a Republican, said denying citizenship to babies born in the United States would be unconstitutional. Reichert said that is something “for the lawyers” to hash out. “I think that has to be part of the entire discussion that has to take place,” he said.

I have calls in to Reichert’s D.C. office and his local campaign office requesting further amplification of the Congressman’s position of immigrant babies. I’ll let you know what I hear.


CommentsRSS icon

Why, oh why, do they hate America and our values of Truth, Justice, and our Constitution so?

What if the little Mexican is born in an alley in Belltown?

Since I'll assume that Mr. Reichert isn't Native American, I wonder if he realizes that that little 14th Amendment thing is the reason that he is an American citizen?

And isn't a cornerstone of the Republican mindset that any person born anywhere in America can pull themselves up by the bootstraps to become a member of the landed gentry? Or is that only white people? What an asshole.

Mr. Reichert's probably one of them durned immigrants with their uppity ways.

Someone,please correct me if I am wrong here,
however there is an additional, small issue Mr. Reichert and his ilk forgot to consider...you must have been be born in the United States as a prerequisite to becoming President of the United States. Correct?

Not only do you have to have to overturn the 14th Amendment, Dave, but you have other little, bothersome constitutional issues to deal with too.

Dave, are you sure this job isn't a bit over your head when you can't put a muzzle on the uber-conservative faction of the Republican base in this state?

Or are you just one of them too, Dave?


---Jensen


Given a chance this bundh of right wingers would undo most of the Bill of Rights and the Constitution

That is indeed the danger of a constitutional cnvention. Given any power the R's of this era would lead us back to the utopian 1750's.

Poor Mexican women squatting in Arizona parking lots to give birth, why arn't they in the New Caddillacs Welfare buys for them?

Fuckheads ...... and by the way, if I was there, at that moment, I would give them a cheer - God what fighters - and help chew the cord.

What did the R"s decide on Ref. 65?

The Republicans are harkening back to some deeper traditions in the region as well. The Anti-Japanese League of the 1940s, which was very strong in the Bellevue area, advocated stripping all Japanese Americans of their citizenship, claiming that Constitutional protections had provided the second generation with a "loophole" for taking over the country with their supposedly subversive ways.

Miller Freeman (Kemper Jr's grandfather), was a guiding light for this movement. He also developed Bellevue Square, and its reliance upon suburbanization fit nicely, if coincidentally, with the displacement of Japanese American farmers in Bellevue during internment.

For more info, check out:

http://www.palgrave-usa.com/catalog/product.aspx?isbn=140396792X

Come on, people... Is it really such a crazy idea to suggest that children born to NON-citizens should not be automatically granted citizenship status.

It's not just an illegal alien thing. Why should a Japanese man and his wife working over here get U.S. citizenship for their kids if they're not becoming permanent residents?

Heck, why should a vactioning German couple in Hawaii be able to claim citizenship for their kid if she's born there?

How about diplomats in D.C.?

It's not an entirely wild idea. And has nothing to do with challenging our "values of Truth and Justic..."

Geesh, and I thought we agreed on lots of other things, Mickymse ... oh well ...

Comments Closed

In order to combat spam, we are no longer accepting comments on this post (or any post more than 45 days old).