Slog - The Stranger's Blog

Line Out

The Music Blog

« Do They Have WMD Too? | Pity the Poor Exurbians »

Saturday, December 17, 2005

Constitutional Dictatorship

Posted by on December 17 at 13:40 PM

That’s what a politically-involved friend of mine is now calling this country, based on the news that Bush has authorized government officials to break long-standing law and spy on Americans.

If Bush thought America’s laws against spying on its own citizens were too restrictive, he could have pushed for Congress to change the laws, rather than reauthorizing this illegal program 30 times since 2001. That’s American Democracy 101: Congress makes the laws, and no one is above them, not even the President.

Instead, in defending his lawbreaking today, Bush is asserting a Constitutional preogrative to ignore laws passed by Congress — and to direct government agents to do the same. That’s not American democracy as Americans understand it, and it will be interesting to hear how Bush justifies his illegal directives before Congress, where members are furious and hearings are now certain.

There’s a lot swirling around this story right now, including more calls for impeachment and many questions about why The New York Times held this story for a year before breaking it just ahead of the vote on the Patriot Act renewal.

But all I can think about is a forwarded email I received this morning from my brother. It was sent by a friend of his who is serving in Iraq. The friend was shot in the leg recently during a gun battle, and saw a close friend in his unit killed in the same fight. Young Americans are dying nearly every day in Iraq, supposedly to bring democracy to that country, while here at home the same president who claims to want to spread democracy abroad is unapologetically subverting it in America. Tell me how this makes sense again?


CommentsRSS icon

Bush to American people: "Yeah, I'm breaking the statute, yeah I'm spying on you! What are you going to do about? Spank me?"

The United States is an aristocracy posing as a democracy, and has been since nearly the beginning.

Who wins the high offices in elections? Often those who spend the most money on their campaign, because money buys endorsements and exposure.

A republic run primarily by those who have the most money to spend is the inherent definition of an aristocracy.

"Who wins the high offices in elections?"

Don't forget those with the best hair and the most convincing lies.

It comes down to which guys with the best hair and the most convincing lies get on TV the most.

Exposure and the right soundbites are what it's all about, sadly. Most of America doesn't have the time to do their research, and those who run the show know it.

On the other hand - there are people out there who will gladly murder thousands or millions of us should they get the chance.

It would be ironic if - and we may not know this for decades after the fact - a terrorist operation aimed at (say) Seattle was disrupted by this unconstitutional act. Your lives may have been saved by the very action you revile.

Comments Closed

In order to combat spam, we are no longer accepting comments on this post (or any post more than 45 days old).