Slog: News & Arts

RSS icon Comments on Seattle Parks Wants You To Keep It In Your Pants


Is that the same guy also known as "the naked gourmet"? Used to be a regular at Paradise Hot Springs whipping up ginormous gumbos and shit up in "the lobster pot"?

Posted by COMTE | October 24, 2008 2:58 PM

@1 Nope that is not him. Different guy. I know them both.

;) and it is not called Paradise hotsprings, and the lobster pot no longer exists either... which is sad.

The Naked Gourmet is in his 40's. Daniel is in his early 30's

Posted by Reality Check | October 24, 2008 3:02 PM

Allowing nudity is far too progressive for them at this point. People take their kids there.

Posted by sepiolida | October 24, 2008 3:05 PM

..we can't have the kids seeing naked peoples.

Posted by reverend dr dj riz | October 24, 2008 3:28 PM

How about some real life solutions for the nudies? Like lobbying for a specific nudist park or beach, or raising money to buy property and turn that into a nudist space. Aren't most or all nudist colonies private property?

Posted by keshmeshi | October 24, 2008 3:35 PM

Seattle Parks ain't the boss of me!

Posted by This Is America! | October 24, 2008 4:26 PM

I think for 146 Million we should pretty much be allowed to do what we want in the parks. No questions asked.

Posted by Zander | October 24, 2008 6:20 PM

#7 has an excellent point.

But realistically, what do you need to create a space (private or public) where nudists can go and do their thing without getting on the wrong side of the law?

Posted by Greg | October 25, 2008 3:28 PM

Comments Closed

Comments are closed on this post.