Slog News & Arts

Line Out

Music & Nightlife

« Marijuana: Like a Bullet Throu... | Too Much Sexy For Me »

Wednesday, June 18, 2008

Re: Emmanuelle

posted by on June 18 at 16:23 PM

Yes! Sorry! This is not Emmanuelle Chriqui.
megan_fox_gq_02.jpg This is Megan Fox.

RSS icon Comments


hey great recipes at

mmmm christian food

Posted by benxer | June 18, 2008 4:38 PM

That's her reading outfit then, is it? What a terrific library.

Posted by MvB | June 18, 2008 4:44 PM

Hey, cool! My comment was deleted, and replaced with spam!

Posted by Fnarf | June 18, 2008 4:45 PM

Thanks, but I've already got all the fried potato product casserole recipes that I need.

Posted by Jerod | June 18, 2008 4:45 PM

There's no question that Megan Fox is a hot piece, but why does she always look a little greasy?

Posted by Westside forever | June 18, 2008 4:49 PM

My guess is baby oil.

Posted by wisepunk | June 18, 2008 4:53 PM

@5 and 6: The Marilyn Monroe tattoo on her forearm causes the greasy look. Because nothing says "serious actress" like a fucking Marilyn tattoo.

Posted by Jessica | June 18, 2008 5:10 PM

She's 22, yet she looks older than me. That is just not right.

Posted by Greg | June 18, 2008 5:21 PM

If someone can get her in a movie beating a guy off and singing Happy Birthday Mr. President, Mr. Skin may f'ing explode.

Posted by left coast | June 18, 2008 5:23 PM

Never mind, I've been faked out by Charles swapping photos.

Posted by Fnarf | June 18, 2008 5:31 PM

Those dessert mold boobs are uber creepy. They're not real and they're not incredible.

Posted by Smarm | June 18, 2008 6:22 PM

I have no idea if her tits are real or not, but it's quite possible to get the dessert-mold look with careful garment fitting, or not-fitting I should say.

Those are definitely $450-an-hour eyes, though.

Posted by Fnarf | June 18, 2008 6:56 PM

The camera loves her - there're some primo images of her floating around.

Posted by as a rule | June 18, 2008 10:25 PM

why isn't she doing porn?

Posted by Bellevue Ave | June 19, 2008 8:39 AM

Also, the lighting in this photograph is terrible.

Posted by Greg | June 19, 2008 8:44 AM

In the same manner as "Line Out", I suggest the Stranger create a separate blog for Charles' various chick photos and pointless marxist ramblings. You could call it "CLOG", and it would enable us to access the otherwise fine content of SLOG without these distractions. I have no doubt A. Birch Steen has brought this idea up in a meeting or two.

(Charles, you do have kick-ass taste in architecture, however. Please keep those posts coming.)

Posted by Joe M | June 19, 2008 10:18 AM

And @13: It is possible for natural ones to be pushed up like that, but it is not possible for them to be natural and also have that desert valley between them. I call fake.

Posted by Greg | June 19, 2008 1:17 PM

Comments Closed

Comments are closed on this post.