Slog: News & Arts

RSS icon Comments on Mass Market Food and Architecture


Didn't they just redo the interior of the 125th Safeway? I am at a loss to understand what the point of this redevelopment is.

Posted by Greg | March 17, 2008 2:30 PM

The Pinehurst Safeway is being redeveloped as a "green" and hopefully LEED certified store. The current store, built in the mid-1960s, is too small and very outdated. There is more information on the project at:

Posted by Pinehurst | March 17, 2008 2:45 PM

Well, it's almost twice as big, it looks like. Is that enough of a gain for such a huge cost? I dunno. As urban planning, it's a total joke; that "pedestrian facade" means nothing, and calling that a "plaza" is a true abortion of language. It still presents mostly surface parking to the important streets; and since the entry is on the parking lot side, the street side becomes the only thing more offensive to urban living than surface parking: a blank wall.

Posted by Fnarf | March 17, 2008 2:49 PM

ooo, I live on 85th and 23rd, and i could really use a coffee shop. please be an independent one (not holding my breath) still anything will be nicer than an empty parking lot for a vinyl company and an ugly modeling agency

Posted by vooodooo84 | March 17, 2008 3:04 PM

Density rocks.

Posted by Mr. Poe | March 17, 2008 3:07 PM

more excellent work by the foremost chronicler of seattle development. and no, the pun was not intentional.

Posted by dpa | March 17, 2008 3:13 PM

Too short.

Density rocks.

Build it ... taller.

Posted by Will in Seattle | March 17, 2008 3:31 PM

Driscoll is not a developer. They are, as their name implies, an architecture firm.

The sucky thing about the Safeway on 15th East and East John is that the pedestrian entrance, while on the street, is only open until the evening. So if you are a pedestrian coming from the east, as most pedestrians are, you have to go ALL THE WAY AROUND to the parking lot. At night. Also the John Street facade, while right against the sidewalk (go urbanism!) is ugly as sin.

Posted by Finishtag | March 17, 2008 3:40 PM

look out, adjacent trailer park - you are not long for this world.

you're going to be Driscollized! yawn!

Posted by max solomon | March 17, 2008 3:47 PM

oh, and please note:

at the north edge of the Driscoll site is Talents West's tiny building, AKA the Colacurcio's stripper-licensing agency.

Landmarks Board, get on it!

Posted by max solomon | March 17, 2008 3:51 PM

@10 Italian parking only

Posted by vooodooo84 | March 17, 2008 4:02 PM

Fnarf's right. The Safeway not only retains a horrible parking lot (and even enlarges it), it adds nothing for pedestrians but a blank wall.

The parking should be underground or at least in a garage structure with a smaller footprint. There needs to be street-level retail and other amenities on all sides (or at least regular pedestrian entryways from all surrounding sidewalks) so that it's not at war with pedestrians. As it is, this is a blight that might improve the interior of the store but actually worsens the neighborhood.

Posted by Cascadian | March 17, 2008 4:53 PM

How many LEED points for taking out that many grown trees?

Driscoll's not an architecture firm, it's a CAD bog.

Posted by greg | March 17, 2008 8:36 PM

driscoll is a phenomenal architect, greg. i don't know what you are talking about. he's the next zumthor. damn, there is a reason he only lets you see 3 projects on his website... he knows you'll only copy his masterpieces.

the safeway should have to front the entire lot. so what if that means the building is only 40' wide. fuck, do something interesting and innovative, d-bags!

Posted by holz | March 17, 2008 10:05 PM

Prior bloviations on this topic here:

Posted by Henry Miller Lite | March 17, 2008 11:17 PM

Comments Closed

In order to combat spam, we are no longer accepting comments on this post (or any post more than 45 days old).