Monday, April 9, 2012

Here Come the Anti-Obama Ads

Posted by on Mon, Apr 9, 2012 at 11:20 AM

The New York Times reported yesterday:

American Crossroads, the biggest of the Republican “super PACs,” is planning to begin its first major anti-Obama advertising blitz of the year, a moment the Obama re-election campaign has been girding for and another sign that the general election is starting in earnest.

With an anticipated bank account of more than $200 million, officials at American Crossroads said they would probably begin their campaign this month. But they said they would focus the bulk of the first phase from May through July, which they believe is a critical period for making an impression on voters, before summer vacations and the party conventions take place.

Crossroads was co-founded by our old friend Karl Rove. It's probably smart for them to start attacking President Obama now, since President Obama is already taking a few shots at Romney. But negative ads aren't going to help the fact that Mitt Romney is currently the most disliked presidential candidate in recent memory.

I've written about what I believe the Republican strategy is going to be this time around: Pour as much toxic sludge into the pond in order to try to suppress voter enthusiasm. When fewer people vote, Republicans win, and so by making the presidential campaign a completely distasteful experience for voters, they'll drive away enough independents to push the numbers in Romney's favor. It's a disgusting strategy that just might work, if the DNC can't organize as efficiently as they did in 2008. But there's a flip side to this strategy, too: Nobody buys it when a candidate claims that they have no control over their Super PACs; everyone recognizes that an anti-Obama ad is a pro-Romney ad. If Republican Super PACs go overboard in attacking the president with their own candidate running at such dismal likability numbers, they could wind up making Romney even more unlikable.

 

Comments (10) RSS

Oldest First Unregistered On Registered On Add a comment
Will in Seattle 1
All that foreign Sovereign Wealth fund money streaming into "American" subsidiaries to create attack ads can't be good for Democracy.

Just ask the Soviet SCOTUS. They sold out America on principle.

The principle of surrender.
Posted by Will in Seattle http://www.facebook.com/WillSeattle on April 9, 2012 at 11:28 AM
2
Vote for the most effective evil:

either Obamney, or Romobama....
Posted by sgt_doom on April 9, 2012 at 11:33 AM
balderdash 3
Well, it is certainly nice that we live in such a strong economy that people can throw away all that money on a losing campaign! I mean, just imagine how people would feel if the economy were in the crapper, lots of people were unemployed, and humanitarian causes around the world were badly neglected, and they saw all those rich men sloshing that kind of money around trying to promote some unlikeable WASP*-bot that had absolutely no chance of winning the election!

*- Do Mormons count as Protestant? I don't even know. I certainly don't care.
Posted by balderdash http://introverse.blogspot.com on April 9, 2012 at 11:35 AM
Dr_Awesome 4
No, mormons aren't protestant. They are their own brand of wacky.
Posted by Dr_Awesome on April 9, 2012 at 11:58 AM
5
Actually, do Mormons believe in the divinity of Christ?
Posted by seatackled on April 9, 2012 at 12:22 PM
internet_jen 6
There is this nuke waste billionaire who has donated 18 million so far this year, and he says he'll out spend his previous giving by a lot. $18 million is about 0.2% of what the Obama campaign spent in 2008. And $18 million is about $5.00 per voter in the 2008 presidential election.

His past giving wasn't only to republicans, but this year I think Karl Rove's superpac has received the most.

http://www.salon.com/2012/04/05/the_gops…
Posted by internet_jen on April 9, 2012 at 12:31 PM
7

Instead of just rerunning NYT lead, and windy punditry, you might point that Crossroads GPS (the Rove arm that doesn't report its givers) poured $5.5 million into this state in 2010 trying to defeat Sen. Murray.
Posted by joel connelly on April 9, 2012 at 1:08 PM
8
This year is all about voter suppression. The Crossroads ads will just provide a nice counter-narrative for why turnout is so low: it's not that people have been systematically disenfranchised, it's just that they're turned off by all the partisan bickering.
Posted by dirge on April 9, 2012 at 1:35 PM
Vince 9
No amount of PAC money can make Republican shmucks look good.
Posted by Vince on April 9, 2012 at 2:18 PM
slade 10
the amount spent by Republicans and supporters will equal billions. as its a media war that has no rules other than buy up all the media you can and lie about everything, promise everything ,lets go to the moon with Newt and build a Military base? I dont think the GOP even knows how much cash and tax they are going to spew across the nation.

As @9 put it if you have nothing to say then spending money to say nothing is not as effective as saying something for nothing that is useful and at least true?
Posted by slade http://www.youtube.com/user/guppygator on April 10, 2012 at 12:11 PM

Add a comment