They didn't equate Linux and Gandhi. They equated the struggle and the mechanics of non-violent confrontation. I understand that it's faster and easier to simply mock them, but the comparison is interesting.
On one hand you have an unrepentant monopolist, defending their position with every means available. On the other, you have an alternative given away for free. I can see why they might characterize this as meeting violence with non-violence.
If you meant that you consider the cause to be less important - there too I think you might be wrong. Even a cursory understanding of the arguments surrounding Net Neutrality, wikileaks.de, "porn free" internets, HDMI and The Pirate Bay reveal that the widespread dissemination of affordable, reliable networking and encryption gear might do as much for the widespread adoption of human rights and the sterling example of Gandhi.
A simplistic portrayal of "free versus evil" isn't quite right. Microsoft turned PC manufacturing into a commodity business and therefore made its major economic complement cheaper. Linux turns operating systems into a commodity, making a major economic complement of anyone doing work with computers cheaper. (Example: see IBM.)
If Linux has killed any monopoly, it was Sun Microsystem's monopoly on big iron servers.
Posted by
Jonathan Golob on April 14, 2009 at 12:13 PM
I don't think Fedora's even in the running any longer. Ubuntu's competitors are now OpenSUSE, Arch, and maybe PCLinuxOS. Fedora's fine as a testbed for RH's new technologies, but it doesn't really focus on usability or stability.
The RH video is very nicely produced, and is thought-provoking, but no matter how justified it might actually be, the invocation of Gandhi and populist non-violent resistance really does make me squirm. Not because I think that software is unimportant, but because I think that one must establish that importance more firmly prior to invoking a legend of Gandhi's magnitude. Without doing so, it looks like ingenuous self-importance.
re: " Not because I think that software is unimportant, but because I think that one must establish that importance more firmly prior to invoking a legend of Gandhi's magnitude. Without doing so, it looks like ingenuous self-importance"
Comments (11) RSS