
What happens when he tries to follow the advice:
The warrior in every dictator's paradise...
A year later, news organizations are still in the dark about certain details. If you read Nicholas Schmidle's piece in The New Yorker about the killing of bin Laden last August, you may think all the details have been nailed down, but CBS News believes (and has been hawking) a slightly different set of details.
According to Mark Follman, writing in Mother Jones: "You don't have to be a conspiracy theorist to be still scratching your head about the end of Osama bin Laden."
BBC:
The head of the Israeli military has said he does not think Iran will develop nuclear weapons.Chief of Staff Lt Gen Benny Gantz made the statement in an interview with the Israeli newspaper, Haaretz.
He said Iran's Supreme Leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, had not yet made the final decision whether to build a nuclear bomb.
...Gen Gantz says this pressure is beginning to bear fruit.
He added that Iran "is going step by step to the place where it will be able to decide whether to manufacture a nuclear bomb. It hasn't yet decided to go the extra mile".
And speaking of the supreme leader he continued: "I don't think he will want to go the extra mile. I think the Iranian leadership is composed of very rational people."
But these views appear to put him at odds with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu.
The chain of questions raised by the report: Will this relax the tension between the powers? If so, will gas prices go down? If so, will this help the US economy? If so, will this mean Obama is reelected?
Our man in Java sent us this video of soldiers dancing in a military parade to honor the Sultan of Yogyakarta's 100th birthday. (He's been dead since 1989.)
Back in 1989 our man in Java was living in Java—now he's just visiting—and he attended that Sultan's funeral. "I was one of the two foreigners," he writes. "The other one was the well-liked ambassador to Indonesia at the time and later warmonger—Paul Wolfowitz."
Boulder's 4/20 campus smokeout is infamous, as anyone who attended CU can tell you. Each year for the last decade, a crowd of 10,000+ students, dedicated stoners, once-a-year indulgers, and other Boulder residents have converge on the campus's Ferrand Field to light up in unison on 4/20 at 4:20 pm.
But last week, school officials announced that they're snuffing out the celebration:
To that effect, CU-Boulder plans to bring in a swarm of police officers on Friday to surround the campus and set up checkpoints at key entrances. They intend to prevent unauthorized access to the campus by non-students, and the school said that officers will be issuing tickets for tresspassing that carry fines of $750 and up to six months in jail.Problem is, marijuana protesters in Colorado are more amped up than ever this year, especially with full legalization on the state’s ballot this fall for the first time ever during a presidential election season. An added complication: Demonstrators have held an April 20 protest at CU-Boulder every year for the last decade with very little resistance from the administration.
Meanwhile, protesters say they're not staying home, a lawyer has filed a restraining order to block the university's police-enforced edict, and everyone's bracing for violence.
Today in Baseball History, we get the beginning of one of the most pernicious aspects of Baseball in America:
1910 At American League Park II in Washington, D.C., William Taft becomes the first president to throw out the ceremonial first pitch. Senator legend Walter Johnson one-hits the A's, 3-0 in the season opener.
But at least some other interesting things happened once upon a time today. The team Bud Selig thought he would get before he hijacked the Pilots played their first home game on this date:
1969 In the first regular season game played outside the United States, the Expos play their first home game, treating 29,184 fans at Jarry Park to an 8-7 win over St. Louis. Montreal moundsman Larry Jaster throws baseball's first international pitch to Cardinal left fielder Lou Brock.
And one of the villain/heroes of the Black Sox Scandal, Eddie Cicotte, on this date:
1917 White Sox hurler Eddie Cicotte no-hits the Browns, 11-0. The Michigan native will finish the season with twenty-eight wins.
Legend has it that he got only 28 victories in 1917 because cheapskate ChiSox owner Charles Comiskey had him benched to avoid paying a promised bonus for a 30-win season.
Today is the 20th anniversary of the beginning of the Siege of Sarajevo, the longest artillery siege—even longer than the Siege of Leningrad—and one of the most infamous in modern history. It was brutal, with a poorly equipped citizenry going into old war museums to find working rifles and ammunition.
A Stranger reader in Sarajevo, Amir Telibechirowich, wrote us a few weeks ago to ask whether he could send a series of jokes from the siege era as his form of commemoration. This is from a city where an underground radio station "celebrated" the day that the siege became the longest by playing the Queen song "We Are the Champions." (Another station, he told us, would begin broadcasts with: "'Good evening to all three of you out there who still have batteries for the radio set.' Of course, this was referring to the fact that electricity was gone in most of the city back then.")
Some of these jokes are grim—very grim. But they were the product, Amir says, of people trying to stay sane in extremely grim circumstances. Here is a photo Amir took in his neighborhood during the siege. He explains it in the caption:

This tweet is not uncharacteristic:
You do everything you can to live a good and honest life. Only to have your heart end up inside Dick Cheney.
They were protesting all that nasty shit going on in Darfur, a region in Western Sudan. In case you forgot, there was a 20 year civil war in Sudan:
But that’s not really why Clooney got himself arrested. The fighting [...] has largely subsided. The Sudanese government has basically won. Now, they are punishing the civilians who still live in the Nuba Mountain border regions by blocking humanitarian access to the region. The Sudanese government is not letting groups like the World Food Program, UN Refugee Agency, or Red Cross/Red Crescent bring food or medicine to people in the region. The UN is warning of a looming famine and mass starvation in the Nuba Mountain region of Sudan. About 200,000 people on the Sudanese side of the border are at immediate risk of starvation.
Now you know.
The Guardian has gotten ahold of a cache of Syrian dictator Bashar al-Assad's email, and yeah, sure, he may be a mass-murdering baby-killing war criminal, but in many ways he's just an ordinary guy.
For example, Assad enjoys using his iPad to swap "entertaining internet links" like this YouTube of a re-enactment of the brutal siege of Homs using biscuits and toys. Ha-ha, funny!
The 46-year-old Baathist tyrant also enjoys downloading music from iTunes, although given US economic sanctions, he has to use a buddy with an American address to help him with his downloads. And as for Mrs. Assad, well, she turns out to be quite an avid online shopper, her many purchases including a fondue set she instructed an aide to order through Amazon. Amazon delivers!
On a more serious note, the emails provide a fascinating look into the Assad regime, and some of the behind the scenes diplomatic efforts to diffuse the situation, including a correspondence between Assad's wife and the daughter of the emir of Qatar, in which the latter repeatedly attempts to persuade the Assads to go into exile. Interesting stuff.
What the fuck? Is this a nutter using his personal experiences to make sense of a global crisis that could easily make the Iraq war look like walk through the park? Is he comparing Obama to Carter? What about the Iran–Contra affair? I was hot and ready to denounce this character until I read the last two paragraphs of his piece. What they make clear is he's one smooth mover. He waits until the very end to either tie you up or, in my case, shut you up.Iran held me hostage three decades ago. It shouldn’t hold America hostage today.
CNN:
A recent rash of killings of people perceived to be gay or emo in Iraq has stoked fear within those communities, which worry the government might be unwilling or unable to protect them.At least you are liberated from a tyrant who had WMD.
At least 14 such victims were killed in Baghdad in the past three weeks, according to a senior Interior Ministry official, who was not authorized to talk to the media.
Rights activists claim the number is actually much higher, with some suggesting dozens or more than 100 have been killed since February.
The killings appear to target people perceived to be gay, or emo — shorthand in Iraq for an in-your-face style of Western dress that favors tight clothes, long hair and the color black.
Most of the killings have taken place in Shiite neighborhoods like Sadr City, Shulaa, Ameen and Tariq, activists said.
A United States service member walked out of a military base in a rural district of southern Afghanistan on Sunday and opened fire on three nearby houses, killing at least 16 civilians, including several children, local villagers and provincial officials said.
The shooting risks further inciting anti-American sentiment in Afghanistan and troubling a relationship that had already been brought to a new low by the burning of Korans at an American military base last month.
Ya think?
Americans burn some Korans, and so Afghanis kill some Americans.Then some American goes crazy and kills a bunch of Afghans. Wonder what comes next.
A decade ago, before we got distracted by Iraq, we had the opportunity to do the right thing in Afghanistan. But we blew it. It's well past time to get out.
UPDATE: The AP is now reporting the US soldier in question is from Fort Lewis. Local angle and all that.
Yesterday I called for Democratic Senators to pull their endorsement of Secretary of State wannabe Jim Kastama. Today I called for the Senate Dem leaders to yank the Higher Education Committee chair held by Senator Ro_ney Tom. So what to do about the third member of this troika of budget traitors, Senator Tim Sheldon?
Well... a while back my dog Feisty killed a friend's chicken, an unfortunate incident about which I still feel bad. But I don't blame the dog. Dogs kill chickens. That's just what they do.
Kastama and Tom knew better, but Sheldon? He's just a dog (that's why, despite his seniority, he sits on the fewest committees of any senator, and chairs none). So while I wouldn't mind smacking Sheldon on the nose with a rolled up newspaper (metaphorically or otherwise), it's not like it would change his behavior.
Representative Deb Eddy thinks I'm unhelpful. Yesterday, when I suggested that Senate Dems might want to express their ire at Senator Jim Kastama's betrayal by withdrawing their endorsements of him in his run for Secretary of State, Eddy took issue with my call for party discipline, responding on Facebook that "with commentary like this, I wouldn't be looking for Sen. Kastama to vote for any Democratic budget."
Uh-huh. As if the real obstacle to progress in Olympia is bloggers like me. If only political commentary was still the exclusive reserve of writers handpicked by wealthy daily newspaper publishers, our budgets would be in perpetual balance.
But undaunted by criticism (as always), I have another suggestion for Senate Democratic leaders seeking to restore order to their caucus: It is time to yank the chairmanship of the Higher Education Committee away from Kastama co-conspirator Senator Ro_ney Tom (_-Medina).
While not himself issuing a call to action, I think Bill Lyne of the United Faculty of Washington State lays out as compelling an argument as any for relieving Tom of his committee chairmanship:
Senator Tom was particularly quiet Friday night. His support for the Zarelli budget is particularly disheartening for those of us in higher education. We’ve always hoped that Senator Tom, as chair of the Senate Higher Education Committee, would somehow see his way clear to genuinely supporting our state’s outstanding universities and colleges. In the budget that Senate Democrats presented last week (the budget that people actually got to read and testify about), Senators Ed Murray, Lisa Brown and Derek Kilmer showed a lot of leadership and courage in finally proposing no more cuts to education. As Senator Tom sat down with his Republican pals to write the coup budget, we would have hoped that he would have insisted, as the chair of Higher Education, that another $38 million not be cut from an already decimated system. As the 25th and deciding vote, you’d think he could’ve gotten at least that in the deal.
The Democratic budget defended higher education from further cuts. The Republican budget, for which Tom was the 25th vote, slashed another $30-plus million. Tom didn't just betray his fellow Democrats. He betrayed the colleges and universities his committee oversees, and the tens of thousands of students who attend them.
If the Democratic leadership wants to hold off on disciplining their wayward caucus members in the hope of luring them back into the fold, fine. But I can't think of a more fitting punishment for Tom than to pull his chairmanship of a committee he failed to serve faithfully.
State Senator Jim Kastama fucked his Democratic caucus Friday night, and now it's time for his ex-colleagues to fuck him in return. Kastama is running for Secretary of State, allegedly as a Democrat, and according to his campaign website he currently has the endorsement of the following 15 Senate Dems:
Lisa Brown, Senate Majority Leader 3rd District Spokane
Adam Kline, State Senator 37th District Seattle
Brian Hatfield, State Senator 19th District Raymond
Debbie Regala, State Senator 27th District Tacoma
Derek Kilmer, State Senator 26th District Gig Harbor
Ed Murray, State Senator 43rd District Seattle
Maralyn Chase, State Senator 32nd District Shoreline
Mary Margaret Haugen, State Senator 10th District Camano Island
Paull Shin, State Senator 21st District Edmunds
*Rodney Tom, State Senator 48th District Bellevue
Steve Hobbs, State Senator 44th District Lake Stevens
*Tim Sheldon, State Senator 35th District Potlatch
Tracey Eide, State Senator 30th District Federal Way
Rosemary McAuliffe, State Senator 1st District Bothell
Kevin Ranker, State Senator 40th District San Juan Island
[*Fellow caucus traitor]
Judging from their speeches on the floor of the Senate Friday night, and their public comments and statements afterwards, many of Kastama's endorsers were shocked and offended by his stunning betrayal. So isn't it time to repay him for his perfidy by pulling their endorsements? Isn't it?
If any of these Kastama-endorsing Dems are your senator, you might want to ask them.
A quick if obvious reminder to Democratic budget negotiators in Olympia that despite the endless string of legislative deadlines, we already have a 2011-2013 budget in place. So there's no rush to cave on your principles in order to appease the bullies and traitors across the aisle.
Sure, thanks to recent revenue forecasts, the state is currently projected to run out of cash before the budget ends in June, 2013. But not long before. Maybe May of next year. So it's not like we're facing an imminent government shutdown if a deal isn't struck. There's no emergency.
Yes, the longer we wait, the harder it is to close the gap, but while it may not be the optimal way to deal with the problem, there are a lot of things Governor Gregoire can do unilaterally to cut spending, and who knows? Maybe with the economy recovering, revenues will pick up faster than expected, erasing the shortfall on its own?
The point is, Senate Republicans and the three ex-Democratic Benedict Arnolds don't have you over a barrel. Dems control the House and the governor's mansion. Act like it.
"Congratulations Mr. Minority Leader, you fooled me," an emotional Senate Majority Leader Lisa Brown exclaimed last night just before the final 25-24 vote approving the Republican coup budget. Earlier, a parade of angry Democrats took to the floor to express their shock and disappointment at the Republicans' brazen subterfuge:
"It is a narrow, extremist agenda that is being shoved down our throats tonight."
— Senator Ed Murray (D-Seattle)"Last year I was proud, this year I am disgusted."
— Senator Kevin Ranker (D-San Juan)"I am embarrassed and appalled."
— Senator Tracey Eide (D-Federal Way)"We can't negotiate in good faith when we don't have credibility and trust."
— Senator Karen Keiser (D-Kent)
Throughout this session and the last, Democrats negotiated in good faith with their Republican counterparts on a number of crucial issues, yet in the end, the Republicans failed to return the favor. Having secured many of the compromises and reforms they demanded (four-year budgeting, teacher evaluation, state control of teacher health care benefits, permanent suspension of I-728, etc.) the Republicans then turned around—with the aid of three Democratic turncoats—to, as Senator Murray aptly put it, shove the rest of their extremist agenda down our throats.
Well, I hope the Democratic leadership in both houses fully understands that the time for bipartisan cooperation and compromise is over. The Republicans are playing hardball, and as every major leaguer knows, when their pitcher beans one of your batters, your pitcher has to bean one of theirs. Otherwise, they'll just bean all your batters without fear of retribution, until your entire team is brushed back six feet off the plate.
The proper response to this treachery isn't for the House Democrats to meet the Senate Republicans somewhere in the middle between their two budgets. No, the correct response is to up ante.
"No revenue, no budget!" That is the slogan I suggest Democrats adopt throughout the remainder of these budget wars. Democrats twisted themselves into knots, fucking over their own constituencies, to give Republicans a no-new-tax budget. The Republicans had their chance, but that option should now be irrevocably taken off the table. Without at least the closing of a glaringly nonproductive tax loophole like the mortgage interest profit exemption for out-of-state banks, there is absolutely nothing to talk about.
Honestly, Dems. The Republicans think you're a bunch of pussies. In fact, they're counting on it. They think if they bean you a few times, you'll just back off the plate. And they'll keep on beaning you until you start whipping fastballs at their heads. Because that, alas, is how this game is played.
Yeah sure, there's still another week in the current session, but the Senate Republicans' nuclear parliamentary maneuver today guarantees a budget deadlock and a special session or three. The Republicans will pass their budget in the Senate—there's no way to stop it—but there's also no way this budget gets through the House anywhere near its current form, and there just isn't the time this late in the session to negotiate some sort of compromise.
The Republican leaders and their three ex-Democratic collaborators had to know this when they chose to violate both precedence and decorum in such an insulting, anti-democratic, and heavy-handed manner. There is now absolutely no chance of passing a budget this session. None. Zero. Nada.
But tonight's proceedings are more than just the kickoff to an acrimonious special session. The Republicans expect to win control of the Senate this November—possibly girded by a Rob McKenna victory in the governor's race—and this is a clear indication of how they plan to govern: Capriciously, dishonestly, unilaterally, and in a totally partisan manner. Their goal is to take advantage of what's left of the Great Recession to defund and destroy what's left of our state's social safety net and regulatory capacity.
Even K-12 education, for which Republicans love to voice their support, endures another $40 million in cuts in the Senate Republican budget. Total. Fucking. Liars.
No, a budget is not possible this session, and possibly not in the special session either—or the next—because it's starting to dawn on Democrats that there's nothing to be gained from negotiating with terrorists or appeasing tyrants. Make no mistake: Republicans want to do to Washington what they've done to Wisconsin, and if it means grinding state government to a stop to oppose them, then so be it.
This is war. And the Republicans started it.
UPDATE: Speaking of war, twice now Senator Derek Kilmer (D-Gig Harbor) has made impassioned speeches defending education programs from brutal cuts, and twice Republicans have responded by threatening to sanction him for "impugning the motives" of the budget writers, and violating "decorum." Yup. That's how Republicans plan to play this game once they're in control: Censure the opposition into silence.
What a total bunch of assholes.
UPDATE 2: Speaking of assholes, Senator Dan Swecker (R-Rochester) is now speaking in defense of cutting $3 million from the K-12 "Readiness to Learn" program in order to fund prizes at state fairs, pointing out that his own son was home-schooled, and thus never spent a day at public schools. Get it? He didn't choose to send his son to public schools, thus they don't deserve funding. Ass. Hole.
UPDATE 3: The Senate Dems have released a fact sheet, which I've appended after the jump.
UPDATE 4: I've been a pretty vocal critic of the Dems' "Roadkill Caucus", but today we see the difference between being a Roadkill Dem and a total traitor. Democratic Senators Steve Hobbs and Brian Hatfield remain Democrats, while Senators Ro_ney Tom and Jim Kastama have abandoned their party by facilitating this undemocratic GOP coup.
"Our caucus is about reform of government through efficiency and transparency, not going behind the backs of our fellow members, wrote Hatfield in a statement. "This move is the antithesis of transparency, respect and fairness," added Hobbs.
UPDATE 5: Hey... looks like House Speaker Frank Chopp agrees with my assessment:
"The Senate Republicans have exercised the worst abuse of power I have ever witnessed in the legislature. It says something about them that the minute they gained power, they abused it.
With this stunt, the Republicans have poisoned the political well for a generation.
UPDATE 6: Senator Ed Murray (D-Seattle): "It is a narrow, extremist agenda that is being shoved down our throats tonight."
Senator Kevin Ranker (D-San Juan Islands): "Last year I was proud, this year I am disgusted."
Senator Tracey Eide (D-Federal Way): "I am embarrassed and appalled."
Senator Karen Keiser (D-Kent): "We can't negotiate in good faith when we don't have credibility and trust."
UPDATE 7 (12:47 AM): Well, that's it, the Republican coup budget passes 25-24, totally poisoning the political well in Olympia. Senate Majority Leader Lisa Brown: "Well congratulations Mr. Minority Leader, you fooled me."
In listening to the closing comments from members of both parties, it's kinda stunning how much the R's fail to comprehend the level of animosity they have generated. They have the votes to pass what they want in the Senate, but they're smoking crack if they think that this procedural fuck you is going to lead to a spirit of bipartisan cooperation in the House.
You want to transform legislators into Goldy-style Democrats? This is the way to do it.
Now off to bed so I can get up tomorrow morning and fuck with the Republican caucus with renewed vigor.
Utilizing a parliamentary maneuver called the "9th Order", and thanks to the support of alleged Democrats Jim Kastama, Tim Sheldon and Ro_ney Tom (a man who doesn't even deserve a "D" in his name, let alone next to it), Republicans have just seized control of the Washington State Senate Floor in attempt to force through the Republicans 233-page budget proposal, without hearings or review. You can watch the debate right now streaming on TVW. It's pretty dramatic.
So much for bipartisanship. Or even decorum. This is at best a political stunt, at worst a coup.
UPDATE (4:57 PM): Kastama, by the way, is running for Secretary of State as a Democrat. Given his betrayal today, I'd vote for a Republican in November before marking my ballot for him. Not that it matters, as I can't see how he now gets enough Democratic votes in the primary to make it through the top-two.
UPDATE (5:10 PM): How many times does shit like this have to happen for Democrats to realize that Republicans view Democrats' unwillingness to go nuclear as a sign of weakness to be exploited at every opportunity? Hell, conservative Democrats view Democrats unwillingness to go nuclear as a sign of weakness. Kastama, Tom, and Sheldon should be expelled from the Democratic caucus. That might teach 'em. And besides, if Republicans are going to have a majority in practice, they might as well have one in reality, so that a Democratic so-called "majority" doesn't get blamed for the Republicans' cruel budget.
UPDATE (5:33 PM): I need to head home and walk my dog before her bladder explodes, but one final comment on this post. This is more than just crossing party lines. Kastama, Tom, and Sheldon are voting with the Republicans to subvert the process and embarrass their own leadership. This is inexcusable behavior—behavior no Republican would dare without well justified fear of being stripped of all committees and privileges. Democrats will never have the discipline they need to govern until they impose it on their own members.
This is a superb analysis of the Iran/Israel situation as it stands:
Washington, DC - President Barack Obama has finally begun in recent months to signal to Israel that the United States would not get involved in a war started by Binyamin Netanyahu without US approval. If it is pursued firmly and consistently through 2012, the approach stands a very good chance of averting war altogether. If Obama falters, however, the temptation for Netanyahu to launch an attack on Iran, indulging in what one close Israeli observer calls his "messianism" toward the issue of Iran.Netanyahu, like every previous Israeli prime minister, understands that an Israeli strike against Iran depends not only on US tolerance, but direct involvement against Iran, at least after the initial attack. In May 2008, his predecessor, Ehud Olmert, had requested the approval of George W Bush for an air attack on Iran, only to be refused by Bush.
Netanyahu apparently feels, however, that he can manipulate right-wing Israeli influence on American politics to make it impossible for Obama to stay out of an Israeli war on Iran. He has defied the Obama administration by refusing to assure Washington that he would consult them before making any decision on war with Iran.
The solution?
...[U]nless Obama warns Netanyahu publicly that an attack against US wishes would indeed mean he is on his own, the chances of deterring him and avoiding war with Iran will be sharply reduced.All well and good, but, really, you'd think the son of a great historian would be able to clearly see Obama's situation, see why he can't go into another war with an Islamic nation. If Bush couldn't do it, how the fuck does he think Obama can?
Do not separate this...
The Israel Air Force may stop the production of the Iron Dome and David Sling missile interception systems in 2012 as a result of insufficient funds, a military budget breakdown revealed on Sunday.Last month, the government backtracked on its intention to cut NIS 3 billion from the defense budget, meant to pay for social benefits in the wake of last summer's wave of protests according to the recommendations of the Trajtenberg committee.
The move was decided after Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu accepted the Defense Ministry's stance, according to which such a dramatic cut would be unwise in the face of the political upheavals taking place across the Mideast. these, in turn, could increase terror threats against Israel.
However, despite succeeding in averting a drastic budget cut, the IDF's financial woes are far from over.
From this...
Israeli prime minister Binyamin Netanyahu has accused Iran of being behind twin attacks on Israeli targets in India and Georgia on Monday in a move likely to further escalate tensions between the two countries and increase international pressure on the Iranian regime.This is as raw as it gets.
WaPo:
The U.S. defense budget is about 43 percent of the world’s total military spending — more than the combined defense spending of the next 17 nations, many of which are U.S. allies. Are Republicans really going to warn voters that America will be imperiled if the defense budget is cut 8 percent from projections over the next decade? In 2017, defense spending would still be more than that of the next 10 countries combined.As the economy seems, for now, not the best line of attack for the GOP, it's turning to family values and saber rattling. Both of these lines, however, may not be efficacious. As George Will points out, saber rattling is useless at this time because the military is already huge, expensive, and in the middle of a long and unpopular war, and recently ended another long and unpopular war. As for the family values thing, Kellie Ferguson makes this point:Do Republicans think it is premature to withdraw as many as 7,000 troops from Europe two decades after the Soviet Union’s death? About 73,000 will remain, most of them in prosperous, pacific, largely unarmed and utterly unthreatened Germany. Why do so many remain?
Since 2001, the United States has waged war in three nations, and some Republicans appear ready to bring the total to five, adding Iran and Syria. (The Weekly Standard, of neoconservative bent, regrets that Obama “is reluctant to intervene to oust Iran’s closest ally, Syrian President Bashar al-Assad.”) GOP critics say that Obama’s proposed defense cuts will limit America’s ability to engage in troop-intensive nation-building. Most Americans probably say: Good.
“I think this week’s outrage over the Komen decision should be a warning to the Republican party about how quickly there was a mass outrage over further and further attacks on general women’s health,” Kellie Ferguson, executive director of Republican Majority for choice... “You could see the same backlash on attacks on contraception.”So, what's left for the GOP to attack?
A recent report noted that former senior White House official, Dennis Ross, who is known for his closeness to the Israelis, estimated an Israeli strike on Iran could come in the next nine months.Yes, but I can't see how war against Iran would be popular with the American public. Israel is doing most of the drumming for it, and Americans have not forgotten about Iraq's WMD. What is Netanyahu playing at? My guess is it has nothing to do with Obama's second term. It's much more immediate than that: He is trying get as much out of the remaining 9 months as possible. Threats of war with Iran threaten the American recovery (enter oil). And the election really comes down to the state of the economy. What will Obama pay for stability in that region? My bet is the Palestinians are going to get fucked again.In about nine months, the US will hold a general election to decide who shall be its President and all the noise about striking Iran could have more to do with American domestic politics than any real or perceived threat to the Israelis.
It is no secret that the right-wing government in Israel led by Netanyahu would prefer a new US president in January 2013. This is not simply because Netanyahu had some tense moments with President Obama, but also because in a second term Obama would not face the type of electoral constraints he faces in his first term.
It is no secret that US Presidents who have engaged in Israeli-Palestinian peace-making have been most active in their second terms as Bill Clinton was at Camp David and George W Bush was in Annapolis. Those that were particularly active in first terms - Jimmy Carter and George HW Bush - were defeated. Netanyahu does not want an unrestrained Obama demanding he halt settlement expansion in 2013. He'd rather have Mitt Romney or Newt Gingrich as they are more likely to be more susceptible to the pro-Israel pressures AIPAC is apt to apply.
Netanyahu also knows that if Israel went ahead and attacked Iran on its own before the election, he would put Obama in an extremely compromising position. Obama does not want to get into a war with Iran, nor should any American as it is completely against American interests, but Obama also knows that should Israel go it alone, he'd be obligated to participate lest he appear weak before the electorate and a Republican opponent who'd be more than happy to attack Obama on what would immediately become a major international crisis before the election.
About 200,000 missiles are aimed at Israel at any given time, a top Israel Defense Forces officer said on Thursday, adding that Iran's ability to obtain nuclear weapons was solely dependent on the will of Iranian Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei.These "experts" never left 2002. Their drums for war are identical to Bush's. Reading Haaretz today is like reading New York Times in the months that led to the biggest crime of the previous decade....The remarks by Military Intelligence Chief Major General Aviv Kochavi came after IDF Chief of Staff Lt. Gen. Benny Gantz said on Wednesday that the threats facing Israel have increased and intensified in recent years due to regional instability.
...Referring to Israel's concerns over Iran's nuclear ambitions, Kochavi presented a relatively tame estimation of a possible timeline en route to an Iranian atomic bomb, saying that the project depended more on the will of Iran's Supreme Leader than on any technological advancement.
"If Khamenei issues a command to achieve a first nuclear explosive device, we estimate it would take another year before that's achieved," the top IDF official said, adding that "if he asks to translate that ability to obtain a nuclear warhead, that would take another year or two."
CNN:
Iran on Saturday welcomed the rescue of 13 Iranian sailors by a U.S. Navy ship, calling it a "humanitarian act."I recall reading in some essay about American military bases that the Roman Empire did not expand by brute force but by running a sophisticated protection racket. Meaning, Rome offered small and weak states protection (military bases) from their larger and stronger enemies. I even recall reading this essay six or so years ago on a sunny day in Portland (I'm almost positive it was in an issue of Foreign Policy). My point: For better or for worse, assistance is a more effective weapon than aggression.The sailors were on a fishing boat that had been hijacked by pirates in the Arabian Sea, near the Strait of Hormuz. According to the Navy, a helicopter from the destroyer USS Kidd spotted a suspect pirate boat alongside the Iranian vessel on Thursday. The destroyer is part of the USS John Stennis Strike Group, which moved into the Arabian Sea from the Persian Gulf last week.
As the helicopter spotted the suspect pirate ship, the Kidd received a distress call from the fishing boat's captain, saying pirates were holding him and his crew captive. A team from the Kidd boarded the vessel, took 15 suspected pirates into custody, and freed 13 Iranian hostages, the Navy said.
A spokesman for Iran's Foreign Ministry, Ramin Mehmanparast, had positive words about the rescue when he spoke Saturday to the Arabic news network Al-Alam.
#Obama to visit #Pentagon Thursday to discuss Defense Strategic Review (ie, the painful, long-feared defense budget cuts)Hope someone has got your back, prez. You're now fucking with the real OGs.