
When you think of Georgetown, you think of men. First off: George. Second, the burly working-class history of the place. Third, there's the military-industrial-complex-titled ART ATTACK! Which is awesome, and which I love—it is clearly the best art walk besides Pioneer Square's (and is celebrating its fourth anniversary tonight)—but it doesn't put you in mind of the womenz.
This, however, is misleading, as I recently discovered. The artist Julie Baraoh, who recently took over the reins of publicizing Art Attack (Larry Reid of Fantagraphics used to do it), sent me an email a few weeks ago selling me the idea of "the women of Georgetown" as a story. I was reticent. Then I went to visit, and women came out of the woodworks over the course of a two-hour walk through the neighborhood. Three of us lady-snowballed into a whole gang of women. We stopped traffic at least once just by appearing to desire to cross the street, there were so many of us.
All of which is to say that when you go to Art Attack tonight, you should keep the ladies of Georgetown in mind, too. There's Baraoh, whose Krab Jab Studios is home to three artists and a writer. There's Angielena Vitale Chamberlain, who is in the running for kindest, warmest person on the planet, and who operates Belle Vitale Studio. Chamberlain also founded, in 2007, the Georgetown Arts and Cultural Center, which you have to check out if you haven't already. It's an old union hall-slash-ballroom converted into an exhibition and studio space around the corner from Stellar Pizza on the northern end of Georgetown. Right now at the center, Betty Jo Costanzo—who before moving to Seattle last year was teaching and working mostly as a performance artist in the Bay Area (at Mills and CCAC, among other places)—shows lushly painted landscapes that look like they're in extremely slow motion. Throughout the neighborhood, women rule as owners, operators, and independent curators at spaces including Calamity Jane's, Stellar Pizza, the Stables, Full Throttle Bottles (where Erika Tedin is reported to be the brassiest woman in Georgetown), the Roving Gallery, Georgetown Trailer Park Mall, Two Tartes Bakery & Cafe (showing photographs from Arts Corps), American Pie (showing collage works by Nyky Gomez), inside the Old Rainier Bottling Plant (ask Mary Tudor about her secret recipe for making her oil paintings roll up without cracking), and Nautilus Studio.Nautilus is an eccentric home and studio designed to look like a shipwreck. You do not want to miss it. The lady artist behind all this is assemblagist Yvette Endrijautzki (her male partner is Jethaniel Peterka).
Art Attack starts at 6 and runs to 9, but many places are open later. GO!
Seeking to calm a manufactured furor over a "new" rule requiring health insurers to provide free birth control to women—even insurance plans offered by church affiliated employers—the Obama administration will reportedly offer an "accommodation" this morning that drops this requirement of employers, and instead shifts the mandate to insurance companies to offer such coverage as a free side benefit to enrollees.
Clever, clever, Mr. Obama.
In the long run, there's no additional cost burden to insurance companies (giving away birth control is far cheaper than paying for pregnancies), yet it essentially achieves the same end as the original rule while removing church affiliated employers from the equation. No doubt the Catholic bishops and other conservative religious organizations will not be satisfied by the accommodation, but it totally shifts the parameters of the debate. What had been a conversation about whether religious organizations should be exempt from providing a service that violates their faith, now becomes a conversation about whether these employers should be allowed to deny their female employees access to affordable birth control. (Which, of course, is what this was always really about anyway.)
Recent polls show that despite the Bishops' objections, 98 percent of Catholics have used birth control, and a majority supported the "new" birth control rule. Which by the way, isn't all that "new." Insurers have long been required to offer birth control. All this new rule does is remove the deductible and co-pay.
UPDATE: US Senator Patty Murray (D-WA), a champion of reproductive rights, just issued a statement supporting the proposed rule change: “My highest priority here is ensuring contraceptive access and coverage for all women, and I believe this accommodation meets that goal." Full statement after the jump:
In fitting response to the misogynistic argument that life begins at conception and fertilized eggs deserve more legal rights than the women carting them around, yesterday Oklahoma Senator Constance Johnson introduced an "Every Sperm is Sacred" amendment to her state's so-called "personhood" bill that read:
Any action in which a man ejaculates or otherwise deposits semen anywhere but in a woman’s vagina shall be interpreted and construed as an action against an unborn child.
Sadly, Johnson later withdrew the amendment after claiming that she'd made her point. Still! Between Johnson's amendment this week and Virginia State Senator Janet Howell's hilarious erectile dysfunction suggestion last week, it's refreshing to see legislators finally rising to the challenge of fighting stupid logic with stupid logic.
Curtsies to Enigma.
Seattle artist Lynn Schirmer today announced a new project called After Dinner Party. The title is a reference to Judy Chicago's early feminist masterwork The Dinner Party, which is on long-term display at the heart of the Elizabeth Sackler Center for Feminist Art at the Brooklyn Museum. The Dinner Party is a vagina thing. After Dinner Party is clitoral, a body part that's inherently more politicized, more feared, more misunderstood, more ignored, more attacked, more everythinged. It's time to clitoralize.
At this point, After Dinner Party is just a web site—but one with drawings of the clitoris that already make you remember its shape when you close your eyes. (I did not already have a 3D projection of the clitoris in my brain; maybe you did.)
The project has two upcoming (ahem, upcoming) phases, set to begin during Pioneer Square's First Thursday Art Walk in May:
At present, After Dinner Party consists of two kinds of activities: a curated art exhibit and celebration; and a loosely coordinated series of individual and/or mass public actions. The form and scope of the second portion is entirely dependent upon the energy and creativity of participants. The goal is to represent the shape of the clitoris, in as many art forms and in as many venues or public spaces as possible, all over the city.
You've really gotta check this out.
Aaaand, the results are in! Congratulations April T, Barry P, and Jason G, for you are the lucky winners of the world's first Feminist KillJoy t-shirts, donated by ooshirts.com, as well as tepid bottles of Komen-themed Fuze Slenderize™, donated by my office desk.

And finally: Thanks to everyone who donated to Planned Parenthood!
Oh, no! This morning, Rick Santorum said that President Obama might force the Catholic Church into not treating women as lesser beings than men:
This is a president who, just recently, in this Hosanna-Tabor case was basically making the argument that Catholics had to, you know, maybe even had to go so far as to hire women priests to comply with employment discrimination issues. This is a very hostile president to people of faith. He’s a hostile president, not just to people of faith, but to all freedoms.
Okay, first of all, this is a bullshit scare tactic that's not based in any kind of reality. But second of all: It's clearly impossible for women to take on the priesthood. As everybody knows, women's bodies simply cannot handle the Word of God being delivered directly into them. Their little baby brains simply weren't "intelligently designed" for it! Only men's rugged frames can carry the immense weight of the Truth of Jesus. (Also, women probably would not enjoy raping children as much as male members of the clergy do, which could lead to some awkward breakroom conversations.) Let's leave the gold lamé gowns and fancy hats to the fellas, the way Jesus intended, okay?
We're giving away three of these hot-pink babies today:

For a chance to win, just donate to Planned Parenthood and forward a copy of your donation receipt, along with your preferred T-shirt size, to feministkilljoy@thestranger.com by noon.
Last week, US Senator Patty Murray led a noisy campaign condemning the Susan G. Komen foundation's decision to defund Planned Parenthood breast cancer screenings—she appeared on MSNBC, she sent routine email blasts criticizing their decision, and she helped round up 24 other US Senators to sign a letter condemning the breast cancer charity's action.
Today, Senator Murray kept the ball rolling and once again stood up—this time on the Senate floor—to fight for women's healthcare. You can watch her entire speech here, but here's my favorite part:
“On Friday, Komen did the right thing and announced that they had reversed their initial decision—and I want to commend them for that. Because their mission—and their great work in the fight against breast cancer—is just too important to get mixed up in partisan politics.
“But Mr. President, although this reversal was a great victory for so many women across America, let’s be clear: Our fight for women’s health does not end here. There are still many who will continue to put partisan politics ahead of women’s health—and we need to make sure the grassroots support and energy that successfully came together to right this wrong last week, continues to stand firm against each and every attack that comes our way.
“Because Mr. President—we know the attacks are coming. Republicans in the House of Representatives have been waging a war on women’s health since the moment they came into power.
“After campaigning across the country on a platform of jobs and the economy, the first three bills they introduced were direct attacks on women’s health in America. The very first one, H.R. 1, would have totally eliminated Title X funding for family planning and teen pregnancy prevention. And it included an amendment that would have completely defunded Planned Parenthood and cut off support for the millions of women who count on it.
How bad was the public relations and political fallout from Susan G. Komen for the Cure's Pink Handguns, Inc.'s disastrous decision to pull Planned Parenthood funding, and subsequent reversal? Senior vice president (and former GOP gubernatorial candidate) Karen Handel, the woman who reportedly orchestrated the Planned Parenthood defunding, has resigned.
Good riddance.
But from the tone of her resignation letter, obtained by the Atlanta Journal Constitution, Handel doesn't appear to be going quietly:
I am deeply disappointed by the gross mischaracterizations of the strategy, its rationale, and my involvement in it. I openly acknowledge my role in the matter and continue to believe our decision was the best one for Komen’s future and the women we serve.
Handel has declined a severance package, which might have come with a gag order. She's scheduled to meet with reporters later today.
UPDATE: FYI, there's still time to win your very own "Feminist Killjoy" t-shirt! Just make a donation directly to Planned Parenthood, and then email your receipt to feministkilljoy@thestranger.com for a chance to win. Three winners will be chosen at random, Wednesday at noon.
I got so swept up in the glacial pace of the polling that I totally missed this:
On the eve of Saturday's Nevada caucus, Ron Paul sits down with Piers Morgan for a revealing interview, during which the Republican from Texas shares his views on rape and abortion: "If it's an honest rape, that individual should go immediately to the emergency room, I would give them a shot of estrogen."
Ron Paul has always been absolutely terrible on women's rights, but: Seriously? "Honest rape?" Jessica Pieklo asks:
I guess I would start by asking Paul to follow-up on just what exactly constitutes an “honest” rape. What kind of evidence would we need to show a lack of consent? Does a woman need to have signs she resisted? How much resistance counts before a rape goes from being “fraudulent” to being “honest”? Can spousal rape ever be “honest”? What about other forms of familial rape? What exactly is the bright line here?...About that shot of estrogen. What exactly is this shot of estrogen supposed to do? Paul is purportedly an ob/gyn, so he must know a shot of estrogen won’t do a thing to prevent fertilization and implantation. So what’s that shot for?
I’m not sure what is the most dangerous aspect to come from Paul’s statements here: that is platform is built on a criminal disdain of women or as a doctor he doesn’t know his ear from his elbow.
I was going to write, "Ron Paul is the worst Republican candidate when it comes to women's rights." But then I remembered that Rick Santorum exists. It's a tough call! I think this needs to be resolved with a poll:
This is what a lying sack of shit looks like. Then this is what a brave, truth-telling, ass-kicking cancer survivor looks like:
Damn. (Via Balloon Juice.)
It's been a long, teeth-gnashing week in the world of women's health, albeit with overwhelmingly positive results: Planned Parenthood is $3 million richer and Susan G. Komen's weasely Republican board members have learned an important lesson about using poor women as punching bags boobs to push their political agenda.
The fight's not over—Komen hasn't technically pledged to fund Planned Parenthood in the future (they've has simply reinstated PP as eligible to apply for their grants) and Congressional Republicans are still working to defund and discredit the women's health organization at the federal level—but fuck it, you helped Planned Parenthood raise $3 million dollars in three days! That's impressive! And you deserve a reward for your boob-loving altruism! Like a three-of-a-kind FEMINIST KILLJOY t-shirt!!!


But by the time her plane touched down in Seattle, Murray had won her battle. "I found out about Komen's decision to continue funding Planned Parenthood as I stepped off the plane," she explained this morning while standing in front of Planned Parenthood of the Great Northwest's (PPGN) E. Madison Street headquarters. So instead of censure, her scheduled presser became a well-deserved victory celebration.
"I want to congratulate Susan G. Komen on reversing their decision today," Murray told the crowd of Planned Parenthood volunteers, supporters, and staff. "This is a huge win for men and women... I have stood and will continue to stand shoulder to shoulder with so many men and women across the country, with on voice, to fight to ensure that women have vital screenings for breast health."
Planned Parenthood's victory here is twofold: Since Komen's decision to stop breast cancer screenings through Planned Parenthood went public on Tuesday evening, PPGN has raised $50,000 to continue funding breast cancer screenings and education programs, while nationally, Planned Parenthood has raised a staggering $3 million earmarked for breast health. Meanwhile, Komen's reputation has taken a hit and conservative Republicans—who have long attempted to defund and discredit Planned Parenthood—have learned that a nation of men and women stand behind them with their wallets open.
Thanks to the public's generous donations, the 710,000 breast screenings Planned Parenthood conducts annually will continue uninterrupted, as will the 1,000 breast screenings that PPGN offered last year using local Komen funds. "We chose to serve Native American women in Cle Elum Clallum County and refugee women in Boise using Komen grants and we're going to remain focused on that as our top priority," said PPGN's CEO Chris Charbonneau, ensuring that women like 29-year-old Sharona Lindgren will have access to the services they desperately need.
If Komen has reversed course... why do anti-choice Catholic orgs approve?
Great news... but watch out for weasel words:
We will continue to fund existing grants, including those of Planned Parenthood, and preserve their eligibility to apply for future grants...
None of Komen's "existing grants" to Planned Parenthood—money Pink Handguns, Inc., had already promised to Planned Parenthood—had been pulled. And Pink Handguns, Inc., never said that Planned Parenthood couldn't apply for grants. Planned Parenthood could apply for all the Komen grants they wanted to. But so long as Planned Parenthood was being subjected to politically-motivated "investigations" by some rightwing douchebag with a congressional committee—investigations that would go on forever, of course, if keeping 'em going meant taking money from Planned Parenthood (and killing poor women)—Komen wouldn't award Planned Parenthood any grants.
Pink Handguns, Inc., now says that they won't deny any orgs funding unless an investigation is "criminal and conclusive in nature." What does that mean? Does it mean an investigation has to be over and it has to have found that crimes were committed? Or does it mean that some trumped-up, bullshit, politically-motivated charge of criminal behavior and the existence ongoing investigation—but one that is somehow "conclusive in nature" (what does "in nature" mean in this context?)—will be grounds to deny grants to Planned Parenthood?
It's unclear.
But, hey: I welcome this news. I love a good cave. But this could be an effort by Pink Handguns, Inc., to end the uproar for now, kick the can down the road, before they make a second attempt to defund Planned Parenthood. We won't know if Komen has truly reversed itself until 2012's grants are announced. And until then...
No one with any sense should give the rightwing douchehags at Pink Handguns, Inc., one red cent.
From the Komen foundation blog, by CEO Nancy G. Brinker:
We want to apologize to the American public for recent decisions that cast doubt upon our commitment to our mission of saving women’s lives.
The events of this week have been deeply unsettling for our supporters, partners and friends and all of us at Susan G. Komen. We have been distressed at the presumption that the changes made to our funding criteria were done for political reasons or to specifically penalize Planned Parenthood. They were not.
Our original desire was to fulfill our fiduciary duty to our donors by not funding grant applications made by organizations under investigation. We will amend the criteria to make clear that disqualifying investigations must be criminal and conclusive in nature and not political. That is what is right and fair.
Our only goal for our granting process is to support women and families in the fight against breast cancer. Amending our criteria will ensure that politics has no place in our grant process. We will continue to fund existing grants, including those of Planned Parenthood, and preserve their eligibility to apply for future grants, while maintaining the ability of our affiliates to make funding decisions that meet the needs of their communities.
At least, that's what the AP is reporting. Developing...
UPDATE: Dom's got a link to the Komen foundation's official statement.
Had Komen held to its original decision, Republicans in congress would have been emboldened to hold firm to their demands to fully defund Planned Parenthood. But now, after this massive show of popular support, you can be pretty sure that it is Democrats who are emboldened to have Planned Parenthood's back.
But to be clear, this isn't just a huge victory for Planned Parenthood in particular, and women in general. This is a huge victory for the broader progressive community, in that it finally got its shit together to effectively push back against the creeping right-wing conspiracy.
Activism works. Who knew?
But lesbian moms—women with four-breasted families—might not want to give any of their money to Komen. Here's what Komen Senior VP Karen Handel, the woman who orchestrated Komen's attack on Planned Parenthood and poor women, had to say about lesbian moms (and gay dads) when she running for GA governor less than two years ago:
KH: I’ve been very clear. And you know, as a Christian, marriage is between a man and a woman. I do not think that gay relationships are—they are not what God intended. And that’s just my viewpoint on it. Others might disagree with that. But I would also hope that if you look at what is happening in our state, we’ve got issues we need to be focused on in Georgia . We have a constitutional amendment against gay marriage. And it’s something that I supported wholeheartedly. We have that, and let’s get dealing with the other issues that we also need to deal with in Georgia. And the press can help with that. (Laughs).
Q: Frequently, folks in the Legislature kind of threaten to—there are always rumblings in the Legislature that they may outlaw gay adoptions. You’re against gay adoption.
KH: I am against gay adoption. But remember—I mean, if there is legislation on that, certainly I will follow that and look at it. But in the end, ultimately courts are going to be the ones to have to make the decision on that and it’s always in the best interests of the child. Do I think that gay parents is in the best interest of the child? No. But we do have our court system that deals with many and most of those issues
Q: Would you favor outlawing gay adoptions?
KH: Yeah, I would consider that, absolutely.
Q: Do you know any gay couples with children?
KH: Not that I’m aware of.
Q: So you think gay couples are less qualified to function as parents than straight couples?
KH: I think that for a child to be in a household—in a family in a household with a situation where the parents are not married, as in one man and one woman, is not the best household for a child.
Q: Is it better or worse than a single parent household?
KH: Doug, I’m really trying to be straightforward with you but I’m not going to debate all the nuances. I’ve made it abundantly clear that I think that marriage is between a man and a woman. And that’s what I believe, and I don’t know what more you would like me to add to that.
Q: I guess I want to know why you think gay parents aren’t as legitimate as heterosexual parents.
KH: Because I don’t.
Why would any self-respecting lesbian who give a single effing cent to the Komen? If this woman had made similarly bigoted comments any other minority group, she would never been hired.
You know else does that? One of these babies:

Discount Gun Sales is proud to team up with the Susan B. Koman Foundation to offer the Walther P-22 Hope Edition in recognition of Breast Cancer Awareness Month. A portion of each P-22 Hope Edition will be donated to the Seattle Branch of the Susan G. Komen Foundation. The P-22 Hope Edition has an exclusive DuraCoat Pink slide in recognition of Breast Cancer Awareness month.
So... the rightwing douchehags who run Komen for the Cure are cutting off Planned Parenthood—and killing poor women—because they're so dang pro-life it hurts. (But it only hurts poor women, so who gives a shit, right?) But Komen is bringing out a pink breast-cancer-awareness-raising HANDGUN because nothing says LIFE like a product specifically designed to stop a beating heart. But it's a breast-cancer awareness gun so women can also use it to blow away any worrisome lumps they might find in their breasts. (Biopsies are for wimps!)
Terry and I made a $250,000 donation to Planned Parenthood yesterday—no, wait. That was Michael Bloomberg, New York's billionaire Republican mayor. We gave $500 to Planned Parenthood.
UPDATE: A detail from this morning's must-read NYT editorial:
In addition to harming women, the foundation has also tarnished, perhaps permanently, its brand, symbolized by the pink ribbon that adorns yogurt cups and running shoes and tote bags and Federal Premium Ammunition’s pink shotgun shells. Companies like Ford Motor, Dell and Yoplait may not find the same value in identifying themselves with the foundation after its sharp departure from political neutrality.
Pro-life shotgun shells?
Cienna Madrid, Jen Graves, Dominic Holden, and Goldy on the latest from the local chapter, plus some national context.
This video, "Straight Talk from Ambassador Nancy G. Brinker, Founder and CEO of Susan G. Komen," appeared on Komen for the Cure's Youtube channel yesterday, and it's worth a gander (as are the outraged Youtube comments, one of which I appropriated for the title of this post).
What strikes me most about Brinker's speech—other than the fact that she never mentions Planned Parenthood by name—was that she (and other Komen officials) keep repeating the talking point that these changes to introduce "more stringent eligibility and performance criteria... will affect any number of long-standing partners."
But I haven't been able to find evidence of any other long-standing Komen partners stepping forward and claiming that their grants are in jeopardy. And like many of my colleagues here at The Stranger, I've tried to contact Komen for the Cure Puget Sound repeatedly over the past few days to find out if any other local organizations are at risk of having their funding cut "phased out." But no one from our local Komen affiliate—not Communications Manager Jim Clune, Advocacy Director Elisa Del Rosario, Director of Development Gail Lapasin, or Executive Director Cheryl Shaw—have been answering their phones or email (not even the office's receptionist).
In fact, it appears that everyone from Komen for the Cure Puget Sound has been rendered either spineless or speechless.
UPDATE: mr. herriman points out that the new Komen policies also prohibit funding to be used on stem cell research. So, uh, there.
The letter about the "troubling decision" urges Komen to "put women’s health before partisan politics" and says it would be "tragic if any woman—let alone thousands of women — lost access to these potentially life-saving screenings because of a politically motivated attack." The signees include senators Murray and Cantwell, reliable lefties like Franken, and "relatively conservative senators like Begich and Tester," the Washington Post reports.
After its thundering silence, Susan G. Komen for the Cure® just released a statement. Komen says that even though its board just invented a new rule that singles out funding for Planned Parenthood—that is, a funding cut the board justified by citing an inquisition led by congressional Republicans—politics totally had nothing to do with it:
We are dismayed and extremely disappointed that actions we have taken to strengthen our granting process have been widely mischaracterized. It is necessary to set the record straight...
We regret that these new policies have impacted some longstanding grantees, such as Planned Parenthood, but want to be absolutely clear that our grant-making decisions are not about politics.
Read the whole implausible statement.
"Breast cancer has always been a part of my life," says Kate Harmer, a 30-year-old Seattle resident. "My mom was diagnosed when I was nine and passed away from breast cancer when I was 19. I grew up knowing that I could get breast cancer, that my sister could have it, doctors told us that because our mom had breast cancer that we were really at high risk.
"When I graduated high school, I lost my health insurance. All throughout college and graduate school, I was without insurance—yet I had this high risk of breast cancer—and the only place I could get free screenings was Planned Parenthood. For 10 years, I would go to Planned Parenthood for my annual physicals, checkups, and breast exams. They were my primary healthcare provider.
"Without Planned Parenthood, I don't know what I would've done. I'm only insured now because I married someone with health insurance.
"And now, I'm torn," Harmer says, referring to Komen's decision to defund Planned Parenthood breast cancer screenings. "My family tries to participate in Komen's Race for the Cure every year and I try to raise money beyond the standard entrance fee. Race for the Cure is an emotional event for me every year. It is a way I remember and honor my mother. I will still participate for that reason, but I may not try to raise additional funds beyond the entry fee. While I support them, I may try to find ways to funnel more of my money towards supporting Planned Parenthood instead.
The Komen foundation claims it had no choice but to defund Planned Parenthood due to an internal new rule against dispersing grants to any recipient under local, state, or congressional investigation. However, it doesn't matter if the investigation lacks a legit concern of malfeasance, it appears, or whether the investigation doesn't stand to find dirt or if the probe is purely political.
Because the investigation into Planned Parenthood by congressional Republicans fails all three tests.
So how about this: How about any city or county council member in the country, any state legislator in the US, or any congressperson begins a cursory investigation into every single recipient of a Komen grant.
Investigate them all.
Komen won't stop funding all of them, right? They'd have to change their rule instead. And if they want to continue to defund Planned Parenthood, which they do, at least Komen may be forced to explain the true politics behind their decision—instead of hiding behind this implausible excuse to cover up the right-wing agenda of tearing down progressive nonprofits.
Reality Check has an exhaustive article on Komen, its rabidly pink-ribbon waving, anti-choice staff and board members, and the dirty politics and hypocritical justifications behind the breast-cancer monolith's decision to defund Planned Parenthood's breast cancer screenings. It is an absolute must read:
While anti-choicers including those on Komen's board are spreading lies, Komen's steps will ensure that more women who might have been screened will now lack access to early detection and treatment and may die from breast cancer. This is in keeping with a general and patently insane approach of the anti-choice movement: Decry abortion, for example, but limit funding for contraceptive education and supplies which can prevent the unintended pregnancies that lead to abortion. Decry the plight of minority women, but make their access to care increasingly limited. Cry for the "babies," but defund pre- and post-natal care, nutritional support, and other forms of life and health care for infants and mothers. It is a venal and disgusting strategy that until now I would have thought well beneath the Komen Foundation no matter other issues.
But Komen as an organization now appears so little able to stand the truth that it is deleting comments from its website protesting the policy change. And this is not the first time Komen has come under fire for misinformation or questionable affiliations. Some point to concerns about Komen's influence on a recent Institute of Medicine report playing down environmental factors in breast cancer, and its close affiliation with many companies that manufacture products using cancer-causing agents.
Cancer screening and prevention comprises 17 percent of Planned Parenthood's services; abortion makes up less than three percent. A spokesperson for Planned Parenthood, speaking anonymously, says, "We requested meetings with the Komen board and they were not at all responsive... we know that some local Komen affiliates are unhappy with the decision, but this is obviously coming down from the national level, so their hands are tied."
In other news, Daily Kos is running a campaign to tell Komen what sorry sacks of shit they are; join in the fun over here!
And remember, if you love healthy breasts, grab a wadful of cash and DONATE TO PLANNED PARENTHOOD HERE.
Curtsies to Slog tipper Sara.
The nation's largest breast cancer charity, the pink-ribbon-festooned Susan G. Komen Foundation, has succumbed to right-wing pressure and defunded Planned Parenthood of hundreds of thousands of dollars in grants—$680,000 last year and $580,000 the year before—money that primarily paid for breast exams for poor women.
Over the past five years, Komen funds have enabled Planned Parenthood health centers to provide nearly 170,000 clinical breast exams and referrals for more than 6,400 mammograms. Now Komen says they've withdrawn their support because Planned Parenthood is under investigation by Congress (an investigation launched by right-wing, anti-choice groups) but the issue, as always, comes down to abortion.
“At the heart of this issue is the shameful ‘investigation’ of Planned Parenthood by House Republicans trying to score political points and appease their extreme right-wing base," said Senator Patty Murray in a statement. "Komen should not allow these sort of partisan games to put women across America at risk... this decision will cut women off from the health care providers they rely on for critical preventive care."
Senator Murray is half right, but it's not just about bowing to political pressure. It turns out, Komen is staffed by powerful anti-choice assholes. Here's what Komen's SVP public policy director, Karen Handel, had to say about Planned Parenthood in 2010, while (unsuccessfully) running for governor in Georgia:
"Let me be clear, since I am pro-life, I do not support the mission of Planned Parenthood. During my time as Chairman of Fulton County, there were federal and state pass-through grants that were awarded to Planned Parenthood for breast and cervical cancer screening, as well as a “Healthy Babies Initiative"... I'll eliminate them as your Governor."
Wow! What a socially responsible person hag.
It's clear that Handel and her Komen cohorts are no longer racing for a cure—they've stopped for a water break and to wage a holy war on Planned Parenthood, and they're willing to sacrifice the heath of thousands of women in the process. But hey, maybe next year they'll charitably donate a few thousand pink coffins to us poor ladies who relied on Planned Parenthood's free breast cancer screenings for early detection.
I think Komen should be reminded that their charity war chests come from thousands of women (and their families) who also donate to Planned Parenthood, support breast cancer research and women's right to comprehensive health care, and don't like being fucked with. Planned Parenthood is accepting donations to continue its breast cancer screenings HERE.
Meanwhile, Komen is hosting its annual, local fancy-assed Grace Notes Gala at the Fairmont Olympic Hotel on Saturday, March 3. Wouldn't it be fun if they had to race through a picket line to get to their $300-a-plate buffet?
*Thanks to all pro-lady Slog tippers everywhere for filling my inbox with frothy rage.
The desk of Alithea O'Dell:

Yesterday evening, at the twilight of "Hug a Uterus" lobby day in Olympia, the Senate Health and Long-Term Care Committee approved the Reproductive Parity Act (SB 6185), which would preserve the current trend that all health insurance policies sold in Washington that offer maternity coverage to also cover elective abortions.
Rep. Eileen Cody's (D-34) companion bill (HB 2330) was also approved by the House Health Care and Wellness Committee on January 26.
The bill still must pass out of either the House or the Senate by February 14 or else it's dead, but still: Light hurrahs all around.