
I'm with flat top here. Colby pretty much sucks as far as robots go. He doesn't even know what games are, and all he does is make up songs about scripture. Boooring! Flat top says: "Who ever heard of have a computer for a friend?" Agreed, especially if it's Colby.
Oh, Microsoft. Why do you make it so, so easy to make fun of you? Is it really that hard to hire marketing people who have a single original or interesting idea? You have a lot of money, don't you?
This video was posted to YouTube by Brad Slavin. Here's his description:
The Blackeyed Peas compel the employees at the Microsoft Store in Mission Viejo, California to break out in dance, let their hair down and have some fun. This is an amazing store, the employees seem really excited and engaged, almost happy to be at work. My favorite parts are when people walking in the mall come inside the store, join in the dancing and have some fun. The amazing thing is that people are in the store for hours, they love interacting with the software and learning about new technology.
His website is titled "Subtle Persuasions" and subtitled "Marketing, Persuasion, Technology, Life — Finding Balance." (Let that settle in for a minute.) He has an unusual number of posts about Microsoft stores and how totally, totally, totally awesome they are. Why, he almost seems like a real person! Not at all like a shill, right? He's just honestly amazed at how much the employees and customers love this store!
Really, I'm not anti-Microsoft, I'm just anti-crap, and this is complete crap. Somebody help them.

The first bulletin board system (BBS) was developed during a blizzard in Chicago in 1978.
There is nothing else there. Why a blizzard? Did the blizzard help with the creation of the online bulletin board somehow? Yesterday I didn't know anything about this, and today I find it fascinating.
Has anyone written an Harold Robbinsesque Carpetbaggers-style epic trashy novel of the invention of the internet? Because I would be all over that book. It's got it all: the U.S. military, fabulous wealth, the sudden loss of fabulous wealth, and D&D nerds. Throw a little sex in there and you've just written a bestseller.
That's a smart thing to spend money on in the middle of one of the biggest budget shortfalls in the city's history. What a bunch of fucking idiots.
Really? Way to support local business. Microsoft is LOCAL. Why would you want (as a function of city government) to stop contributing to the largest company in the NW. I have never understood Seattle's obsession with Apple. I think it really speaks poorly of Seattle residents that they would not champion their own local company. Where is the pride?
Knowing the old and outdated, bizarro, hacked-together proprietary software that municipal governments often have to work with, I'd be shocked if any or most of those programs worked on Macs.
Ever since the Motorola Droid was announced, I've heard stories of people ready to dump their iPhones and get a Droid—not necessarily because they want to give up their iPhones, but because they hate AT&T.
It turns out that while AT&T might have spotty coverage, Verizon is actively fleecing the hell out of people.* David Pogue explains...
Starting next week, Verizon will double the early-termination fee for smartphones. That is, if you get a BlackBerry, Android or similar phone from Verizon, and you decide to switch phones before your two-year contract is up, you'll be socked with a $350 penalty (it used to be $175).
That's pretty bad, but this is much worse: Verizon has designed many of their phones to have easy-to-hit-by-accident buttons that connect you to the Internet using their "Get It Now" or other stupid services, and they charge you $1.99 for pushing that button, even if you cancel the action immediately.
Better yet, if you call to have them block your account from accessing online data, those buttons return a message from the Internet saying you can't receive data, and they charge you $1.99 for that error message too.
Whatever carrier you're on, check your bills. These guys are merciless.
*I'm not saying AT&T is NOT actively fleecing the hell out of people—they very well might be—but I haven't found examples as egregious as these from Verizon.** And AT&T quickly got on board with Pogue's "Take Back the Beep" campaign, so they at least understand the value of good customer relations a little. Verizon was the ONLY carrier that didn't respond to that campaign.
**AT&T did charge me $39.95 once to apply a 10% discount to my account. Charging me for a discount was pretty ballsy, I thought.
The Facebook status update that became an iron-clad alibi in a criminal investigation.
Google is working with 47 airports across the country to provide free airport Wi-Fi now through January 15, 2010.
Google Inc. (NASDAQ: GOOG) today announced that it is working with airports across the country as well as Boingo Wireless, Advanced Wireless Group, Airport Marketing Income and others to provide free Wi-Fi as a holiday gift now through January 15, 2010. The gift currently includes 47 airports, including Las Vegas, San Jose, Boston, Baltimore, Burbank, Houston, Indianapolis, Seattle, Miami, Ft. Lauderdale, Orlando, St. Louis and Charlotte. Additionally, as a result of this project, Burbank and Seattle airports will begin offering airport-wide free Wi-Fi indefinitely.
Well, gee, that's sure nice of them. Note to other multi-billion-dollar multinational corporations: If you're going to have an evil empire, at least be nice about it.
via daring fireball
More and more, people use several Google products every day to do all kinds of routine things - email, chat, shopping, documents, kitten videos, RSS, Waving, on and on. It's easy to forget how much information you're handing off.
Well, Google is now providing a new service that lets you see what's happening on all of their other services. It's called Google Dashboard, and it summarizes all the stuff you're storing on Google's servers and gives you access to various settings.
It can be a little unnerving to see all this info laid out on one page, but the intention is good—Google is making it easy to find what they're storing about you, and easy to change your settings if it gets too creepy.
Participation is mandatory.
T-Mobile is having a global network outage in honor of Joe Mallahan's impending doom*. If you have T-Mobile, you should be able to dial out, but if anyone tries to call you, they will get the fast busy tone that is the soundtrack of driving efficiencies. T-Mobile's Department of Customer Delight is unable to give an estimated fix time at this juncture.
*Yes, I know, knock frantically on wood! But I'm calling it for McGinn. See you at the War Room!

As far as I can tell, the only important thing about this announcement (and the Kindle and the nook and and Peek's other, e-mail only devices, too) is the fact that you can get lifetime cell service to a device and the device itself for two or three hundred bucks. We need more of that kind of cheap connectivity, not more of these weird, single-use-only devices.
Spring Design, the creators of the upcoming Alex Reader, are suing Barnes & Noble. Spring Design claims that they showed the Alex to Barnes & Noble under a nondisclosure agreement, and that Barnes & Noble copied significant characteristics of the Alex reader for their new e-book, the Nook. Here's a description of the Alex Reader:
Alex is the first Google Android-based e-book device to provide full Internet browsing over Wi-Fi or mobile networks such as 3G, EVDO/CDMA and GSM. With its dual-screen, multi-access capability, it provides the entire Web universe as a handy reference library, prompting users to delve into its vast information base to complement, clarify or enhance what they are reading. Alex is the first truly mobile wireless e-book device that gives users their own personalized library on the go, whenever and wherever they need it.
The Nook is also Android-based and it has a dual-screen with e-ink above and a touchscreen below. However, the Nook doesn't have full internet access. Whether Barnes & Noble is found to be guilty of copying the Alex design or not, if you're thinking about buying the Nook, I suggest you check out Alex instead.
A few stray photos on a computer trip up the Scranton branch of the Catholic church...
A northeastern Pennsylvania priest has been removed from his duties after church officials say he accidentally displayed inappropriate pictures from his computer before Sunday Mass. The Diocese of Scranton said the Rev. Edward Lyman was using his computer on Oct. 25 to project an informational DVD about the annual diocesan fundraiser when four photos were displayed. They featured what church officials describe as "minimally attired adult males."
Minimally attired adult males—those are my favorite kind! But the minimally attired male, seen above (click on image for a larger version), is not—so far as I know—one of adult males whose picture was displayed before mass at St. Anthony's in Scranton. His picture was taken at a gay nightclub in Rome, though, so it felt like an appropriate illustration. More shots from the Gorgeous Party at Rome's Alpheus at Homo-Neurotic.
According to the Lone Wolf Librarian, e-reading and book-related apps surpassed gaming apps on the iPhone in September. I still believe that the iPhone is the most popular e-reader in the world, despite the efforts of Kindles and Nooks.
Marvel Comics just announced that they're starting to sell comics over the iPhone for as low as 99¢ each. Frustratingly, they're only issuing back issues of comics. I don't understand why they wouldn't make their comics available in multiple formats on the day of publication. I suppose they're worried about cannibalizing their own business, but the iPhone is a much larger market than just people who go into comic book stores—in theory, they could expand their readership by exponential levels, and it would cut down on digital comic piracy (which is a much larger problem than prose book piracy at the moment). It's easier to pay a buck than go through the hassle of torrenting a comic.
In other comics news, Salman Rushdie is thinking about writing a comic book.
"Seattle-based technologist, writer, and media activist" Jeff Reifman has an interesting post up about how Microsoft claims all of its licensing revenue in Nevada, thus avoiding paying nearly $1 billion in Washington taxes, according to Reifman's calculations.
For tax purposes, Microsoft reports that it’s earned its estimated $143 billion in software licensing revenue in Nevada, where there is no licensing tax. However, for legal purposes, Microsoft executes its licensing contracts so they are governed by and rely on the protections of Washington law and its courts (some regional contracts are governed by the laws in Ireland or China).When necessary, as in the case Microsoft Licensing GP v. TSR Silicon Resources, which lasted two years, Microsoft uses the resources of Washington courts to enforce its licensing contracts. It does this while simultaneously dodging the taxes it would normally pay for engaging in the software licensing business in Washington - the same taxes that fund the courts.
Reifman's analysis continues, hitting on things like The doctrine of Nexus, The Step Doctrine, and Alter Ego Theory, which are all a bit over my head and frankly sound like Scientology terms.
Any Slog legal eagles out there care to comment? Is this legit? Because from what I understand, Washington could really use a billion dollars right about now.
I love headlines that would make absolutely no sense to anyone fifteen years ago.
Anyway: AFP says that Bing has signed a deal with Twitter and Facebook to include information from both of those services in their search results, in real time. The deal is non-exclusive, so Google could play catch-up whenever it wants, but the point is that Google would be playing catchup to Bing, which is maybe the first time that's ever happened.
Google's Eric Schmidt has famously underestimated Twitter for quite a while now. As I said in my piece on Twitter a while back, the thing that Twitter now provides that Google doesn't is a laser-sharp focus into what people are thinking about right now. Even Google is starting to look painfully slow in comparison.
According to the New York Times, Barnes and Noble is introducing their e-reader today. It is called the "Nook" E-Reader, which, when you say it aloud fast, actually makes "Kindle" sound like the best name in the universe.
Engadget has a little more news about it: It does have an e-ink screen above and an iPhone-like touch-screen below. It also will allegedly cost $259. It will allow you to "lend books to friends," which the Kindle decidedly does not allow you to do. But it remains to be seen whether this is a Zune-like social feature that is heavy with weird stipulations.
By the end of this year, according to the Times article, it's estimated that the number of people who own e-books will double. I know that independent booksellers are getting very close to including e-book sales, too. I've heard that a couple independent bookstores in town will start selling e-book readers for that purpose pretty soon.
What happens when a Chinese news agency invents a story about a secret city of 25,000 lesbians in northern Sweden? Two things.
1. Millions and millions of Chinese men swamp Sweden's ISPs, slowing the whole country's Internet service to a crawl.
2. Someone buys the domain chakopaul.com (Chako Paul was the made-up name of the made-up girl-on-girl metropolis), puts a crappy site up, and sells t-shirts for $30.
The original Chinese article, as dug up by Shanghaiist.
In Sweden, there is a place that is respectful of women’s love, but with a rule that men cannot enter. This is Chako Paul City. The town holds around 25,000 women, all from around Europe. If men transgress into the forbidden city, they will be beaten half to death. The citizens of Chako Paul are mostly engaged in the forest industry, because of such many of the women wear thick belts full of woodworking equipment. Some go into nearby cities to work and return to Chako Paul by night. Chako Paul’s tourism industry is increasingly prosperous, with hotels and restaurants everywhere that cater specifically to women around the world.
Thanks to Slog tipper Sarah
Reports are flying around the Internet this morning that transcriptions and audio of some people's Google Voice messages are turning up in public search results.
Try this search query, for example.

The thing is, there are only 35 results. If Google were actually indexing GV voicemails, there would be zillions of them, right?
So what's the real story?
Well, it's still not 100% clear, and I'm sure a more emphatic statement from Google will be coming very soon, but on the Google Voice support board, a Google employee explains (poorly) that these are voicemails that people have posted to the web voluntarily, and so Google indexed them, as is their habit. He also says they've changed the system so these will not be indexed in the future without explicit permission from the embedding site's owner.
Since the initial idea behind posting a voicemail, was precisely to share it with others, we did not restrict crawling of those messages that users post on the web, but we can certainly understand that users would want to make them public on their sites but not necessarily searchable directly outside of their own website. We made a change to prevent those to be crawled so only the site owner can decide to index them.
Stand down. Nothing to see here.
While we're having stone-age debates over whether our citizens should be allowed to die of treatable diseases because they're poor or unlucky, Finland has gone ahead and made high-speed Internet access a legal right.
The LA Times reports that all Finns will have a legal right to 1-megabit web access come next July. The promise to raise this (pretty slow) requirement to 100-megabits (really fast) by the end of 2015.
Look for the U.S. to follow suit... never.

The day before yesterday I announced my plan to show my gratitude to Microsoft—which recently donated $100,000 to the campaign to approve Referendum 71—by switching to Microsoft's splashy new search engine Bing for ten days.
The ten-day stipulation is kind of arbitrary—if Bing's a significant improvement on my old standby Google, I most likely won't notice when the ten days are up. So far my Bing adventures have been sleek and lovely. I especially appreciate the e-z "preview" action of its image search. The only thing I miss about Google is the name. "Googling" is an easy-to-understand activity. "Binging" reads like something you do before "Purging."
Yesterday, Slog tipper Ben alerted me to this TechFlash.com item, which essentially just recounts the basics of my Slog post, but has since brought some interesting feedback from TechFlash.com commenters:
I will now be changing from Bing to Yahoo. Microsoft is crazy to get involved in social issues. They can do whatever they want within their company, but they should stay out of this stuff.
If they want to play in the political arena..then so be it. I will not use Bing, and will start to move away from Microsoft products. My stance is sell your product not your agenda. Companies need to stay away from politics because you can't please everyone!
Why they are focusing on pushing a controvertial social agenda rather than making better products is beyond me, but polls continue to show that the vast majority of americans are in favor of traditional marriage, so Microsoft is in the minority here.
These types of comments show exactly why what Microsoft did is so important. Referendum 71 isn't just some random political cause: Microsoft is based in Washington State, and if opponents of Ref. 71 succeed in stripping the state's same-sex couples of near-equal rights, a whole bunch of Microsoft's workforce will be among those hurt. So suck it, TechFlash haters.
A new study has found that 36 percent of people under 35 admit to checking Facebook, texting, or Tweeting right after sex.The survey found that guys are twice as likely as women to use social media after sex, and that iPhone users are three times more likely to check Twitter or Facebook after "doing the deed" than Blackberry users.
I think I just became three times more likely to sleep with a Blackberry user.

It's a single purpose device with a monochrome screen and a simplistic touch interface and on the inside is an 8GB microSD card loaded up with three million of Wikipedia's finest hypertexts. The device can be searched or just browsed through clicking through interlinked articles
Apparently, you can subscribe to a service that will deliver a new, updated SD card in the mail every so often. This seems so weirdly low-tech for a new gadget, although it does kind of pleasantly remind me of the Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy.
GOOD Magazine reports that, just after the last Polaroid film on Earth has passed its expiration date, Polaroid cameras will be returning.
Production is expected to begin by the end of this year at a photographic paper factory in Enschede, Holland, as part of a plan to bring back analog photography in the digital age. “This is the beginning of our instant analog directive that will span a family of products and return Polaroid to a relevant industry participant,” Giovanni Tomaselli, managing director of Salt Lake City-based Summit Global Group, which has the worldwide license to design, produce and distribute Polaroid cameras, digital frames, film and Pogo printers, which allow you to print Polaroid format photos directly from any digital camera. He expects to achieve retail sales of $1 billion for Polaroid next year which will see the re-launch of several digital cameras as well.
I knew Polaroid wouldn't be gone for long. Nostalgia's pull is way too strong.