Slog

News & Arts

The Stranger Suggests

Critics' Best Bets
Music Arts & Food


Line Out

Music & the City
at Night

Parenting Issues

Wednesday, February 8, 2012

The Eagle Dad

Posted by on Wed, Feb 8, 2012 at 2:44 PM

China Daily:

BEIJING / NANJING - A man calling himself "eagle dad" recently stirred up a public controversy after he uploaded a video of his 4-year-old son, whom he had forced to run naked in the snow, to the Internet.
The father He Liesheng, 44, considers himself a new Chinese parental archetype in the tradition of the so-called "tiger mom".
"When the old eagle teaches its young, it takes the young eagles to the cliff side, beats them and pushes them to teach them to use their wings, and I believe I am helping my son in this way - to force him to challenge limitations and exceed his own expectations," said He.
There is also a "wolf father" in Hong Kong. The "wolf father" supports the "eagle dad" in Nanjing. Next? A "grasshopper grandmother"? What kind of grandmother would that be?

Tuesday, January 17, 2012

Why Overpraising Children Is Bad

Posted by on Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 8:26 AM

WaPo:

Overpraising children is under attack, which is interesting because almost exactly a year ago, one mother’s philosophy of withholding praise was receiving the same treatment.

Yesterday, The Post’s Michael Alison Chandler wrote about a trend in which teachers refrain from showering kids with “Good try!” at every turn.
Studies show that easy, unearned praise interferes with students’ learning.

“A growing body of research over three decades shows that easy, unearned praise does not help students but instead interferes with significant learning opportunities. As schools ratchet up academic standards for all students, new buzzwords are ‘persistence,’ ‘risk-taking’ and ‘resilience’ — each implying more sweat and strain than fuzzy, warm feelings,” Chandler writes.

Wrong! This has nothing to do with "unearned praise" and teaching them a more meaningful reward system (market thinking is always contaminating American thinking). We do not want to overpraise children because they are uninteresting, and excessive praise may lead them to think they are what they are certainly not: interesting. Children don't know anything interesting and so they bore us to tears when they're much too talkative. It's fine for them to talk among themselves, but when in the presence of adults, they must know they are not in our league, that what comes out of their mouth is to us as tasteless as a carrot.

There is, in short, no such thing as "earned praise" when it comes to a child. A child is a dry loss, which is why it's better to see the family as a form of communism. At the end of childhood, a person must rate his/her family not by how much praise or rewards they received but by the quality of the communism.

Advertisement

Friday, January 13, 2012

Monster Trucks Celebrate at the Tacoma Dome This Weekend

Posted by on Fri, Jan 13, 2012 at 1:33 PM

From the 2012 press release:

Monster Jam is heading back to the Tacoma Dome from January 13 – 15. The engagement in 2012 will mark a special celebration as the 30th Anniversary of the monster truck icon Grave Digger® ! That celebration kicks off in Tacoma as the first stop of the West Coast tour!

I don't even have kids, but wouldn't it seem a little spooky to take your little ones to the Monster Jam at the Tacoma Dome? I mean, this just happened a couple of years ago. I guess money talks and [terrified] parents walk?

On American Teenage Pregnancy

Posted by on Fri, Jan 13, 2012 at 10:27 AM

Let's return to Sarah Hrdy's marvelous paper "The Past, Present, and Future
of the Human Family," and examine two passages. One:

Looked at comparatively, rates of teenage pregnancy (which happen to be higher in the United States than in any other developed nation) have less to do with moral decline than with changes in the nutritional status of human beings over the last tens of thousands and hundreds of years. Teenage pregnancy, then, is very much a human-made problem, a human-solvable public health issue, not a moral one.

What is this brilliant sociobiologist getting at?

As in all apes, human ovaries evolved to factor how much fat a woman’s body had stored. For a still partially dependent girl living among nomadic hunter-gatherers, this indicator of nutritional status would have been synonymous with how much social support she had. Among nomadic foragers, where youngsters depend on shared nutritional subsidies from other group members, a young girl’s fat reserves provided a fairly good indicator of how much social support she could expect from parents, grandparents, boyfriends, her mate perhaps, as well as other group members.

By and large, the plumper a girl is, the sooner she matures. Girls growing up in nomadic foraging society on the African savanna remained active, intermittently fed, and very lean, menstruating for the first time closer to sixteen than twelve, the average age of girls today in sedentary, hypernourished Western societies.


We should never forget, and Americans are always taught to forget, that we are highly social animals. And, most important of all, our sociality is not just cultural but profoundly biological. From the sclera, the white part of our eye, to the strange fact that our facial and head hair grow indefinitely (more about this in another post), our bodies reveal adaptations, selections for social life, life with others, group living. The body is not isolated; it is tuned to our social worlds. For the body, fat is a sign of social support, a sign that others are there for you. Agreed, in certain societies (rich post-industrial societies), this reading is a little screwy (adaptive lag can be a bitch), but it still reveals the core of our "species being" (I do not uses this term in the same way as Karl Marx—more about this in another post).


I will now leave you with another passage (this time by the primatologist Richard Wrangham—I highly recommend his book Catching Fire: How Cooking Made Us Human) that I think connects well with Hrdy's insights:

I was impressed to learn that raw-foodists are thin compared to those eating cooked diets, given that in most cases they are eating domesticated foods with lots of nutrients, are processing them in machines like electric blenders, and of course, living as most do in the developed world, never suffering through seasonal food shortage. Yet despite all these advantages over anyone who might try eating wild foods raw, the average woman on a 100% raw diet did not have a functioning menstrual cycle. About 50% of women entirely stopped menstruating! When a raw-foodist’s reproductive system does not allow her to have a baby even when her diet is composed of processed, high-quality, agricultural foods, the obvious explanation is that she is not getting enough calories.

Monday, January 9, 2012

Fisking Rick Santorum's Remarks on Gay Rights at the New Hampshire GOP Debate on Saturday Night

Posted by on Mon, Jan 9, 2012 at 11:12 AM

Santorum was asked if he would be speak out for gay rights in the GOP. After the audience finished laughing, Santorum responded...

SANTORUM: I would be a voice in speaking out for making sure that every person in America, gay or straight, is treated with respect and dignity and has equality of opportunity. That does not mean that I would agree with certain things that the gay community would like to do to change laws, with respect to marriage or respect to adoption, and things like that.

Nothing says "respect and dignity" like comparing people in loving, consensual, same-sex relationships to dog fuckers and child rapists. If that's how Rick Santorum defines "respect," I'd rather be dissed, thanks. And contrary to efforts to tolerance-wash Santorum's position on gay rights and wish away his infamous 2003 interview with the AP, Rick Santorum hasn't changed his position on gay rights or the dignity of gay people in the eight years since that interview. Santorum has not gone soft (not even runny) on gay rights, says TPM: "Santorum’s famous 2003 'man on dog' comment, which still follows him to this day every time someone Googles his name, wasn’t made while just discussing gay marriage. He was also arguing that people of the same sex shouldn’t have the right to be physically intimate in their own homes....There’s nothing to suggest Santorum has changed his tune there. In fact, he’s still using anti-sodomy laws as a wedge issue, this time against his fellow Republican candidates instead of Democrats."

Rick Santorum respectfully suggests that states should be allowed to arrest, prosecute, and imprison gays, lesbians, and bisexuals. Just in a dignified way. And if Rick Santorum had his way everyone, regardless of sexual orientation, would enjoy an equal opportunity to be arrested, prosecuted, and imprisoned for engaging in homosexual acts. The completely heterosexual Ted Haggard would go to jail just the same as the completely homosexual Neil Patrick Harris. Equality under the law! God bless America!

As for who wants to change laws: Rick Santorum supports efforts to change the marriage laws as they currently exist in New Hampshire, where same-sex marriage is legal, and he wants to change marriage laws in Massachusetts, New York, Connecticut, Vermont, Iowa, and the District of Columbia. Santorum also wants to change adoption laws: it is currently legal in almost all US states for gays and lesbians to adopt children. Adoption laws vary from state to state, and there are unique legal hurdles in many that gay couples have to jump through, but adoptions by gay and lesbian individuals and couples is only illegal in four US states. Rick Santorum wants to change that—even if it means harming children. From a must-read post by Joel Mathis at the Philly Post:

Talk to adoption experts about gay parents, and you’ll hear a frequent refrain: While many—even most—prospective parents are looking for “healthy white babies” to adopt, it is gay couples who most often take the children no one else wants: Children with disabilities. Older children. Children with problems. “Overall,” one 2001 study found, “gay men and lesbians are more willing to consider and accept children with a broader range of difficulties.” More recent numbers affirm that observation. A 2007 study by the Urban Institute drew on Census numbers to suggest that 21 percent of children adopted by gay men have a physical disability—compared to 2 percent of children adopted by the population at large. That’s an astonishing gap. And an October report by the Evan B. Donaldson Adoption Institute showed that more than 10 percent of children adopted by gays and lesbians are 6 years or older—”a population,” researchers noted, “generally perceived as more difficult to place.” Half the adoptees had spent time in foster care.

In other words: Gay and lesbian parents are doing damned hard work, providing loving homes to kids that few other people seem to want. They’re doing those kids—and society—a tremendous service. But you don’t hear even the tiniest acknowledgement of that from Rick Santorum.

Changing the law to ban adoptions by same-sex couples—despite a mountain of evidence proving that we are just as fit to parent as heterosexuals—would result in more kids languishing forever in the cruel limbo of foster care. Santorum's election would, writes Mathis, "[harm] tens of thousands of children hoping for a home of their own. But it would be quite a boon for orphanages."

SANTORUM: So you can be respectful. This is the beautiful thing about this country. James Madison called the First Amendment—he called it the perfect remedy. And that is, people of all different backgrounds—diversity, opinions, faith—can come into the public square and can be heard and can be heard in a way that’s respectful of everybody else.

R E S P E C T: You gay people are like dog fuckers and child rapists—but, hey, I say that with the utmost respect! It's not like I have anything against people who fuck dogs and rape kids!

SANTORUM:But just because you don’t agree with someone’s desire to change the law doesn’t mean you don’t like them or you hate them or you want to discriminate against them, but you’re trying to promote —excuse me, promote things that you think are best for society.

Again, Rick Santorum, is the one who wants to change laws.

Continue reading »

Advertisement

Saturday, December 31, 2011

Thursday, December 29, 2011

The Thin Line

Posted by on Thu, Dec 29, 2011 at 8:27 AM

From Sarah Hrdy's paper "The Past, Present, and Future of the Human Family":

When male mice encounter a strange pup, they either ignore it or eat it. When suffiently “primed,” however (that is, presented with pup after pup until the males become sensitive to pup signals), males finally quit cannibalizing and caretake: licking pups, gathering them in nests, hovering over them to warm them with their bodies. Primed males do just about everything mothers do, short of lactating. The hormonal basis of such maternal-seeming behavior in males—including humans—is only beginning to be studied.

We all know about the thin line between love and hate, but who knew the line between parental love and cannibalism was even thinner?

Monday, December 26, 2011

And This Is Why the "Every Child Deserves a Mother and a Father" Posts Will Continue

Posted by on Mon, Dec 26, 2011 at 12:45 PM

"Minnesota for Marriage is now posting Google ads asking if marriage should be between one man and one woman," writes Slog tipper Emily. "But when you click the poll link it brings you to this survey."

urgentbigots.jpg

The folks behind Minnesota for [Some Marriages, Not for Others] don't seem to think much of fathers:

By encouraging men and women to marry, society helps ensure that children will be known by and cared for by their biological parents. Whenever a child is born, her mother will almost always be nearby. But the same cannot always be said of her father. Men, especially, are encouraged to take responsibility for their children through the institution of marriage.

Straight women, who are usually nearby during birth, don't need to be encouraged to take responsibility for their children. Straight men, on the other hand, are assholes and cads who could give a shit about their children—but, hey, toss in a bachelor party, a wedding registry, and some cake and straight men are much likelier to stick around for the decade or two it takes to raise those kids. (And you thought they just hated gay people.)

Remember: marriage is about children... which is why marriage licenses are denied to the elderly, infertile, and childless-by-choice.

Advertisement

Wednesday, December 21, 2011

Breasts in the Mall

Posted by on Wed, Dec 21, 2011 at 8:45 AM

WaPo:

Michelle Hickman told the breast-feeding advocacy group Best for Babes that she had been Christmas shopping when her baby woke hungry. She found a remote area and tried to discreetly breast-feed, but several employees tried to discourage her, and when that didn’t work, embarrass her so that she’d stop.

Now the Facebook page where the nurse-in is being organized has more than 3,000 members. Hundreds of them signed up this week as media picked up the story.

Antoine LaFromboise, a Target spokesman, told me that Target had apologized to Hickman and was aware of the planned nurse-ins.

LaFromboise said that store employees will “feel proud to support” the women who join the protest. “Guests who choose to breast-feed in public places in our stores should feel welcome to do so.”

What's terribly upsetting is that this is still an issue.

Monday, December 5, 2011

I Have Failed Miserably

Posted by on Mon, Dec 5, 2011 at 9:05 AM

The culture has beaten me. My son will not listen to me. It seems he wants to learn how to drive a car. How many times have I told him that a true gentleman maintains a strict wall of ignorance between himself and that machine. A true gentleman uses public transportation. A true gentlemen walks to the store or park. Driving is so... middle class.

1312128805-1.jpeg

Tuesday, November 29, 2011

Overheard in the Office

Posted by on Tue, Nov 29, 2011 at 2:40 PM

David Schmader: Here's that film. [Hands DVD screener to Charles Mudede]

Charles: Oh, what's it about?

Schmader: It's about a girl who becomes submissive when she's asleep. Then she becomes a prostitute.

Charles: Oh, that sounds wonderful!

Advertisement

Tuesday, November 15, 2011

Monday, November 14, 2011

The Cross Lightsaber

Posted by on Mon, Nov 14, 2011 at 8:21 AM

My daughter refused to accept this gift.

Picture_2.png

I think it would look great on her. It's the best white Jesus I have ever seen. Maybe she thinks it's sacrilegious. If so, then there is still a vunkelin, a scintilla of Christianity in her. Must figure out how to gently place the ice of reality on it.

Beating the Hell Out of Black Children

Posted by on Mon, Nov 14, 2011 at 7:40 AM

CNN:

In a study Gershoff co-authored that examined 20,000 kindergartners and their parents, she found that 89% of black parents, 79% of white parents, 80% of Hispanic parents and 73% of Asian parents said they have spanked their children.

But why do so many black parents approve of disciplining their children that way? The answer is complicated, experts said.

Some researchers have suggested it's a legacy left by the brutality of slavery. Some say it's rooted in fear - that if parents don’t use force to demand obedience, someone else will. Others said African-American parents, in aggregate, are disproportionately lower-income, have less education and are more likely to follow a religion that implores them not to spare the rod for fear of spoiling the child - all factors that correlate with use of corporal punishment, regardless of race.

Still, 79% of white parents! That's fucking high. Black Americans are hardly exceptional. This is the 21st century. How is this barbarism able to persist? Hitting a child in our day and age. There is no such cutesy thing as spanking, there is only hitting. Hitting another human being.

Overheard on Twitter

Posted by on Mon, Nov 14, 2011 at 7:12 AM

Charles Mudede, The Stranger's parenting-issues editor: "Very pleased that my son is doing very well in math and biology and sucking in the arts. This is a relief."

Wednesday, November 9, 2011

Santorum: As Wise as He Is Frothy

Posted by on Wed, Nov 9, 2011 at 2:54 PM

Hey, you know that guy who's accused of sexually abusing kids while employed as a coach at Penn State? Rick Santorum gave him a “Congressional Angels in Adoption” award!

Take it away, Thomas Fitzgerald at the Philadelphia Inquirer:

Then Pennsylvania Sen. Rick Santorum thought enough of Jerry Sandusky nine years ago to sponsor the former Penn State defense coordinator for a “Congressional Angels in Adoption” award, citing his work with a non-profit group he founded to provide care for foster children.

“Its philosophy is simple: it is easier to develop a child than to rehabilitate an adult,” read the citation from Santorum in the awards dinner program from Sept. 24, 2002.

Sandusky, of course, has been charged with sexual abuse of young boys and Penn State University is under fire for its handling of reports of the coach’s suspicious behavior. The burgeoning scandal reportedly is about to force legendary head coach Joe Paterno to retire.

Santorum, a 1980 PSU graduate, is one of the school’s most distinguished alumni – a candidate for the Republican presidential nomination who represented Pennsylvania in the U.S. Senate from 1995 to 2007. A social conservative and champion of adoption, Santorum is staking his candidacy on an appeal to family values.

Monday, October 31, 2011

The Fear of Halloween Candy

Posted by on Mon, Oct 31, 2011 at 8:33 AM

VS:

CHESAPEAKE, Va — Creating a colourful pile of wrappers, the medical centre technician upends a basket of Skittles, Hershey bars, Twizzlers and other candy onto the bed of an x-ray machine.

Suzanne Mailler is demonstrating a procedure that will be repeated scores of times on Monday evening at the Chesapeake, Virginia medical clinic Patient First.

Across America, paranoid or justifiably cautious parents will bring in their children's trick-or-treat goodies for screening. Their fear is that the candy given to their children by strangers will be laced with glass, metal or other foreign objects.

This person who poisons candy does not exist. Do not scan your children's candy. Do not disrupt this excellent circuit of sociality. We are humans. Our mode is to trust strangers. Without this mode, we would not be seven billion beings.

Patient First, an organization that's been x-raying candy for the past decade in "37 centers in Virginia, Maryland and Pennsylvania," has yet to find this person who puts needles or bits of glass into candy. The reality? This is the reality:

"Children taking their candy to hospital on Halloween night risk involvement in traffic accidents," along with the additional drawbacks of overcrowding radiology departments and emergency rooms with excited children, the study concluded.

Monday, October 24, 2011

Bonobo Parenting

Posted by on Mon, Oct 24, 2011 at 4:20 PM

From Frans de Waal's Our Inner Ape: A Leading Primatologist Explains Why We Are Who We Are:

They [bonobos] simply have no shame, no modesty, no inhibitions other than the wish to avoid trouble with rivals. When two bonobos couple, the young sometimes jump on top of them to take a peek at the details. Or another adult may move in and press her swelling against one of them to take part in the fun. Sexuality is more often shared than contested. A female may lie on her back masturbating in the open, and no one will blink an eye. She moves her fingers rapidly up and down through her vulva, but can also assign a foot to the job, keeping her hands free to groom her infant.
The bonobo is also the quadrumanual ape.

Tuesday, October 11, 2011

Today in Kids Who Will Eventually Grow to Hate Their Mothers

Posted by on Tue, Oct 11, 2011 at 3:21 PM

Kotak is a pregnant performance artist in New York who's performing an exhibit called “The Birth of Baby X,” in which she plans to give birth to her child at the Microscope Gallery in Brooklyn. Roughly five weeks away from the due date, Kotak is spending her days in the gallery where curious art aficionados are told (or, rather, warned) that she could go into labor any minute.

Whoa! Did anyone check with with the potentially retroactively unwilling participant!? "Real life is the best performance art,” Kotak told the New York Daily News Previous projects include "attending her grandfather's funeral and losing her virginity in a blue Plymouth,” according to the gallery. What will the next projects consist of? "Curing a yeast infection," or maybe "taking my son to the psychiatrist." Somebody call Kickstarter!

UPDATE: Jen and I unknowingly posted about the same thing at the same time. Thanks for reading.


Via, h/t: Kathy Fennessy!

Wednesday, September 28, 2011

My Son Commented on My Parenting Piece

Posted by on Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 1:51 PM

wow dad, i didnt realize that you hated my drawing so much.
Posted by Eben Mudede on September 25, 2011 at 7:30 PM · Report


Once again, a child disappoints their parent. He knows he is banned from reading my work. My work is for the public, not the family. He broke this ban for no good reason. What is a father to do?

Tuesday, September 20, 2011

Leashing Your Child

Posted by on Tue, Sep 20, 2011 at 8:28 AM

At least it is not on the neck.

Picture_8.png
We can all agree that some children do need to be leashed.

Thursday, September 15, 2011

Babies Are the New Boxcutters

Posted by on Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 4:31 PM

A hot tip from Slog reader Cedar, who went through airport security yesterday, but declined to go through the backscatter body scanner with his wife and 17-month-old son.

[The screener] asked if we were opting out, and I said yes. He called out "we have an opt-out!". His companion, on an adjacent baggage scanner told him "they aren't opt-outs, let them through, I'll tell you why". Then he told him that parents traveling with small children could elect not to go through the machine, and it wouldn't be a formal "opt-out", they could just go through the regular metal detector. Their supervisor overheard the explanation and made a "be quiet" gesture, and said to "keep it down!". So apparently, there is a new, secret policy that lets families avoid the scanner, without a pat-down.

Yeah, you never know when the terrorists are going to bring down an airplane with an exploding baby, so shhhh... don't tell anybody.

Also, let me understand this, the backscatter radiation scanners are perfectly safe—nothing to worry about at all, the TSA assures us—yet they've made an exemption for babies. Doesn't exactly inspire confidence. But then, nothing about TSA's security theater ever has.

Wednesday, September 14, 2011

Chinese Man Donates His Skin to Burned Daughter

Posted by on Wed, Sep 14, 2011 at 4:05 PM

China Today:

BEIJING - A farmer whose child was severely burned in a fire had surgery to donate his skin without general anesthesia, as he could not afford the medical fees.
Du Jinhui, 31, volunteered to endure the pain after learning his 5-year-old daughter had suffered burns to 60 percent of her body in a blaze on Aug 16.
"He broke out in a sweat and screamed when I removed the skin," said Shi Longjie, the doctor who operated on Du at Hebei Friendship Hospital in Shijiazhuang, the provincial capital.
Even after this great sacrifice, she will never love her father half as much as he loves her. Children are the greatest waste of love. They are the earth, and the parent is the sun. The sun keeps giving/loving with no hope or expectation of a return.

Tuesday, August 30, 2011

Several Terrible Sentences from an Article About How to Bring Your Kids to Burning Man

Posted by on Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 8:06 AM

Since Burning Man is upon us again, (OH GOD, GET HIM OFF ME! GET HIM OFF! HE'S BURNING ME!) someone thought this article about helping your children enjoy the festival could be useful. It's via Slog tipper Griff, and everything is [sic].

So read on Burning Moms and Dads, in honor of this years Rights Of Passage theme, we’ve compiled a list of 10 Insider Tips to make your Burning Man 2011 a fun-filled success with your Burner Babes.

Bringing along the kids will lend an entirely different experience. This is the reality, but it doesn’t mean that you won’t have an amazing time!

Little ones can be especially prone to playa foot so try and keep thin socks on their feet and be sure to clean off every night with Vinegar wash, which neutralizes the alkaline dust and restores Ph balance.

If your kid gets a nose bleed or the dreaded “playa-taters” (nose buggers), blow their noses in a moist fragrance-free towelette and then run the moisturizer inside the nostril before sleep.

Maybe Stranger parenting issues editor Charles Mudede will have some advice about bringing the tots 'n tykes™ to Burning Man, if we ask him nicely.

Wednesday, August 24, 2011

Hot Sauce in a Child's Mouth

Posted by on Wed, Aug 24, 2011 at 11:41 AM

His text: "In your opinion, does rinsing a 5-year-old's mouth out with hot sauce for lying equal child abuse?"
My text: "Yes."

Monday, August 15, 2011

No Youth Labor

Posted by on Mon, Aug 15, 2011 at 1:01 PM

BBC:

A boy of 11 called a German police emergency line to complain of "forced labour" after his mother told him to help clean the home.

Police say the boy from Aachen, who has not been identified, spoke to an officer via the 110 number.

They say he complained: "I have to work all day long. I haven't any free time."

I side with the child. This business of forcing children to clean up after themselves is empty moralizing. Making a boy clean his room is as meaningful as a dog biting a rock. Children should do no housework. There is no honor in housework. One should not beam with pride at the sight of a counter or window they've just wiped. Domestic chores are dreary, and it's better to be free from them. This type of freedom is a child's right.

Saturday, July 16, 2011

My Mother Has Sent This Video to Me Twice Now.

Posted by on Sat, Jul 16, 2011 at 4:37 PM

I guess she really wants me to enroll my dogs.

BTW, my mom has nine (9!!!!) dogs. It's a wonder she still has a tongue.

Wednesday, June 22, 2011

Everything About Her Is RILL, Okay!?

Posted by on Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 1:51 PM

Here's Anderson Cooper spazzing out about how 51-year-old Eugene Victor Tooms* married that 16-year-old Real Childwife of Ocean Shores. This was already my favorite news story of the week, and that was before I saw her YouTube clips. They're rill, rill, rill good, you guys:

*To everybody who "doesn't know who that guy is," I ask, WHAT THE FUCK WERE YOU DOING DURING THE ENTIRE '90S!?!? READING!? If you need me I'll be down here in my papier-mache saliva nest under the escalator eating your mom.

Tuesday, June 21, 2011

How Did Your Father Influence Your Taste in Music

Posted by on Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 1:08 PM

Mine forced me to listen to this over and over again. How about you?

Friday, June 10, 2011

Read

21comments

Wednesday, May 11, 2011

Read

8comments

Thursday, May 5, 2011

Read

22comments

Wednesday, April 13, 2011

Read

13comments

Tuesday, April 12, 2011

Read

17comments

Friday, April 8, 2011

Wednesday, March 23, 2011

Read

14comments

Wednesday, March 16, 2011

Friday, March 11, 2011

Monday, February 28, 2011

Read

71comments

Tuesday, February 15, 2011

Read

24comments

Read

7comments

Monday, February 14, 2011

Read

76comments

Wednesday, February 2, 2011

Read

0comments

Saturday, January 22, 2011

Read

46comments
 

Want great deals and a chance to win tickets to the best shows in Seattle? Join The Stranger Presents email list!


All contents © Index Newspapers, LLC
1535 11th Ave (Third Floor), Seattle, WA 98122
Contact Info | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Takedown Policy