Slog

News & Arts

Line Out

Music & Nightlife

Homo

Saturday, November 7, 2009

Titties and Beer

Posted by Dan Savage on Sat, Nov 7, 2009 at 12:31 PM

From People of Walmart....

428.jpg

Queers can't have titties and beers?

Continue reading »

Friday, November 6, 2009

Your Daily Douchebag

Posted by Dominic Holden on Fri, Nov 6, 2009 at 8:31 AM

The homophobes who tried to reject Referendum 71 are praying for a miracle:

Larry Stickney, campaign manager for Protect Marriage Washington, the conservative Christian organization that worked for rejection of the referendum, said: "There are a lot of votes out there still. We continue to have some hope that the votes cast later will move in our direction."

Earlier this week, Stickney said he was requesting prayers statewide, and the Web site for Protect Marriage Washington said: "As you may know, we have seen amazing things happen at every critical juncture of this campaign. ... Let's pray the Reject R-71 effort across the finish line!"

You can read about how they're praying into the wind over here.

Thursday, November 5, 2009

What She Said

Posted by Dan Savage on Thu, Nov 5, 2009 at 9:52 AM

mcjoan at DailyKos:

[While] it's not official yet, affirmation of Washington's "everything but marriage" law seems assured. R-71 affirms the expanded protections for domestic partners granted by Washington State lawmakers last year. It's not full-fledged marriage, but it does mark Washington as the first state in America to approve a gay-equality measure by the will of the people. I know it's small comfort to everyone who worked so tirelessly to defeat hate in Maine, but hopefully knowing that there's a corner of the country where hate couldn't prevail with Americans will provide some comfort, and some hope.

What He Said

Posted by Dan Savage on Thu, Nov 5, 2009 at 9:11 AM

Ted Gideonse:

As Jesse Ventura said last night, “You can’t put a civil rights issue on the ballot and let the people decide. You have to have elected officials to who have courage to make the right decision. If you left it up to the people, we’d have slavery, depending on how you worded it.”

But when our lives aren’t run by mob rule, we do pretty well: We’ve pretty much conquered Hollywood.
We’ve conquered academia. The press is ours. Book publishing? Ours! The governments of Western and Northern Europe? Ours! And considering how people until 40 feel in this country, the future is ours, too!

So, this is what I have to say to Frank Schubert, Maggie Gallagher, Brian Brown, the Catholic Church, LDS, to the born-again nut jobs who haven’t a clue what the Golden Rule means and to the people who think that telling children that gay people exist is something like terrorism: Fuck you. Really: Fuck you. Fuck your lies. Your hypocrisy. Your cruelty. Fuck your pick-and-choose-only-the-most-bigoted-parts religion. Fuck your ignorance. Fuck your fear. Fuck you. Please: Eat shit and die. Fuck you. Very much.

Go read the whole thing.

Wednesday, November 4, 2009

Catholics Are the New Mormons

Posted by Dominic Holden on Wed, Nov 4, 2009 at 3:19 PM

Catholics are strutting around boasting about their role in repealing Maine's gay marriage law. At least they're taking responsibility for it. Catholics are the new Mormons—which sucks for me because I was raised Catholic. Can I unbaptize myself? Can I do it in a hot tub? How many guys will it take?

The Catholic Church vs. Gay Equality

Posted by Dan Savage on Wed, Nov 4, 2009 at 2:30 PM

From the Bangor Daily News:

“We went up against tremendous odds,” Marc Mutty, public affairs director for the Roman Catholic Diocese of Portland who has been on loan to the [Yes on 1] campaign, said from Portland. “We all know we were the little guy going up against the big guy, but we prevailed."

First, is that legal? Can the Catholic Church really just loan employees to political campaigns without losing its tax-exempt status?

Second, the Catholic Church and the forces arrayed against marriage equality and the 95+ percent of voters who are straight... are the little guys? And embattled same-sex couples are the big guys?

Third, I'm off to throw cans of creamed corn through a few stained-glass windows.* Who wants to join me?

* Kidding, just kidding.

Gay Marriage: Who's Ready for Round 32?

Posted by Dan Savage on Wed, Nov 4, 2009 at 1:48 PM

The marriage equality fight moves to New Jersey... where yesterday voters turned their pro-marriage equality Democratic governor John Corzine out of the office and elected anti-marriage equality Republican Chris Christie. The New Jersey legislature is about to pass a marriage equality bill, however, and Corzine has promised to sign it, defeat or no defeat. I don't know if New Jersey has a referendum process or a "people's veto" and I'm not going to check because right now I don't wanna know. Garden State Equality brought out a very effective, very moving ad today...

...but our side brought out lots of very effective, very moving ads in Maine. More info here.

UPDATE: Beth in NJ writes in comments...

We do NOT have a "people's veto" or referendum process or anything like that in New Jersey, and any proposed constitutional amendment has to be approved by 3/5ths of each house of the state legislature to even get on the ballot for the people to vote on it. If we can get a law passed and signed before Corzine leaves office, it will be very hard for the bigoted assholes to get it overturned.

What She Said

Posted by Dan Savage on Wed, Nov 4, 2009 at 1:15 PM

Pam Spaulding...

What this loss in Maine (and the victory in Washington State) says to me is that I am so grateful that my civil rights, as a person of color, were not put up to a popular vote. As we've seen over and over in the last year, the emergence of naked racism lives despite laws on the books banning discrimination based on race. Reality-based arguments to people who are raised with bias have little motivation to change their thinking outside of keeping their bigotry out of the realm of law-breaking (and even then—it still occurs!). The feelings simply go underground.

That public expressions of racism have re-emerged and been cultivated by a major political party shows the work the LGBT community has to do as it waits for equality at the federal level. Changing hearts and minds every day is necessary—not just when there's a pending bigoted mob rule ballot measure. LGBTs—and more importantly, allies—need to come out of the closet advocating for equality in ways large and small. It's the only way to move many voters, particularly the ones who think they don't know someone who is gay. Too many politicians who support us privately still don't have the spine to step up their game when our rights are under attack. That has to change.

What He Said 3

Posted by Dan Savage on Wed, Nov 4, 2009 at 12:44 PM

David Mixner:

President Obama standing on the sidelines in Maine and Washington was appalling. The failure of our national organizations and leaders to demand his involvement was equally appalling. The outrageous act of the Democratic National Committee sending an email into Maine asking Maine Democrats to call into "NEW JERSEY" instead of to support the fight against bigotry was unbelievable. No one gets to sit on the sidelines in an epic battle against apartheid and no one gets a free pass. If you want our support, you have to earn it. We are way beyond where we will accept a little bit in 2009, some in 2010 and maybe more in the second term. Does anyone think after yesterday election results and the upcoming 2010 election, Obama has the ability to repeal "Don't Ask, Don't Tell" and "DOMA" next year? Does anyone really believe we haven't already missed a historic opportunity in the first 10 months of this year? Only a courageous fighting President and Congress can now help turn us this around and that we have not seen so far. Enough.

What He Said 2

Posted by Dan Savage on Wed, Nov 4, 2009 at 11:58 AM

Andrew Sullivan...

After Maine, where the Catholic church actually organized a second collection to raise money to prevent gay people from having civil rights, the situation shifts again. Using a tax-exempt church to raise money to defeat the civil rights of fellow citizens is not too shocking in the age of Benedict. It is shocking if one believes in a separation of politics and religion, and if one believes that the church of Jesus should stand in solidarity with the marginalized, rather than seeking to marginalize and demonize them still further.

It is time to acknowledge that the Catholic church hierarchy can no longer pretend that it isn't the active enemy of gay people and our families. That this church hierarchy—especially in its more conservative wing—is disproportionately gay itself and waging war against their fellow gays through the cowardly veil of the closet, is not new. But it is, as we flinch with the sting of defeat, harder to take than ever.

It is time to demand that gay priests who are actively fighting against the dignity of gay people own their enmeshment in injustice, stigmatization and cruelty. It is time to reveal them in this respect as the enemies of the Gospels, not the champions.

Time to reveal them, Andrew? It almost sounds like you're calling for an outing campaign that targets closeted Roman Catholic priests. Which sounds good to me; I support outing closet cases when it's appropriate. Outing, as I've said before, is a brutal tactic that should be reserved for brutes. And it seems to me that, after Maine, closeted Catholic priests have to be regarded as either taking an active role in the brutalization and political persecution of gays and lesbians or complicit in the brutalization and political persecution of gays and lesbians. So let's out the bastards, I say, let's out 'em all.

What He Said

Posted by Dan Savage on Wed, Nov 4, 2009 at 11:39 AM

Wayne Besen writing about last night's heartbreaking defeat in Maine...

It is time we wake up and acknowledge that the GLBT fight for equality is the world’s first “Civil Likes” movement. Each year, a popularity contest is held somewhere on the map and if the locals find us likeable our families are protected. If the natives have a negative view of gay people, we remain second-class citizens.

Given this reality we have to make a major choice.

We can declare the current process a disgusting and humiliating insult to our humanity and opt out of all future referendums. The movement would make the case to the nation why such votes are anathema to American values and in the process educate people about our families and quest for equality. A powerful campaign of continued and sustainable civil disobedience would have to supplement this strategy.

Or, we can continue to participate in degrading referendums. But, if we do so, we have to stop pretending that the majority of the American people understand the U.S. Constitution, much less the notion of equality. Those who vote against GLBT rights simply do not like gay people and their antipathy, often masked by religious bigotry, overrides the idea of equal protection.

Addendum to the Morning News

Posted by Paul Constant on Wed, Nov 4, 2009 at 11:20 AM

Slog Tipper Patrick points out an addition to the Morning News that I should have caught but didn't. Patrick says:

The city of Detroit could also use a mention for electing an openly gay man as city council president.

Very true, Patrick. I apologize. Openly gay former news anchor Charles Pugh will lead Detroit's City Council. I like him already:

The thirty-seven-year-old, self-proclaimed “Detroitaholic” traded in an anchor post at Fox 2, where he first announced his sexuality on air in 2004, to pursue politics.

After coming out, Pugh's celebrity has only increased. During the campaign he acknowledged that being gay added a wrinkle to his candidacy but added that he believed most Detroiters would give him a fair shake.

“I think there will be people who grumble about it and some people who may stay away from voting for me because of that, but I think Detroiters already know me,” Pugh said last month. “I believe Detroiters are open-minded, hardworking people who really do accept people who are different.”

“I'm focused on bringing a level of class and dignity and respect for the job that Detroiters want,” Pugh added.

It seems as though, after the defeat in Maine*, that it is a good idea to get as many smart gay people as possible into political office, and we took a few great steps in that direction last night.

Thanks, Patrick, for notifying me of my failure to highlight Pugh's victory.

* As someone who was born and raised in Maine, I'd like to apologize to the gays for their disappointing gay marriage results. The thing people underestimate when talking about my home state is that Maine is incredibly poor and Mainers often tend to hickishness. I often refer to Maine as "the south of the north." I wrote a little bit about Maine's supreme capacity for hatred over here a while back.

Tuesday, November 3, 2009

Early Returns In Maine

Posted by The Stranger Election Control Board on Tue, Nov 3, 2009 at 5:46 PM

The first numbers are in and they don't look good. Only 19 of 605 precincts have reported, however, so... fingers crossed.

UPDATE: And now with 11 more precincts in... things look bettter. "NO" is ahead—55 to 45. It's going to be a long, long night, people.

UPDATE 2: Rex Wockner is in Maine, covering the Question 1 campaign. He's at the "No on 1" campaign party. He's posting pictures, commentary, and the results as they come to to his blog.

R-71: Nate Silver Gives 10-1 Odds Against It Being Rejected

Posted by Dan Savage on Tue, Nov 3, 2009 at 2:31 PM

Nate Silver at 538 believes that Washington state voters will approve R-71...

Washington is similar to Maine in certain respects, being white and fairly secular, and since I think the pro-gay marriage side is more likely than not to prevail in Maine, you might think I feel the same way about the initiative in Washington state. Indeed I do feel that way, although the initiatives are not directly comparable. On the one hand, Referendum 71 does not go as far as Maine's Question 1 or California's Proposition 8 since it seeks to reaffirm an "everything but marriage" bill that does not formally bestow the title of marriage upon same-sex couples. On the other hand, a rejection of the referendum would not overturn Washington's 2007 domestic partnership law, but instead only the expanded, marriage-like benefits that were afforded to those couples this year.

Were Washington to vote on a measure to ban domestic partnership outright, it would almost certainly fail and fail badly: by a 58-42 margin, according to my statistical model. A measure to ban gay marriage but not domestic partnership would be much closer; I have such a measure failing 52.5-47.5, but there is a good deal of uncertainty there, and in an off-year election the numbers might be closer to 50:50. Referendum 71 appears to be polling somewhere in between those two goalposts, which makes sense, since it takes Washington somewhere in between domestic partnership and full-blown marriage.

There is also arguably less uncertainty about the outcome in Washington than in Maine. This is because, as in California, most Washingtonians vote by mail, and SurveyUSA has the Approve side leading 53-42 among those who have already voted. A small bit of good fortune for the Approve side is that there is a highly competitive mayoral race in Seattle, which might encourage turnout in that obviously very liberal corner of the state.

Nate Silver has been pretty much right about everything over the last two years, so... fingers crossed.

Father Michael Scott

Posted by Dan Savage on Tue, Nov 3, 2009 at 10:19 AM

A few stray photos on a computer trip up the Scranton branch of the Catholic church...

corsetandpits.jpg
A northeastern Pennsylvania priest has been removed from his duties after church officials say he accidentally displayed inappropriate pictures from his computer before Sunday Mass. The Diocese of Scranton said the Rev. Edward Lyman was using his computer on Oct. 25 to project an informational DVD about the annual diocesan fundraiser when four photos were displayed. They featured what church officials describe as "minimally attired adult males."

Minimally attired adult males—those are my favorite kind! But the minimally attired male, seen above (click on image for a larger version), is not—so far as I know—one of adult males whose picture was displayed before mass at St. Anthony's in Scranton. His picture was taken at a gay nightclub in Rome, though, so it felt like an appropriate illustration. More shots from the Gorgeous Party at Rome's Alpheus at Homo-Neurotic.

Marriage Equality in Washington D.C.

Posted by Dan Savage on Tue, Nov 3, 2009 at 9:01 AM

The District of Columbia is debating the legalization of same-sex marriage. The loudest voices being raised in opposition belong to African American religious leaders and it makes for pretty depressing YouTube viewing. But Lurleen at Pam's House Blend points out that more black clergy in D.C. support marriage equality than oppose it. And they're making their voices heard:

[When I saw a] delicious article by Tim Craig in today's Washington Post, called "Pastors unite to support same-sex marriage in D.C.", I just had to stop and take a look. A quote from the article encapsulates what we here at The Blend have known but some in the general public may just be catching on to: 'There is this myth out there that you can't be pro-God and pro-gay.' Move over Harry Jackson, because here's the real face of D.C. clergy. Meet The Reverends Christine Y. Wiley & Dennis W. Wiley of Covenant Baptist Church, and co-founders of Clergy United for Marriage Equality: "Rev. Christine Y. Wiley... noted that many District churches have a history of fighting for social and economic justice.... "It just really seemed like a natural thing that we would do," Wiley said. "We believe as African Americans who have been discriminated against [that] we don't have the right to discriminate against anyone else."

Here's hoping the Rev. Bernice King gets the message.

Fierce Advocacy Watch

Posted by Dan Savage on Tue, Nov 3, 2009 at 8:17 AM

Barack Obama made time to campaign in New Jersey and Virginia and sent Joe Biden to upstate New York to campaign for a Democrat running for Congress. But the Obama administration refused to do the bare minimum for the president's LGBT supporters. Obama didn't issue an explicit statement calling on voters in Maine to vote "NO" on Question 1 and he didn't ask voters in Washington state to approve R-71. Obama's political organization—Organizing for America—sent an email to voters in Maine yesterday asking them to remember to vote. But it didn't mention Question 1 or ask Maine voters to vote "NO" on Question 1.

The votes in Maine and Washington state today are likely to be very, very close, and Obama's inaction—his refusal to advocate for the equality of same-sex couples—could hand the bigots a victory.

UPDATE: It gets worse. Organizing for America sent another email to Maine voters today asking them to get involved and take action and help out of the vote... in New Jersey.

UPDATE 2: Kevin in comments points us to a mealymouthed, vague, and useless statement issued by the White House in mid-October that said president "has long opposed divisive and discriminatory efforts to deny rights and benefits to same-sex couples." It was issued in response to a request for comment by The Advocate. The statement did not make headlines in Maine or Washington state or anywhere else because it didn't specifically and explicitly call on voters in Maine and Washington state to vote "NO" on Question 1 and vote to approve R-71 respectively. Here's me and Corey Johnson from Towleroad on AC360 two weeks ago talking about what Obama needed to do for Washington and Maine...

And he didn't do it. No one felt that statement went far enough—and it wasn't just dismissed by gay activists. Obama's vague statement wasn't even mentioned by mainstream newspapers or broadcasts in Washington state or Maine because it didn't specifically and explicitly call on voters, again, to vote "NO" on Prop 1 in Maine and vote to approve R-71 in Washington state.

Monday, November 2, 2009

Your Daily Douchebags

Posted by Dominic Holden on Mon, Nov 2, 2009 at 2:02 PM

Slog tipper Emma writes about intimidation of "Approve Referendum 71" sign wavers in Olympia:

Olympia's sign waving rally on Sunday the 1st (Black Lake Blvd & Cooper Point Rd) was overtaken by bullies late in the afternoon. The rally went peacefully from 12 - 4 pm. At 4 pm, Pastor Roy & his wife Valerie appeared, (local leaders of the anti-gay "Reject" campaign who are based in Dupont but lead a Church in Lacey). They had summoned 40 - 50 young men and a few young women who bullied us out of their way by jostling us and blowing painfully loud air horns close to where we were already standing. They appeared to be almost entirely Russian immigrants from one of the Tacoma churches involved in the anti-gay campaign. I asked Pastor Roy & Valerie to request their recruits to stop blaring the air horn in our ears and not to bully our sign wavers. Valerie blew me off and Pastor Roy just walked away. Ironically, last weekend when both sides were at the Lacey rally, our side made it a point to be courteous, and I even intervened in a few situations where Pastor Roy thought our people were being aggressive.

This was a pretty scary encounter. Most of our people left, including one father with a toddler. Two organizers (including myself) strongly encouraged the handful our supporters still there to leave in pairs to be safe.

Emma asks folk to join them from 4:30 p.m to 6:00 p.m. this afternoon and tomorrow "to ensure our safety in numbers and stand up against intimidation" at Plum & Union and Black Lake & Cooper Point. Go and be nice. Be really, really nice.

"Dad let me upload this :D"

Posted by Dan Savage on Mon, Nov 2, 2009 at 10:40 AM

"Our 14-year-old son Elliott debuted as Lady Gaga in West Hollywood for Halloween," writes Slog tipper Miss Poppy. "His father accompanied him, dressed as his body guard. Elliott drew a crowd as he lip-synched and danced to Lady Gaga's music. He was ecstatic." Miss Poppy sent along a link to this YouTube montage of photos of Elliott...

A few more details from Miss Poppy: "Elliott is a middle-school student in Los Angeles, and a distance runner on his track team. He has been out for two years. Devoted mother that I am, I made his costume and helped him with his makeup."

This boy has been out to his family since age 12 and when he wanted to go out in drag on Halloween and his mother made his costume and his dad took him to West Hollywood. There's just one comment on the post at YouTube right now and it's from Elliott: "Dad let me upload this :D"

His dad let him post this video to YouTube.

You know, whatever happens in Maine and here in Washington state tomorrow, where marriage equality and domestic partnerships are on the line respectively, we can all take comfort in something as seemingly trivial as a 14-year-old boy's night out in West Hollywood with his folks. I've said it before and I'll say it again: We are winning—despite the setbacks—because our families are on side now. It's almost impossible to imagine an openly gay 14-year-old twenty years ago, much less an openly gay 14-year-old with parents like Miss Poppy and her husband. Moms and dads like Elliott's—parents who aren't ashamed of their gay children, parents who love and support their gay children for who they are, parents who want their gay children to be safe and happy and treated equally—used to be the exception. Not anymore.

We are winning.

New Head of HRC Opposes Interracial Marriage, Affirmative Action, Voting Rights Act

Posted by Dan Savage on Mon, Nov 2, 2009 at 10:05 AM

I'm trying to imagine a large and historically significant gay civil rights group appointing an avowed racist as its director. I'm trying to imagine the board of HRC or GLAAD or NGLTF or GLSEN or Lambda Legal appointing a director who opposed interracial marriage or was against the renewal of the Voting Rights Act or was critical of affirmative action. But it's impossible to imagine a gay rights group appointing a racist bigot as its executive director. It couldn't happen—it shouldn't happen—not a million years.

The reverse however—a large African American civil rights group appointing an anti-gay bigot—just happened. Noted anti-gay bigot Bernice King was appointed to head the Southern Christian Leadership Conference last week. Thankfully she's being called out on her bigotry by the Daily Voice, "Black America's Daily News Source":

Bernice King can make history in two ways. She made it first by becoming the first woman in the 52 year history of the Southern Christian Leadership Conference to take the organization's reins. Now she can make history in another way. She should renounce the anti-gay bigotry of her recent past. That bigotry was on shameful and insulting display in December 2004 when she and thousands of marchers stood at the gravesite of her father, Martin Luther King, Jr., and denounced gay marriage. The implication was that King might well have stood with her and them in their protest against gay rights.

Nothing could be further from the truth. King's fight against bigotry and discrimination, all bigotry and discrimination, was relentless and uncompromising. If anything that day, King would have been across the street from his gravesite with the hundred or so other counter-demonstrators. They loudly shouted that what Bernice and the marchers were doing at her father's gravesite and in his name, was a travesty and a disgrace. King sullied her father's name to show her enmity to gay marriage. She also sullied her mother's too. A few years before Bernice's gravesite antic, Coretta Scott King issued a public statement forcefully denouncing anti-gay bigotry and made it perfectly clear that her husband would be a champion of gay rights if he were alive.

Via JoeMyGod.

Meanwhile in Maine

Posted by Dan Savage on Mon, Nov 2, 2009 at 9:44 AM

It's too close to call in Maine. If you haven't made a donation yet...

Goal Thermometer

Anti-gay bigots are polluting the airwaves with homophobic bullshit—married gay couples are going to assrape each other in front of your children at mandatory school assemblies!—and the our side needs to respond. If you're not tapped out, help out.

Friday, October 30, 2009

How Long Will Gay Rights Activists Be Mollified By Obama Signing the Hate Crimes Bill Into Law and Overseeing the Dismantling of the HIV Travel Ban?

Posted by Dan Savage on Fri, Oct 30, 2009 at 3:13 PM

Not long—not now that Obama is back in court defending DOMA. Oh, and remember that gay guy—raped in his home country—and legally married to American citizen in Boston whose application for asylum was denied by the Obama administration because we can't willy-nilly bend those immigration rules, even in cases where a person's human rights may have been abused? Remember him?

In an unusually protracted and closely watched case, the Obama administration has recommended political asylum for a Guatemalan woman fleeing horrific abuse by her husband, the strongest signal yet that the administration is open to a variety of asylum claims from foreign women facing domestic abuse.

Wake me when the fierce advocacy begins.

"Gay Eradication Day"

Posted by Dan Savage on Fri, Oct 30, 2009 at 9:43 AM

Lefty? Progressive? Got gay friends? Support gay rights? Don't spend your tourist dollars in Jamaica.

When THE STAR visited the area, a small group of residents pointed out an old community centre which is said to be the main 'hang out' spot for the lesbians. According to the residents the lesbians gather there almost nightly and can be seen hugging, kissing and even "touching".

The residents say they are mostly worried about the lesbian group as they are most prevalent and influential. The number of persons in this group is said to be steadily increasing. In terms of the suspected gay men, the residents claim they are not as bold as the lesbians and are fewer but they too are expected to comply with the two-week notice.

No quotes from the authorities about protecting the gay men and lesbians in town where the "eradication" is under way. Because, of course, the authorities in Jamaica don't protect gays and lesbians from mob violence. Background on boycotting Jamaica is here. And if Barack Obama is going to send an openly gay ambassador anywhere, he should send one to Jamaica.

Obama to Announce The End of the HIV Travel Ban Today

Posted by Dan Savage on Fri, Oct 30, 2009 at 9:22 AM

It was legislation passed by the last Congress, and signed into law by George W. Bush, but it was the Obama administration that oversaw the final dismantling of the Helms-era ban on HIV-positive tourists and immigrants. And now it's history.

Congrats, Andrew.

Now all we're waiting for is action on DADT, DOMA, and ENDA.

Thursday, October 29, 2009

Your Daily Douchebags

Posted by Dominic Holden on Thu, Oct 29, 2009 at 5:42 PM

There are 921 members of the Facebook group Reject Referendum 71. Why do they want to repeal the domestic-partnership law? I'd hate to color their logic with the prism of my bias, so here they are, in their own words:

Ben about 6 hours ago

i rejected referendum 71 thats totally wrong marraige stands between one man and one women this homosexual marriage makes me sick as a wa resident my self to hear this garbage this state is not california nor ma. either lets show congress what we really think by rejecting gay marriage proposal in our state!!! may god help us all

Ruslan Ukrainian about 1 hour ago

Marriage was made between man and women, everything else is just peoples perverted minds, due to moral decay, caused by early sexual activities, premarital activities, and web searched by children and adult related to "porn".

Jennifer Lalander 2 days ago

well it is written in the bible only a man and a women are to be married and as a christian women i truly believe this is what is right

Tip from NaFun, who also offers this image to cleanse your brain.

Most Commented on Slog

@SEAshows

The Stranger's Twitter Feed of Seattle Shows
  • Loading Tweets
    loading

Follow @SEAshows
 

All contents © Index Newspapers, LLC
1535 11th Ave (Third Floor), Seattle, WA 98122
Contact Info | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use