
From Darwin's Descent of Man and Selection in Relation to Sex:
The following case, though relating to savages, is well worth giving from its curiosity. Mr. Winwood Reade informs me that the Jollofs, a tribe of negroes on the west coast of Africa, “are remarkable for their uniformly Fine appearance.” A friend of his asked one of these men, “How is it that every one whom I meet is so fine looking, not only your men, but your women?" The Jollof answered, “It is very easily explained: it has always been our custom to pick out our worse-looking slaves and to sell them.”Descent of Man, a work of fantasy for the most part, is filled with twisted passages like this. Darwin and the best minds of this time could not resolve race; they could only complicate it, confuse it with bad and good intentions, entangle it in a language that had the authority of science but none of its content. The early part of the 20th century saw a break with this messy mind. But the war to end all wars brought this moment of improved reasoning to an end.It need hardly be added that, with all savages, female slaves serve as concubines. That this negro should have attributed, whether rightly or wrongly, the fine appearance of his tribe to the long-continued elimination of the ugly women is not so surprising as it may at first appear; for I have elsewhere shown that negroes fully appreciate the importance of selection in the breeding of their domestic animals, and I could give from Mr. Reade additional evidence on this head.
...I've been tasked with telling you how today's court decision re-confirming the unconstitutionality of Prop 8 affects me.
The answer: It's nice! I love when sanity prevails and is upheld, and both the parsing of the constitution-flouting elements of the Prop 8 legislation and the rejection of the notion that Judge Vaughn Walker should have recused himself from hearing the original appeal because he's a real-live gay are great.
But it doesn't change anything about my actual California marriage, in the same way that Prop 8 didn't change anything about my actual California marriage, just made it so other same-sex couples couldn't get their own same-sex California marriages. As I wrote at the time:
[Prop 8] did nothing to my marriage other than render it a novelty item, one of the 18,000 same-sex weddings performed during 2008's 18-week window of legality, the ridiculous arbitrariness of which will figure into all legal challenges to Prop 8 forever. I'm happy to be part of this klutzy march toward equality, and I'll be happy to watch it struggle onward for as long as I need to.
Hurrah for sanity and progress and onward. (And I'm super curious about the points brought up by Eli at the end of this post.)
“The president came over to me and asked me if I’d like to take a tour of the second floor of the White House and see some of the rooms that had been redecorated. The last room that we went into was the bedroom and we walked into the bedroom and it was a beautiful room…I learned later that it was Mrs. Kennedy’s bedroom,” Alford said.
Alford says that she lost her virginity to the president in the first lady’s bedroom. In her soon to be released memoir, Once Upon a Secret My Affair with President John F. Kennedy and its Aftermath, Alford described her first sexual encounter with the president writing that, “I wouldn’t describe what happened that night as making love, but I wouldn’t call it nonconsensual either.”
Man. Sex in the White House with an intern on the First Lady's bed, and nobody knew about it? Reporters sure were bad at their jobs, back in the day.
Two things: It's not that we are all immigrants in America, with the distinction only being between those who were forced here and those who came here of their own free will. Fleeing poverty or war or persecution is not leaving a country of your own free will. The bad situation, what ever it may be, is forcing you to depart. Mexicans do not come to the US because it's such a cool place; it's because they have to, are forced to, and risk lives and dignity to. The Irish of the 19th century were in much the same situation. The ancestors of many Americans were forced to come here, one way or another. So, it is a question of what forced you to this country.
Secondly, I hate it when immigrants, in reference to black Americans, go on about how their parents or grandparents were not lazy, how they came to this country and broke their backs to make ends meet. True, those noble people worked hard for very little pay, but a little pay is still infinitely more (financially and spiritually) than getting paid nothing for hard work. And slavery did not happen a very long, long, so long time ago. This isn't deep history. It happened fairly recently. Even I was born in a segregated hospital; born in the section for black Africans only. Before that, my great-grandmother saw the first white person on Christmas Pass. 40 years before that, black Americans were picking cotton for nothing.
Myrtle Beach, the location of the last GOP debate, is the only place I've been called a nigger in my face by a white person. Well, to be honest, it wasn't exactly in my face. Let me explain: I went down there in 91 for spring break. I went with a group of students from my small and dreary Pennsylvania college. I shared a room with this group. At the end of our first day there, I walked to a quiet spot near the crowded motel, lit a cigarette, and stared at the unbeautiful sea. A moment into the smoke, a white woman approached me and asked for a cigarette. I gave her one and hoped she would continue on her way for two good reasons: one, I really wanted be alone; two, she was ugly. But she stayed put and smoked and talked.
Suddenly from a passing car: "Hey, what are you doing with that nigger." On hearing this, what upset me most was the hicks actually thought I was romantically tied with this ugly woman. That was a deep insult. I wanted to yell: "I have nothing to do with this woman, I'm from the city, she is not my type, please feel free to save her from the nigger."
The car was gone before any word formed on my lips. I turned and saw the woman's face was the picture of mortification. She profusely apologized for her race—we're not all like that, times were changing, people would learn to live together. The more she apologized, the worse I felt for thinking bad things about her appearance. Life is so complicated.
So writes Metafilter about this from-the-vaults IHOP commercial (which might make you want to revisit acid, but not revisit IHOP.)
You can see how this developed into "George Bush doesn't care about black people."
[Again, via Atrios]
"There was shock in Harlem tonight when word of Dr. King's murder reached the nation's largest negro community. Men, women, and children poured into the streets. They appeared dazed."
William Rufus de Vane King! And who the fuck was he? HistoryLink has the story:
William Rufus de Vane King was a plantation owner in Alabama who was elected to the U.S. Senate and served there for 34 years. In 1844 he became ambassador to France, and his diplomacy enabled the United States to annex Texas. He was a key advocate of the Compromise of 1850, a series of laws that forged a compromise between slave states and free states concerning the extension of slavery into new states and territories. The compromise kept the Union together for a few more years before the Civil War, but included the Fugitive Slave Act of 1850, a harsh law requiring the return of alleged fugitive slaves from the North back into bondage in the South.As for why this county was named after this slave owner, I don't even want to know. The only great thing about him was the luck of his surname.

This post has to give much love to Radjaw of Mad Rad for making it happen.
Here's Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. on a 1968 broadcast of either Mike Douglas' show or The Tonight Show (there's some disagreement). Either way, delightful and fascinating to see.
Here's a photo I never expected to see—Asian schoolgirls marching down the street in Nazi uniforms:
Questions are growing in Thailand about how school students in Chiang Mai were able to adopt a Nazi theme for their school sports-day on Friday, wearing outfits modeled on those of SS guards and waving huge swastika banners.
Which reminds me of this photo an artist-friend sent me when he was living in India.
"I dunno," he wrote when I asked about the photo, "I have noticed that more than a few Indians (and Indonesians, when I lived there) have a regard for Hitler."
As for the Thai kids, school officials explained that the students hadn't cleared the costumes with teachers—they're supposed to be a surprise—and they "didn’t realize it would upset anybody." And, as the article notes, swastikas are all over Asia (temples, religious altars), "possibly softening the impact of the Nazi version among locals."
Still... maybe the school wants to consider revising its history curriculum?
"FOD is kicking off 2012 by bringing back your favorite shows from our 1986 spring lineup," crows comedy website Funny or Die, which quickly earns both halves of its name.
Funny!
Die.
See the whole 1986 spring lineup here.
I confess: I have felt uncomfortably conflicted about Ron Paul. There are things to like and things to loathe about the man and his politics, but I couldn't quite articulate the intersection of those feelings.
Today, Ta-Nehisi Coates does the job over at the Atlantic by making a surprising comparison—what Paul means to (some) Americans now and what Farrakhan meant to (some) Americans during the height of the 1980s crack epidemic:
As surely as Ron Paul speaks to a real issue—the state's broad use of violence and surveillance—which the America's political leadership has failed to address, Farrakhan spoke to something real, something unsullied, which black America's political leadership failed to address, Both Paul and Farrakhan, in their glamour, inspired the young, the disaffected, the disillusioned.
To those who dimly perceived something wrong, something that could not be put on a placard, or could not move the party machine, men such as this become something more than political operators, they become symbols. Substantive charges against them, no matter the reasons, are dismissed. The movement they represent means more. But as sure as the followers of Farrakhan deserved more than UFOs, anti-Semitism and conspiracy theories, those of us who oppose the drug-war, who oppose the Patriot Act deserve better than Ron Paul.
To be perfectly clear: I cannot imagine myself ever voting for him, any more than I'd vote for Farrakhan—his history on race issues alone disqualifies him, not to mention his other bad ideas. But I also can't whole-heartedly write him off as a total crackpot. He's a problematic representative of a problematic constituency.
The Daily Mail tells us about the next scandalous presidential biography in the pipeline:
A new biography by Don Fulsom, a veteran Washington reporter who covered the Nixon years, suggests the 37th U.S. President had a serious drink problem, beat his wife and — by the time he was inaugurated in 1969 — had links going back two decades to the Mafia, including with New Orleans godfather Carlos Marcello, then America's most powerful mobster.
Yet the most extraordinary claim is that the homophobic Nixon may have been gay himself. If true, it would provide a fascinating insight into the motivation and behaviour of a notoriously secretive politician.
I've read a whole lot of Nixon biographies in my time, and not one of them has theorized that Nixon was gay. I'm not rejecting the idea out of hand—many of the most hateful, paranoid American politicians of the last century were closeted—but Fulsom had better have some compelling evidence. While it's true that Nixon had a special place in his heart for the alleged object of his alleged affections—Charles 'Bebe' Rebozo, who was a perennial Nixon hanger-on—these allegations would demand that we rethink everything we know about the man.
(Via Sarah Weinman on Twitter.)
(Thank you, Slog tipper Jeffrey!)
They're going to dig up his body and find out:
The Communist Party in Chile has asked for the remains of the poet Pablo Neruda to be exhumed due to allegations that he may have been poisoned.
The Nobel laureate died in Santiago in September 1973, 12 days after the military coup that brought Gen Augusto Pinochet to power.
Mr Neruda's death certificate says he died of prostate cancer.
But his former driver said he received an injection which provoked a heart attack.
Irrelevant fact: Neruda wrote in green ink whenever possible (sample letter here) because he considered it a hopeful color.
From 1951, back when Republican Governor Arthur B. Langlie liked to remind Washingtonians that they better express thanks for not living under "godless tyranny."
Over the weekend, sci-fi author David Brin responded to comics artist Frank Miller's dumb rant against Occupy Wall Street. Brin tears Miller apart by proving that one of his best-loved comics, 300, is founded on lies and a willfully ignorant reading of history. It's titled "Move over, Frank Miller: or why the Occupy Wall Street kids are better than #$%! Spartans," and you should read the whole thing—Brin schools Miller's 300 on just about every single point, before it builds to its dramatic conclusion:
“300″ idolizes the same arrogant contempt for citizenship that eventually ruined classical Greece and Republican Rome, and that might bring the same fate to America.
It's pretty awesome stuff. Also a must-read: highly underrated comics writer Ann Nocenti's response to Miller, in which she sounds like an involved citizen of the world and not, oh, a housebound Fox News addict.

The veteran that holds the largest space in my brain is my maternal grandfather, Melvin Aaron, a farmer turned soldier turned World War II vet, who came back from the war a changed man. The exact reasons for this change were a mystery. All we ever knew was “he saw some bad things in the war,” and these things changed him from someone who did things besides sitting in a chair reading Louis Lamour paperbacks to someone who didn’t. Eventually even the books went—whatever my grandfather saw in the war made him unwilling to see a doctor for any reason, and in his last years he lost his vision from easily operable cataracts.
“That’s grandpa!” went the story—the whole story, until a few years ago, when my Uncle Mike was going through some old boxes and found my grandfather's written account of exactly what he'd seen in the war. Along with being passed among family members, my grandpa's journal entry was published in the Clarion County Register, my grandpa and uncle's hometown paper, and it was a truly horrifying thing to read.
But it was also something we never thought we'd get: an actual answer to the question, "What broke Grandpa's brain?" I think this information was particularly valuable to my mother's younger sisters, who were born too late to know their pre-war dad. My mom was the eldest child and has memories of a dad who'd pick her up and swing her around and was a different person than the frozen man who came back from the war. My aunts and all us grandkids only knew the post-war version, and reading this account is the closest we'll ever get to knowing the earlier man.
You can read my grandfather's account of being a medic accompanying the first wave of U.S. Marines as they stormed the beaches of Iwo Jima after the jump. It's brutal, and involves historically understandable racial insensitivity ('Japs' throughout), but I am so glad it exists.
...at eleven minutes after 11:00 today? Are cows going to fly? What is the deal with the date today??!!
And here it is. Sob!
Did you go to punk rock shows? Click here.

Lindy West is here to make it 700,000 times better, via this week's Concessions 90210. Seriously.
What the fuck?
Historians rarely have much to say about the role of charm in public affairs. But it matters, and sometimes it matters a lot. William F. Buckley Jr. founded and spent thirty-five years editing National Review, published some fifty-odd books, hosted 1,429 episodes of Firing Line, and wrote a syndicated newspaper column from 1962 until the day of his death in 2008. Yet anyone who seeks to explain the nature of his contribution to American political life must start by pointing out something else that those who knew Buckley took for granted, which is that he was an irresistibly charming man. Whatever your political beliefs, you couldn't spend five minutes in his company without liking him, or feeling that he liked you...This is pure rubbish. Buckley? Likeable to the max? Please watch the "Baldwin vs. Buckley" video and tell me who is really likeable:
Sure, it was 73 years ago, when the place was called the Night Hawk Tavern, but still, fascinating! From the August 22, 1938 edition of The Seattle Daily Times.

Thank you, Slog Tipper Ryan. (You may read about the ghosts of Re-bar and other Seattle bars here.)