
Democrat Maureen Judge (yes, she's my ex-wife) won endorsements today from Planned Parenthood and NARAL/Pro-Choice Washington in her 41st Legislative District state senate race. Perhaps just as significantly, these are endorsements that her opponent, Republican incumbent Steve Litzow, has now lost. Litzow, who claims to be pro-choice, and is a former NARAL PAC Board member (as is Judge), shared a dual endorsement from NARAL with Democratic opponent Randy Gordon in 2010. Not this time:
In describing their endorsements, each organization cited Judge’s adamant and unwavering support of women’s reproductive rights, as well as Litzow’s votes to kill the Reproductive Health Parity Act in the 2012 Legislative session. Although he has described his votes as “procedural,” it is clear to women’s health organizations his votes equate to a broken campaign promise.
“Women and families don’t understand what a procedural vote is, but they do understand when a candidate runs on a platform of protecting women’s health but then votes three times against protecting women and families,” said Dana Laurent, Political Director at Planned Parenthood Votes Northwest.
Judge also received the endorsement of the National Women’s Political Caucus of Washington.
As the incumbent, and a relatively moderate Republican who voted for marriage equality, Litzow still likely holds the edge in this race. But Litzow only beat Gordon by less than 200 votes in a Republican wave election year, and while the 41st got slightly less Democratic after redistricting, it still leans in that direction. Women vote. So this'll hurt.
Now that the AP has followed up on and confirmed the story Eli and I broke a few weeks back on the hundreds of campaign documents gathered from Rob McKenna's King County Council office, and stored in the county archives, the rest of the media is following suit. Thanks, AP!
Of course McKenna's people have denied that this is evidence of anything improper, and maybe that's true (maybe) in a purely legalistic sense, given that the chain of custody cannot be verified. We only know that these campaign documents were found in McKenna's office (where they shouldn't have been). We can't be certain how they got there.
But, you know, come on... hundreds of pages of campaign documents scattered among McKenna's official council records? Are we really supposed to believe nothing improper was going on?
What was different about McKenna's office than that of other council members of the day is that McKenna used his taxpayer salaried council staffers to simultaneously run his election campaigns. That's legal, as long as these staffers perform none of their campaign activities on council time, on council premises, and using council resources. But what these documents suggest is that this is a helluva lot more difficult to accomplish in practice than in theory, and that McKenna was at very least negligent in enforcing the ethics rules.
I don't know whose idea it was, but Governor Chris Gregoire deserves a ton of credit for executing a political maneuver yesterday that could end up keeping control of the state senate in the hands of her fellow Democrats. Just days after the candidate filing deadline, Senator Cheryl Pflug (R-Maple Valley) announced she would step down July 1 to take a $92,500 a year appointment by Gregoire to a six-year term on the Washington Growth Management Hearings Board, suddenly putting Pflug's 5th Legislative District into play.
Hey, thank you, Governor, for the lovely parting gift.
Pflug has been one of the more moderate members of the senate Republican caucus since being appointed to the seat Dino Rossi left to run for governor in 2004. She will be perhaps best remembered for her crucial vote on marriage equality... a vote that had earned her a Republican primary challenger from the right, Snoqualmie businessman Brad Toft.
But Pflug was also facing a tough Democratic challenger in Issaquah Councilman Mark Mullet. No Democrat has held this seat since the single term won by Kathleen Drew (now running for Secretary of State) in 1992, but Mullet is considered a bit of an up and comer, and given his name ID, experience, and lack of being a one-issue rightwing Christianist like Toft, insiders tell me that Mullet has the early edge in this suddenly competitive race.
Republicans need to pick up three Democratic seats to take control of the senate. They have a virtual lock on the seat Senator Jim Kastama (D-Puyallup) has left open to run for Secretary of State, and a decent shot at unseating senators Mary Margaret Haugen (D-Camano Island) and Rosemary McAuliffe (D-Bothell). Add in races for open seats left vacant by Lisa Brown (D-Spokane), Derek Kilmer (D-Gig Harbor) and Craig Pridemore (D-Vancouver), and senate Dems have little room for error.
With Pflug's departure, the 5th LD now becomes the Democrats best shot at a pickup, followed by the Democratic-leaning 41st LD where first term Senator Steve Litzow (R-Mercer Island) faces a tough challenge from Maureen Judge (D-My Ex-Wife). If Dems can pickup one or both of these seats, the Republicans once promising takeover math becomes awfully complicated.
Yesterday was the filing the deadline for Washington's 2012 political season, and for me the biggest surprise was not who filed but who didn't: state Senator Joe Zarelli (R-Ridgefield), the ranking Republican on the Senate Ways & Means Committee, and the de facto chair during last session's budget coup. I had no idea Zarelli was considering retirement, and didn't even hear about it until Ways & Means (official) chair Senator Ed Murray (D-Seattle) sent out the following conciliatory statement last night:
“Sen. Zarelli’s departure from the Senate means the loss of one of the chamber’s most knowledgeable members, especially on fiscal issues. He advocated for his positions and his caucus strongly, but he was also a leader who knew how to compromise for the good of the state. I am glad that, despite our differences over the years, we have maintained a good relationship. I wish Joe the very best in the future.”
How politic of Ed. Personally, I thought Zarelli and his Republican colleagues were kinda dicks about the whole budget coup thing, but whatever. I don't have to work with them. Ed does.
Regardless, Zarelli's retirement seems strange considering his party stands a reasonable chance of seizing control of both the state Senate and the governor's mansion this November, and possibly even the state House. After 17 years in the legislature, next session might have been the chance for Zarelli—a proud signatory to Grover Norquist's "no new taxes" under even the most urgent circumstances pledge—to finally implement the drown-government-in-a-bathtub budget for which he'd long been striving. Absent some undisclosed illness or offer of a better job, the timing of Zarelli's retirement just strikes me as odd.
Zarelli's departure also kicks off a campaign season that features as many open seats as I can remember in my decade of paying close attention to these sort of things. Let the games begin!
Former State Sen. Eileen Qutub, a conservative Republican who was swept into the Oregon House in 1994's "Gingrich Revolution," has filed to run in Washington's 49th Legislative District for the open state senate seat being vacated by Democratic State Sen. Craig Pridemore. Pridemore is leaving office to run for state auditor.
Qutub served one term in the Oregon House and one in the Oregon Senate before losing in 2000 in what was then the most expensive legislative race in Oregon history. Willamette Week describes Qutub as "an outspoken foe of abortion;" she will face off against Democrat Annette Cleveland, a hospital administrator and former Patty Murray staffer.
Defying an effort by the state party to dissuade the field of 1st Congressional District Democratic candidates from also filing in the special election to serve out the remaining weeks of Jay Inslee's term in the pre-redistricting 1st CD, Darcy Burner officially filed in both races this morning, on the final day of candidate filing week. I'm guessing Washington Dems chair Dwight Pelz probably isn't too pleased.
On a conference call last week arranged by Pelz, the other Democratic candidates—Laura Ruderman, Suzan DelBene, Steve Hobbs, and Darshan Rauniyar—had all agreed to stay out of the special election if the rest of the field would, but Burner balked, largely due to concerns that it would leave the Democratic nominee at a financial disadvantage in the general should the lone Republican John Koster run in the special, enabling him to essentially double the cap on campaign contributions. Campaign insiders disagree on the dollars at stake, but it's likely somewhere in the $200K to $500K range.
Now that Burner has filed in both races, the rest of the field is likely to follow suit. And what that means is ultimately hard to say.
Both races will appear on the ballot in those precincts that overlap the old and the new 1st CD, confusing enough regardless of who is running. Some election observers fear that this could lead to the doubly-confusing scenario of a different Democrat appearing on the general election ballot in each. Maybe. But I'm not the only one who thinks that the primary election will likely swing hard in one candidate's direction (much like the crowded King County executive primary race ultimately swung to Dow Constantine), sweeping one candidate to victory in both races. We'll see.
In any case, prepare for the recriminations to begin. No doubt Burner will be accused of not being a team player. But tired of party politics, who's to say that may not be exactly what voters are looking for in a candidate?
UPDATE: As expected, DelBene has announced she is filing in the special, and Pelz has issued a statement saying he is "very disappointed" with Burner for "breaking ranks." C'est la vie.

Democratic US Representative Rick Larsen just dodged a bullet in WA-02, where Democratic challenger Dick McManus has apparently announced that he is dropping out of the race... or the dance... or something. You read the exact wording of his statement for yourself and see if you can figure it out:
Because I have not raised $1,740 in campaign contrabutions, my name and issues will not be on the ballet.
It's hard to imagine how the McManus campaign was so shockingly derailed, but I can only presume that failing to raise enough money to pay the filing fee might have something to do with it. Also, spelling.
Snohomish County Council Chair Brian Sullivan announced over the weekend that he will run in the special election to fill out the remaining month or so of Rep. Jay Inslee's term in the old 1st Congressional District, suggesting that there might be a deal in the works to avoid a weird battle between the Dems in the crowded field for the new post-redistricting WA-01.
"The people in the old 1st District need to be represented when Congress takes up key issues after the election and I am stepping up to serve them," Sullivan said in statement released by the Washington State Democratic Party.
Sullivan's candidacy comes with the blessing of state Dem chair Dwight Pelz, who has been working to avoid a potentially confusing situation in which the Democratic candidates appear twice on ballots in precincts where the old and the new 1st CD overlap. It's very possible under those circumstances that a different Dem makes it through the top-two primary in each race. What voters would make of this in November is hard to say, but you can't blame party officials for feeling uncomfortable about the uncertainty.
None of the Democratic candidates are running to serve for a mere month, but the special election—which became necessary after Inslee resigned to focus on his gubernatorial campaign—does bring with it a bonus: the ability to double up on contribution limits within the same campaign cycle. Money raised in the old 1st CD race should theoretically be spent only in that race, but since much of the district both overlaps and shares the same media market, those restrictions are pretty much meaningless.
Republican John Koster, essentially running unopposed, is free to run in both and seize this windfall. Whether all of his Democratic opponents are prepared to cede this fundraising advantage to Koster for the sake of avoiding the potential voter confusion that comes with it we'll soon know: the filing deadline is the end of this week.
Everyone expected a competitive race to replace retiring state Representative Mary Lou Dickerson in Seattle's 36th Legislative District, and from the recent fundraising totals, that's exactly what we got:
| Raised | Spent | Debt | |
| Gael Tarleton | $46,489.82 | $6,627.83 | $7,856.96 |
| Brett Phillips | $37,062.23 | $7,869.54 | $11,297.25 |
| Noel Frame | $35,871.80 | $7,954.38 | $13,831.44 |
| Sahar Fathi | $21,362.84 | $5,389.84 | $0.00 |
| Evan Clifthorne | $13,136.98 | $6,681.77 | $3,715.00 |
| Linde Knighton | $1,240.80 | $1,068.72 | $100.00 |
Gael Tarleton, a two-term port commissioner, was widely expected to hold a fundraising advantage over her competitors, all of whom are first time candidates. And she does. But not by as much as she'd probably like. Brett Phillips and Noel Frame aren't far behind, and Sahar Fathi shows respectable numbers too.
When you adjust for cash on hand and debt, the picture's a little different, with Tarleton's month-end balance almost twice that of her nearest competitor, and with Phillips, Frame, and Fathi all clumped together. But it's hard to read too much into the burn rate at this early stage of the campaign, as different expenses fall into different months.
My takeaway? Well... um... it's a competitive race. No surprise there.
If there was a ton of pent up demand to write checks for Rob McKenna following the fundraising freeze that ended with the close of the special legislative session, you wouldn't know it from his fundraising totals. McKenna raised $645K for the month of April, better than Jay Inslee's $527K, but not spectacularly better. By comparison, Governor Chris Gregoire raised over $1.3 million in 2008 following the end of the legislative session freeze.
McKenna has now raised $4.6 million total for his gubernatorial race, and has $2.5 million cash on hand. Inslee has raised $5.4 million total and has $3 million cash on hand. Of course those totals pale compared to the $47 trillion that will be spent by third parties to influence this race (thank you, Citizens United!), but so far neither candidate has demonstrated a significant fundraising advantage.
On Monday the Seattle Times gave former Washington Secretary of State Ralph Munro precious space on its op/ed page to advocate for online voting:
HAVING served as Washington's chief elections official for 20 years, I am impressed by those advocating our state move to online voting.
While there still are security issues to resolve before we implement true online voting, I strongly encourage more elections officials to embrace available technologies that utilize the power of the Internet to make our elections more accessible and efficient, without compromising the security of a voter's ballot.
Okay. Fair enough. I'm a technologist at heart and don't entirely dismiss the notion that online voting could someday be made accessible, efficient, and secure. But in talking about something as central to democracy as the integrity of our voting system, you'd think both Munro and the Seattle Times might have bothered to disclose to readers that in addition to being a former secretary of state, Munro is also a current director and former longtime chairman of Dategrity Corporation (formerly VoteHere), a for-profit company selling online voting technology.
This strikes me as a pretty ginormous conflict of interest.
That Munro is "impressed by those advocating our state move to online voting" shouldn't come as much of a surprise to the handful of us election integrity wonks familiar with Munro's decade-long leadership of VoteHere/Dategrity. But the fact that the Seattle Times didn't see fit to mention this to their readers is simply mind-fuckingly irresponsible.
Munro is a "former Washington Secretary of State," the paper tells us. He "served as Washington's election chief for 20 years." That makes him sound awfully damn credible. But while I don't doubt that he genuinely believes in online voting, the fact that Munro stands to make more than few bucks should it be widely adopted is something he and the editors had an ethical obligation to disclose. You know, context and all that.
Makes me wonder how much of the rest of their op/ed page is similarly filled with advertorials?
Rob McKenna's "Go get a job!" snipe is going to haunt him throughout the rest of this campaign. As it should.
US Senator Dick Lugar (R-Indiana) has been defeated by Tea Party challenger Richard Mourdock, unceremoniously ending Lugar's 36-year Senate career.
As much as I hate to see a Tea Party victory, this can't help but put in play for the Democrats what would have otherwise been a safe Republican seat. So yay!
Last week House Majority Leader Eric Cantor flew all the way out to Washington state to raise money for Rep. Dave Reichert in WA-08, who, thanks to redistricting, is currently enjoying the first easy race of his political career. Yet Cantor totally ignored Republican John Koster in WA-01, smack dab in the middle of the only truly competitive congressional race in the state.
Later this month House Speaker John Boehner will fly out for a $1,000 a plate fundraiser for Rep. Jaime Herrera Beutler in WA-03, also, thanks to redistricting, in what appears to be an awfully easy race. And again, there are no plans for Boehner either to campaign for Koster, the one Republican congressional candidate in the state who really needs the help.
What explains the snub? No doubt the House Republican leadership will be happy to have his vote should he win election, but let's be clear: Koster is fucking extreme, even for a party dedicated to privatizing Social Security and ending Medicare. Possibly even too extreme for his party to risk any of his avowed craziness to rub off on it.
Initial results suggest that Francois Hollande will beat right-wing incumbent Nicolas Sarkozy by about four points, to become France's first Socialist president in 16 years. No other way to interpret this than as a rejection of Europe's austerity regime.
(By the way, I was just watching Sarkozy's concession speech, and you should have heard the boos from his right-wing supporters when he said that the election results should be "respected." Typical right-wingers.)
Yesterday there was a huge rally over at the new campaign headquarters gubernatorial candidate Jay Inslee shares with the state Democratic coordinated campaign and President Obama's Washington reelection staff. About 800 enthusiastic supporters showed up to hear Inslee talk, along Democratic National Committee chair Rep. Debbie Wasserman Schultz (D-FL), Rep. Jim McDermott (D-WA), King County Executive Dow Constantine, and state Democratic Party chair Dwight Pelz.
Lots of fighting words and resounding rounds of applause. You might have read about it or saw it on the TV news. That is, assuming any reporters had actually bothered to show up.
Only four journalists bothered to sign in as press: me from The Stranger, Jordan Schrader from the News Tribune, education blogger Melissa Westbrook, and of course a reporter from the Times. The Seattle Emerald Chinese Times. I couldn't help but be reminded of a snarky comment in yesterday's thread on the 90 women suing Rob McKenna:
Note to Jay Inslee: This would be a great time to remind people that you are an alternative to McKenna by, oh, I don't know, being in the public eye a little bit more. Just a thought...
Of course, being in public and being in the public eye are two different things. I can't tell you how many times I've heard the complaint that Inslee has been an anemic campaigner. But honestly, how many voters could possibly have a reasonable take on the size and frequency of Inslee's campaign appearances if reporters don't bother to show up and report on them?
I couple weeks back I complained that "Inslee has never quite gotten the coverage he deserves," and as the refusal to cover yesterday's event shows, that hasn't changed.
I get it. There wasn't likely to be much actual news generated at yesterday's rally, and as far as I could tell, apart from the fact that it happened, there wasn't. But there isn't any actual news generated at most campaign events. That's just the way this game is played.
Whatever. Eventually the paid media in this campaign will overwhelm the impact of the earned media, making what little is left of our state's political press corps less and less relevant. But in the meanwhile, just because you don't see Jay Inslee in the public eye doesn't mean he isn't there... at least in the eyes of those members of the public and the press who actually bother to show up.
In case you are wondering whether state Senate Majority Leader Lisa Brown took it personally when three Democrats betrayed the caucus and secretly conspired with the Republicans to orchestrate the budget coup at the end of the recent regular legislative session, this should clear things up:
I have decided not to seek re-election to the 3rd district Senate seat this fall. Returning home two weeks ago, I began taking stock of my twenty years in the Legislature, reflecting on what I have been able to achieve with the help of colleagues and supporters. I decided that, though it is still immensely gratifying to serve Spokane and the state of Washington in this capacity, I am ready for new challenges.
Brown doesn't mention the budget coup in her statement, preferring instead to dwell on her many accomplishments. But it's hard to imagine that wasn't the final straw pushing her toward retirement.
"This is a big loss to the senate, and a big loss to Democrats," Senator Ed Murray (D-Seattle) lamented by phone. "Lisa was one of the few people down there in Olympia who really understood the the nuts and bolts of budgeting," said Murray, the caucus's chief budget writer. Brown is an economist by training, but that's obviously not something much valued in a chamber where half the members seem to take their instructions straight from Grover Norquist.
As the Ways and Means chair, Murray would seem like an obvious choice to replace Brown as majority leader, assuming the Democrats retain control of the Senate. "I haven't though about it," Murray said when asked if he would pursue the post. "The leadership team will be chosen by the people elected in November."
As for the Dems' prospects of holding Brown's Spokane-based seat, they seem pretty good. The 3rd legislative district is perhaps the only Democratic-leaning LD east of the Cascades, and it's likely that one or the other of Democratic representatives Andy Billig or Timm Ormsby will move up and retain Brown's seat.
Still, being forced to defend yet another open seat can't help the Democrats' chances of retaining their tentative control of the Senate as a whole. They can pretty much kiss Senator Jim Kastama's seat goodbye, which reduces the Democratic majority to a mere two seat advantage. That doesn't provide much of a margin of error in what could still prove to be a very volatile election year.
House Majority Leader Eric Cantor was in town for a breakfast fundraiser at the Bellevue Westin this morning. Not that that's really news. Cantor does a lot of fundraisers for congressional incumbents and candidates. It's what he does.
No, what really makes this particular trip so interesting is that Cantor flew all the way out here to raise money for Rep. Dave Reichert—who is in the race of his life only in the sense that this is the first race of his life not to be much of a race (thank you, redistricting!)—not for John Koster, Washington's only Republican congressional candidate in a remotely competitive contest.
Why? Because John Koster is too extreme even for Eric Cantor! And that's saying something.
A Cantor-allied group has been spending money against Republicans Cantor thinks are too extreme, for example some who advocate eliminating the Department of Education. You know, just like Koster. So it would be a little odd for Cantor to spend money in one state against extremists he fears are undermining his party's credibility, while raising money for them in another.
You'd think if Cantor was enthusiastic about Koster's candidacy he'd have held a fundraiser for him too. But he didn't. And that tells you everything you need to know about how mindfuckingly extreme Koster really is.
On KUOW's Weekday this morning, the Seattle Times' Joni Balter implicitly acknowledged that snapping at a young woman to "go get a job" didn't look so good for attorney general and Republican gubernatorial wannabe Rob McKenna. "It was kinda out of character," said Balter of the candidate her editorial board will surely endorse.
But was it?
Last July at a Young Republicans meeting at the Bellevue Community Center, McKenna retreated to the cupcake table, refusing to speak, as meeting organizers called the police on a Democratic tracker. A month earlier he had me kicked out of a press conference—a couple days later at the KUOW studios, in careless earshot of the other journalists, a flustered McKenna excused my exclusion, complaining to Eli that I was just "a partisan hack."
This is a man who isn't comfortable being caught on camera speaking his mind, and who rudely disregards people who ask him tough questions. No doubt Joni and her editorial board colleagues don't see his rude side. Why should they? Here she is defending him as best she can given the circumstances. But from my experience, McKenna's lack of transparency and arrogant dismissiveness is totally in character.
And that in the end is the question at the heart of this race: Who is the real Rob McKenna? The mild-mannered moderate so many in the press make him out to be? Or the partisan hack on display this week, a man who sounds more like a right-wing troll than a credible gubernatorial candidate?
Seattle City Council member Mike O'Brien is looking for help to dismantle the city's political war chests by imposing a $5,000 cap on campaign funds that a politician could roll over from one race to the next.
Today, O'Brien and fellow council members Sally Clark and Tim Burgess addressed a letter titled "Request to Evaluate Local Campaign Finance Reform Measures," to the Seattle Ethics and Elections commission, asking them to weigh in on two specific regulatory actions:
·Limit the time period that candidates seeking local office can solicit or accept campaign contributions
·Cap the maximum amount of campaign surplus funds that can be rolled over to a future campaign at $5,000.
O'Brien staffer Esther Handy confirmed that O'Brien is drafting legislation to restrict the state law at the city level by requiring candidates running for city office to donate the bulk of their surplus campaign contributions after each election cycle—either to the city, to a nonprofit of their choosing, or by returning it to donors. Candidates would be allowed to keep up to $5,000 as seed money to use during the next election cycle.
Handy says the legislation would also whittle candidates' current four-year fundraising window down to 16 months by prohibiting candidates from launching fundraising efforts until January 1 of their election year through April 30 of the following year. Los Angeles and San Diego have imposed similar fundraising windows for political office.

And instead of answering a concerned constituent's question, you give her the third degree and belittle her by telling her to get a job? You fuckwad.
As Goldy has noted, McKenna's hypocrisy when it comes to meddling with legislative matters is striking. He's happy—eager, even—to tell the state legislature how to balance the budget but still refuses to comment on a now-dead bill that would've ensured women equal access to maternity care and insurance-covered abortions. McKenna's petite shit fit when confronted by Obom hammers home a serious problem with his candidacy: He adamantly refuses to stand up for—or even address—women's reproductive rights.
Aside from the Reproductive Parity Act, he's repeatedly refused to explain his stance on funding birth control, family planning, and STD testing. He also refused to address questions about Planned Parenthood as Congress was trying to defund the organization last year.
"Our next governor will play a pivotal roll in the implementation of the healthcare exchange, and as one of the attorneys attempting to block the affordable care act, Rob McKenna is not one of the people we can trust to protect women’s health during that process," explains Planned Parenthood Votes NW spokeswoman Sara Kiesler. (Unsurprisingly, the organization endorsed Jay Inslee last week.)
I have to agree. Having publicly stated that he “believes life begins at conception” along with this consistent evasiveness, Rob McKenna is not the candidate women can trust to protect our reproductive health.
Yesterday outside the Bering Sea Fisheries Conference, a young woman approached attorney general and gubernatorial wannabe Rob McKenna to ask him his stance on the Reproductive Parity Act, a bill his fellow Republicans killed in the legislature last year, but on which he has refused to comment.
His response, as recorded in the audio above and transcribed below, was remarkably curt and rude:
Woman: "Mr. Mckenna."
McKenna: "Yes."
Woman: "What's your stance on the Reproductive Parity Act?"
McKenna: "My stance is I'm a lawyer for the State. You can turn that recorder off if you'd like, instead of trying to bushwhack me. It's not really very polite is it? Do you think you're honest?"
Woman: "I'm just wondering..."
McKenna: "Do you think you're being honest?"
Woman: "Huh?"
McKenna: "Are you being honest? Or are you just not going to answer my question?"
Woman: "I'm a youth worker who's wondering..."
McKenna: "You're not being honest. Forget it."
Woman: "Okay..."
McKenna: "You're just trying to gain a political advantage, sorry. Why don't you go get a job?"
"Get a job"...? Really? Jesus. What an arrogant asshole.
A few observations. First, this is a proposed bill not a legal case, so McKenna's status as AG gives him no excuse not to answer—that's total bullshit, plain and simple. Second, I'm told that this woman was not a Democratic tracker, as McKenna seems to presume in so rudely dismissing her. Third, I'm shocked, shocked to find people "trying to gain a political advantage" in a political campaign! And finally, "get a job"...? I mean, what the fuck?
This is of course the standard conservative Republican approach to everybody with which they disagree politically, that we are somehow all lazy economic parasites sucking the blood from hardworking "producers" like themselves. A young woman asks a politically challenging question about McKenna's stance on a reproductive health bill, and he dismissively responds by telling her to "go get a job."
I could riff on this for days (and possibly will), but the short of it is that if there was ever a window into the ideology and psyche of Rob McKenna, it's this ill-mannered, ill-considered offhand remark. "Go get a job!" That's the Republican prescription for everything, isn't it? If you are unemployed, uninsured, uneducated, unhomed, or unanything, go get a fucking a job instead of looking for handout or a hand up.
As for McKenna, as a politician and elected official, part of his job is to answer questions from constituents. And if he's not up to it, perhaps he should go look for another line of work?
I'm not ashamed to admit that I like Rep. Dennis Kucinich (D-OH). Sure, he can be a little, um, eccentric, and I'm not entirely convinced that he's always in it for the right reasons. And yeah, he's maybe not the most effective congressman out there. But on issue after issue he offers an unabashedly liberal voice, absolutely unconcerned with the personal political consequences.
No, I wouldn't want a congress filled with Kucinichs, but at least a few of them are necessary to help balance his many counterparts on the right. That's why after being redistricted out of his safe Cleveland seat, I for one welcome Kucinich to run in Washington. You know, as long as he runs for a seat Democrats don't see much chance of winning.
"It is clear that Cleveland and Washington State agree on one thing: we just don't want Dennis Kucinich," state Democratic Party chair Dwight Pelz said in a statement earlier this week. Yeah, well, maybe. Before the redistricting maps were complete Kucinich was considering a run for an open seat in either the 1st or the 10th, districts that I know Pelz and I agree Kucinich wouldn't stand a snowball's chance of winning. Voters don't take kindly to carpetbaggers 'round these parts, and so I'd be surprised to see Kucinich even make it through our top-two primary in either of those districts, or in Representative Norm Dicks' recently vacated 6th.
Defeated in a primary for an open seat. It would be a shame to see Kucinich end his career embarrassing himself like that.
But there would be nothing embarrassing about taking one for the team, forcing a Republican incumbent like Dave Reichert or Jaime Herrera Beutler to actually fight for their jobs in WA-08 or WA-03. These are races apparently without credible Democratic challengers. Kucinich could change that.
Yesterday (before Slog died) I posted on the money race in the 1st CD, the most competitive congressional race in the state. Okay, the only competitive race in the state. The 1st quarter 2012 campaign finance reports are in for the other nine districts, and there are at least some interesting numbers, if not particularly surprising ones:
6th CD: Not only has State Senator Derek Kilmer raked in all the Democratic endorsements in the surprisingly uncompetitive race to replace retiring Congressman-for-Life Norm Dicks, he's also raked in most of the money: $357,339 compared to... well... I'm not exactly sure what numbers to use for his Republican competitors. One challenger has loaned himself $133,000 and done absolutely nothing else. None have raised more than about $20K in actual contributions. It sure looks like a cakewalk for Kilmer.
10th CD: The third of three open seats this election is also proving to be surprisingly uncompetitive. The uninspiring yet establishment-beloved Denny Heck added another $402K to his coffers, bringing his total haul to $902K, plus another $350K in personal loans. Meanwhile Heck's Republican opponent Dick Muri only added $31K to his $134K total, and has a meager $64K cash on hand. Money isn't everything, but you don't win races being outspent ten to one.
2nd CD: Likable if pulse-slackening Democratic incumbent Representative Rick Larsen won reelection by a graphene-thin margin in 2010, but only after late ballots gave him a come from behind victory over crazy Tea Party challenger John Koster. So even in a substantially more Democratic redistricted 2nd, you'd think he would've drawn some moderately strong competition. Not so much. Larsen added $134K to his $819K total. Larsen's only challenger, Republican Dan Matthews, has raised $2,130, about $8,000 less than he's spent.
Cancel the election, don't bother printing up the ballots—the race to replace retiring State Representative Mary Lou Dickerson is all but over after 28-year-old Sahar Fathi cleared the field last night at The Stranger's totally binding and official 36th Legislative District Candidate Forum. Who knew Cienna was such a power broker?
Okay, not really.
A panel of six Democratic candidates whose positions on most issues couldn't be separated by a putty knife, drew a standing-room-only crowd at the Spitfire last night for a Survivor-style forum in which the audience would vote a single candidate off the island after each round of questions. But this is politics, so if you thought this was about the issues you had another think coming.
Early on, before the first question was asked, it was clear that Seattle Port Commissioner Gael Tarleton would be the first to go. No matter how many times we cleared the results and explained to the audience that no votes would count until we opened the poll, the text messages kept coming in to give Tarleton the boot... presumably from the many "Noel Frame"-stickered boosters who had packed the room. And so she was.
But Tarleton had her own smaller if equally partisan army in the room, and they were determined to pay Frame back in kind. Frame survived the next couple rounds, but just barely, ultimately leaving Fathi and Brett Phillips to duke it out for the final honors. It was no contest, with Phillips getting the thumbs down from 67 percent of the audience.
The first quarter 2012 financial reports are in, and the 1st Congressional District fundraising race is shaping up largely as expected:
| Candidate | 1Q12 | Total | Cash on Hand | Debt |
| Suzan DelBene | $341,636 | $341,955 | $317,723 | $250,000 |
| Darcy Burner | $178,533 | $306,408 | $114,640 | $11,286 |
| Laura Ruderman | $103,256 | $361,715 | $220,026 | $12,525 |
| John Koster (R) | $87,701 | $312,259 | $103,495 | $20,000 |
| Steve Hobbs | $73,673 | $188,765 | $98,990 | $9,000 |
| Darshan Rauniyar | $29,622 | $169,086 | $123,957 | $500 |
Suzan DelBene had a strong first quarter in the race, tapping in to her rich network of rich people. A full $160K of her $342K came in "double-max" donations ($2,500 for each the primary and the general, $5,000 combined), many of them from people named Balmer, Gates and the like. That means $80,000 of the money she raised can't be spent in the primary. DelBene also records $250K in debt—a personal loan—a number that helps explain her oversized cash on hand advantage despite $121K in expenditures.
Coming in second in the money race last quarter was Darcy Burner, who has taken a more grassroots approach to her fundraising. According to her campaign, Burner has now received contributions from 5,062 supporters, far more than any other candidate in this race, at an average of less than $60 per individual contributor. That includes $30,000 from 1,200 supporters through an online drive on the last day of the quarter alone. This suggests that Burner should have no trouble attracting volunteers during the crucial final weeks of the campaign.
Coming in third was Laura Ruderman, with $103K raised, which she recently touted as her best quarter yet. Ruderman has a healthy $220,000 cash on hand, but she better pick up the fundraising pace if she hopes to stay dollar competitive with DelBene and Burner.
State Senator Steve Hobbs and political newcomer Darshan Rauniyar bring up the rear of the Democratic field, raising $74K and $30K respectively. Hobbs has a string of endorsements from fellow state legislators, but doesn't have a history of raising big money. As for Rauniyar, his early fundraising success appears to be petering out as reality sets in among prospective donors.
And finally John Koster, the putative Republican nominee, raised only $88K in the quarter. Sure, he can count on millions of PAC dollars to be ultimately spent on his behalf, but his anemic fundraising doesn't say much about his work ethic or his grassroots support.
Governor Chris Gregoire announced today that she has endorsed Suzan DelBene in the hotly contested race to replace Jay Inslee in the 1st Congressional District. “Getting people back to work is the most critical issue facing our country and we need more experienced leaders in Congress who know how to create jobs. Suzan is that person,” said Gregoire in a press release.
It's no surprise that DelBene is the choice of the Democratic establishment. Her centrist views and demeanor make her a safe choice in a swing district, and her personal fortune and willingness to self-fund make her very attractive to Democratic strategists. But I am a little surprised that a sitting governor would jump in so early to pick a favorite out a field of qualified Democrats. Makes me wonder if the establishment types are getting a little jumpy?
That said, DelBene was also Gregoire's Department of Revenue director, so maybe the governor is just rewarding loyalty with loyalty.
State Representative Roger Goodman (D-Kirkland) announced today that he was dropping his bid for the open seat in Washington's 1st Congressional District, and would instead run for reelection to the legislature.
"Having campaigned hard in this huge, new 'swing' congressional district, and working under the brutally relentless pressure to raise the startling amount of money now needed for congressional campaigns, I have decided to continue representing my constituents in the State Legislature," Goodman wrote in a prepared statement.
Neither the announcement nor the timing came as much of a surprise. Goodman had worked the district hard, but was having trouble keeping pace in the Democratic fundraising race dominated by Suzan DelBene, Laura Ruderman, and Darcy Burner. He was also the only 1st CD candidate out of eight who would have had to give up an elected office in order to continue to run.
As for the rest of the field, it's hard to argue that Goodman's exit doesn't favor Burner. Both Goodman and Burner have run aggressively liberal campaigns, potentially splitting that segment of the Democratic base, with Roadkill Senator Steve Hobbs staking out a more conservative position, and DelBene and Ruderman jostling near the center. With Goodman out, Burner will find it easier to differentiate herself from the rest of the field.
Great news for Republicans: There were 380,000 new claims for unemployment last week, the highest level since January!
Let's be honest, Mitt Romney's chances in November improve considerably if the economy starts heading in reverse. That's why Republicans desperately want America to fail.