
I wonder if Mike McGinn's promise to build the tunnel was just as sincere as Greg Nickels' promise to build the monorail.
Photos from outside the memorial service for Seattle Police Officer Timothy Brenton at Key Arena today...

More after the jump. All taken by photographer Ashley Robinson.
The Stranger's Brian Geoghagan videotaped the funeral procession for slain officer Timothy Brenton in front of the Seattle Police Department East Precinct, where Brenton had been assigned for eight years.
The funeral procession for slain Seattle Police Officer Timothy Brenton is rolling past our offices right now, as Dan mentioned a minute ago. Police cruisers from far and wide—hundreds of them, from Tacoma, Everett, Stilacoom, Snohomish, Steilacoom, border patrol, Salem, Oregon, they just keep coming—are filing down East Pine Street.

A few thoughts: I really hope they catch the craven douche who shot Brenton. Second, the new police cars are fancy, especially the yellow and black road monster from Tulalip that looks like a big bee. But the coolest car? Definitely this old SPD cruiser that must have been rolled out of the museum for the occasion...

I'll be on KUOW's Weekday this morning, starting at 10 a.m., to talk about the week that was: Microsoft layoffs, a new King County Executive, no new mayor (yet), and the ambush and murder of a Seattle Police officer.
That's 94.9 FM.
Reacting to the latest results in the mayor's race, Joe Mallahan's campaign spokeswoman Charla Neuman says, "I don't see how this doesn't go to a recount. Something very abnormal would have to happen at this point." Mallahan is trailing by only 515 votes, which is just a 0.4 percent difference.
Despite three sets of returns showing Mike McGinn with a razor-thin advantage, Neuman has "some initial reasons to be optimistic," she says. Certain legislative districts may be underrepresented among the votes tallied thus far. Those uncounted votes, she says, "are from neighborhoods that could be more favorable to Joe Mallahan."
According to a summary of results from election night, released earlier today by election workers, the 34th and 46th Legislative Districts favored Mallahan. McGinn held an advantage in the 11th, 37th, and 43rd Districts. The 36th District was essentially tied, favoring Mallahan by only 50 votes. Again, those are only election-night results. Over 60,000 votes have been tallied since.
If the ballots yet to be counted disproportionately represent voters from the 46th and 34th Districts (northeast Seattle and West Seattle), we could see Mallahan take the lead. "We will know more after tonight when we get a better look," says Neuman. King County is estimated to have slightly over 80,000 uncounted Seattle ballots on hand.
What the hell am I going to do between now and 4:30?
Work on my Genius Profile of PNB, I guess, and watch these lovely videos by this year's film genius Zia Mohajerjasbi to remind me of what's good about Seattle and what will remain, no matter who becomes our next mayor.
The opening bars of this one are a perfect balm for hurting/anxious souls, the camera moving from Beacon Hill to the glass towers of the city's financial center (as Mudede has written for his profile of Zia in next week's issue):
And give a hand to Mix-a-Lot for his cameo (and his orange Lamborghini). Zia's colors and light are dreamy and crepuscular. Even when I don't like the rappers (and I don't like all these rappers), the images are their own reward.
4:30 today. Then Nov 13.
I'm getting excited for the party at the Moore on the 13th, in part because MY GENIUS (I call him this only because he's the visual art Genius, not because I selected him alone: we pick as a committee) IS THE BEST GENIUS.
Oh yeah. I'm throwing it down for Jeffry Mitchell. He will WHUP all you other Geniuses, like Wesley Willis whupped Batman's ass!
Okay, I'm just talking shit. But I did come across this adorable photograph of Jeffry making a drawing of Gretchen Bennett last week.
And need I remind you of Ellen Ziegler's Jeffry tribute?
Says the Seattle Police Department:
A memorial procession along city streets for Seattle Police Officer Timothy Brenton will be held on Friday, November 6. Approximately 1,000 to 1,500 vehicles will depart at 9:00 a.m. from the University of Washington and will travel to a service for the slain officer at Key Arena.During the procession, which is expected to last from 9:00 a.m. to noon, other traffic will not be allowed on the route and will not be allowed to cross it. The Seattle Department of Transportation (SDOT) advises travelers to expect severe congestion near its path, especially as mourners are also anticipated along its course. [...]
The public memorial service at Key Arena will begin at 1:00 p.m., with doors opening at 11:00 a.m.
More info on the route and service is over here.
Revel Smith at Real Change writes, "Nickelsville's amicable 5-week stay at Keystone Congregational Church ends tomorrow." The 30 residents of Nickelsville—it's a small town—will be moving to New Hope Missionary Baptist Church, she says. "The outdoor lots connected to the church can accommodate 50 to 100 people."
But since Mayor Greg Nickels leaves City Hall in less than two months, what will they call this nomadic village after the new mayor takes office? These were the best names we could come up with: Mallahamlet, Mallahanistan, Mike-ronesia, and Papua NewGinny... None of those seems to stick. And Smith hasn't returned my phone call about this pressing matter. Got any better ideas?
UPDATE: Smith, who is "at the end tail end of the piggy flu," says they may or may not rename their fine burg. "Our hope is that the new mayor will treat this issue differently and there will be no need to change it to another mayor's name." But, if the incoming mayor turns out to be an anti-homeless ass, "we'll be sure to let everybody know."

The good people of King County elections would still love for you to cast your vote, and have made it pretty easy, and (lucky you) there is no one in line at the "accessible voting" location inside Union Street Station at 401 S. Jackson Street.
I got there this morning and had the help of a dozen election workers to myself. Walked into the station, found the room (to the right), filled out a brief form, showed my ID, got a magnetized card to plug into a machine, and was led to a touchscreen voting station where it took about three seconds to vote for Mike McGinn, Dow Constantine, no on I-1033, approve Ref-71, etc.—print out The Stranger's full endorsements and take it with you. Then I got to read a printout of my selections to make sure the machine got everything right. Then I pressed a button that said "Cast your ballot." While there, exactly two other people showed up to vote. One of them was another guy who'd lost his ballot. The other was Rusty Williams, who ran for city council this year but didn't make it through the primary, who walked into the polling place saying, "Where is everybody?" We're right here, one of the election workers said back. "No, no, the customers!" Williams said, laughing.
The election workers were so relaxed/friendly/unbusy I asked a tableful who they were voting for. "We're non-partisan," one of them said. She was doing a crossword puzzle. "Within these walls," she added.
Another chimed in, "We just want people to vote."
If your ballot's at home, just go to Union Station to do it. (If you're elsewhere in King County, you can also go to Bellevue City Hall or the elections office in Tukwila—there's a map here.) It's so easy. And it's going to be a close election. And you know how beautiful Union Station is, right?

It's open til 8 pm, though they expect it'll become a madhouse after 5 pm. GO!
Detailed cross tabs of a poll released yesterday by SurveyUSA show Joe Mallahan has a two-point lead, but 12 percent of voters remain undecided. How are they likely to vote?
If late-October trends are an indiction, Mike McGinn could do well: He picked up seven percent support since a poll conducted 10 days before—when 21 percent of voters were undecided—but Mallahan only picked up two percent. If McGinn continues to get three-quarters of undecided voters, he could win.
Younger voters will probably steer heavily towards McGinn. The largest age demographic of undecided voters are 18 to 34 years old—who make up a quarter of all likely voters and a group considered McGinn's base—and still 19 percent of these younger voters haven't made up their minds. Voters of the same age who have made up their minds support McGinn by a 49 percent to 33 percent margin. That's a 26 percent lead. Looking at a larger chunk of the electorate, again by age, voters under 50 years old who have decided support McGinn by a five-point margin. Overall this group makes up 57 percent of all likely Seattle voters and they are 14 percent undecided (compared to 10 percent of voters over 50), so the largest age demographics prefer McGinn and they are also the majority of undecided voters.
But Mallahan may have the upper hand—that is, if younger voters are fairly represented, which they may not be, considering the biases of SurveyUSA's methodology. Undecided voters over 50 years old—who make up 43 percent of all voters—are trending toward him by a 12 point margin, far more than the lead for McGinn among younger voters.
Another metric that seems to give Mallahan a boost is gender. Although men are evenly split on the candidates (one point difference), women prefer Mallahan by a four points. And 15 percent of women are undecided, six percent more than men.
Undecided voters also don't seem impressed by McGinn's softening stance on the tunnel; 28 percent say McGinn's new position makes them less likely to vote for him but only 17 percent of undecideds say they're more likely to vote for him. Fifty percent don't give a shit about his new position on the tunnel.
A few other interesting points Mallahan's holds strong support among Republicans, conservatives, and moderates. Mallahan has also been moderately more successful at wooing Nickels voters—49 percent of them now support Mallahan and 40 percent support McGinn. Voters who make less than $50,000 a year—working class folks, not surprisingly—support McGinn by a 10-point margin. But the working class folks making under $50,000 a year are less than one-third of all likely voters.
Well, sing me a lullaby, Sweet Baby Jesus! Consider that barn BURNED! I could just hang my head and weep, that it's all over now…
Yes, my friends, that was it! The very last mayoral debate of this most mayorally debatey season! And my God, how I have adored them, these damn debates—all fourteen-trillion of them! They were like reality teevee, sans the slightest shred of reality—and featuring only two belligerent children! (And, um, sometimes even sans the teevee…this last one was radio-only, you know. Did McGinn steal Mallahan's suit-and-tie concept again? Who had the beard this time? How will we ever know? Goddamn it, radio! It really makes you feel for the blind…you know?)
And what a phenomenal showing from Mallahands it was! He was driving accountability all over the damn place! Also, efficiencies! (How you ever observed accountability and/or efficiencies so completely and totally driven? No. I thought not.)
But I must say: one deeply impressive characteristic of The Mallahan that he has ever-so-modestly, yet foolishly, kept under wraps this election is his SCARY PSYCHIC POWERS. Shhh… listen…
In the future, an officer will make a mistake and commit an offense against a citizen.
Whoa! SPOOKY! Is he a wizard? Got a Sybil in his pocket? Dionne Warwick on speed dial? Or is precognition merely a standard feature of his contract with the devil (plus a nice set of golf clubs and all the comely virgins he can swallow)? Well. Thanks for the futuristic warning, Mayor Fortune Cookie! And take heed, all ye officers of the alleged “law”! Be on your guard, easily offended “citizens”! Mistakes are lurking in your future, waiting to happen all over you! Joe Mallahan, human Ouija board, has spoken.
Peculiar and rather disturbing, however, that nary a single mention of those oh-so-supportive Africans raised its head during this final debate. What has happened to the legendarily unwavering loyalty of Africans—and their deep and very African Malla-love?
I guess Africans don't support him quite as vociferously as he once imagined, perhaps? So he's backing off bringing them up again? Capricious and rather two-faced, it seems there, you Africans. Or maybe he was just driving things like accountility (and effeciencies!) and moving forward—you know, keeping his mind on the road? Not being psychic myself (very often), I am simply unqualified to comment at this juncture.
By all accounts, the city council is expected to pass an ordinance this afternoon to allow cottages up to 800 square feet in backyards. Based on recent testimony at city council hearings, cottages—ranging from converted garages to hyper modern—are especially popular with growing families, aging families, and folks who want to raise a little rent. Today's vote would expand a 2006 pilot project in Southeast Seattle. But they have hardly hardly prolific in the pilot area; only 17 were built. Nonetheless, residents of northeast and northwest Seattle had kittens at the prospect of a cottage boom, calling it the end of single-family zoning and a threat to Seattle. Even the normally-reasonable Marty Liebowitz, a developer, wrote a post on Central District News the other day calling this “judgment day for the fate of single-family neighborhoods.” He says cottages will loom over backyards, encroaching on privacy in our homes and gardens.
Liebowitz warns: “If passed on November 2nd, none of our rear yard sanctuaries is safe. No longer can we toke up in private or sunbathe au naturelle. No longer can we and our backyard critters enjoy a moment or careless, peaceful, piece of mind.”
But Leibowitz should know that two-story structures looking over backyard fences aren't all bad. His business, the Madrona Company, built Miller Mews, an eight-unit town house development in the Central District in the late 1990s directly between two single-family homes (I know because I was a painter on Leibowitz's project, hanging from a ladder and looking into the backyards of people who were smoking pot).
I respectfully disagree with Liebowitz (who can still be naked and stoned in his backyard even with a cottage or a town house next door). We’ve tested the cottages in Southeast Seattle, where they are less intrusive than houses, less prolific than tree houses, and only slightly larger than doghouses.
If anything, the council should adjust the rules to allow more cottages in tighter quarters. The proposal before the council only allows cottages on lots over 4,000 square feet. But many of the lots in the Central District and Capitol Hill—where people tend to be more amenable to increased density—are less than 4,000 square feet. The council should allow cottages of 600 square feet on lots over 3,000 feet, too. But who will think of the pot smoking critters in the nude?
Immediately following the full council meeting, the budget committee—which happens to be the entire city council—meets to discuss two items of particular interest. One is the repealing the so-called “head tax,” which taxes business $25 for each employee who relies overwhelmingly on a single-occupancy vehicle to get to work. The money pays for sidewalks and bicycle amenities, but businesses balked and mayoral candidates turned the head tax into a political football. So now the budget committee will discuss its options. The head tax could be repealed by January 1. But now that the mayor’s race is one day from over—praises and thanks—hopefully the council will shelve this fake issue and keep the revenue to build sidewalks in all those neighborhoods that don’t have them, which is a real issue.
Speaking of mayoral races, whoever wins the election will get some money for a mayoral transition team. City council budget committee chair Jean Godden is sponsoring a bill to give $175,000 to assist the new mayor elect’s transition staff and offices. Is that cash intended to grease the wheels for the relationship between the council and new mayor? “That would be my intention,” says Godden.
9:00 am: Steve Scher thanks listeners for letting him take vacation, and other staffers who covered for him, and says: "We jump back into the fray of things now—we talk to the two candidates for mayor... competing visions for Seattle..."
9:06 am: Scher: "Joe Mallahan, Mike McGinn. They wrap it up on Weekday... We're going to do it a little differently today, as I'm easing back into my job"—Steve, no one cares you were on vacation—"and let you introduce yourselves."
9:08 am: "I was born and raised in the pearl of the west coast, Everett." Scher: "I like that 'pearl of the west coast.' That's nice. Why do you want to be mayor?" Mallahan: "I want us to keep moving forward... We're very much at risk of moving backward." Scher: "So you're thinking is essentially stayed the same." Mallahan: "I think my thinking has grown. It's a big city, there are a lot of stakeholder groups."
9:09 am: McGinn starts by talking about himself as a father and family man, and someone who's spent a lot of time trying "to make this city a better place. The reason I'm running is because I believe we face really serious challenges, and we have people ready to face those challenges, as long as government is willing to work with them."
9:12 am: Mallahan is talking about how he wants to give everyone the opportunity to hold him accountable. Why is he allowed to keep saying this, considering he hasn't been accountable for his career at T-Mobile and hasn't let T-Mobile out of the non-disclosure agreement they struck when he took leave? That would be letting yourself be held accountable. (UPDATE: A friend points out that non-disclosure agreements almost always are to protect the employee from talking about the company, not the company from talking about the employee. Which kind of makes T-Mobile's unwillingness to talk about Mallahan even more suspect.)
9:13 am: Mallahan: "It's not lost on me that this event on Halloween night, the killing of this officer, puts us at great risk... The tension level among officers must be extraordinary... It's just raised the tension dramatically.
9:14 am: McGinn: "This is clearly an extraordinary tragedy. Police officers put themselves on the line for us... I think it's one of the reasons why the selection of a new police chief is so critical... Having a serious discussion about what are the qualities we're looking in a police chief," and about issues facing the police force, is critical. "Building trust between police and the community has to be a high priority."
9:17 am: Mallahan is saying he will be "present" to the police force if he's mayor. "I can't overemphasize being physically present... In the future, an officer will make a mistake and commit an offense against a citizen." Huh? "It's coming together and having a dialogue." Can anyone follow this answer?
This event at the Moore looks promising for the early end of Halloween, 2009:

A massive collaboration from Degenerate Art Ensemble that is part dance spectacle and part concert, a little bit punk-rock and a little bit Butoh. Featuring musicians Joshua Kohl and Jeffrey Huston, dancers Haruko Nishimura, Trinidad Martinez (Pat Graney Company), and Marissa Niederhauser (Maureen Whiting Company), set designer (and Stranger Genius) Jennifer Zeyl, video by Leo Mayberry, and many, many more. Sonic Tales should float by like a dreamy, postmodern fairy tale.
For the late end: Rumor has it Orkestar Zirkonium will assemble at Cal Anderson Park around 11 to march around and inflict their delightful Balkan brass-band havoc on the Halloween drunks.
Make a note of it, Seattle. That's what you are:
OLYMPIA — The Washington State Board on Geographic Names today approved a proposal to use ‘Salish Sea’ as the collective name for the body of water that includes Puget Sound, the Strait of Juan de Fuca, and Georgia Strait.
God I love a Board on Geographic Names. Actually, what I really love is the United States Board on Geographic Names, which I first encountered during the great squaw debate in Oregon. This mighty federal board weighs important matters such as whether to change the name of, say, Oregon's Squaw Creek, or Yellowstone's Chinaman Spring, or Florida's Jewfish Creek. It is my dream to one day sit on this board.
Though he has positioned himself as the business candidate, it's not clear Joe Mallahan has succeeded all that well in business. (The BBB gave T-Mobile an F rating while Mallahan was "Vice President of Customer Delight.") And it's not clear that success in business would translate into success in office.
But enough from the candidates. What do people in Seattle's business community think about Mallahan and McGinn?
Jeffrey Taylor, insurance agent for State Farm for over 10 years. His office is in the Columbia City/Seward Park neighborhood:
I'm still making my decision. I haven't finished all my research yet. But I'm interested in mass transit—it helps my clients get to my business and helps them save money. I'm for extending light rail to the Eastside. A lot of my clients work there. Being from Chicago, I know that trains work. It makes for a smart city. I also want park-and-rides inside the city. It's a big issue for the Columbia City business district and not something Nickels supported.
Business experience can translate into political experience—if you have that elusive "it" and you're a good leader. But I'm not endorsing either candidate yet.
Frank Rizzo of Rizzo's French Dip in Ballard:
- That's Frank on the left.
I've been supporting McGinn for months. He seems like a down-to-earth gentleman, like he knows what he's talking about. He seems like a good man, not like he's in it for the money. He's not: "I'm gonna be the mayor and fuck all you guys." He wants to help the city and help the city's people—he's for the working man. He's not for the rich.
I've been putting McGinn stickers on all my sandwich bags, telling people: "Don't be a dope, make sure you vote!"
Bruce Herbert, chief executive and investment manager of Newground Social Investment on Queen Anne. (Herbert cut his teeth on Wall Street 26 years ago with Merrill Lynch, then opened his own shop. Newground has been around for 16 years.)
The fact that Joe has not voted is a deal-breaker. Would the FC Sounders hire a coach who has never played soccer? No wait—it's even worse than that. Would the FC Sounders hire a coach who not only has never played soccer, but has never watched it on TV? You start a political career by voting. Not by asking to be king of the hill without a record of past performance.I also think Mike's new openness to the tunnel showed a degree of good judgment and humility—it's a good indicator. You have to deal with change.
Darryl Smith, realtor for Windermere in the Mt. Baker area for almost 15 years. He is also past president of the Rainier Chamber of Commerce, a South-Seattle business board, past chair of the Columbia City Revitalization Committee, board member of the Rainier Valley Community Development Fund, board chair of Great City, and a McGinn campaign volunteer.
Mr. Smith said many things about how McGinn would be good for business. A few excerpts:
Mike is in favor of keeping the head tax—that goes to fund fixes we need for sidewalks and transportation to make it easier for people to access business districts. It funds the stuff that makes business more accessible and it's only a few dollars a head. I know of no small business owners who have complained about—or even really notice—that head tax.We opened a campaign office here in SE Seattle in King Plaza, in the heart of the Vietnamese and African business community. You need to put feet on the street all around the city to learn what the small business needs and challenges are. You have to go and listen to people—there is a lot of wisdom in those communities.
I honestly don't know what Mallahan offers. Michael came to the Rainier Valley Chamber of Commerce and Mallahan sent a surrogate. I hear from my friends on the Chamber that they felt bad for the surrogate. They had specific questions and all she could do was read from a prepared statement. She looked silly up there. It's too bad.
Tim Nuse, coordinator of the "Corporate Social Responsibility Team" at Starbucks and chair of the 34th district Democrats:
The business community is divided. It's interesting to see that executives are divided—but certain things are consistent. The head tax is a concern. For some businesses, the administrative costs to keep track of the data necessary to pay it appropriately is actually more money than the head tax itself. A lot of businesses want to contribute what they owe, but want to do it a more efficient way.Another issue is transportation—major concerns there. But both candidates have areas that cause concern. For many retailers, specifically the food industry, packaging is an issue. The city is trying to do good things for the environment, but some of the choices they're making aren't better for the environment and are a burden on businesses.
I was in the room with Starbucks executives when they met with both candidates, but I'm not a spokesperson so I cannot comment on any details from that.
Len Davis, Pangeality Productions in the Rainier Valley:
Barack Obama was a lawyer without much business experience. Did that make him a less attractive candidate? No. I'm pretty excited McGinn has an opportunity to win this election and put Seattle on a different footing, to be a global leader.
Brian Allen, a technology consultant for green building and renewable energy, based in West Seattle. Before starting his own shop here, he worked in Latin America for Chiquita Banana and Morgan Stanley, helping with IT and infrastructure build-out.
Having come from a corporate background and having lived around the world, I look at Mallahan and see someone who wants to be the strongman—almost a caricature of the business guy who thinks he can manage city government like a company.
I fear what will happen with Mallahan. Think about transportation. I've been following the oil markets for years and production in the Middle East. And he's betting on cars and highways—that's a terrible idea. I'm not seeing creative, long-term thinking from Mallahan.
The head tax? That's $15 a head. Give me a break. And it goes to pedestrian stuff and bicycle stuff. You won't be saving much by nuking that tax, and you'll be doing some serious damage to the city.
McGinn is better at building an amazing team—and it's volunteer! Anybody can buy a decent team, but to build McGinn's team for free? Wow. As a manager, that inspires me. If McGinn gets in and Dow gets in and they see eye to eye, we might see some amazing changes in this city.
The most telling quote comes from Tim Nuse at Starbucks. He was in the room while Starbucks executives interviewed the candidates (individually) and says: "The business community is divided. It's interesting to see that executives are divided."
Business executives are supposed to be the Mallahan stronghold—but they're divided. Good news for McGinn.
The runner-up quote, from Len Davis: "Barack Obama was a lawyer without much business experience. Did that make him a less attractive candidate? No."

Joe Mallahan, the man who would be mayor, has publicly positioned himself as the business candidate and has leaned on his experience at T-Mobile HQ—working as the "Vice President of Customer Delight," among other things—as evidence that he can manage a city.
A few problems with that:
1) Both T-Mobile and Mallahan's campaign have been vague on what, exactly, Mallahan did at the cell phone company. Even a simple job description has been difficult to extract.
2) T-Mobile has an F rating from the Better Business Bureau. That rating is based on an equation that factors in the size of the company, how long the company has been around, how many complaints the company has racked up, how many of those complaints have gone unanswered, and how many of those complaints have been resolved. AT&T Wireless, for example, has a BBB rating of A+. (It is also accredited by the BBB—businesses with an A or B rating can apply for accreditation.)
When people criticized Mallahan for working at anti-union T-Mobile, he said: Hey, not my department, not my fault.
But when your department is customer satisfaction/delight and the BBB gives you an F... what then? The (non)answer from a campaign spokesperson:
Looks like they should have kept Joe in charge of customer delight!
That F rating, by the way, is based on 36 months of data—well within Mallahan's tenure as a high-ranking T-Mobile executive.
3) Mallahan's management experience hasn't been that extensive. Two sources at the Municipal League (who requested anonymity) said a representative from T-Mobile told them that Joe has never managed more than 40 people at the cell phone company. Campaign spokesperson Charla Neuman quasi-denied this:
His average size group that he manages usually varies between 20 and 40 people although he has managed as many as 500. Either way, vastly greater than the number of people Mike McGinn has managed throughout his lifetime.
McGinn laughed when he heard this quote "I'm managing more than 20 to 40 people right now on my campaign!" he said. "But the framing of the question is off. It's more about leadership style and ability to achieve."
McGinn rattled off his public and management experience—managing teams of lawyers in commercial litigation, the Sierra Club, Great City, the Parks Levy, the roads and transit battles—before going in for the kill:
Joe says "Mike's risky because he doesn't know how to manage." But he's never put forth any vision for the future. We've seen his leadership style. He's not available to the public, not available to the press, has no vision for the future, and insulates himself with paid advisers who represent people who stand to profit from cost overruns for the deep-bore tunnel.
Government is not a business, McGinn continued. "You can't fire the citizens you don't like," he said. "Citizens aren't customers either. But this is Joe's model: His funders are stockholders and he's planning to give them an excellent return on their investment with cost overruns on the tunnel."
So what do actual business owners think of the two candidates?
That post coming later today.
Seattle Times reports:
Four gun-rights organizations, including the National Rifle Association, are suing the city of Seattle and Mayor Greg Nickels over the new ban on guns in city parks.How exasperating! The insistence of this form of stupidity, gun rights, is like the backside of a proud water buffalo.They were joined by five individuals, including two Department of Corrections workers who say they need to carry their personal weapons in city parks to protect themselves against criminals.
Bruce Ramsey, an opinion columnist at the Seattle Times, opines today that we must "pause to consider the housing levy." The levy, which renews the same amount of affordable housing production as the levy passed in 2002, raises median property taxes $2.25 a month. The typical homeowner would pay $5.50 a month. Ramsey says, "The campaign for the levy — and there is none against it — is funded by the people who expect to make a living from it." Ah yes, those people employed by affordable-housing nonprofits. They must be getting very wealthy. Let's talk to one of those Richie Rich McRichensteins. Here's the outreach director of the Housing Development Consortium and a supporter of the Yes For Homes campaign, Anna Markee, who I asked to respond to Ramsey:
We appreciate the Seattle Times’ attention to the details of the Housing Levy renewal. This attention led them to endorse Proposition 1 along with The Stranger and Publicola. Proposition 1 will continue our commitment to housing our most vulnerable residents with the lowest incomes, like seniors, people with disabilities, domestic violence victims and low-income families.Proposition 1 would continue the same level of services that we currently provide. Mr. Ramsey suggests that the Housing Levy should purchase existing apartments, which it has. A great example is the preservation of the beautiful Sylvian on Capitol Hill, a historic brick building near Broadway and Harrison. With levy funds, Capitol Hill Housing purchased the building, keeping rents affordable and making needed repairs.
As Mr. Ramsey points out, the cost of housing has risen sharply since voters approved the last levy in 2002 and this levy will run until 2016. The cost to the typical homeowner will now be $5.50 per month. For this price, we will help thousands of residents, bring in additional matching funds from the state and federal government, create jobs, and save money. One Housing Levy funded building, 1811 Eastlake saved $4 million in one year by reducing the amount of emergency services used by its residents.
Most of the financial contributions to the campaign for the Housing Levy have come from the already-stretched non-profits and their employees who are dedicated to providing housing opportunities for everyone. Our campaign is running on a shoestring powered mostly by committed volunteers who have made over 30,000 phone calls. We welcome other contributions which can be made at www.yesforhomes.org.
Bruce, I know that you're worried about saving money in a recession—we all are. But you know who's really worried about money? PEOPLE WHO DON'T HAVE ENOUGH MONEY FOR FOR AN APARTMENT. Most of the housing levy goes towards housing for poeple who can pay some—but not all—of the average rental rates in Seattle. Providing apartments for low-income and middle-income workers makes more sense than providing emergency services and health care for the homeless (not to mention that it's more humane). And we'd be keeping workers near their jobs and creating new construction jobs. You could vote for that. Or you could vote to let them go homeless in a recession—if that's worth saving $2.25 a month.
Historically when times were good and rents were high and cities were full of it and themselves, sex-related businesses—sex-toy shops, dirty movie theaters, strip clubs—had a hard time getting a toehold. When landlords could take their pick from shoe shops, high-end restaurants, and pricey boutiques, they were reluctant to rent to sex-related businesses that annoyed their neighbors and invited unwelcome scrutiny from authorities who wanted to keep sex-businesses out of "upscale" retail districts. But landlords who wouldn't rent to sex-related businesses when times were good would rent to them when times were bad—because, hey, it's better to have some rent coming in from a sex-related business than no rent at all. And the same authorities that harassed sex-related businesses when times were good turned a blind eye when times are bad—because, hey, it's better to be collecting taxes than not. That's why the sex industry has always been literally and figuratively "down market." When sex stores moved in it was a sign of economic decline and desperation.
But landlords desperate for rent and cities desperate for tax revenues can't rely on the sex industry anymore. Most sex business—sex toys and porn—are online now and consumers prefer it that way. So what's moving in?

The skin trade is out. The skinned trade is in.
Bodies: The Exhibition is in the retail space that used to house Seattle's Adidas store. It's across the street from Banana Republic and around the corner from Nordstrom. It's not anywhere near as "down market" as strip club or a porn shop, of course, but it's still a little shocking when you walk down Pike to the market and pass Bodies. Whatever you think of the ethics of Bodies—and some people have reservations—the fact that a large retail space in the center of the downtown shopping district that used to be house a major shoe retailer now houses a temporary traveling exhibition tells you a lot about the state of the local economy.
Way back at the beginning of October, I wrote about how Seattle Public Library is discussing budget cuts that would require most SPL branches to operate on the following schedule:
Monday, Tuesday: 1 p.m. to 8 p.m.
Wednesday, Thursday: 11 a.m. to 6 p.m.
CLOSED FRIDAY
Saturday: 11 a.m. to 6 p.m.
CLOSED SUNDAY
Well, over at Seattle Times, Mary Ann Gwinn finally picked up on the story yesterday. There will be a library board meeting tomorrow at the Central Library at 4:30 pm to listen to a report on the budget. And if you haven't voted and the library is an important issue to you, the Friends of the Library have a page up with candidate's statements on SPL budget cuts. (Weirdly, neither Mallahan nor McGinn responded to Friends of the Library.)
After what I've seen of the mammoth brain drain that is the Library Board in action, I have to say that it's almost certainly too late to stop these cuts for next year. But we can press the candidates to increase funding to the library in years to come.