Slog

News & Arts

The Stranger Suggests

Critics' Best Bets
Music Arts & Food


Line Out

Music & the City
at Night

Friday, March 22, 2013

Obama Exceeded My Expectations While Touring Israel

Posted by on Fri, Mar 22, 2013 at 1:22 PM

Posted by news intern Ben Steiner

If you're like me—raised Jewish but questioned your faith after spending two mortifying years studying the Israel/Palestine conflict—you had extremely low expectations for Barack Obama's trip to Israel this week. Historically, America has unilaterally backed whatever Israel wanted.

And, If you're anything like me, you found that President Obama rose above your abysmally low expectations.

The minute Barack Obama got off the plane in Tel Aviv critics were claiming he was the "first sitting American president to visit Israel as a tourist"—i.e., he was there to take pictures, not get shit done. To be sure, his list of tourist activities made my 2006 trip to Israel look like a bathroom break at a strip mall but he also made a surprisingly candid speech arguing for a two-state solution in Israel. This is something a president has never done before:

Put yourself in [the Palestinian's] shoes — look at the world through their eyes. It is not fair that a Palestinian child cannot grow up in a state of her own, and lives with the presence of a foreign army that controls the movements of her parents, every single day. It is not just when settler violence against Palestinians goes unpunished. It is not right to prevent Palestinians from farming their lands; to restrict a student’s ability to move around the West Bank; or to displace Palestinian families from their homes. Neither occupation nor expulsion is the answer. Just as Israelis built a state in their homeland, Palestinians have a right to be a free people in their own land.

The exciting thing about this speech isn't what he said, but that he crafted it well enough that Israeli Prime Minister Bibi Netanyahu wasn't too pissed off to get lunch with him later. In fact, they were on such good terms that Barack Obama was able to persuade Netanyahu to apologize personally to Turkish Prime Minister Rekap Erdogan for a 2010 Israeli raid on a Gaza-bound flotilla that killed 8 Turkish (and one Turkish-American) civilians. The apology was enough for Israel and Turkey to "fully restore" their tarnished diplomatic relationships.

Barack Obama shied away from his condemnation of the West Bank settlements, he didn't reconsider his black-and-white no negotiation policy with Hamas, he made little mention of the colossal crisis happening a stones-throw away in Syria (although he's expected to do so in Jordan), and he didn't spend enough time at Palestinian sites on his tourist ventures.

But, if you're like me—consistently disappointed—you will be pleased that he was ballsy enough to openly push for a two-state solution, and crafty enough to help make Turkey and Israel friends again. I'll take what I can get.

 

Comments (19) RSS

Oldest First Unregistered On Registered On Add a comment
venomlash 1
Thumbs up from me too. I support Israel's right to exist and responsibility to not be enormous assholes to persons of Arabic heritage.
Posted by venomlash on March 22, 2013 at 1:34 PM
Pope Peabrain 2
Barack Obama was reelected for good reason. He's a capable man with a knowledge of the world. He's not a southern yahoo.
Posted by Pope Peabrain on March 22, 2013 at 1:47 PM
Cato the Younger Younger 3
So..you're admiring him for another speech he made. Well crafted, well delivered... I think we've seen this show before
Posted by Cato the Younger Younger on March 22, 2013 at 1:47 PM
4
A two-state solution that requires neither occupation nor expulsion, eh? How about a sweet and tasty cake with absolutely no calories?!
Posted by DoubtingThomas on March 22, 2013 at 1:52 PM
Reverse Polarity 5
Pretty much every American president from both parties for 40+ years has attempted to do something about the Israel/Palestine conflict... and gotten mostly nowhere. So, yeah, my expectations were almost nonexistent.

A US president might have some small influence, but a solution can't be imposed from outside. It's kind of like trying to help an addict. Very little an outsider does is going to help unless the addict actually wants to make a change.
Posted by Reverse Polarity on March 22, 2013 at 2:38 PM
6
More fancy talk but no actions like putting conditions on the billions in aid (plus the above board military aid) given annually to Israel. As long as you are happy with fancy speeches that are opposite to policies implemented, nothing will ever change. At this point, it's so obvious that I wonder how may suffer from Stockholm syndrome.
Posted by anon1256 on March 22, 2013 at 2:47 PM
Some Old Nobodaddy Logged In 7
5, W/o US support over the past six decades, militarily and thru direct financial outlays, Israel would have ceased to exist. Now, however, Israel has used (ours, the US taxpayer's) money to create it's own arm inside the US government, through lobbying and propaganda, that has blurred the lines between the two countries. Who is the dog & who is the tail & who is doing the wagging is a huge subject, I'm not going to condense it into a brief post.

But the idea that our government is 'outside' of Israel is simply not true. We are as wedded to Israel as they are to us.
Posted by Some Old Nobodaddy Logged In on March 22, 2013 at 2:50 PM
Cascadian 8
Here's the deal: the US has always favored the Israelis and so cannot be an honest broker between them. We've spent so many years with a "peace process" that was flawed from the beginning (though still almost succeeded in 2000) that it's no longer viable. A two-state solution would have been nice--ten years ago. It's not possible after the events of the last decade.

My prediction: a 2-state solution will never happen, Israel will become a de facto apartheid society (I mean, even more than they are already), become politically unviable, and we'll eventually have a one-state solution with Palestinians as full citizens in a bi-ethnic state that protects the rights of its two largest communities. About 50 years from now.

That was where a 2-state solution would have taken us eventually anyway (two states, with increasing integration, and final a union after a long period of adjustment), because geographically it's just not sustainable to split that small slice of land into two or more parts.
Posted by Cascadian on March 22, 2013 at 2:57 PM
9
#3 - and for helping to repair israeli-turkish relations. Tangible results!
Posted by catsnbanjos on March 22, 2013 at 3:29 PM
10
Any of you people ever actually been to Israel?
Posted by sarah70 on March 22, 2013 at 4:09 PM
samktg 11
@7, Ew.
Posted by samktg on March 22, 2013 at 4:27 PM
Phoebe in Wallingford 12
@2: Careful now, wasn't some southern yahoo a recent president, with a 'D'?
Posted by Phoebe in Wallingford on March 22, 2013 at 4:50 PM
Dr_Awesome 13
@Phoebe:You mean the Rhodes Scholar one? That president?
Posted by Dr_Awesome on March 22, 2013 at 5:18 PM
Sargon Bighorn 14
It does not serve America to have peace in the Middle East, hence there is no peace.
Posted by Sargon Bighorn on March 22, 2013 at 5:36 PM
tim koch 15
6, 7: actually, prez did (indirectly) touch upon the U.S. aid issue in relation to the settlements in his speech to the students the other day. he's not stupid.
Posted by tim koch on March 22, 2013 at 5:59 PM
GeneStoner 16
Intern, you are a sycophant for the beguiling golfer.

Let’s actually BE reporters and hold the powerful accountable.
Posted by GeneStoner on March 22, 2013 at 7:04 PM
Cascadian Bacon 17
It's easy to shit talk Israel when you are not under a rocket attack.

Barak Obama has openly supported Al Queda factions in both Libya and Syria. Obama is the best thing to happen to Islamic extremist since the Regan Era CIA.
Posted by Cascadian Bacon on March 22, 2013 at 7:15 PM
Ian Awesome 18
Likely the reason Netanyahu had lunch with him later is because he knows Obama will do jack squat about Israel's racist policies. Why should he be pissed when we're still going to back Israel anyway?

Also, Canadian Bacon is an idiot. Just had to say it.
Posted by Ian Awesome http://oneangryqueer.blogspot.com on March 22, 2013 at 8:07 PM
19
Great line: "The exciting thing about this speech isn't what he said, but that he crafted it well enough that Israeli Prime Minister Bibi Netanyahu wasn't too pissed off to get lunch with him later."

It was a remarkable visit considering that Obama and Netanyahu managed to put on a display of almost chummy unity. Yes, Bibi Netanyahu, long-time Mitt Romney buddy and Israel's Dick Cheney. And yet at the same Obama was able to speak frankly and unequivocally to the Israeli people about the occupation. And to top it off, as Ben Steiner notes, Obama managed to get the Israelis and the Turks talking to each other again.

Now, as successful as this visit was, good luck changing any of those "facts on the ground" where the Israelis have annexed much of the West Bank. Thankfully, America's got its own intractable political problems Obama can focus on. Just think if all that blood, treasure, and energy we've spent on the Middle East which we could instead have channeled homeward. The sad thing is, not only would we be better off if we'd turned inward, but so perhaps would the Middle East.
Posted by cressona on March 23, 2013 at 12:18 PM

Add a comment

Advertisement
 

Want great deals and a chance to win tickets to the best shows in Seattle? Join The Stranger Presents email list!


All contents © Index Newspapers, LLC
1535 11th Ave (Third Floor), Seattle, WA 98122
Contact Info | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Takedown Policy