Slog

News & Arts

The Stranger Suggests

Critics' Best Bets
Music Arts & Food


Line Out

Music & the City
at Night

Friday, March 22, 2013

Let Jeremy Griffin Buy Back His Foreclosed House

Posted by on Fri, Mar 22, 2013 at 7:41 AM

Posted by news intern Jocelyn Macdonald

Jeremy attempts to pay rent on his foreclosed house
  • Jeremy (in red) attempts to pay rent on his bank-owned house

On January 25, grassroots organizing group Standing Against Foreclosure and Eviction demonstrated outside of Wells Fargo in downtown Seattle. Fifteen people shouted and held signs demanding that the bank accept rent in lieu of mortgage from Jeremy Griffin, whose home was foreclosed in November 2012. Metal gates came down and the bank locked up for the day, with six guards and another six bored and irritated SPD officers blocking the entrance.

So, other than the obvious anger surrounding massive foreclosures nationwide, why picket Wells Fargo, why focus on this foreclosure? Because Griffin has a steady job and is ready to pay a mortgage again. But now, with shredded credit, he can't get financing to buy back his house.

Home prices in Washington State have been on the rise. Foreclosures dropped significantly in 2012, due to new legislation, and due to bank settlements over rapacious practices like robosigning. But in 2013, foreclosures are projected to spike again, across the country. In February of this year, Washington was among the worst in the nation for foreclosures. According to RealtyTrac, 1 in 656 houses received notice, compared to a 1 in 849 nationwide average.

One problem for lenders, for Griffin and over three million other families foreclosed on since 2008, is that these houses aren’t worth much. Griffin bought his South Park fixer-upper for $220,000, and according to Zillow.com, it’s now worth only $150,000.

The first industry to pull the emergency brake in 2008 was construction. Despite contracts scheduled a year out, the iron working company Griffin owned went tits up almost immediately; banks stopped lending money to potential developers in November 2008. He laid everyone off. He turned to the Iron Workers Local 86 for contract gigs. When construction picked up in 2011, Griffin had the income to back-pay the delinquent mortgage. But it was too late, he says. “At that point they would only accept total payment. They wouldn’t accept half or part, they said, ‘You have to come with the full amount that you’re late or we’re foreclosing on you. I just couldn’t do it.”

I spoke to the co-founder and partner in the family of businesses associated with Northwest Trustee Services, which mediates foreclosures with borrowers and lenders all over the Western US. It's a vertically integrated foreclosure machine that serves clients with legal counsel, titling, advertising, publication and even newspapers, which print mandatory foreclosure notices at a fraction of the cost of traditional papers: everything you need to execute a foreclosure without going through the court system. Although his business thrives on tragedy, Stephen Routh was charming and helpful on the phone. He said, "The mindset for every employee in the enterprise is that the most successful outcome is if the borrower stays in their home." He even offered to look into Griffin's case to make sure that Griffin's eviction was being put off while a buy-back deal is negotiated with Deutsche Bank, the current title holder.

"There are a lot of moving pieces," said Routh of the shuffling relationships between owners, borrowers, and securities, and the strict timelines for notices and eviction. "The reality is that the borrower has to pay their loan," he said, "There are lots of opportunities, such as forbearance, to keep borrowers in their home." But it's easy for delinquent borrowers to fall through the cracks, even when they are ready to make good on their loan.

Griffin told me he pursued such options, and as for the other side of the story, I couldn't find much, other than a terse statement from Wells Fargo saying he refused relocation assistance. The situation is shitty, because he was the very model of a middle class citizen: a small business owner making a long-term investment in property. At the protest, Griffin told me. "I bought well within my means in a dilapidated part of the city with the idea that I would live there for 20 years and fix it up. Since I was 21, I've been working 40-50 hours a week. I could afford the house—I make $40 an hour. I just needed to be employed."

With so many bank-owned properties on the market, construction, the industry that would keep Griffin in his home, is at a disadvantage. But more worrisome is the present tense. No bank is going to finance a purchase with his history. With the help of allies from SAFE, he is now trying to get into a bank-tenant agreement while he repairs his credit. But he faces down more struggle in advance of the April deadline, explaining by email that such an agreement, where he would rent his house from Deutsche Bank, is uncommon for the real estate clearinghouse. SAFE plans to continue actions, up to an eviction blockade, where protesters will crowd the lawn, lock themselves to stair rails, and otherwise physically prevent the police from throwing Griffin out.

 

Comments (14) RSS

Oldest First Unregistered On Registered On Add a comment
1
We've seen two Stranger staff members post the same story on the same day, but two months apart by Unpaid Intern (same one?) is a bit ridiculous.

http://slog.thestranger.com/slog/archive…
Posted by decidedlyodd on March 22, 2013 at 8:23 AM
2
This, again?

Nothing's preventing Jeremy from buying back his foreclosed house -- aside from the fact that he doesn't have the money to purchase it, and that because he burned his previous lender (on this very same home!) no sane lender would offer him a mortgage.

Man up, and rent until your credit improves.
Posted by hrmmmm on March 22, 2013 at 8:24 AM
3
Some people will find any reason to protest. Dude can just walk away, rent an apartment for while while he saves money, and then put down a sizable down payment on a house which he should have done in the first place. Fuck man, borrowed money and could not pay it back, he has nothing to complain about.
Posted by _db_ on March 22, 2013 at 8:25 AM
Kinison 4
Why did Griffin stop paying his mortgage? Clearly he has a job, but for some reason he stopped paying his mortgage bills, but now is ready to start paying them again? WTF!? Why are people protesting the bank, when it sounds like the guy willfully stopped making payments, then complained when the banks foreclosed.
Posted by Kinison http://www.holgatehawks.com on March 22, 2013 at 8:38 AM
Pol Pot 5
1-4... Exhibits A, B, C and D of everything wrong with Americans.
Posted by Pol Pot http://bottlefuelrag.blogspot.com on March 22, 2013 at 8:50 AM
Cato the Younger Younger 6
@5, If someone else is suffering it's their own damn fault. If it happens to me then it's the system's fault. That's America!
Posted by Cato the Younger Younger on March 22, 2013 at 8:56 AM
7
What exactly is the injustice here? He was not able to pay on his loan so he is going to lose the collateral. Collateral probably not even worth the amount he still owes. And he has been living there for free for at least a couple years.

It is a tragedy sure, but not every tragedy is political.
Posted by giffy on March 22, 2013 at 9:07 AM
8
The house was bought by his partner; they are no longer together. There are plenty of horrible things that banks are doing; this is a bogus situation to hang a protest on.
Posted by sarah70 on March 22, 2013 at 9:57 AM
GeneStoner 9
But liberals LOVE to protest the banks, even when they themselves are at fault.

They are the 99% afterall...
Posted by GeneStoner on March 22, 2013 at 1:34 PM
10
The only thing that's news here is that this guy is shameless enough to stand on a street corner and publicize the fact that he didn't pay his mortgage yet still thinks he should get the house.

Here's the new headline: "Seattle Man Shocked to Discover That Stuff Costs Money, Protests Ensue."

You're welcome.
Posted by loudvoiceofreason on March 22, 2013 at 2:30 PM
11
@decidedlyodd: Did you not notice that this article went into much more depth than the first short article? The same events can and should be reevaluated by reporters as more information comes to light. It's your own problem if you have too short an attention span to handle context.
Posted by svinka on March 22, 2013 at 2:51 PM
12
Perhaps others have a better memory, but to the best of my recollection Jeremy did not cause the Great Recession. Jeremy lost his company because the banks devastated the economy in 2008. Now he has a job again and can pay rent. The banks, however, don't want his money; they'd rather throw him onto the street. Why does having decent shelter (or food, healthcare, education, clothes, etc.) depend on how much money you have? Housing is a Human Right.
Posted by Estaban on March 22, 2013 at 10:15 PM
13
People on this blog that are complaining about people in foreclosure need to realize that the bankers have screwed ALL homeowners, not just those in default.

Please view the recent Senate hearing where trustee/title attorney/lobbyist and former WA Senator Stuart Halsan admits that if the legislature mandates the original note be required to come to escrow prior to conveyance, commerce would stop altogether. What Stu doesn't tell the legislature is the original note is MANDATED BY CONTRACT (the Deed of Trust we all sign in Washington mandates this) to come to the trustee to reconvey the property. ALL HOMEOWNERS SHOULD BE PAYING ATTENTION!!!! Wake the H*LL UP!

http://www.tvw.org/index.php?option=com_…
Posted by GuyFawkes on March 26, 2013 at 10:12 PM
14
Too many people have been drinking the kool-aid... Jeremy clearly did what he was supposed to do - he took reasonable risks, based on that in things like buying a house, choosing a profession, there are risks but the powers involved are taking the same risks, and there is an expectation that things will be fair. When you have banks that invest money in risky situations, in turn risking the entire economy and all of us who are subject to it - yet those banks in reality are taking no risk because they will be bailed out by the very people who suffer - then Jeremy was put in a much more risky situation than he expected. In turn, people like Jeremy who are foeclosed upon and evicted suffer, his neighbors suffer, his community suffers... yet banks and Wall Street are at record profits. If it is not affecting you directly, it does not mean it isn't affecting you. Housing values going up? That means banks are keeping foreclosed houses off of the market (less supply drives prices up). Eventually that bubble will pop too. As long as the banks are running the country, we will continue to suffer their careless and criminal whims. We all need to be angry and start blaming the real culprits in this mess and hold them accountable, instead of believing that good people suddenly became bad.
Posted by Bets23 on March 27, 2013 at 7:24 AM

Add a comment

Advertisement
 

Want great deals and a chance to win tickets to the best shows in Seattle? Join The Stranger Presents email list!


All contents © Index Newspapers, LLC
1535 11th Ave (Third Floor), Seattle, WA 98122
Contact Info | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Takedown Policy