Slog

News & Arts

The Stranger Suggests

Critics' Best Bets
Music Arts & Food


Line Out

Music & the City
at Night

Friday, March 22, 2013

Alaska Is On a Teabaggy Roll

Posted by on Fri, Mar 22, 2013 at 2:30 PM

Right after Alaska approved a "Stand Your Ground" bill, the state decided to throw tons of money at the oil industry. Anchorage Daily News reports:

The Senate voted Wednesday night by the barest of margins to approve a massive tax cut for the oil industry in the hope that it would lead to more oil production in Alaska.

The vote on Senate Bill 21 was 11-9, with only Republicans supporting the measure.

What's next? Creationism replacing evolution in science classes?

 

Comments (19) RSS

Oldest First Unregistered On Registered On Add a comment
care bear 1
Ehh, this just seems like normal Republican behavior to me.
Posted by care bear on March 22, 2013 at 2:34 PM
internet_jen 2
Don't Alaskan residents get pipeline $ every year from the oil industry?
Posted by internet_jen on March 22, 2013 at 2:56 PM
3
Who will help the poor, suffering oil industry?
Posted by keshmeshi on March 22, 2013 at 3:03 PM
Will in Seattle 4
Talk about tax-subsidized Takers ...
Posted by Will in Seattle http://www.facebook.com/WillSeattle on March 22, 2013 at 3:04 PM
5
Imagine, for a moment, Mitt Romney saying:

The oil industry only votes for teabaggers because teabaggers give things to the oil people things. I can't even persuade the oil industry to take responsibility for itself.
Posted by Clayton on March 22, 2013 at 3:19 PM
COMTE 6
Well, they've still got a lot of trees to cut down and wild animals to shoot and native peoples to subjugate and exploit, so...
Posted by COMTE http://www.chriscomte.com on March 22, 2013 at 3:22 PM
Will in Seattle 7
@6 only so many helicopters to go around for shooting wild animals from ...
Posted by Will in Seattle http://www.facebook.com/WillSeattle on March 22, 2013 at 3:26 PM
Banna 8
As if oil companies need an incentive to produce more oil in Alaska beyond "there's oil in the ground here". Everyone knows there's no money to be made in oil; good on them for giving those struggling multinationals a hand up.
Posted by Banna http://www.ucp.org on March 22, 2013 at 3:38 PM
9
So, state that generates almost every dime of it's revenue from resource extraction cuts tax deal for it's #1 industry?

I'm shocked, cue the outrage!

This is how WA used to pay for it's schools, until we cut down all the trees.
Posted by Westside forever on March 22, 2013 at 3:46 PM
10
If the creation thing is next, they'll be just like Louisiana! How exciting!
Posted by Sheryl on March 22, 2013 at 3:59 PM
kk in seattle 11
The governor ran on a platform of one issue, and one issue alone, and that was cutting taxes for oil companies. He was elected in a landslide. Ironically, it was Sarah Palin that almost single-handedly restored the state to fiscal sanity by finally taxing the oil companies at reasonable rates. I wonder what she's thinking now. It's incredible to watch an entire state commit mass economic suicide.
Posted by kk in seattle on March 22, 2013 at 4:45 PM
Free Lunch 12
Oil industry: "Well, I was planning to drill there anyway, but... Thanks!"
Posted by Free Lunch on March 22, 2013 at 7:01 PM
13
Gosh. Alaska cutting a deal with the oil industry? Why, that's almost as stupid as Washington cutting a deal with Boeing, Microsoft and Amazon combined!

How silly!

BTW, I was fortunate enough to be a part of the finest public school system in the world. Where, you ask?

Why, Alaska! In Anchorage! In the 70's and 80's!

Why, you ask? Because of oil revenue.

It's what Alaska does. And why they don't have a budget crisis.
Posted by CPN on March 23, 2013 at 7:06 PM
14
Oh, to add:

In high school I learned wilderness survival, orienteering, rappelling and calculus.

And we had a rifle range in the school underneath the gymnasium and I learned competitive target shooting.

In high school. In Alaska.

Too bad they brainwashed me to become a slack-jawed, knuckle-dragging, uneducated illiterate gun-nut with no concept of critical thinking.
Posted by CPN on March 23, 2013 at 7:10 PM
15
@CPN, can it. Taxing the oil revenue is what keeps the tea baggers from having to pay income or sales taxes. Cutting those taxes will lead to budget problems in the future. No, there's no budget problems now, because the taxes are there now! That doesn't stop Republicans in charge of the legislature from cutting education in the name of cutting the budget. It's a give away by current and former oil company employees now in the legislature and governor's mansion, plain and simple.
Posted by Genghis John on March 24, 2013 at 9:59 AM
venomlash 16
@14: I learned rock climbing, field first aid, canoeing, archery, and knot-tying, not to mention calculus (single- and multi-variable) in high school. In suburban Chicago. Keep with the times, man.
Posted by venomlash on March 24, 2013 at 11:16 AM
17
Hey #16

Sounds like you went to a great school in Chicago.

"Keep with the times, man."? What the fuck is your point?

We're on the same side here. Better schools means better everything. For everybody.

Education is the silver bullet to cure whatever humanity is capable of curing itself of. Without the best education humanity can provide, humanity is doomed.

Lighten the hell up. We're on the same side... at least hopefully on education.
Posted by CPN on March 24, 2013 at 5:37 PM
kk in seattle 18
@CPN: The point is that LOWERING the taxes on the oil companies will lead to LESS revenue for the public schools. Apparently you studied calculus but never figured out basic math.

And BTW, where are the best public schools TODAY? Not in Alaska. In fact, the
Posted by kk in seattle on March 24, 2013 at 10:29 PM
19
Nobody ever said that human farming was easy.

Keeping the tax livestock securely in the compounds of the ruling classes is a three phase process.

The first is to indoctrinate the young through government "education." As the wealth of democratic countries grew, government schools were universally inflicted in order to control the thoughts and souls of the livestock.

The second is to turn citizens against each other through the creation of dependent livestock. It is very difficult to rule human beings directly through force -- and where it can be achieved, it remains cripplingly underproductive, as can be seen in North Korea. Human beings do not breed well or produce efficiently in direct captivity. If human beings believe that they are free, then they will produce much more for their farmers. The best way to maintain this illusion of freedom is to put some of the livestock on the payroll of the farmer. Those cows that become dependent on the existing hierarchy will then attack any other cows who point out the violence, hypocrisy and immorality of human ownership. Freedom is slavery, and slavery is freedom. If you can get the cows to attack each other whenever anybody brings up the reality of their situation, then you don't have to spend nearly as much controlling them directly. Those cows who become dependent upon the stolen largess of the farmer will violently oppose any questioning of the virtue of human ownership -- and the intellectual and artistic classes, always and forever dependent upon the farmers -- will say, to anyone who demands freedom from ownership: "You will harm your fellow cows." The livestock are kept enclosed by shifting the moral responsibility for the destructiveness of a violent system to those who demand real freedom.

The third phase is to invent continual external threats, so that the frightened livestock cling to the "protection" of the farmers.
More...
Posted by Siddha on March 25, 2013 at 4:47 AM

Add a comment

Advertisement
 

Want great deals and a chance to win tickets to the best shows in Seattle? Join The Stranger Presents email list!


All contents © Index Newspapers, LLC
1535 11th Ave (Third Floor), Seattle, WA 98122
Contact Info | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Takedown Policy