Slog

News & Arts

The Stranger Suggests

Critics' Best Bets
Music Arts & Food


Line Out

Music & the City
at Night

Thursday, March 14, 2013

Sneak Peek at the Seattle Water Bears' Metropolitans' New Arena

Posted by on Thu, Mar 14, 2013 at 4:51 PM

Artist rendering of ice hockey rink and seating at proposed new Sonics arena.
  • Sonicsarena.com
  • Rendering of ice hockey rink and seating at proposed new Sonics arena.

Curious about what the proposed new Sonics arena might look like when configured for an NHL game? Well wonder no more: SonicsArena.com has a couple of renderings up online that has visions of Water Bears skating in Megan's head! (Yes, Megan has this ridiculous idea that the team should be named the Seattle Water Bears instead of what we all know it will be called: The Seattle Metropolitans. Silly Megan.)

As far as we know, Seattle doesn't even have an NHL ownership group put together yet, let alone a team in hand. But it's still fun to look at the pictures.

 

Comments (51) RSS

Oldest First Unregistered On Registered On Add a comment
1
Someone needs to tell them about blue lines
Posted by msea1 on March 14, 2013 at 4:59 PM
2
I still say we should be the Seattle Chinooks. I know, not historical at all, but the Metropolitians is a stupid name. What would the mascot look like? A tall building?

But yeah, I am totally ready to root on the home team. Go Chinooks!
Posted by SeattleKim on March 14, 2013 at 5:01 PM
3
bring back THE BREAKERS!!!!
Posted by juan gabriel on March 14, 2013 at 5:04 PM
4
I like the Sockeyes.

The Water Bears sound like a yellow hanky party the Eagle would throw.
Posted by ProstSeattle on March 14, 2013 at 5:10 PM
Megan Seling 5
Water Bears are INDESTRUCTIBLE CREATURES!

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tardigrade

Also: Needs penalty boxes. The Water Bears are gonna fight. A lot.
Posted by Megan Seling on March 14, 2013 at 5:16 PM
6
Sorry, Goldy: I don't know if Megan's right, necessarily, but you're wrong, based on the very simple notion that you can draw a Water Bear. You can't draw a "Metropolitan". And you can represent a water bear with northwest coastal art, or realistic art, etcetera. You can make a stuffed animal of it. Mind you, a Sockeye or Chinook (as mentioned upthread) fits this criterion as well, and I probably prefer those to Water Bear. But "Metropolitan" fails the test absolutely.
Posted by Warren Terra on March 14, 2013 at 5:16 PM
7
@ 2 Umm What is a Sonic exactly, yet the mascot was bigfoot.
Posted by Seattle14 on March 14, 2013 at 5:19 PM
Paul Constant 8
What about the Seattle Hockeys? It's to the point, the mascot can be a puck, and it's easy to remember.
Posted by Paul Constant http://https://twitter.com/paulconstant on March 14, 2013 at 5:21 PM
9
@#7 There never was a team called the "Sonics". There were the Super-Sonics, named at a time when everyone thought Boeing was going to establish a huge industry outside Seattle building SST's (super-sonic transports, like the Concorde), and when most people in the country hadn't heard of Seattle, or had heard of it only because of Boeing.

But, yeah, the mascot wasn't an airplane. I don't go far enough back to be completely sure, but I doubt the mascot was ever an airplane.
Posted by Warren Terra on March 14, 2013 at 5:24 PM
Megan Seling 10
@8 Get outta here, book nerd.

(I kid! You're great!)
Posted by Megan Seling on March 14, 2013 at 5:27 PM
Will in Seattle 11
How about Emerald City Dream Skaters?
Posted by Will in Seattle http://www.facebook.com/WillSeattle on March 14, 2013 at 5:40 PM
Fnarf 12
Plus, the name "Metropolitans" is already in use, sort of, by the New York Mets (short for Metropolitans). Didn't stop 'em before, but we're all much more sophistimacated nowadays.

I vote for The Seattle Chryseobacteria.
Posted by Fnarf http://www.facebook.com/fnarf on March 14, 2013 at 5:41 PM
biffp 13
Water Bears seems to portend a loser when the game is played on ice. Metropolitans has great history. The Times piece a couple weeks ago convinced me they should take that name.

http://seattletimes.com/html/othersports…
Posted by biffp on March 14, 2013 at 5:42 PM
Matt from Denver 14
@ 12, there are two Giants teams. They even used to live in the same city. And two Cardinals teams too, who also once called the same place home. That said, I wouldn't put it past today's sports teams not to sue...

I think it should be the Seattle Orcas, and the logo should look a lot like the Canuck's orca. Just to piss 'em off.
Posted by Matt from Denver on March 14, 2013 at 5:56 PM
15
@6 behold: http://www.etsy.com/listing/107009945/pl… and http://www.neatoshop.com/product/Water-B…
Posted by the mighty tardigrade on March 14, 2013 at 5:57 PM
Matt from Denver 16
@ 13, I hate when new teams graft themselves onto the histories of teams now gone (especially when they live somewhere else under a different name). But, that ship has sailed. At least the old Metropolitans disappeared into oblivion.
Posted by Matt from Denver on March 14, 2013 at 5:58 PM
nicholaus 17
We should be the Seattle Freeze. Just think, our mascot could be a hipster, and when kids ask for a photo, he can say "we should totally do that sometime!" and then walk away.
Posted by nicholaus on March 14, 2013 at 6:05 PM
18
No! Not the water bears! Use the alternate common name of the tardigrade: Moss Piglets!

GO MOSS PIGLETS!

(Metropolitans suck, unless we shorten it to the 'Tans, just to be ironic)
Posted by I Love IPA on March 14, 2013 at 6:10 PM
Cascadian Bacon 19
Metropolitan is not fitting for the Pacific Northwest at all.

Metropolitan brings up images of elitist east coast pricks of the kind that The Stranger likes to politically pander to.

I am still against the stadium, I hope they have bread to go with the circus.
Posted by Cascadian Bacon on March 14, 2013 at 6:18 PM
striatic 20
what's a Metropolitan?

what's a Canuck? what's a Canadien? what's a Flyer? what's a Capital? what's a Wild? etc. etc.

the team name doesn't have to evoke a mascot, dammit.

the mascot can be a sea otter with attitude and a "let's go metros!" sign.
Posted by striatic on March 14, 2013 at 6:20 PM
biffp 21
@16, I hate when teams are stolen from a town when they are full of young talent and just a year or two from a championship.
Posted by biffp on March 14, 2013 at 6:27 PM
dotSpec 22
Boy, the team benches and penalty boxes look really great!
Posted by dotSpec http://www.spec907.net on March 14, 2013 at 6:43 PM
Will in Seattle 23
@17 for the Call It What It Is win.
Posted by Will in Seattle http://www.facebook.com/WillSeattle on March 14, 2013 at 6:44 PM
Matt from Denver 24
@ 21, yeah, sucks about the Sonics, doesn't it?
Posted by Matt from Denver on March 14, 2013 at 6:55 PM
Posted by Tacoma Traveler on March 14, 2013 at 6:56 PM
nicholaus 26
@24 Interesting since the year that Quebec left for Colorado, they win the cup...
Posted by nicholaus on March 14, 2013 at 7:04 PM
biffp 27
@24, years of losing to get picks and build a nucleus just to watch another city jump on the bandwagon.

All jokes aside, it was a pretty sad story about Steve Moore's brother.
Posted by biffp on March 14, 2013 at 7:07 PM
Matt from Denver 28
@ 26, yeah, but they weren't "stolen." The Sonics were, but the Nordiques were not. Above ground deals might bite for locals, but it wasn't like they came in saying they'd keep playing in Quebec.

@ 27, I don't think they would have won in 96 if they were still the Nordiques. Remember, the Avs got Roy halfway through that season. There's no way Montreal would have traded him to Quebec.

Anyway, I'm not sure what you mean about Steve Moore's brother. I looked up on wikipedia and saw that one of his brothers's wife died earlier this year. Is that what you meant?
Posted by Matt from Denver on March 14, 2013 at 7:37 PM
29
The Seattle Cascades is clearly the best hockey team name.
Posted by crapitol_hill_cock_party on March 14, 2013 at 7:55 PM
30
"Steelheads". Book it.
Posted by derkle on March 14, 2013 at 7:57 PM
31
megan: "the seattle chiefs"

http://www.icejerseys.com/images/product…
Posted by tim koch on March 14, 2013 at 8:31 PM
32
Just buy off the WHL franchise and stick with Thunderbirds.
Posted by jeffinfremont on March 14, 2013 at 8:32 PM
33
@28 - yeah, there's no way the Nordiques get Roy.

And yes, Dominic Moore's wife just died of liver cancer.

http://www.theglobeandmail.com/life/rela…

Posted by UnoriginalAndrew on March 14, 2013 at 8:51 PM
ERIN! 34
THE SEATTLE GEODUCKS!

Totally kidding. I like Sockeyes, Steelheads and Cascades. Metropolitans is just... meh.
Posted by ERIN! on March 14, 2013 at 9:12 PM
Rujax! 35
Totems, people.

Got to be the Totems!

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Seattle_Tot…
Posted by Rujax! http://rujax.blogspot.com/ on March 14, 2013 at 9:32 PM
36
Nice to see Goldy whoring for Chris Hansen, the bondholders, and the $350 million that could be spent on the schools he pretends to care about.
Posted by Unbrainwashed on March 14, 2013 at 10:14 PM
Fnarf 37
@30, except the plural of "Steelhead" is "Steelhead".
Posted by Fnarf http://www.facebook.com/fnarf on March 14, 2013 at 10:18 PM
Some Old Nobodaddy Logged In 38
Water Bears? Seriously? It's like "Seahawk." Sure, it'll grow on you, but nobody really knows what it is. Or cares. The only name that sucks worse is "Metropolitans."

Sports teams want something badass. Panthers. Predators. Grizzlies. The most badass creature on the Puget Sound is the Orca.

The Seattle Orca. Gonna fuck you up. Plus, they look cool. Damn right.
Posted by Some Old Nobodaddy Logged In on March 14, 2013 at 10:27 PM
California Kid 39
can't use Orcas, Vancouver's logo is fricking Orca breaking out of the ice. We got beat to the punch, damnit anyways

Not Metropolitans, people would call them the Metro's and other people would wonder why we named our team after our bus transit system or after well dressed straight men.

The Angry Animal Naming Convention will not steer us wrong. Go Seattle Wolves! Or Steelhead, or Chinook, Elk, Grizzlies- anything as long as it's pissed off
Posted by California Kid on March 14, 2013 at 11:12 PM
40
Once we get the an NBA team it's really just questions of when and how for an NHL team. The city of Glendale rejected the latest deal to keep the Coyotes. And the proposed NHL realignment has the Western Conference with two less teams than the preposed Eastern Conference. We'll get an existing team (Coyotes or Blue Jackets) or an expansion team.
Posted by searunner on March 15, 2013 at 12:45 AM
41
As for a name for the team, who the fuck cares. I want hockey!!
Posted by searunner on March 15, 2013 at 12:46 AM
Cracker Jack 42
Seattle Metrosexuals?
Posted by Cracker Jack on March 15, 2013 at 6:39 AM
43
The Seattle Dramatic Chipmunks. Something like this would look good on a jersey.
http://www.mike2.com/2012/07/13/dramatic…
Posted by Zastrugi on March 15, 2013 at 8:22 AM
Gurldoggie 44
I like "Seattle Freeze" too. Smart.

Though I'm still holding my breath for local pro sports franchise called "The Green River Killers."
Posted by Gurldoggie http://gurldogg.blogspot.com on March 15, 2013 at 9:37 AM
camlux 45
Bravo @18. I would buy tickets to either the Moss Piglets or the Tans.

That hockey rink rendering is a thing of beauty, by the way.

Posted by camlux on March 15, 2013 at 9:56 AM
starsandgarters 46
Sockeyes, Sasquatch (Sasquatches?), or Easter Eggs if you're a Marek vs. Wyshynski fan.
Posted by starsandgarters on March 15, 2013 at 12:12 PM
biffp 47
No one believed Clay Bennett was keeping the Sonics in Seattle. He said he was moving them in the OKC papers. Roy was done in Montreal, and there's no way to say where he couldn't have gone. Buying a team stocked with talent is the quick route to a contender. Who is to say whether the fans have earned it? Colorado continues supports its team. Maybe the Avs can make the playoffs again after realignment.
Posted by biffp on March 15, 2013 at 3:01 PM
Matt from Denver 48
@ 47, Roy may have been done in Montreal, but the Nordiques were done in Quebec because of their market size and weak Canadian dollar. The provincial government wouldn't help, so that was that. Their 1995-96 season was destined to be played somewhere else.

Anyway, Roy himself said he wouldn't have played in Quebec because of their rivalry; and he was still a top goaltender, so it's really too unlikely to imagine the Canadiens trading him there, or elsewhere in their division, and preferably not in their conference. Teams in any major league avoid sending disgruntled stars to rivals. You don't want to make them better.
Posted by Matt from Denver on March 15, 2013 at 3:22 PM
biffp 49
@48, it's your hypo. No need to tell me the Nords had moved and the Cdn dollar was then lower than the USD. There was a strike, and there was not a lot of support for a bailout. In any case, those deserving fans in Colorado waited less than a year for their Cup, but as you say they never would have won in Quebec.
Posted by biffp on March 15, 2013 at 4:28 PM
Matt from Denver 50
@ 49, what does "hypo" mean? And "deserving fans"? No fan is "deserving" of anything.
Posted by Matt from Denver on March 15, 2013 at 6:23 PM
biffp 51
Hypothetical. I'd say Seahawk fans are deserving. Last year, Cheatin' Pete blew it, but this year they will be rewarded.
Posted by biffp on March 16, 2013 at 1:58 PM

Add a comment

Advertisement
 

Want great deals and a chance to win tickets to the best shows in Seattle? Join The Stranger Presents email list!


All contents © Index Newspapers, LLC
1535 11th Ave (Third Floor), Seattle, WA 98122
Contact Info | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Takedown Policy