Slog

News & Arts

The Stranger Suggests

Critics' Best Bets
Music Arts & Food


Line Out

Music & the City
at Night

Tuesday, March 12, 2013

Seattle Teachers' Union Votes to Support Use of "Courageous Conversations" Curriculum at Center School

Posted by on Tue, Mar 12, 2013 at 3:58 PM

When Seattle Public Schools superintendent José Banda sent out a letter last Friday that ordered the temporarily suspended race and gender curricula at the Center School to be reinstated, he offered four specific recommendations that were to be implemented "as soon as possible."

The first was to stop using a part of the curriculum called "Courageous Conversations," which had been adapted by the teacher of the class, Jon Greenberg, from a staff training. The training was convened and paid for by the district and led by Glenn Singleton, who is the author of this model for discussion and teaches it nationwide. It's not just a lesson or two, but a sort of framework for how to have difficult discussions about race, and it sets out rules to keep the discussion fair and honest and helpful. Participants are asked to agree to stay engaged with the discussion, to expect to experience some discomfort, to "speak your truth," and to expect and accept a lack of closure on such a complex and charged topic.

At the Seattle Education Association's representative assembly meeting last night, they voted "overwhelmingly," according to union president Jonathan Knapp, to encourage the district to remove that particular restriction. "Academic freedom is an important consideration," says Knapp, and teachers need to be allowed to "make professional judgments about what they should be teaching." He also said the union's position isn't actually that far from the district's—the district says this training was aimed at adults and is therefore age inappropriate. But the Center School is "not teaching it to kids, they’re teaching it to seniors," Knapp says—some of them are legal adults, some of them are just months away. They're expected to be preparing for the adult world of college and work. He says he understands "it's tough for the district" when they get a parent complaint, but that there haven't been complaints in the past, and that with any challenging curriculum, "eventually you’re gonna come up with a complaint or two."

I asked him if he thought it was funny that in the same set of recommendations, Banda said the syllabus had to be resubmitted to the College Board for AP approval—to make sure it was being taught at the college level. "We grasped that irony," laughed Knapp. The district thinks the discussions on race shouldn't be taught at an adult level, but the English lessons should be.

Greenberg, for his part, says he "objects" to the ban on lessons using the Courageous Conversations framework. "They are age-appropriate for seniors in a college-prep school," he says. Students I spoke with on Friday were of the same mind. School district spokeswoman Teresa Wippel maintains, via e-mail: "The Courageous Conversations model was intended for staff training. The specific intent of that training was not to use the model for students in the classroom."

 

Comments (13) RSS

Oldest First Unregistered On Registered On Add a comment
Sargon Bighorn 1
And this is in part why American students are in 27th place in the world of education.
Posted by Sargon Bighorn on March 12, 2013 at 4:21 PM
2
@1, because one dumb racist parent can shut the whole thing down?
Posted by GermanSausage on March 12, 2013 at 4:24 PM
Sargon Bighorn 3
#2 BINGO. You figured it out too. "Concern for the children" American style.
Posted by Sargon Bighorn on March 12, 2013 at 4:39 PM
Some Old Nobodaddy Logged In 4
and to expect and accept a lack of closure on such a complex and charged topic.


This is the money part for me. Bigots can't stand open-ended discussions and world-views that aren't completely nailed down for all time. Things that continue to evolve are anathema to conservatives and religious nutjobs. Which gives me a pretty good idea of the kind of person who complained about the curriculum.

Still, who knows? Until they keep their names hidden and their opinions only for those in closed-door sessions, we'll have to accept a lack of closure.
Posted by Some Old Nobodaddy Logged In on March 12, 2013 at 5:09 PM
5
To note, the St. Paul, MN and Portland school districts use a modified Courageous Conversations curriculum for their own students. To say it can ONLY be used for adults is just one way to try to take the focus off the real issue - talking about race.
Posted by westello on March 12, 2013 at 5:16 PM
6
Also, I find it interesting that the teacher has been teaching this class and using this curriculum, all under the eye of several different Center School principals. Anybody on the administrative side get their hand slapped? I didn't think so.
Posted by westello on March 12, 2013 at 5:17 PM
7
So is "Courageous Conversations" one of those re-education deals where the white students are forced to call the non-white student by racial epithets, and then be attacked for their racism?
Posted by Unbrainwashed on March 12, 2013 at 6:03 PM
8
Who did Knapp have to do to get this through?

He will only do what is necessary to guarantee his job in central office after his ONE term is up.
Posted by burb on March 12, 2013 at 6:09 PM
GeneStoner 9
@1 Well said.

Sure, we need to have a conversation about race in America. But this time, it has to be a two-way conversation. White America needs to be heard from, not just lectured to.

This time, the Silent Majority needs to have its convictions, grievances and demands heard.

Let's talk about the culture of poverty and violence that emanates from black people.

Let's have a conversation homies, and talk about REALLY hard stuff. Try not to get violent when we confront those facts about you. Mmmkay?
Posted by GeneStoner on March 13, 2013 at 7:30 AM
10
White America, the America that has existed for hundreds of years hasn't been heard? I hope you are being funny in your remarks, @9.

Where do you think that "culture" of poverty came from?

You're not entirely wrong - there's plenty of questions to be asked all around. But your phrasing leaves a lot to be desired.
Posted by westello on March 13, 2013 at 7:37 AM
GeneStoner 11
@10 They brought their culture of poverty over with them apparently. Were there "rich Africans" kidnapped by Black and Arab slavetraders back in the day?

Did that clarify things for you westello?

It has been two generations now since we (voluntarily) gave the store away (and rightly so). But you'd think by now they would rise to the occasion and take the incredible gift that was given to them...American opportunity.

Slavery is so dead, get over it yo.
Posted by GeneStoner on March 13, 2013 at 7:50 AM
12
It was okay to enslave people because they weren't rich to begin with?

Aren't you an unpleasant little piece of work? Yes, you are.

Posted by westello on March 13, 2013 at 9:09 AM
13
The Africans are enslaving each other today. But no white people had better trade with them.
Posted by Unbrainwashed on March 13, 2013 at 10:28 AM

Add a comment

In an effort to keep the discourse respectful and on topic, commenting on this item is available only to registered commenters.
Advertisement
 

Want great deals and a chance to win tickets to the best shows in Seattle? Join The Stranger Presents email list!


All contents © Index Newspapers, LLC
1535 11th Ave (Third Floor), Seattle, WA 98122
Contact Info | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Takedown Policy