Slog

News & Arts

The Stranger Suggests

Critics' Best Bets
Music Arts & Food


Line Out

Music & the City
at Night

Thursday, February 28, 2013

House Finally Passes Violence Against Women Act

Posted by on Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 9:48 AM

This morning, after a bit of hand-wringing musical theater from Republicans, the U.S. House of Reps finally did its job and passed the Senate's version of the Violence Against Women Act. The vote was 286 to 138. Eighty-seven Republicans voted in favor of the bill; no Democrats voted against it. Now all it needs is Obama's signature to seal the deal.

This is a huge victory for our Washington state Senators, Patty Murray and Maria Cantwell, who lobbied hard to get the bill passed. A little history from the Washington Post:

The law has been renewed twice before without controversy, but it lapsed in 2011 as it was caught up in the partisan battles that now divide Congress. Last year, the House refused to go along with a Senate-passed bill that would have made clear that lesbians, gays, immigrants and Native American women should have equal access to Violence Against Women Act programs.

It appeared the scenario would be repeated this year when the House introduced a bill that didn’t mention the lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender community and watered down a Senate provision allowing tribal courts to prosecute non-Indians who attack their Indian partners on tribal lands.

House Majority Leader Eric Cantor, R-Va., who has spent months working on the issue, defended the Republican plan: “Our goal in strengthening the Violence Against Women Act is simple. We want to help all women who are faced with violent, abusive and dangerous situations. ... We want them to know that those who commit these horrendous crimes will be punished.”

"This is a major victory for women and especially for Native, LGBT, and immigrant women," said Chris Stearns, chairman of the Seattle Human Rights Commission. "Combined with the pounding the Republicans took at the polls from women, Hispanics, blacks, and Native Americans, they had no choice this year to start dealing. The possibility of losing elections for the forseeable future meant that the House leadership had to change their strategy or face extinction. In short, the [2012] election changed everything."

 

Comments (14) RSS

Oldest First Unregistered On Registered On Add a comment
1
What about the violence against white, heterosexual men act? Oh, there's not one of those? Because it's different? Enjoy your special status.
Posted by ExitOnly on February 28, 2013 at 10:06 AM
Pope Peabrain 2
This is proof that people who say voting is a waste of time or that both parties are the same, are absolutely wrong.
Posted by Pope Peabrain on February 28, 2013 at 10:07 AM
3
"Rep. Tom Cole, R-Okla., a Native American, also wrote his Republican colleagues saying he was voting against the House alternative because “it falls short of giving tribes what they need to keep their women safe.”"

Anyone know if Cole is serious or just pulling the standard Republican tactic of spouting bullshit and voting their radically regressive party line?
Posted by It's Different Because It's The Lion's Share Of Abuse on February 28, 2013 at 10:20 AM
Urgutha Forka 4
Damn. I really wanted the republicans to make it fail.

Oh well, I have complete confidence they'll find many, many other ways to alienate 99% of voters in the country.
Posted by Urgutha Forka on February 28, 2013 at 10:50 AM
passionate_jus 5
@1

Seriously? Your statement is too stupid to even respond to.

@4 The fact that it took this long for this to pass and that more than 1/2 of the Republican House voted against it will ensure that it is used in the 2014 elections and beyond.

And look who voted against it (in the Senate):

Marco Rubio and Rand Paul

I'd say that will come back to haunt the GOP if either is the nominee for president or vice president in 2016, against Clinton, Biden or anyone for that matter.

I think the Republican Party will finally split apart after their defeat in 2016.

Posted by passionate_jus on February 28, 2013 at 11:20 AM
6
"hand-wringing musical theater" --great line

That's all the Republicans know how to act these days.
Posted by Bugnroolet on February 28, 2013 at 11:26 AM
passionate_jus 7
Yeah, but the Republicans have Binders Full of Women at their disposal.
Posted by passionate_jus on February 28, 2013 at 11:28 AM
GeneStoner 8
Actually, this is a profoundly BAD bill (despite its universally-acceptable title).

The net is cast far too wide, including people who have limited legal standing in the US (illegal immigrants).

It probably includes a free green card with an (already criminal) beating.

Think about it, a Dumbocrat comes up with a bill called "the violence against cute little kittens act," wherein no mention of kittens occurs. Republicans vote against such act and later, get accused of voting FOR violence against cute little kitties, whereby the low information voters (as seen here on the Slog) lambaste the reasonable Republicans for not approving a bad bill.

Its Orwellian lib-BS.
Posted by GeneStoner on February 28, 2013 at 11:29 AM
9
@3,

From the context of the article it sounds like he was going to vote against the watered down bill the House Republicans were trying to push forward. I'm pretty sure the House just approved the Senate's version of the bill.
Posted by keshmeshi on February 28, 2013 at 11:30 AM
Lissa 10
@8: Aww look at you regurgitating memes you saw on Reddit! That kitten comment sure is making the rounds.
Posted by Lissa on February 28, 2013 at 12:00 PM
GeneStoner 11
Actually no Lissa, I thought I was being clever. They musta stole my brilliance.

What else is cuter than a kitten? Maybe a baby chick? Shoulda used that...
Posted by GeneStoner on February 28, 2013 at 12:33 PM
JonnoN 12
@11 "I thought I was being clever"

You thought wrong. I bet that happens a lot.
Posted by JonnoN on February 28, 2013 at 12:54 PM
passionate_jus 13
@8

What does this phrase mean?:

"Its Orwellian lib-BS."

Does this mean that you think liberals talk a lot of "doublespeak" as George Orwell (Eric Blair) would call it?

Or does it mean that you acknowledge that George Orwell (Eric Blair) was a radical liberal and that you think he was full of BS?

Just curious. As someone who studied George Orwell (Eric Blair) I hate it when conservatives use his words to try to push their nonsensical philosophy, especially since George Orwell was such a left winger that he almost died fighting for the Socialists against the Falangists in Spain.

Just curious.

The rest of your post is just non-sensical jibberish, what George Orwell (Eric Blair) might call Doublespeak.
Posted by passionate_jus on February 28, 2013 at 2:10 PM
Frank Blethen's vodka distiller 14
The only one from our state's delegation to vote against the VAWA is Doc Hastings. This should be repeated over and over come 2014.
Posted by Frank Blethen's vodka distiller on February 28, 2013 at 4:51 PM

Add a comment

Advertisement
 

Want great deals and a chance to win tickets to the best shows in Seattle? Join The Stranger Presents email list!


All contents © Index Newspapers, LLC
1535 11th Ave (Third Floor), Seattle, WA 98122
Contact Info | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Takedown Policy