Slog

News & Arts

The Stranger Suggests

Critics' Best Bets
Music Arts & Food


Line Out

Music & the City
at Night

Thursday, February 28, 2013

After 370-lb Mentally Ill Man Shot and Killed by Seattle Police, Department Admits Police Are Ill-Equipped to Deal with Mentally Ill Suspects

Posted by on Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 3:02 PM

Nick Metz displays a photograph of a sharpened stone found on the dead 21-year-old
  • Ben Steiner
  • Nick Metz displays a photograph of a sharpened stone found on the dead 21-year-old

Posted by news intern Ben Steiner

A grim-faced Deputy Police Chief Nick Metz briefed a crowd of reporters this morning on Tuesday night's officer-involved confrontation with a 370-lb mentally ill man by the name of Jack Sun Keewatinawin, who was shot dead by Seattle Police on Tuesday night in Greenwood. Only one of the officers who responded to the scene had Crisis Intervention Training—i.e., they were trained to handle people in the throes of a mental-health crisis.

The police are still investigating what exactly led to this fatal confrontation, which began when police responded to two 911 calls stating that a man was being held hostage at knifepoint by his mentally ill son. The incident ended with the officers firing eight to nine bullets into the agitated 21-year-old. At this point it's unclear if the officers knew the man was mentally ill when they arrived, what type of illness the 21-year-old was diagnosed with, why there were stray bullet holes in surrounding houses, or if the officers acted within protocol.

However, Metz was quick to point out that all police in Seattle are going to be trained in dealing with mentally ill people soon (which should already be happening, given that this is not a new problem, and which, another officer later noted, probably wouldn't have helped in this case).

The press conference began with two recorded 911 calls from the deceased's two brothers. They were both out of town and had received a call from their mentally ill brother, Metz explained. "My dad's being killed right now... my brothers got a knife to him," the first brother stated hysterically, "He was saying he's going to kill my Dad."

"My little brother... thinks that I raped his girlfriend and took his money and my dad was in the background saying 'please stop'", reported the second 911 caller. "I think he's got my dad hostage." The caller added that his mentally ill brother had neither money nor a girlfriend.

Seattle Police arrived almost "simultaneously to the call coming in," Metz said. As officers were setting up containment, the suspect came out on the porch. He was described by Metz as "highly agitated and not responding to the police directives." The suspect's father then came out on the porch and the suspect moved to stand behind him, "using him as a human shield," Metz explained.

The father had informed the officers that the subject "was armed with a knife and a steel pipe."

Keewatinawin then ran inside. The officers followed him, concerned that there may be a hostage inside or another weapon. Officers attempted to tase Keewatinawin but his clothes were too thick for the prongs to make contact with the man's skin.

The chase ended outside, where one of the officers attempted to tase Keewatinawin again, and in the process "slipped on the wet grass" and landed on his back with his leg pinned under him, Metz said. The officer on the ground was armed with a shotgun just a few feet from the subject.

At this point, Keewatinawin turned and allegedly stood over the officer with a piece of rebar in his hand in an "attack-like manner," Metz said. The officer on the ground said he believed his "life was in danger."

That officer, along with two others who were chasing Keewatinawin, then "opened fire on the subject pretty much simultaneous[ly]," Metz said. Eight to nine shots were fired. Keewatinawin was rushed to Harborview where he was later pronounced dead.

The three officers who fired on Keewatinawin were Stephen Sperry, Michael Spaulding, and Tyler Speer, said SPD communications spokesman, Sgt. Sean Whitcomb. All of them had roughly five years experience, and only one of them had "Crisis Intervention Training."

CIT training is designed to provide officers with skills to deescalate situations with mentally ill subjects. Only about half of Seattle Police are trained in CIT, but Whitcomb says that SPD is in the process of making sure that all Seattle police officers will receive the training in the near future.

Of course, SPD is busy covering as much of their ass as possible. For example, Sgt. Whitcomb cautioned that this particular type of situation was not necessarily CIT territory. Using CIT training on a situation like this would be like police responding to a bank robbery, shooting the robber, and being asked "well couldn't you talk the bank robber down?" Whitcomb explained.

"It doesn't matter if the person is completely mentally sound or ill and off their medication," Whitcomb explained, "you have to take action, you don't have the luxury of just watching things unfold and say 'I hope it turns out okay.'"

SPD promises to keep the public updated online.

 

Comments (25) RSS

Oldest First Unregistered On Registered On Add a comment
1
The phrasing in this story really grates on me. It talks about "mentally ill people". What? Are they like French people, dead people, cancer-ridden people, murderous people, hateful people, bad teeth people, loveable people, etc? When you talk about a person who has an illness or a condition, you don't go call them "diabetic people" or "cystic acne covered people". You acknowledge their humanity and say that they are people that have a condition, like diabetes, acne, or a mental illness. Having a mental illness is a condition, not a classification into a certain type of human being. People that have mental illnesses are still human beings and they aren't really that different. Stop calling them by a classification (like "mentally ill people") and instead acknowledge that they have a condition ("person with a bipolar disorder"). You might not think this phrasing is important, but it helps to prevent people from seeing those that have mental illnesses as being Others, Who-Are-Different. This type of thinking perpetuates the stigmas of all diseases, including mental illness.
Posted by delirian on February 28, 2013 at 3:18 PM
2
Shades of the Eleanor Bumpurs case in NYC circa 1984--An "emotionally disturbed" person with a dangerous weapon in hand threatens a cop with harm after attempts to subdue without deadly force, but the disturbed person attacks or appears to attack anyway and the cop has no choice but to defend himself in the best way he knows how.

Families need to do more to take care of business instead of letting their spawn's problems escalate to the point that the cops need to be brought in, e.g., the military vet with dementia who pulled a gun on a cop. You can give cops some de-escalation training but it is not nearly as effective as the family getting the disturbed person some mental health treatment/incarceration.
Posted by neo-realist on February 28, 2013 at 3:34 PM
Westlake, son! 3
Maybe don't give guns to people that aren't well equipped to handle their job?
Posted by Westlake, son! on February 28, 2013 at 4:01 PM
4
"Department Admits Police Are Ill-Equipped to Deal with Mentally Ill Suspects"

The only thing surprising here is that SPD admitted this.
Posted by TechBear on February 28, 2013 at 4:13 PM
5
Maybe get the cops some better shoes? How embarrassing for the department that all it takes is some wet grass for an officer to fall on his ass.

@1,

What's your suggestion when the writer doesn't seem to know from what illness that individual suffered? And if I see someone who appears to have an illness and I don't know what that illness is, I probably would describe that person as an "ill person" (probably not a "sick person" since that connotes something else). Does that mean that I enjoy stigmatizing ill people?
Posted by keshmeshi on February 28, 2013 at 4:20 PM
6
What's the crisis response when a cop comes across a mentally ill man trying to impregnate another man by putting his penis in the other one's ass?
Posted by ExitOnly on February 28, 2013 at 4:34 PM
7
@1 Yes, but having acne doesn't typically cause someone to take their father hostage and threaten his life.

Obviously we don't know if what happened is exactly as the police described, but it doesn't seem like an impossible scenario. Given SPD's record, though, they don't deserve too much benefit of the doubt.
Posted by deign_to_say on February 28, 2013 at 4:39 PM
Fnarf 8
@6, You spend five hours a day thinking about this, don't you?

Congratulations, you win the prize for the stupidest, most out-of-context crazy response in the history of your whole species of stupid, out-of-context crazy people, not just in the "mah butt is foah exit only" category. How do you say "non sequitur" in Klingon? That's how far off you are. And yet, and yet, so close to the bone. Your own.
Posted by Fnarf http://www.facebook.com/fnarf on February 28, 2013 at 4:42 PM
Will in Seattle 9
As the population continues to age, and as more and more vets develop PTSD from our unending foreign wars, this is just going to get worse.

@6 obviously lives in Eymanitis, a suburb of Red Idaho.
Posted by Will in Seattle http://www.facebook.com/WillSeattle on February 28, 2013 at 5:20 PM
10
Yes, but having acne doesn't typically cause someone to take their father hostage and threaten his life.
@7: Nor does mental illness, asshole.
Posted by delirian on February 28, 2013 at 5:25 PM
Rhysling 11
I believe @2 has the right of it. Regardless of reason / excuse, this man's behavior was unacceptable. It would be wonderful if he could have received the help he needed - but he didn't. And he paid the price nature charges for all living beings unsuited for their environments.

I hope the SPD officers involved don’t lose too much sleep over it. They have an impossible job.
Posted by Rhysling on February 28, 2013 at 5:25 PM
12
Families can't force people to get evaluation/treatment if they don't want it. No one can, except for MHPs(Mental Health Practitioners given that charge by governments) AFTER the person has shown they're a danger to themselves or someone else.
Posted by sarah70 on February 28, 2013 at 5:37 PM
yucca flower 13
@2,

Anyone over the age of 18 years is an adult and free to go on or off their meds as the please. Unless they actually do something the courts won't intervene and commit them and if the court does finally intervene they typically don't do it for longer than a few days. There is no mental health care system in this country anymore. There hasn't been one since Ron Reagan decided to de-fund and dismantle it.
Posted by yucca flower on February 28, 2013 at 5:40 PM
Gus 14
Damn, the police need better shoes.

Beyond that -- sounds like a complete clusterfuck. I'm glad they tried to use a taser first, but putting 8-9 bullets in the guy and strays into neighboring houses is unacceptable.

I don't think we should make them follow Barney Fife's example -- one bullet, kept in the pocket -- but maybe they shouldn't have so many bullets in their guns if they are going to go shooting up the neighborhood like that.
Posted by Gus on February 28, 2013 at 5:42 PM
15
And he paid the price nature charges for all living beings unsuited for their environments.
@11: Are you pro-eugenics? If you say no, then you are a hypocrite. If you say yes, then you are an asshole of the highest order.

Isn't it amazing how people will openly say things such as people with mental illnesses don't deserve to live? I somehow doubt that you would say that people with cancer don't deserve to live. At what point did you decide that the world would be better off without those who suffer from mental illness? What other people that have certain diseases or conditions would the world be better off without?
Posted by delirian on February 28, 2013 at 5:50 PM
16
One part of "violent 370lb knife wielding man" seems to be confusing everybody? Jesus. That's like a horror movie right there. I'm not sure there IS training for that.

I'm as cynical about SPD as the next lefty, but you guys seem to expect the average cop to be some sort of expert non-lethal all-purpose ninjas for every scenario. I trained with cops for a dozen years. Well. They can do a lot better, sure. But these kinds of expectations where they can handle every single situation like they are PhD's. It's just not possible.

Again. Knife wielding. Violent. 370 fucking pounds!

I'm sad for this kids family for sure and I wish there were better mechanisms for families to deal with disturbed family members (believe me, I've way too personal experiences on that). But still. Not to be cold, but part of me is glad, one way or another, that guy is no longer walking the streets. I tangled with some big dudes but... well, holy shit. That's NFL linebacker size. And possible a ticking time bomb.
Posted by tkc on February 28, 2013 at 5:59 PM
17
@13: There wasn't a mental healthcare system even then. All that happened was that people were locked in asylums so nobody had to worry about them or ever know how their rights were being violated.

If you want effective mental healthcare, it has to be done in community. I know that mental hospitals are a popular topic right now, but the truth is that they were only meant for emergency conditions where people are at an immediate risk to hurting themselves. The skills learned in a mental hospital (at ~$1500/day) aren't the same skills a person needs to survive day to day in the real world. That can only be done through outpatient treatment, which nobody wants to fund. If you want to help someone, you help them deal with their life as it occurs, not take them out of it and put them in a total control environment for a couple of months and then drop them back into a hellstorm when they are released.

Wait, wait. I think I missed your point. You weren't actually talking about treatment. You just wanted to get them back in cheap asylums where you could forget about them, right? Because if you were actually talking about treatment, you would talk about funding outpatient treatment so that conditions don't progress to need hospitalization. Instead you only talked about how hard it was to lock people up, so obviously 'treatment' has a different meaning for you.
Posted by delirian on February 28, 2013 at 6:01 PM
18
@17,

Considering that he was under court-ordered mental health care, which he ignored, what do you propose the state should have or could have done other than institutionalize him?
Posted by keshmeshi on February 28, 2013 at 6:34 PM
19
And anyway, I retract my statement @5. I don't know why the unpaid intern didn't mention that the man was suffering from schizophrenia.
Posted by keshmeshi on February 28, 2013 at 6:36 PM
Gern Blanston 20
Beyond his mental illness, this guy was also a level three sex offender who attacked a female jogger on a secluded trail last year, tackling her to the ground and shoving her head in the dirt before she was able to fight him off. Strange that unpaid intern neglects to mention this. I guess it doesn't fit the usual Stranger police brutality narrative.
Posted by Gern Blanston on February 28, 2013 at 9:35 PM
21
@10 It did in this case, delirious. The guy was a schizophrenic violent sex offender, not sure how you're equating him to an asthmatic.
Posted by deign_to_say on February 28, 2013 at 10:45 PM
22
@21: And was he violent because he had a mental illness? Is that what you are trying to imply?

There is no evidence to support your conclusion. People with many conditions commit violence. But we don't causally link them except in the case of mental illness. The sad thing is that the mental illness link is fallacious. The risk of violence by someone with a mental illness isn't higher than that of the average population. But that isn't enough to satisfy your witch-hunt is it? You think the existence of a mental illness, in and by itself, is enough to explain everything about a person, including violence.

Do you know what actually does predict violence? Previous criminal behavior. So was this man a high risk for violence? Yes! But not because of a mental illness.

All that your witch-hunt and desire to clamp down on the civil liberties of people that have mental illnesses accomplishes is to scare away the majority of people that have a mental illness from seeking help. Let me repeat that: the majority of people that have a mental illness do not get help because they are afraid of discrimination and stigma. Do you think that the statements in this very thread might affect that stigma, such as talking about how a man with a mental illness deserved to die (@11 and @16), how people with mental illness don't deserve the civil liberties of 'normal' people (@2, @12, and @13), or associating mental illness with violence (the post, @7, and @21)?
Posted by delirian on March 1, 2013 at 12:07 AM
23
@22 -- If you nominate a phrase to describe the condition where someone perceives their surroundings in a way that leads to dangerous anti-social outbursts and impairs their ability to make rational decisions while under stress,

And somehow explains the seemingly irrational behaviors that often lead to these kinds of tragedies,

And doesn't somehow stigmatize persons with related but not-quite-the-same illnesses (or differences),

then I'm sure the commentariate will gladly replace "mentally ill" or "psychotic" with that phrase.

Until then, understand we understand the difference between the 98% of people with mental illnesses who never physically harm anyone but themselves and the 2% who make the news when they scare the shit out of us.

Unfortunately, there are some varieties of mental illness that include paranoia, poor impulse control, and tendencies toward violence against others.

So please, suggest a phrase we can all agree on and let us get back to kvetching about the police.
Posted by six shooter on March 1, 2013 at 8:12 AM
24
@23: You again associate mental illness with violence despite the evidence to the contrary. It is so ingrained in your thinking that even when you are presented the evidence to the contrary, you still feel the urge to attack people with mental illnesses. Then you show callous disregard to the effects of your discrimination and demand the right to continue to stigmatize people based on your unsupported fears.

How the fuck do you expect me to reply to this? Read the DSM to see how the recognized mental illnesses are diagnosed. You will not find murderous rampages listed as a symptom anywhere.

What you are doing is equating mental illness with being a criminal or a bad person. Before you post again, I would like to know how much you have studied psychology or psychiatry. My guess is that you are an ignorant asshole who doesn't know shit about mental health, but you still feel you have some right to spout off about shit you don't understand.
Posted by delirian on March 1, 2013 at 8:37 AM
JF 25
I love how the intern doesn't drop the loaded word "allegedly" until it came time to describe the guy's violent behavior.
Posted by JF on March 1, 2013 at 9:55 AM

Add a comment

Advertisement
 

Want great deals and a chance to win tickets to the best shows in Seattle? Join The Stranger Presents email list!


All contents © Index Newspapers, LLC
1535 11th Ave (Third Floor), Seattle, WA 98122
Contact Info | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Takedown Policy