Slog

News & Arts

The Stranger Suggests

Critics' Best Bets
Music Arts & Food


Line Out

Music & the City
at Night

Friday, February 22, 2013

State Reproductive Parity Act Passes in the House

Posted by on Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 12:16 PM

Women's health advocates swarmed Olympia on Monday for a reproductive-rights lobby day, wearing pink T-shirts and dressing up as a giant pack of birth control pills dancing with the Statue of Liberty, and rallying hard for Washington State's groundbreaking Reproductive Parity Act. Cienna's covered the RPA before; basically, it would require insurance companies to cover abortions if they cover maternity care.

The press releases are now flying fast and furious: The RPA just passed in the state house, and will move on to the senate. Governor Inslee says:

Today's vote in the House is a big step forward in guaranteeing women's access to a full range of reproductive health care services. As I begin signing bills next week, I expect the Senate to follow the House's lead so the RPA can be among those I have the honor of signing into law. The Senate should not shut the door of democracy when it comes to women's health care.

Meanwhile, Fuse Washington crows: "Now that the full state House has approved the Reproductive Parity Act (HB 1044/SB 5798) by a 53-43 vote, the fate of the bill is up to Senate Majority Leader Rodney Tom."

Dear lord, our wombs are in these hands? Actually, despite his unholy alliance with state Republicans, Tom is plenty supportive of reproductive rights. I just called his office, and they assured me that "he's supportive" of the RPA. On Monday, he signaled his support to the reproductive-rights lobbyists at the rally, saying, "I want to make sure my 17-year-old daughter has all of her reproductive health care covered." But it's unclear if the bill has a real chance in this year's senate, and his office wasn't able to clarify how, exactly, he might support its passage.

The bill died in the senate last year, even though it looked like it had the votes to pass. So it's time once again to holler at your senators, folks.

 

Comments (3) RSS

Oldest First Unregistered On Registered On Add a comment
1
Because to Liberals Killing a Baby is JUST THE SAME as delivering one......
Posted by You do your babies a favor by MURDERING them. on February 22, 2013 at 1:04 PM
COMTE 2
Considering the issues raised in Cienna's article this week, one can't help but wonder what effect, if any, this will have on the increasing number of Catholic-run hospitals in the state. I mean, what real benefit will women get, if their insurance company is required to cover these items and procedures, but hospitals aren't similarly compelled to provide them as well?
Posted by COMTE http://www.chriscomte.com on February 22, 2013 at 1:05 PM
3
All the more reason to pass it. If it doesn't pass, and insurance companies in the red states aren't covering birth control and abortion because their male legislators have vagina-control issues, then there's no reason to provide/cover it in WA either (in their mind). The Catholic hospitals can be dealt with if they take any public monies. But if the insurance companies don't cover it, then WA women are screwed on both ends.
Posted by StuckInUtah on February 22, 2013 at 8:12 PM

Add a comment

Advertisement
 

Want great deals and a chance to win tickets to the best shows in Seattle? Join The Stranger Presents email list!


All contents © Index Newspapers, LLC
1535 11th Ave (Third Floor), Seattle, WA 98122
Contact Info | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Takedown Policy