Slog

News & Arts

The Stranger Suggests

Critics' Best Bets
Music Arts & Food


Line Out

Music & the City
at Night

Thursday, February 21, 2013

The ACLU May Sue to Stop Restrictive Catholic Hospital Mergers in Washington

Posted by on Thu, Feb 21, 2013 at 12:20 PM

Hospital commissioners in Skagit County recently signed a letter stating their intention to hand over control of the county's United General Hospital to the Catholic healthcare organization, PeaceHealth, for the next 50 years.

Now, the ACLU of Washington is politely warning commissioners to reconsider their current plan, which gives PeaceHealth "full discretion to determine the scope of services" at United General, before the 50-year lease agreement is finalized. "The Hospital District must insist that, in order to receive funds, PeaceHealth or other heath care facilities provide access to contraceptive services and abortion, and that their policies be based on medical ethics and state law, not religious doctrine," states the February 8 letter signed Kathleen Taylor, Executive Director of the ACLU of Washington. (A nearly identical letter was also sent to the Washington State Department of Health.)

If the hospital refuses to comply, the ACLU is "exploring all options," spokesman Doug Honig says, "including a lawsuit."

As I mention in this week's feature, 10 hospital mergers have been proposed (and/or finalized) in the last year in Washington between public and Catholic healthcare organizations, each of which could drastically impact women and terminal patients' access to their full range of healthcare options. The ACLU has now issued warning letters to public hospital commissioners in two counties—San Juan County and Skagit County—outlining the illegalities of moving forward with these mergers. What makes these PeaceHealth mergers particularly menacing is that PeaceHealth is also in talks to merge with a much larger (and more conservative) Catholic corporation, Franciscan Health System.*

More from the ACLU's February 8 letter to Skagit County hospital commissioners (.pdf):

We are deeply concerned that PeaceHealth's religiously-based policy of restricting access to reproductive and end-of-life healthcare services violates the Washington constitution and state law. Our concerns are further exacerbated by the likelihood of increased restrictions should a proposed merger between PeaceHealth and Franciscan Health System... go forward.

... As a government entity, the Skagit Public Health District No. 304 is bound by the Washington Constitution. The Washington Constitution provides that "no public money or property" shall be used to support "any religious establishment." (Article 1, Section II) By providing an annual subsidy to PeaceHealth and charging only nominal rent to lease United General Hospital and other public health facilities to PeaceHealth, the Hospital District is impermissably supporting the religious restrictions on reproductive and end-of-life services.

The letter goes on to state that the United General Hospital merger would violate the state's Reproductive Parity Act, which empowers every individual "with the fundamental right to choose or refuse birth control," and every woman the right to have an abortion.

Honig says the Skagit County hospital commissioners haven't yet responded to their letter.

*Franciscan is affiliated with Catholic Health Initiatives, which is widely considered to be the most strident and conservative Catholic healthcare group in the country (it's actually considered a direct arm of the Catholic church). CHI is so conservative that the governor of Kentucky blocked a proposed hospital merger in his state amidst fears CHI would choke out women's access to comprehensive reproductive healthcare. Let me repeat that: CHI is considered too conservative for Kentucky. And yet CHI's affiliation with Franciscan, and Franciscan's proposed merger with PeaceHealth, means that CHI could soon influence healthcare policies at PeaceHealth's nine NW hospitals and 73 medical centers.

 

Comments (6) RSS

Newest First Unregistered On Registered On Add a comment
6
@5: I'm also not all that happy about Oregon having bought into a religious HMO as one (and in many cases the ONLY) health insurance provider for State employees.
Posted by DonServo on February 21, 2013 at 7:08 PM
5
This is fucking scary. The only protection we have is our constitutional right to separation of church and state. If they get their way, we will be back to living under an extremely prohibitive theocracy.
Posted by SeattleKim on February 21, 2013 at 1:53 PM
4
*sigh*

In the last few years all the hospitals near me have come under the Sisters of Charity.

I hope you have better luck out in Seattle.
Posted by swing state voter on February 21, 2013 at 1:18 PM
pfffter 3
The suit should also include right-to-die for end-of-life decisions. I know a hospice social worker who is not allowed to talk to clients about this because he works for a catholic organization.
Posted by pfffter on February 21, 2013 at 1:07 PM
Urgutha Forka 2
That's religion for you:

They tell you it's all your choice whether you want to believe in their god or not.

And when you tell them you've chosen not to believe, they force you anyway.

Fuck religion.
Posted by Urgutha Forka on February 21, 2013 at 12:56 PM
1
When the anti-abortionists know that anti-abortion legislation will never pass, they come in the back way, like this. Sneaky bastards. Hope they get their asses handed to them by the ACLU.
Posted by StuckInUtah on February 21, 2013 at 12:33 PM

Add a comment

Advertisement
 

Want great deals and a chance to win tickets to the best shows in Seattle? Join The Stranger Presents email list!


All contents © Index Newspapers, LLC
1535 11th Ave (Third Floor), Seattle, WA 98122
Contact Info | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Takedown Policy