Slog

News & Arts

The Stranger Suggests

Critics' Best Bets
Music Arts & Food


Line Out

Music & the City
at Night

Wednesday, February 20, 2013

ACLU Seeking Testimony from Patients Who've Been Denied Care at Religious Hospitals

Posted by on Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 12:30 PM

As I write in this week's paper, Catholic hospitals are flourishing in Washington State, which is impacting end-of-life care for dying patients, as well as reproductive health care for women:

To understand Catholic health care, it's important to know the rules that guide Catholic hospitals, otherwise known as Ethical and Religious Directives (ERDs). These directives are drafted and tweaked by the rotating cast of mostly white, mostly celibate bishops couch-surfing at the Vatican. ERDs operate like a code of conduct that medical staff in Catholic hospitals agree to abide by, regardless of whether or not a particular staffer is Catholic. For the most part, the directives aren't suggestions—they're prescriptive.

... As you'd expect, the directives pertaining to women's fertility read like a misogynist romance novel or found art from the Middle Ages: "Catholic health institutions may not promote or condone contraceptive practices." Emergency contraception can only be given to rape victims, and even then only "if, after appropriate testing, there is no evidence that conception has occurred already." Vasectomies and tubal ligations are also prohibited. Egg and sperm donors are deemed "contrary to the covenant of marriage," surrogate motherhood is prohibited because it denigrates "the dignity of the child and marriage," and doctors at Catholic hospitals can't help infertile couples conceive artificially—using their own eggs and sperm—because test-tube babies "separate procreation from the marital act in its unitive significance."

Then there's this: "Abortion... is never permitted."

Now the ACLU of Washington is seeking testimony from patients who've been denied reproductive health care or end-of-life services at religious-based medical facilities. As their website states, "We also would like to hear about any experience of discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation or gender identity and expression in seeking or accessing health care services, counseling, or referrals in Washington state."

To submit your testimony, go here.

 

Comments (12) RSS

Newest First Unregistered On Registered On Add a comment
12
@4 "Does the ACLU have any legal standing to sue?"

Often the ACLU does not, so they could do something like "[Seek] Testimony from Patients Who've Been Denied Care at Religious Hospitals" and then provide them with free representation.
Posted by I ANAL on February 21, 2013 at 8:54 AM
11
"...separate procreation from the marital act in its unitive significance."

For Mary it's a miracle, but for everyone else, it's an abomination. Got it.
Posted by And on February 20, 2013 at 4:46 PM
10
@9: Aw, muffin... You had to work really hard for that one, didn't you? I could almost feel the sweaty effort it took for you to get that out. Kinda like Elvis on his last crapper.
Posted by NateMan on February 20, 2013 at 3:38 PM
9
why doesn't the aclu open some hospitals where they can slaughter babies and old people to their heart's content?

Posted by because that would be constructive on February 20, 2013 at 3:33 PM
8
Can you explain how it's relevant that the Vatican bishops are "mostly white"? Thanks.
Posted by catsnbanjos on February 20, 2013 at 3:26 PM
7
@1 because controlling bodily functions and human biology is a very effective way to control people and societies.
Posted by wxPDX on February 20, 2013 at 2:18 PM
6
Don't forget Swedish Hospital agreed to these conditions when it merged with Providence, so you may think Swedish has no Catholic affiliation, but be prepared to have your living will and final directives ignored if you are about to die at Swedish. They will give lip service to you but then ignore your instructions. Same crap on contraception and abortion.
Posted by ratcityreprobate on February 20, 2013 at 2:12 PM
sperifera 5
Catholic Hospitals: "But, but, but what about our religious freedom??? Now please send us more federal dollars so that we can continue to proselytize our covenants."
Posted by sperifera on February 20, 2013 at 2:08 PM
4
Ugh, just read the article and that's fucked up. In a just world, if both the patient and physician are not Catholic, they can decide their own health care. But no, the Catholic bishops have to get their filthy, hypocritical hands into everything.

Does the ACLU have any legal standing to sue? It sounds they'd have to get new regulations passed to combat this.
Posted by Lumpmoose on February 20, 2013 at 2:00 PM
Pope Peabrain 3
I can hear the threats by the church now. "If you force us to provide...blah,blah,blah we'll close our hospitals!"
Posted by Pope Peabrain on February 20, 2013 at 1:51 PM
Hernandez 2
@1 Because people want what they can't have?

Or alternately: "If I don't get to have any sexy time fun then neither does anyone else." These people don't believe in sex for pleasure because they've never done it.
Posted by Hernandez http://hernandezlist.blogspot.com on February 20, 2013 at 1:20 PM
1
I've just never understood why an organization of dudes who promise to never knock up a woman are so concerned with other people's genitalia...
Posted by NateMan on February 20, 2013 at 1:02 PM

Add a comment

Advertisement
 

Want great deals and a chance to win tickets to the best shows in Seattle? Join The Stranger Presents email list!


All contents © Index Newspapers, LLC
1535 11th Ave (Third Floor), Seattle, WA 98122
Contact Info | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Takedown Policy