Slog

News & Arts

The Stranger Suggests

Critics' Best Bets
Music Arts & Food


Line Out

Music & the City
at Night

Monday, February 18, 2013

People Are Soft and Cars are Hard: Volvo Offers a Vehicle With a Pedestrian Airbag

Posted by on Mon, Feb 18, 2013 at 8:54 AM

See how it works...


But how about just giving us streets with no cars?
Big roads and parking garages are so common in American cities that it's easy to forget these places once functioned exceptionally well without them. However, in their persistent battle to satisfy the demands of motorists, many urban areas are losing out.

In the early 1960s – when highway construction was at its peak and cars were just beginning to leave their mark – a handful of critics predicted there would be irreconcilable tensions between vibrant cities and their motorized inhabitants. Nearly 50 years later, researchers at the University of Pennsylvania published research validating this idea.

Their conceptual model was based on a straightforward premise: cars take up a lot of space, especially when it comes to storing them all day while their owners work.

What the researchers found is that cities that have lots of cars have fewer people. So, to achieve real density will mean building cities that are for people and not for cars. There is no way (airbags, alarms, and what have you) around this fact.

 

Comments (12) RSS

Oldest First Unregistered On Registered On Add a comment
Supreme Ruler Of The Universe 1

Or build cities for cars, with enough room and with segregated bike/pedestrian topologies. Successful new cities -- called suburbs by some, but alternatively Car Cities, do this to some extent. Low density streets mean bikes can travel with lower rates of car interaction. However, it means shifting mindset from 18th to 21st century. Also, Google cars.
Posted by Supreme Ruler Of The Universe http://www.you-read-it-here-first.com on February 18, 2013 at 9:18 AM
Max Solomon 2
we have a street with no cars. it's called occidental and it sucks. you know what it lacks? traffic.
Posted by Max Solomon on February 18, 2013 at 9:36 AM
3
Riddle me how you're supposed to get more than a handful of stuff from one place to another in a carless city.
Posted by The CHZA on February 18, 2013 at 9:42 AM
4
Is this April Fools? That airbag thing looks rather unhealthy for a person who is already up against the corner of the windshield.

I hear the new Hummer has a safety system that will automically roll out a concussion bomb which blows cyclists safely away from the collision. Well it's better than getting hit by a Hummer right?

(You know this is a troll because they stopped making Hummers in 2010, although I hear the military version is still around somewhere.)
Posted by spock on February 18, 2013 at 10:09 AM
5
Is this early April Fools? That airbag thing looks rather unhealthy for a person who is already up against the corner of the windshield.

I hear the new Hummer has a safety system that will automically roll out a concussion bomb which will blow a cyclist safely away from the collision. Well it's better than getting hit by a Hummer right?

(You know this is a troll because they stopped making Hummers in 2010, although I hear the military version is still around somewhere.)
Posted by spock on February 18, 2013 at 10:10 AM
6
@3: It's an exciting technology called "shopping bags". The rest of the world makes extensive use of them as they walk , bike, or ride the bus.
Posted by tiktok on February 18, 2013 at 11:22 AM
Supreme Ruler Of The Universe 7

Creating Hipsturbia

As formerly boho environs of Brooklyn become unattainable due to creeping Manhattanization and seven-figure real estate prices, creative professionals of child-rearing age — the type of alt-culture-allegiant urbanites who once considered themselves too cool to ever leave the city — are starting to ponder the unthinkable: a move to the suburbs.


http://www.nytimes.com/2013/02/17/fashio…
Posted by Supreme Ruler Of The Universe http://www.you-read-it-here-first.com on February 18, 2013 at 11:25 AM
lark 8
Good Morning and Happy Presidents' Day Charles,
Indeed, I completely agree with you. Give us more streets with no cars. Less automobile traffic will be healthier for the pedestrian and other critters (dogs etc.) to walk & to lower the chance of being struck by a motor vehicle, safer for the environment (less air pollution from exhaust) and cheaper for the consumer. I read an advert in this morning's paper for a car dealership. The least expensive car was $12,000 and most expensive $46,000. Automobiles are cost prohibitive. Yet, we continually buy them, even new ones.
Posted by lark on February 18, 2013 at 11:33 AM
Supreme Ruler Of The Universe 9

Cars can be accomodated more safely with a hexagonal street system. Check out discussion on such a automata network here:

https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=…
Posted by Supreme Ruler Of The Universe http://www.you-read-it-here-first.com on February 18, 2013 at 11:37 AM
Charles Mudede 10
@7 i read that this weekend and thought it was just pure nonsense.
Posted by Charles Mudede on February 18, 2013 at 12:28 PM
11
How about giving us reporters with no brains?
Posted by Unbrainwashed on February 18, 2013 at 1:35 PM
Twilight Sparkle 12
@3 In European and Japanese cities with a mode split of less than 50% driving, alternatives for moving large items start to cost out through economies of scale. These can include delivery services and car share.
Posted by Twilight Sparkle on February 18, 2013 at 9:44 PM

Add a comment

Advertisement
 

Want great deals and a chance to win tickets to the best shows in Seattle? Join The Stranger Presents email list!


All contents © Index Newspapers, LLC
1535 11th Ave (Third Floor), Seattle, WA 98122
Contact Info | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Takedown Policy