Slog

News & Arts

The Stranger Suggests

Critics' Best Bets
Music Arts & Food


Line Out

Music & the City
at Night

Monday, February 4, 2013

As Money Dwindles, the Republican Party Tries to Purge Itself of Teabaggers

Posted by on Mon, Feb 4, 2013 at 1:27 PM

1. Karl Rove is trying to shake the Teabaggers out of the Republican Party once and for all:

Karl Rove has created a group designed to stop the Tea Party’s influence over the Republican Party.

The “Conservative Victory Project,” an offshoot of the former Bush adviser’s American Crossroads, is designed to prevent Tea Party-endorsed candidates from winning Senate primaries.

Let's hope Rove is about as successful as he was during the 2012 election.

2. Politico says that the big money might be draining out of the Republican Party:

Wall Street donors and bundlers plunged hundreds of millions of dollars into the GOP’s effort to take back the White House and Senate this year — and now some are threatening to cut off the spigot ahead of 2014 in the face of disappointing results.

New York donors have a list of complaints: Republicans focused too much on social issues, backed too many weak candidates, stalled Hurricane Sandy aid and even let taxes go up for the very rich — in other words, the very people giving the money and their friends.

The entire rest of the universe is calling for the Republican Party to become more moderate. Even Karl Rove is calling for the Republican Party to become more moderate. I highly doubt that the Republican Party is going to become more moderate.

 

Comments (31) RSS

Newest First Unregistered On Registered On Add a comment
Ballard Pimp 31
@30--Personally I'd prefer a real party of the Left. Yes, I'm a lifelong Democrat, too--But in Britain I'd probably vote Tory most of the time. That's how far to the Right America has skewed itself.
Posted by Ballard Pimp on February 5, 2013 at 9:17 PM
Aurora Erratic 30
Lifelong Democrat here hoping hard that they DO become more moderate - it's not healthy for our political system to have only one viable party. And I'd love to see some of the more crackpot ideas sent to some fringe graveyard.
Posted by Aurora Erratic http://www.finemesspottery.com on February 5, 2013 at 5:12 AM
Ballard Pimp 29
@11--John, you can quit trying to be our pet Republican any time; but you really are clueless. And you're one of the smart ones.
Posted by Ballard Pimp on February 5, 2013 at 12:19 AM
28
If Obama and the Democratic Party weren't Wall Street's errand boys, this might be interesting news. Plus, the kill list still on Obama's desk as a confirmed torturer is installed at CIA and secret cyberwar joins the president's post-habeas corpus powers. Yuh, Karl Rove's problems matter a lot.

http://www.nytimes.com/2013/02/04/us/bro…
Posted by Che Guava on February 4, 2013 at 9:01 PM
Mahtli69 27
Karl Rove translated: Don't change, just rebrand!
Posted by Mahtli69 on February 4, 2013 at 8:23 PM
Frank Blethen's vodka distiller 26
Rove's just pissed off cause no one would tea bag him.
Posted by Frank Blethen's vodka distiller on February 4, 2013 at 5:47 PM
GhostDog 25
@10 Ding! I think that rove will succeed. The problem will be that the people who originally started the tea party, the people who are scared of change and the unrealized libertarian anarchists are still there and still active.

In the end, I see the tea party splitting the GOP. Money on one side, people on the other.
Posted by GhostDog on February 4, 2013 at 5:17 PM
venomlash 24
@19: *you're
Posted by venomlash on February 4, 2013 at 4:13 PM
Matt from Denver 23
@ 21, 19 is right. "Pragmatic" and "moderate" are synonymous in politics.
Posted by Matt from Denver on February 4, 2013 at 4:13 PM
Pick1 22
@19 That's kind of the problem. "Conservative", by definition needs to be pulled out of the status quo on rights every 20 years or so. They are wrong, and they refuse and then eventually they give ground (Like the LGBT stuff this time).

They'll move toward a "moderate" position and then they will call that the status quo for 20 more years until the status quo becomes so fringe that they lose elections again.

Social Conservatives are a godamned ball and chain for progress.
Posted by Pick1 on February 4, 2013 at 3:53 PM
Pope Peabrain 21
@19 Not moderate but pragmatic.
Posted by Pope Peabrain on February 4, 2013 at 3:52 PM
20
@5,

You mean it expanded the market. Separating idiots from their money is a grand old American pastime.
Posted by keshmeshi on February 4, 2013 at 3:37 PM
19
@ 8 That is false, it was moderate before Reagan took it hard to the right and it will start to turn moderate when they lose another Presidential election, your being too liberal for you own good.
Posted by Seattle14 on February 4, 2013 at 3:24 PM
Original Andrew 18
@ 9,

You have to look back 160 years to find something remotely decent that the Republicans have done?
Posted by Original Andrew on February 4, 2013 at 3:15 PM
thatsnotright 17
@10 Conservatives may become a little less strident and a little less overtly racist and bigoted but conservatism, is by definition, not forward looking. The party is failing to keep up with the times. It's not what Slog posters think of the GOP that matters, it's what the majority of voters think, and Republicans are out of step. Slavery was ended by liberals, not conservatives,btw.
Posted by thatsnotright on February 4, 2013 at 3:12 PM
biffp 16
Dick Armey. He led the Tea Party and left. That was the story back at Christmas.
Posted by biffp on February 4, 2013 at 2:50 PM
OOF POOF 15
@9
Abolition was pretty controversial back in the day. Google Radical Repulican.
Posted by OOF POOF on February 4, 2013 at 2:49 PM
Gurldoggie 14
If you can use the word "moderate" in a sentence you were never a real Republican. And you can tell Karl Rove not to let the door hit him on the way out.
Posted by Gurldoggie http://gurldogg.blogspot.com on February 4, 2013 at 2:48 PM
Urgutha Forka 13
@11,
No, I'm not encouraging the republican party to destroy itself, but I'm certainly not going to try to stop them either (not that I could if I wanted to).

Besides, the republican party in its current state is not benefitting society.
Posted by Urgutha Forka on February 4, 2013 at 2:43 PM
eastcoastreader 12
schadenfreude, it's so sweet
Posted by eastcoastreader on February 4, 2013 at 2:43 PM
Supreme Ruler Of The Universe 11
#10

So your goal is as a democrat partisan who would encourage bad or wrong behavior in a spiteful way even if it were bad for society as a whole simply so you could win and have power?
Posted by Supreme Ruler Of The Universe http://www.you-read-it-here-first.com on February 4, 2013 at 2:31 PM
Urgutha Forka 10
@7,
I don't. I want them to become more extreme.

The less moderate the republicans are, the less likely the'll win elections. If they become extreme enough, they might even splinter and form a new party. If conservatives start splitting their votes between two parties, the liberals will never lose another election again.
Posted by Urgutha Forka on February 4, 2013 at 2:29 PM
Supreme Ruler Of The Universe 9
#8

Abolition?
Posted by Supreme Ruler Of The Universe http://www.you-read-it-here-first.com on February 4, 2013 at 2:29 PM
Pope Peabrain 8
@7 The Republican party hasn't ever been moderate and will never be moderate.
Posted by Pope Peabrain on February 4, 2013 at 2:27 PM
Supreme Ruler Of The Universe 7
Seems like people here would want to help in our effort to make the Republican Party more moderate.
Posted by Supreme Ruler Of The Universe http://www.you-read-it-here-first.com on February 4, 2013 at 2:16 PM
Some Old Nobodaddy Logged In 6
You know something is wrong in America when the vox populi saw what was going on four years before the so-called "job creators" began to figure it out.
Posted by Some Old Nobodaddy Logged In on February 4, 2013 at 2:13 PM
5
The simpler explanation is that American Crossroads is now damaged goods and Rove needs another venture to bilk donation money from foolish Republicans. Citizens United created a nice, little market for legally untraceable fraud.
Posted by Lumpmoose on February 4, 2013 at 2:12 PM
Pope Peabrain 4
Oh, so that's why they showed Palin the door.
Posted by Pope Peabrain on February 4, 2013 at 1:53 PM
3
Of course, part of the reason why big business is giving less to Republicans is because Democrats have stepped up and are giving big business what it wants.

Why bother with crazy wackjobs, when you can get the results you (big business, in this case) wants with otherwise rational people. No high level executives arrested in the sub-prime mortgage crisis, BofA gets a mild slap on the wrist... Meanwhile they're making billions of dollars while the middle class and poor are squeezed for every cent they've got.
Posted by randoma on February 4, 2013 at 1:45 PM
seandr 2
Karl Rove is trying to shake the Teabaggers out of the Republican Party once and for all

How about starting with Karl Rove.
Posted by seandr on February 4, 2013 at 1:42 PM
yelahneb 1
Your last paragraph made me laugh out loud. Perfect :)
Posted by yelahneb http://www.strangebutharmless.com on February 4, 2013 at 1:30 PM

Add a comment

Advertisement
 

Want great deals and a chance to win tickets to the best shows in Seattle? Join The Stranger Presents email list!


All contents © Index Newspapers, LLC
1535 11th Ave (Third Floor), Seattle, WA 98122
Contact Info | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Takedown Policy