Slog

News & Arts

The Stranger Suggests

Critics' Best Bets
Music Arts & Food


Line Out

Music & the City
at Night

Friday, January 25, 2013

Annual One Night Count Finds 2,736 People Without Shelter Last Night

Posted by on Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 9:40 AM

Each year, the Seattle/King County Coalition on Homelessness organizes a swarm of volunteers to canvass King County in the middle of the night and count shelterless people—people in cars, buses, tents, or just under blankets outside. This year there were 800 volunteers, and the 2,736 people they counted represent a 5 percent increase over the 2,594 people counted in 2012. There were 1,989 people in Seattle alone.

This morning, at City Hall Plaza, a coalition of homeless people and advocates including Real Change and SHARE/WHEEL are gathering to strike a gong once for every person counted last night. With guest gong-ringers—city council members, "members of the faith community," and others—taking five-minute shifts ringing the gong at 5 second intervals, the event, which started at 9 a.m., is expected to last until around 1 p.m.

All this serves to remind us that the city's 10-year plan to end homelessness, which was completed in 2005, only has two years left.

"One unsheltered homeless person in January is one too many," says Real Change founding director Timothy Harris. "The One Night Count isn't just a number. It's about individuals who are suffering. It's our job to make some noise."

 

Comments (16) RSS

Oldest First Unregistered On Registered On Add a comment
Cato the Younger Younger 1
Remember when everyone bashed on Nickles for not getting this done? McGinn hasn't been any better.

Time to vote that clown out of city hall too. Oh wait...we could get a professional basketball team back....
Posted by Cato the Younger Younger on January 25, 2013 at 9:46 AM
treacle 2
Why can't we enable and support more Share/Wheel self-organized tent encampments? And let's have the police stop throwing away homeless people's tents and sleeping bags and coats and boots. That last should be an easy and no-cost step the city can take.
Posted by treacle on January 25, 2013 at 9:49 AM
3
Yawn........
Posted by Limousine Liberal on January 25, 2013 at 10:06 AM
Supreme Ruler Of The Universe 4

Why can't we build one of those "apodment" high rises, but in someplace super cheap yet accessible to services (using light rail)?

With 250 sq ft apartments, you should be able to fit all the homeless in one or a few buildings.
Posted by Supreme Ruler Of The Universe http://www.you-read-it-here-first.com on January 25, 2013 at 10:18 AM
Will in Seattle 5
Did you remember to include people north of the ship canal who had to walk in the rain because bus routes are even slower now?

Rapid Ride my ass.
Posted by Will in Seattle http://www.facebook.com/WillSeattle on January 25, 2013 at 10:20 AM
6
@2 -- The police don't throw away people's boots or shelters, moron.

The city attempted to clean out criminal encampments on Beacon Hill's Jungle in 2003.

When homeless advocates complained about the loss of tents and personal belongings, the city responded with new policies for managing seized property.

The city can't "encourage self-organized tent encampments" without taking on the liability for the encampments and without completely abandoning the building and fire codes the rest of us (imo correctly) must follow.

If you honestly care about homelessness (I suspect you don't) or, for that matter, the interface with public services and homelessness (John T. Williams), then shut up, learn a little and actually DO something.

Until then, let the grownups do the talking.
Posted by six shooter on January 25, 2013 at 10:55 AM
7
@4: i like the cut of your jib.
Posted by Adrian Ryan on January 25, 2013 at 10:59 AM
Max Solomon 8
it seems as if the problem is intractible, particularly during a recession and stagnant recovery. so beware of making plans with perfection as the goal. you will only fall short.

@4: you're welcome to develop that project anytime. i'll be curious to see what site, and more importantly, what funding you can secure that isn't already being battled over by actual non-profits housing providers.
Posted by Max Solomon on January 25, 2013 at 10:59 AM
Matt the Engineer 9
"One unsheltered homeless person in January is one too many" No kidding.

It looks like one woman they tried to count was already dead (third story in the link, and there's no report of cause of death).
Posted by Matt the Engineer on January 25, 2013 at 11:13 AM
Will in Seattle 10
Concur with @7 about real solutions that @4 offered, as opposed to meaningless platitudes while working people reside in Kent and Renton.

Action. Not words.
Posted by Will in Seattle http://www.facebook.com/WillSeattle on January 25, 2013 at 11:13 AM
Sargon Bighorn 11
Not every one wants to live like the majority. Why is the majority insisting that a minority live like they do? Maybe they like living where they do. Maybe they are adults just like you and me and have made a choice. I hate paternalistic "I must save you from yourself" people. Leave them alone until such time as they ask for help.
Posted by Sargon Bighorn on January 25, 2013 at 11:53 AM
Will in Seattle 12
So, @11, you're saying we should bring back flophouses, so that people who prefer to live life inebriated don't die as a result?

Hmmm. Is there a city plan for that?
Posted by Will in Seattle http://www.facebook.com/WillSeattle on January 25, 2013 at 11:58 AM
13
An early step -Free drug an alcohol treatment. Free mental health care. It's a much higher priority than new stadiums.
Posted by randomitis on January 25, 2013 at 11:59 AM
south downtown 14
@4 yes, that would be AWESOME!

if we put 2,700 apartments the size of many of these aPODments (tm) - 125 sq ft - all in a single building, it would only be about 10 stories on a one acre building footprint.

lay that on top of the Cap Hill light rail station and you'd get some real TOD that only a serious urbanista could love!
Posted by south downtown on January 25, 2013 at 12:47 PM
Max Solomon 15
@12: will, "flophouses" and "apodments" are both essentially SRO's. there used to be all levels of such housing up till the advent of urban renewal after ww2, so there weren't folks sleeping on the streets.

this is a good (and academic) book on how poor people used to be housed in Murka: http://www.amazon.com/New-Homeless-And-O…

@14: 10 stories, 43K sf footprint with 2000+ 125 sf apts? your building sounds like a nightmare to this serious urbanista.
Posted by Max Solomon on January 25, 2013 at 1:43 PM
16
You mean you can't find 2,736 uber liberals willing to take one person into their home in Seattle? Wow....
Posted by Limousine Liberal on January 25, 2013 at 2:31 PM

Add a comment

Advertisement
 

Want great deals and a chance to win tickets to the best shows in Seattle? Join The Stranger Presents email list!


All contents © Index Newspapers, LLC
1535 11th Ave (Third Floor), Seattle, WA 98122
Contact Info | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Takedown Policy