Slog

News & Arts

The Stranger Suggests

Critics' Best Bets
Music Arts & Food


Line Out

Music & the City
at Night

Thursday, January 24, 2013

District Threatens Teachers with "Insubordination" Charge Unless They Issue Bullshit Standardized Test

Posted by on Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 2:58 PM

We've received a copy of the sternly worded letter sent by Seattle School District officials that threatens teachers with a 10-day suspension for insubordination unless those teachers drop their boycott of an unpopular standardized test.

As I mentioned last night, teachers packed a school board meeting to protest the district-mandated Measures of Academic Progress (MAP). They are supposed to administer the exam—which is criticized for being redundant and ineffective at gauging student performance—by February 22. The district contends the test is necessary under state law.

Sent yesterday by the district's assistant superintendent for HR, Paul Apostle, the letter includes sample language for a directive that can be given to teachers participating in the boycott. "I acknowledge that you are certainly entitled to your opinion," the sample letter explains, adding, "Your disagreement with the appropriateness of the MAP assessment, however, does not excuse your obligation..."

The complete letter from the district to principals, including that letter to teachers, is below the jump.

From: Office of Public Affairs
Sent: Wednesday, January 23, 2013 10:26 AM
Subject: MAP assessment information for Principals

The following is an important email from Paul Apostle, Assistant Superintendent for Human Resources

Dear Principals,

I am writing today to help provide support and guidance around the recent issue of certain teachers refusing to administer the Measures of Academic Progress (MAP) assessment to our students.

We ask that each principal by the end of the school day provide a clear directive to all administrative and teaching staff that the MAP assessment must be administered to students of tested subjects on the timeline established by you, their building administrator. State law requires that teachers implement a course of study in accordance with District directives. Administering the MAP to students of tested subjects is a District directive.

If a teacher refuses to administer the MAP assessment after a clear direction by you, such conduct is considered insubordination. When a staff member engages in insubordination, such action will lead to appropriate disciplinary action as outlined in School Board Policy 5281 Staff Disciplinary Action and Discharge. Previously, the discipline imposed by the District when a teacher refused to administer a required assessment was a 10-day, unpaid suspension.

If you have staff who have either not administered the test on the date required by you or have given you clear notice that they do not intend to administer the test, you are required to give that staff person this communication, preferably in a letter or email that you send and hand to them:

Dear _______:

State law requires that teachers implement a course of study in accordance with District directives. As you are aware, the Measures of Academic Progress (MAP) is a District assessment that teachers are required to administer. You are receiving this communication because you are required to administer this assessment. Based on information that I possess, I believe you have either refused to or have declined to administer the MAP assessment.

For staff who disagree with MAP assessment, I acknowledge that you are certainly entitled to your opinion. Your disagreement with the appropriateness of the MAP assessment, however, does not excuse your obligation as a certificated employee to provide this assessment consistent with District directives.

Thus, I am specifically requiring that you administer the MAP assessment by the Feb. 22, 2013 deadline, notwithstanding your apparent disagreement with the District’s decision to require this assessment. Your refusal to administer the assessment consistent with District requirements and this directive will lead to discipline. Discipline that has been imposed for such insubordination in the past has included a 10-day, unpaid suspension. Please contact me immediately if you have concerns over getting this assessment done by Feb. 22, 2013.

Sincerely,

__________________

Principal, School Name

We understand that there are concerns around MAP assessments, and Superintendent Banda will soon announce details about a Joint Task Force on Assessments & Measuring Academic Progress. This task force, which will include principals, teachers and central office staff, will report recommendations to the Superintendent before the end of the school year. This is a productive way to work together on this issue. In the meantime, many of our principals and teachers find the MAP assessment to be very helpful. We want to be consistent across the district in administering this to all required students.

As a reminder, all MAP assessments should be administered by Feb. 22. If for logistical reasons your staff are unable to administer the MAP assessment by that deadline, an extension may be granted by your Executive Director.

If you have questions, please work with your Executive Directors of Schools. If you need additional support, please contact me at (206) 510-6697.

Sincerely,

Paul Apostle
Assistant Superintendent for Human Resources

 

Comments (12) RSS

Newest First Unregistered On Registered On Add a comment
12
@Charlie Mas: Well said!
Posted by Tyro on January 25, 2013 at 6:04 AM
11
The superintendent has two problems here.

First, he doesn't have the high ground. He can try to say "They should communicate their concerns in the appropriate way" but they did that. For years. The district leadership refused to even meet with them. So that dodge isn't available to them.

Second, the teachers are right. The MAP test - which may well have value for other teachers or students - does not have any value for the ninth graders at Garfield. It's simply an undeniable fact.

The superintendent had two clear choices:

1) He could have ignored the boycott and met with the teachers. In that case the whole issue would have just faded from the headlines, it would not have received national press attention or all of these letters of support. The he could conduct his staged "review" of assessments, found the MAP inappropriate for 9th graders, and the whole issue would return to obscurity.

He didn't do that. He chose option 2:

2) He acts all tough and authoritarian, threatens the teachers with discipline, makes bigger headlines, attracts support for their cause from all around the district and the nation, riles up the teachers just before labor negotiations start, and paints himself into a corner on the staged "review". Now the review has to show that the MAP has value - regardless of the facts - or the superintendent put in the position of disciplining teachers for being right. He has politicized the "review". Since no rational process can reach that conclusion, but he has to reach it to save face, he has to reach an irrational conclusion.

This is just going to get uglier because he didn't show leadership - just authority.
Posted by Charlie Mas on January 25, 2013 at 5:58 AM
10
I got my ballot today, and just mailed in my two NO votes.
Posted by Mister G on January 24, 2013 at 10:37 PM
Will in Seattle 9
Translation: If you try to teach, we're going to take our non-profit extra funding and hold our breath until we turn Dark Red.
Posted by Will in Seattle http://www.facebook.com/WillSeattle on January 24, 2013 at 4:45 PM
pfffter 8
@6 That's why I hope those teachers stick to their guns so the administration can find out.
Posted by pfffter on January 24, 2013 at 4:45 PM
7
Blah, blah, blah, BECAUSE I SAID SO, blah, blah...
Posted by Charlie Mas on January 24, 2013 at 4:36 PM
Just Jeff 6
What would be the logistics of simultaneously suspending hundreds of school teachers for ten days?
Posted by Just Jeff http://pstonews.wordpress.com on January 24, 2013 at 4:35 PM
5
Go teachers!
Posted by Tent_Liberation_Army on January 24, 2013 at 4:13 PM
rob! 4
Paul Apostle? Srsly?!

Who's in the staff directory under "I" [eye]?
Posted by rob! http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QZBdUceCL5U on January 24, 2013 at 3:51 PM
3
On the other hand, maybe it's superintendent firing season once again.
Posted by Don't you think he looks tired? on January 24, 2013 at 3:50 PM
pfffter 2
Well, it is insubordination. I agree with the teachers, but they should be prepared to face the consequences for standing up for what they believe in.
Posted by pfffter on January 24, 2013 at 3:19 PM
1
No tests! No grades! Equality for all!
Posted by Kenny the 3rd on January 24, 2013 at 3:13 PM

Add a comment

Advertisement
 

Want great deals and a chance to win tickets to the best shows in Seattle? Join The Stranger Presents email list!


All contents © Index Newspapers, LLC
1535 11th Ave (Third Floor), Seattle, WA 98122
Contact Info | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Takedown Policy