Slog

News & Arts

The Stranger Suggests

Critics' Best Bets
Music Arts & Food


Line Out

Music & the City
at Night

Thursday, January 24, 2013

American Buffalo at Seattle Rep: So Much Talent and So Little Effect

Posted by on Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 3:43 PM

Shoveling criticism at David Mamet has never been much of a challenge. On his best days, before he began his quixotically contrarian attempt to become the world's first successful conservative playwright (a stupid move by its very premise—powerful drama is not built on the conservative impulse to defend conventions), he reeked of misogyny, racism, superficiality, and all the weakness that white-male-hetero-American flesh is heir to.

Leggett and Atwies, two great actors in one inferior production.
  • seattle rep
  • Leggett and Atwies, two great actors in one inferior production.

But the motherfucker could write, in his own odd way, and gave a voice and style (with Chicago inflections) to a particular strain of ugliness that some people (understandably) would rather not delve into.

For those who had the stomach for that ugliness of pathetic white-male thuggery, Mamet was the go-to guy. (Though he was never a genius. Just compare him with Werner Herzog—another middle-aged white guy hypnotized by the intersection of power, violence [social and physical], and beauty, and you can see the difference between a mastermind and a guy who happened to knock out a couple of decent plays.)

American Buffalo was the passkey into small-time, double-crossing crooks in a junk shop. Glengarry Glen Ross was the passkey into puny salesman who dreamed of being important. (I'd submit that anyone who's curious about what makes Donald Trump tick, and what drives any rich man—who has the means to live in quiet leisure for the rest of his life—charge into the public spotlight, making himself look more foolish every time, only needs to read Glengarry Glen Ross. For these guys, money is only the means to an end. The end is feeling important. If they have all the money, but still don't feel important enough, they'll pull increasingly stupid stunts to scratch that itch.)

At any rate, American Buffalo at the Seattle Rep looked great on paper—promising script, actors Charles Leggett and Hans Altwies (both Stranger Genius Award short-listers who can both command a room with a mere gesture) in the leads, a big stage to play with, and director Milam Wilson (who helmed another masterpiece of masculine fucked-upedness with The Seafarer at Seattle Rep in 2009).

But somehow, with all that potential and all that talent, the production was as limp as a wet noodle. I'm confounded about why.

Leggett, whose voice can be mesmerizingly stentorian—and who I've seen steal an entire scene of Hamlet with one perfectly-timed lift of his eyebrows—was shy and whispery, even in his character's stern moments. Altwies threw the scripted tantrums of his character Teach, but they felt formulaic and actorly. Newcomer Zachary Simonson didn't have the petrified, young-junkie desperation of his character Bobby. He didn't look like he was scared to be in front of the two old characters who dominate the play; he just looked scared to be in front of an audience.

Strangest of all was the big blowup at the end, where Teach (Altwies) smashes up the junk shop in a fit of rage. These guys are supposed to make us skittish, afraid of what they might do to us or each other. But director Wilson had Altwies knock over a few lamps and then smash a rope that held a net full of pillows over his head.

Pillows. This apotheosis of Mamet rage was a light shower of pillows. It would've been a brilliant climax for a Mamet satire.

But this wasn't a satire—it was a lot of good artists with good track records who somehow went off the rails. Maybe some secret sabotaged the production: a personal problem with one of the artists, a round of the flu. Who knows? But, for whatever reason, it didn't fulfill its promise.

The best production of American Buffalo I've seen in Seattle remains the one at Theater Schmeater in 2007, directed by Aimée Bruneau. (If you want to be scared of a scene in which an actor smashes up a junk shop, go see that scene in a tiny basement theater.)

It shouldn't matter that Bruneau is a lady, but because this is Mamet—and his gender politics are at the forefront of most conversations about him—I thought I'd mention it.

 

Comments (16) RSS

Oldest First Unregistered On Registered On Add a comment
Tracy 1
Yeah, it was SUCH a disappointment. The set was pretty cool, and as the show dragged its lifeless self along, I spent half of my time trying to determine just WHY things weren't working, and the other half staring at all the props throughout the set-dressing (they even carried up to the sides of the balcony...a lovely touch). Shame that the show just couldn't come together, somehow. I'll see anything with Altwies in it, but the whole thing felt anemic. No bite, no real power or threat. When the greatest tension is worrying whether Leggett will drop some of the prop vases he's carrying, or that time Altwies almost accidentally knocked over a folding chair...not a good sign.

(Also, we spent the ENTIRE time assaulted by cigarette smoke. I've never been much bothered by smoke before, but this was surprisingly strong in the balcony. Way more noticeable and persistent than I would've thought possible. 5 people (in two different groups) seated near us left at intermission, complaining of the smoke.)
Posted by Tracy on January 24, 2013 at 4:39 PM
2
"I'd submit that anyone who's curious about what makes Donald Trump tick, and what drives any rich man—who has the means to live in quiet leisure for the rest of his life—charge into the public spotlight, making himself look more foolish every time, only needs to read Glengarry Glen Ross."

Yeah, Donald Trump or Mitt Romney.
Posted by Ken Mehlman on January 24, 2013 at 5:13 PM
COMTE 3
@1:

The great irony is that it probably wasn't even real cigarette smoke - the WA state smoking ban having been ruled to apply to theatrical performances in enclosed buildings - so just about everybody these days uses those fake cigs with the powder you blow out to simulate smoke. Occasionally (if people think they can get away with it), they'll use clove cigarettes, but the aroma is so clearly not-tobacco that most productions where smoking is required don't bother.

And yes, I've seen people complain about the "smell" of non-existent cigarette smoke before, so it does happen.
Posted by COMTE http://www.chriscomte.com on January 24, 2013 at 5:14 PM
Kapow 4
Wow, so I literally just went online to get tickets and I happened to see this. So gonna skip it. Anyone recommend something else for next week? Any idea what "The Seagull" over at the act is about?
Posted by Kapow on January 24, 2013 at 6:54 PM
katrat 5
@4 the show at OtB (She She Pop) looks like a promising adventure
Posted by katrat http://www.kathrynrathke.com/ on January 24, 2013 at 10:22 PM
6
I used to manage a coffee shop where 90% of the employees were masters students at the local university . They talked a landlord into letting them open a shuttered bar and hold a performance of American Buffalo. It was incredible, with a budget of $250. Hard to see how you could fuck this up,
Posted by Chris Jury http://www.thebismarck.net on January 24, 2013 at 11:00 PM
7
IIRC Milam Wilson also directed that Seattle Rep scenery buffet God of Carnage (which incidentally also featured Altweis + his wife Amy Thone).
Posted by Gomez http://misterstevengomez.com on January 25, 2013 at 1:01 PM
Tracy 8
@3 See, that makes sense, and I've never noticed tobacco smelling cigarettes in shows for the last decade, but I SWEAR this was the real stuff. We even talked about why the heck they weren't using the fake powder ones.

I don't know, maybe my brain was being tricked, and I'm not sure how Rep would get away with it, but they do clearly list "onstage smoking" on their website.
Posted by Tracy on January 28, 2013 at 11:14 AM
9
It's "Wilson Milam."
Posted by GrizzlyGav on January 30, 2013 at 4:47 PM
10
They were herbal cigs. I could smell 'em.
Posted by robotmamet on January 31, 2013 at 11:08 AM
11
The cigarette smoke thing is weird to hear...I went last night and they spend the whole play pretending to be unable to light their cigarettes. I'd never seen the play before but it sounds like that's not part of the script? If people complained about smoke to the degree that they needed to change the production, making the characters unable to light cigarettes throughout the play is a pretty distracting way to address that. It felt like schtick running through the whole play.

I agree about the production lacking something. And I also didn't think much of the decision (I'm assuming) to play the kid as having some sort of autism-spectrum thing going on. Was that the intention, do you think? It felt like an unsuccessful choice by actor or director or both.
Posted by g on February 3, 2013 at 3:12 PM
12
I saw it this afternoon. The house manager was telling one audience member that they cut the cigarette smoking because so many people complained.

I thought the bits where they couldn't light their cigarettes were brilliant, both as physical comedy and as metaphor.

I thought that making Bobby have Asperger's was the main thing that screwed the production up. Artistically speaking, that choice takes a lot of power out of the play.
Posted by Louisep on February 3, 2013 at 7:26 PM
13
I thought having the moment of sudden violence capped by dumping pillows onto his head was a little...odd. Also felt a little schticky to me. The lighters not working was kinda funny but dragged on way too long to me...how could smokers really not have any matches or lighters that worked? And it wasn't part of what Mamet wrote. Just felt like a distraction to me, amusing or not.
Posted by g on February 3, 2013 at 8:42 PM
14
Curious, Louisep...did the audience laugh at tons of stuff that wasn't especially comedy-oriented when you saw the play? It was oddly incessant at Saturday night's performance. Constant belly laughs when nothing funny was going on in the play.
Posted by g on February 3, 2013 at 9:21 PM
15
I enjoyed the production a great deal, at least as far as Donnie and Teach went. I think Altweis and Leggett totally nailed it - they're both at the top of their games and it was a joy to see them interact as those two iconic characters. I thought the lighters/matches not working was a great work around about the smoking idea (there has never been smoking in any of the productions I've seen, btw), cause it was both comic and also added a little to the tension because you know what it's like when smokers can't get their 'hit'. I think having Bobby be as out of it was a very bad choice though. It makes Donnie's idea of sending him in to do a robbery totally ridiculous, and took away some tension that comes with considering Bobby might be competently running his own game or using again. While the set looked great, the multi-story effect didn't work- I would've preferred to see Leggett and Altweis have to continue to confront each other face to face vs. Teach running away up the stairs. I disagree with Kiley about the Schmee production- yes, great set, but otherwise not memorable.
Posted by skimming on February 4, 2013 at 7:55 AM
16
I thought - except for the choices surrounding Bobby- the production kicked ass. Altweis and Leggett nailed it- and it was a joy to see two guys at top of their game knock it out of the park. I think the choice of making Bobby such a burnout was a bad idea- makes Donnie considering sending him in on a theft totally ridiculous and takes away some of the element of wondering what kind of game he was running himself. While the set in some ways looked great, I wasn't crazy about the multi-story effect: would rather have seen Teach and Donnie have to face off more than have Teach be able to run away. (It was like something out of a production of Oliver!) Had read about the smoking (which was never in the script anyway and hasn't been in the 3 other productions I've seen)- I think the work around with the matches/lighters was a great idea, plus you realize you're watching smokers who can't get their 'hit'- which added to the feeling of things going out of control and not working. I saw the Schmee production- while it had a good set, it wasn't memorable for any other reason. I'm going to be remembering Altweis and Leggett in these roles for a long time to come.
Posted by skimming on February 4, 2013 at 8:02 AM

Add a comment

Advertisement
 

Want great deals and a chance to win tickets to the best shows in Seattle? Join The Stranger Presents email list!


All contents © Index Newspapers, LLC
1535 11th Ave (Third Floor), Seattle, WA 98122
Contact Info | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Takedown Policy