Slog

News & Arts

The Stranger Suggests

Critics' Best Bets
Music Arts & Food


Line Out

Music & the City
at Night

Wednesday, January 23, 2013

What Role Do Parents Play in Boycott of Standardized MAP Tests?

Posted by on Wed, Jan 23, 2013 at 2:59 PM

At 4:00 p.m. today, Garfield High School teachers and others who support teachers' boycott of the Measure of Academic Progress (MAP) exams are hosting a rally at the John Standford Center (2445 3rd Ave S) to continue their public campaign to get MAP testing removed from the Seattle School District.

The biggest question in my mind is, will parents show up? Following nearly two weeks of boycotts, just how much do parents know about the MAP exams and teachers' objections? Because in a fight against the district, well-informed, pissed-off parents could be a boycott's greatest ally. Kick-ass education blogger Melissa Westbrook touched on the issue of parental participation at a press conference on Monday, when she asked the president of Garfield High School's black student union, who was stating his objections to the MAP tests, if he believed students should write letters to their parents explaining their opposition. He looked stunned and responded something to the effect of, "That's a good idea. We should do that."

Yes, they should! Because parents from at least one public school, Salmon Bay K-8, are getting mind-fuckingly awful mixed messages about the boycott. One mother from Salmon K-8 sent me this anecdote:

I received an email from the school stating why the school supported MAP testing, and that if we wanted our 1st-5th grade student to opt out we would have to write a letter stating our opt out. The same week I received an email from my son's teacher saying they were not going to be giving the MAP test and that if we wanted to opt in we must write a letter stating so. Fast forward one week, and my son brought home two letters, one from the school and one from the teacher. Both apologized for the conflicting info and the possible confusion it may have created, and then both went on to say EXACTLY THE SAME THING as the first round of emails. I've always thought that standardized testing was heavily biased based on circumstance and opportunity so I am all for opting out. But these guys need to get on the same page even if it's opposing sides of it.

Parents could be teachers' greatest ally in getting MAP testing killed, but first these boycotting teachers and their allies need to focus their ground-game on getting parents up to speed.

The 45-minute, computer-based MAP exams are currently administered to all students in the district (except those whose parents opt out) twice and sometimes three times a year. Garfield teachers launched a boycott of the tests on January 10. They argue that the tests are a stupid gauge of academic progress as the margin of error on the tests is often greater than the recorded progress, that they eat away valuable classroom learning time, and that the tests are being unfairly—and improperly—used to evaluate teachers. Teachers at several other schools have joined the boycott since then, while faculty at other schools have taken a slightly more toothless approach: voting to stand in support and solidarity with the boycotters (but nevertheless not committing to not administer the tests).

I've reached out to the school district for comment but they've not yet returned my calls.

 

Comments (10) RSS

Newest First Unregistered On Registered On Add a comment
10
First, thanks for the "kick-ass" comment on my work. I try to ask the questions that I'm not sure others will ask.

I can only say that this is the fifth year of this test. Teachers know what the MAP is and isn't.

The MAP is being used in ways the company never planned. They have stated it was not created to assess teachers. That bears considering.

That the high school kids shrug it off means the teachers are getting dinged for that apathy and the kids are getting nothing out of it.

It is a gatekeeper for Advanced Learning programs and that keeps parents who want their children in those programs in line to take it.

I find it sad that we don't trust our teachers. We don't believe what they are saying despite their expertise and experience.

They have said this is NOT about assessments. Teachers know and agreed to be assessed. They negotiated it in their contract.

I appreciate that the Superintendent is trying to find solutions. Of course an edict doesn't help but he is the boss.

I think listening to teachers would be a good first step.
Melissa Westbrook
Seattle Schools Community Forum blog
Posted by westello on January 23, 2013 at 11:03 PM
9
The superintendent says that teachers who refuse to give the tests will be considered insubordinate and will be penalized accordingly, starting with 10 days' no pay. Teachers should consider that carefully and realize they don't change policy unilaterally without the aid of administrators or parents.
Posted by sarah70 on January 23, 2013 at 8:31 PM
8
If you're using a strand of MAP results to "measure progress" then what do you do with that data? How is that kind of data helpful? What does it help you do? What decisions do you base on that data?
Posted by Charlie Mas on January 23, 2013 at 7:22 PM
7
This parent is for the MAP. The point is not one test at one point in time. It's to lay down a set of trend data for your own kid to measure progress against him/her self. It's very helpful.
Posted by gawd on January 23, 2013 at 6:43 PM
6
The test is worse than useless for K-2, high school, kids who are exceedingly advanced, kids who are exceedingly behind, non-english speakers, special ed kids. Sure it helps some kids in some cases. So what. We don't have the time or money for MAP. The only people in town who looooooovvvvvveeee it are the powerpoint business set (who never could teach, even if they tried) at The Alliance for Education and a bunch of rabid reformers at The Gates Foundation. But then, the business world brought us the Global Fiscal Meltdown. Why not trust that they know best?
Posted by Roses on January 23, 2013 at 6:01 PM
5
ZOMG! 45 minutes? Holy shit, we cannot afford to be wasting 45 minutes dicking around on a computer. These children have probably never sat in front of a computer for that long before. And THREE times a year? Fuck, I can barely count that high. That is like, so many times.

I hope they burn the computers to make sure that children are never again subjected to spending 45 minutes in front of one three times a year again.
Posted by X1 on January 23, 2013 at 4:08 PM
4
Yes! Melissa Westbrook kicks ass!!

Also, the MAP test is waste of time, money, and resources for Garfield students.

The test was supposed to be a formative assessment, a tool for teachers to individualize instruction. That is the test's only legitimate purpose. Unfortunately the school district, to save money, never trained the teachers on how to interpret the results nor gave them any time to interpret the results or to plan these individualized lessons. So the MAP fails utterly in it's one legitimate purpose. It is a useless tool for teachers and the teachers would rather do without it.

Ah, but then the test started to be used for a lot of purposes other than its one legitimate purpose. The District started using it as if it were an achievement test to screen students for access to advanced learning programs and advanced classes. Except not at Garfield or any other high school, so that reason to continue the test isn't valid at Garfield.

Then the District decided to use the MAP as a value-added measure to try to determine "teacher effectiveness". Except that the test was never designed to do that and, since it tests students on knowledge and skill from outside the curriculum it isn't a reliable measure of the teachers' effectiveness at teaching the curriculum.

Now the District wants to use the test as a diagnostic test to determine if students are succeeding with Tier 1 instruction in MTSS. They no longer even classify the MAP as a formative assessment but as a diagnostic and screening test. Only this is not an appropriate use of the MAP either.

The teachers at Garfield have, for years, tried to raise issues about MAP for years, but the district officials have ignored them. They had to take this step - a public boycott - to get the District to respond. And it has worked. Now the District says that they will review their assessments. Sure, now. Not before they renewed the subscription on the MAP, but now, after the Garfield teachers took it to the press.

We need a school district leadership that responds to the legitimate concerns of their professional staff instead of just responding to bad press, the threat of litigation, or the siren call of grant donors.
More...
Posted by Charlie Mas on January 23, 2013 at 4:07 PM
3
The test does not go to all students in the district. It only goes to K-9 graders. Most of the students at Garfield are not even supposed to take the MAP.
Posted by Ballard Dad on January 23, 2013 at 3:40 PM
2
"standardized testing was heavily biased based on circumstance and opportunity"

Oh lordy, you can't have any standards these days. I mean, why don't they test for ebonics, rapping and carjacking?
Posted by Math & english are soooooo white privilege on January 23, 2013 at 3:13 PM
1
That's the John "Stanford" Center. But keep on posting against testing in schools if only to not prove your point.
Posted by Roger This on January 23, 2013 at 3:10 PM

Add a comment

Advertisement
 

Want great deals and a chance to win tickets to the best shows in Seattle? Join The Stranger Presents email list!


All contents © Index Newspapers, LLC
1535 11th Ave (Third Floor), Seattle, WA 98122
Contact Info | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Takedown Policy