Slog

News & Arts

The Stranger Suggests

Critics' Best Bets
Music Arts & Food


Line Out

Music & the City
at Night

Wednesday, January 16, 2013

Democrats Further Repudiate Sen. Rodney Tom (D-Traitor)

Posted by on Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 8:58 AM

In a unanimous vote last night, members of the 43rd District Democrats censured a state senator who was elected as a Democrat but, earlier this week, officially caucused with Republicans to hand control of half the Washington legislature to the GOP. Further, the party members vowed to take their case to county and state Democratic organizations, pledging not only to withdraw any future support for Senator Rodney Tom but also threatening to cut off resources to any other Democrats who stand with him.

"This type of treachery will not only be frowned upon with access to resources taken away for those who hand over control like Sen. Tom did, but other elected officials who would help him win re-election must also have access to resources revoked," says Michael Maddux, a vice co-chair of the 43rd District Democrats. While the urban Seattle district's vote doesn't have the proximity of a similarly harsh resolution passed last week by Senator Tom's native 48th District, comprising the suburb of Bellevue and nearby bedroom communities, last night's vote telegraphs a surge among the party to punish the turncoat. Senator Tom, after all, benefited from $25,000 in party money and campaign infrastructure in his 2010 reelection bid, in which he narrowly defeated Republican Gregg Bennett.

Maddux says his group will ask King County Democrats to further censure Senator Tom and he is "confident" that the state party will deny future support to the backstabbing senator, thereby refusing him access to the Democratic election database called VoteBuilder. "What Sen. Tom did goes beyond crossing party lines," Maddux adds. "The only acceptable response left is to deny him access to the resources that our values, our volunteers, and our dollars create."

If you ask me, Democratic Party leaders should also do this to the entire "Roadkill caucus" and their weaselly counterparts in the House, who are trying to gut education and health care funding when they take silly anti-tax stances. They're not really Democrats if they're screwing over students, the sick, the elderly, and other parts of the true Democratic base. And they're not being honest if they don't admit we have a structural revenue deficit, not living in some ginned up GOP fantasy about a spending problem. We're better off cutting them out of the party and building support for a caucus that can unite around the most essential progressive values in the state's budget. Otherwise these people are just Republicans who vote for gay rights. Now that that the LGBT marriage fight is done, these "moderates" are displacing seats—and usurping Democratic party resources—that should go to candidates who will go to bat for college funding, health care, and fair taxation.

 

Comments (8) RSS

Oldest First Unregistered On Registered On Add a comment
1
The 37th passed a similar resolution on Monday night.
Posted by Gidge on January 16, 2013 at 9:55 AM
2
The 30th passed this last Wednesday.
Posted by K on January 16, 2013 at 10:41 AM
3
Way to go MichaelM
Posted by wl on January 16, 2013 at 11:19 AM
4
What a bunch of whiners. Here's to hoping Tom will run as an independent in the next election, and spend the intervening time building a group of independents in other Democratic and Republican districts who will join him. Let the parties and their lickspittle publicists in places the the Stranger whine their heads off, while the people win.
Posted by Mister G on January 16, 2013 at 11:55 AM
Some Old Nobodaddy Logged In 5
do this to the entire "Roadkill caucus" and their weaselly counterparts in the House,

Isn't that what they're doing w/ the threat about 'anyone who stands with him'? This just seems strategic, you single out one person, throw all your power against him and claim 'anyone who helps will get the same.' If you have more power, you can single out a group, like the Hollywood Ten. If you have less power, you go against an individual.

This just looks like Political Maneuvering 101, and they're doing it by the book.
Posted by Some Old Nobodaddy Logged In on January 16, 2013 at 12:00 PM
6
Please provide specific examples of "roadkill caucus" members in either the house or senate who are "who are trying to gut education and health care funding when they take silly anti-tax stances"

And doesn't supporting medicaid expansion count as something? pretty sure the RK is all behind that one.

And what you seem to miss is that if it were not for moderates in certain purple districts, you would not have the votes needed in Olympia. Do you think a Dominic Holden-type democrat could get elected in the 44th, 19th, 10th (past tense), 5th, and 31st? The answer is no.

Your litmus test politics for liberals is exactly the thinking that will turn the Democrats into the GOP.

By the way, you might want to check the 2012 election results. A majority of the state is socially liberal/fiscally moderate.
Posted by Sickofdominic on January 16, 2013 at 8:05 PM
Sarajane46th 7
The 46th also passed this resolution last week, and it will come before the King County Democrats tonight. Michael Maddux didn't write it--I did. at the suggestion of Sen. Murray. Dwight Pelz also wrote a letter to the 48th calling for censure.
--Sarajane Siegfriedt, former King County Democrats Legislative Action Chair
Posted by Sarajane46th http://www.Sarajane46th.wordpress.org on January 22, 2013 at 4:23 AM
Steve Zemke 8
Michael Maddux is hardly the best person to be lecturing Democrats on party loyalty. Maddux on facebook several times posted his support for Republican Bill Finkbeiner over Democrat Brad Owen in the Lt Governor's race in the last election. The Lt-Governor presides over the State Senate and Finkbeiner's election would have given Tom and his Republican cohorts even more control over the Senate. And Maddux wants to be Chair of the King County Democrat's Endorsement Committee and appears to have been appointed Chair by the current KCDCC Chair.

Here is the relevant part of Maddux's facebook post:
"Take, for instance, the Lieutenant Governor's race. Here, we have the incumbent, Brad Owen, a Democrat, up against Bill Finkbeiner, a Republican. As a Democrat, I feel it is incumbent upon me to recommend folks vote for Brad Owen. As a Democrat who believes that the 2/3 rule is unconstitutional, is pro-choice, believes that elected officials should be held to a high ethical standard, however, I'm going with my brain, and voting for Bill Finkbeiner.

Sure, he's not perfect. While in the State Legislature, he was as partisan as they come. While he clings to his crucial support of the Everything But Marriage bill, that doesn't completely overcome his dalliances with the extreme voices in his Party on issues such as taxes, education, and health care.

However, presiding over the chamber will afford him less opportunity to be swayed by the GOP, and more independence from the ideological purists of the Republican Party. He has already made clear that, if the Supreme Court declares the 2/3 rule unconstitutional, he will abide by that ruling, regardless of what happens with Tim Eyman's latest initiative. The incumbent has been an impediment on this front.

And if he sucks...hell, maybe we can convince the man who presides over the House - Rep. Jim Moeller - to run for Lt. Gov in 2016!"

More...
Posted by Steve Zemke http://www.majorityrules.org on January 22, 2013 at 12:11 PM

Add a comment

Advertisement
 

Want great deals and a chance to win tickets to the best shows in Seattle? Join The Stranger Presents email list!


All contents © Index Newspapers, LLC
1535 11th Ave (Third Floor), Seattle, WA 98122
Contact Info | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Takedown Policy