Slog

News & Arts

The Stranger Suggests

Critics' Best Bets
Music Arts & Food


Line Out

Music & the City
at Night

Thursday, January 10, 2013

Two Reportedly Shot at California High School

Posted by on Thu, Jan 10, 2013 at 10:54 AM

Via Reuters:

Gunfire erupted on Thursday at a California high school in inland Kern County, a sheriff's department dispatcher said, and media reports indicated two people had been shot and the assailant arrested.

The dispatcher confirmed the shooting at Taft Union High School but gave no other details.

 

Comments (31) RSS

Newest First Unregistered On Registered On Add a comment
31
@28
"I'm saying that gun regulation advocates (and everyone else) mostly ignore the major problem of handgun availability, and instead decide how best to get rid of "assault weapons," which account for a small, small minority of gun violence in the US."

I'll go further and say that the people who want to ban "assault weapons" are NOT interested in the specifics of who is shooting whom with what and why.
Because if they had the facts then the solution might NOT be to ban guns.
And the fact that 99 point whatever percent of guns and gun owners are NOT involved in gun violence shows that they are wrong.
Posted by fairly.unbalanced on January 10, 2013 at 11:14 PM
Urgutha Forka 30
@27,
I am not a fan of the NRA. And 5280 and I definitely don't agree on everything gun related. I'm actually in favor of heavier gun regulations (regulations, but not bans) and more scrutiny, education, and accountability.

But the posts here, as well as many of the comments, are little more than angry rants that sound like the liberal version of Glenn Beck. There's no point in trying to have any real discussion or conversation, because too many people are going to believe what they want, regardless of any evidence to the contrary (on both sides).

One thing I do believe though, is that being angry at guns and angry at gun owners isn't going to do shit to stop gun violence. No more than being angry at drugs will stop drug use or being angry at abortion will stop abortions or being angry at gays will stop them from being gay. And that's what a lot of the anti-gun rants here sound exactly like... the extreme right wingers who rail against drugs or gays or abortion. They're not doing themselves any favors.

Posted by Urgutha Forka on January 10, 2013 at 9:06 PM
29 Comment Pulled
28
@27: This has nothing to do with the NRA. I'm saying that gun regulation advocates (and everyone else) mostly ignore the major problem of handgun availability, and instead decide how best to get rid of "assault weapons," which account for a small, small minority of gun violence in the US. The number of people murdered at Newtown? About that many people are murdered _every day_ with handguns in the US. Yet the national dialog is still all about regulating "assault weapons," as though that's going to solve the bulk of the problem. Indeed, banning assault weapons is listed in the top three priorities of Mayors Against Illegal Guns, which you just linked to. Nothing is listed about targeting handguns specifically.

I used a recent local example of a notable murder by a reasonably well-known asshole that went totally unreported by The Stranger to illustrate that they don't care. I maintain that it's an effective example.
Posted by doceb on January 10, 2013 at 6:57 PM
emma's bee 27
@13 and 5280 and Ugurtha: please, just stop wanking each other and the NRA for 2 seconds. Who says that gun-regulation advocates don't care about urban violence? I presume you are all staunch supporters of Mayors Against Illegal Guns, like me, right?
Posted by emma's bee on January 10, 2013 at 5:58 PM
Pridge Wessea 26
What we need are more guns with less restrictions to protect us from the tyranny of school shootings. Let freedom ring!
Posted by Pridge Wessea on January 10, 2013 at 4:46 PM
25
@23
"Stranger staffers are by and large opportunistic hypocrites. But that's their job, so I don't hold it against them too much."

I do.
It's fine if they want to wallow in grief porn. It seems that a lot of the people posting here also want that.

But if Goldy and the others are going to be pushing their advocacy journalism then they should be doing it correctly.
Report on ALL the shootings in Seattle.
Right now they'll skip a local shooting if the shooter and victim were both brown and over 18.
At least until they want to use the sanitized statistics of X people shot in year Y.
Posted by fairly.unbalanced on January 10, 2013 at 4:40 PM
Fifty-Two-Eighty 24
Urgutha, quit making so much sense. You know they only want to hear things that affirm what they already think.
Posted by Fifty-Two-Eighty http://www.nra.org on January 10, 2013 at 3:09 PM
Urgutha Forka 23
You guys know perfectly well why school shootings get massive attention but typical gangland shootings don't.

Same with "missing white girl" phenomenon.

When they print "innocent schoolchildren murdered," readers get worked up and emotional, more page views are generated, and more ad revenue is received. That doesn't happen when they run a story about thugs doing what thugs always do.

Stranger staffers are by and large opportunistic hypocrites. But that's their job, so I don't hold it against them too much.
Posted by Urgutha Forka on January 10, 2013 at 2:50 PM
22
doceb, I am with you on this point. The common factor of this Taft High School shooting and the Munchbar shooting is that some underage turd figured discharging a weapon where many innocent people were was a good way to solve whatever problem was going on in his head. The Stranger should not dismiss the Munchbar shooting, just because it took place in Bellevue. Ja'Mari Jones was a Seattle teenage male with a gun.
Posted by Ever wonder why the Boy Scouts don't have "massacre" badges? on January 10, 2013 at 2:21 PM
21
@20:
1. Not in Bellevue Square, they don't.
2. Slog reports on nightclub incidents all the time.
3. The suspect was a locally notable thug who had previously killed one of Seattle's well-known personalities.

My only point is that we shouldn't be super-quick to say "gun nuts want to ignore this" without applying the same standards across the board.
Posted by doceb on January 10, 2013 at 2:08 PM
Sir Vic 20
@18 People have been getting shot & stabbed in nightclubs since Cain's Copacabana opened. It's not news.
Posted by Sir Vic on January 10, 2013 at 1:55 PM
19
Well-regulated militia shoots two at California High School.
Posted by tiktok on January 10, 2013 at 1:20 PM
18
@17: Obviously that's accurate, but I'm not sure what your point is.
Posted by doceb on January 10, 2013 at 1:19 PM
Max Solomon 17
@13: a bellevue club is not a high school.
Posted by Max Solomon on January 10, 2013 at 1:16 PM
16
From a recent article:
A teacher who "engaged" the gunman in conversation after the shooting suffered minor injuries when he was grazed by a pellet from the shotgun, according to the Kern County Sheriff's Department. The teacher, joined by a school counselor, convinced the student to drop the 12-gauge shotgun, said Kern County Sheriff Don Youngblood.

Hmmm, nothing about bringing a Bushmaster out from the facilities closet for neutralization. Must be bothersome to gun nuts to know that conversation led the 16 yo male student to put the gun down after shooting one of his targets, and missing another, and hitting a teacher instead, and not a high-powered weapon in a room.
Posted by How many minutes until the next school shooting? on January 10, 2013 at 12:59 PM
Will in Seattle 15
@10 yes, but normally, without extensive practice, it takes about 3 minutes.

Most gun nuts are lazy.
Posted by Will in Seattle http://www.facebook.com/WillSeattle on January 10, 2013 at 12:31 PM
14
But the NRA told me more guns in schools would mean fewer shootings! Now I'm confused.
Posted by Proteus on January 10, 2013 at 12:17 PM
13
@3: Not just gun nuts. The Slog writers are also perfectly willing to ignore brown people shooting each other in our own backyard. Ja'Mari Jones (one of the Tuba Man killers) killed a man and wounded another in a busy Bellevue club, was on the run for two weeks, and was caught, all without a peep about it on this site, not even in the morning news roundups. I hate to side with the trolls, but seriously, what the heck is up with that? Did I miss an article about it or something?
Posted by doceb on January 10, 2013 at 12:10 PM
12
@5 instead of quibbling about particular incidents, or technical details, let's focus on what the broad facts are that you wish for us to ignore:

THE WITH GOOD GUN CONTROLS HAVE LESS DEATHS BY GUNFURE THAN WE DO, AND ALL OUR GUNS MAKE US LESS SAFE, NOT MORE SAFE.

Also: we have NOT achieved more liberty through private guns in America; the NRA did not lead the civil rights movement nor oppose the patriot act.

We can't even say how you'd use a gun for safety, when an intruder enters the bedroom, if your gun is locked up.

All laws should have broad clauses ("any material omision is also a securities fraud") and should not rely on narrow technical details, no law is perfect, no law solves any problem 100%.

Finally, America's gun violence problem is largely caused by our gun nuts who prevent us from doing what works so well in canada or australia, where, btw, there are still millions of guns -- they just control them better. Control. Not eliminate. But yes eliminate the higher power weaponry, just like we ban @5 from owning his own tank, nuclear weapon, mustard gas, dynamite, and automatic machine gun, etc.
Posted by quibbling gun nuts on January 10, 2013 at 12:09 PM
Dougsf 11
Whoa, Taft. That's about as remote a city as you can get in central CA. It's a little old oil town. I know nothing about the incident, just thinking out loud that Taft must be a very odd place to grow up.
Posted by Dougsf on January 10, 2013 at 12:09 PM
COMTE 10
Will,

A good, experienced black powder shooter can reload in less than a minute. Not that much difference, admittedly, but let's give them a little bit of credit.
Posted by COMTE http://www.chriscomte.com on January 10, 2013 at 12:07 PM
Former Lurker 9
Now is the time to mourn not talk about gun control...
Posted by Former Lurker on January 10, 2013 at 12:04 PM
Will in Seattle 8
Guns don't kill people.

The ammunition in the guns, sprayed in massive amounts and designed to kill people, kills the people.

Mind you, if we had flintlock rifles and pistols, it would take 3 minutes to reload after each shot ...
Posted by Will in Seattle http://www.facebook.com/WillSeattle on January 10, 2013 at 11:57 AM
Gurldoggie 7
Knowing absolutely nothing about this incident, I am going out on a limb and guessing the shooter was a white male who managed to get hold of a legally registered firearm. Go ahead and troll me if I'm wrong.
Posted by Gurldoggie http://gurldogg.blogspot.com on January 10, 2013 at 11:52 AM
Ph'nglui mglw'nafh Cthulhu R'lyeh wgah'nagl fhtagn 6
@5

It could be your "point" is inane. Everyone is talking about broad solutions to a complex problem, and you keep harping on isolated data points as if each existed only in isolation.

I know it's not just you. The gun lobby broadcasts these talking points to their proxies famous and anonymous across the country, and you all bleat them tirelessly.

You don't care that you're losing ground and that's why you can't change.
Posted by Ph'nglui mglw'nafh Cthulhu R'lyeh wgah'nagl fhtagn http://youtu.be/zu-akdyxpUc on January 10, 2013 at 11:41 AM
5
@3
You have that backwards.
How much money do you want to bet that the gun used in that shooting had a bayonet lug?
Because I'm pretty sure that you will find out that it did not.
Which is the point that the "gun nuts" here have been making over and over and over but which never seems to get through the bias of certain people.
Posted by fairly.unbalanced on January 10, 2013 at 11:36 AM
Max Solomon 4
4 dead in 1 incident is the FBI threshold for a mass killing. so remember, don't try and make any conclusions about the need for greater control of firearms out of this.
Posted by Max Solomon on January 10, 2013 at 11:35 AM
emma's bee 3
Oh, but since it probably involved either drugs or brown people (or both), no worries. At least, according to Slog's resident gun nuts.
Posted by emma's bee on January 10, 2013 at 11:30 AM
2
Taft High School has an armed deputy patrolling the premises. Initial reports are saying shooter is a student (surprise, surprise bullets & puberty are a winning combo, no?)
Posted by "But don't armed deputies prevent complete slaughter?" on January 10, 2013 at 11:18 AM
1
Let me guess: male shooter, prescribed antidepressants but either withdrawing from them or not taking them at all.

I sure would like to see the reasoned arguments linking public education to gummint tyranny. Isn't that why Americans carry guns, to fight gummint tyranny when they're not consenting to being groped by useless window dressing uniformed clowns at the airport?
Posted by Make sure nothing changes, America! For Freedom! on January 10, 2013 at 11:10 AM

Add a comment

Advertisement
 

Want great deals and a chance to win tickets to the best shows in Seattle? Join The Stranger Presents email list!


All contents © Index Newspapers, LLC
1535 11th Ave (Third Floor), Seattle, WA 98122
Contact Info | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Takedown Policy