Slog

News & Arts

Line Out

Music & the City
at Night

« Boring Report | The Good and Bad Rooftops of Hong K… »

Thursday, January 10, 2013

Media / Film "Here Is What Happens When You Cast Lindsay Lohan in Your Movie"

Posted by David Schmader on Thu, Jan 10, 2013 at 1:31 PM

This New York Times Magazine article about the making of Paul Schrader's The Canyons (trailer above) is one of the most entertaining things I've ever read.

FacebookShare

Comments (22) RSS

Newest First Unregistered On Registered On Add a comment

@20: Megalomaniacal tinfoil hat conspiracy theorist and shameless lecher. Charming.

Posted by Knat on January 11, 2013 at 11:21 AM

Frankly, the more interesting movie here would be the drama surrounding making "The Canyons" than the movie itself.

Posted by PA Native on January 11, 2013 at 11:20 AM

Word up, bitchez!

Lindsay Lohan is the greatest living actress (actor?) of our age.

Her performances, especially while naked, are matchless.

Her scenes in Machete almost stole the show (especially the nude scenes).

Nobody comes close to America's Greatest Thespian, Ms. Lohan.

sgt_doom hath spoken, listen well, knaves......

Posted by sgt_doom on January 11, 2013 at 10:42 AM

Damn. You couldn't drug me enough to work on that production.

Posted by sirkowski

on January 11, 2013 at 12:47 AM

I read the article this morning and was amazed by the amount of train-wreckiness documented therein.

But I did not expect this. It's 1000x more amateurish than student films I've seen. It's not even funny or camp how bad it is... It's just suck.

Oh, and Lindsay can't even manage sexy. Sad.

Posted by Cracker Jack on January 10, 2013 at 7:47 PM

I'm really hoping Lindsay Lohan will get it together. She's very much an underdog. I have a soft spot for that.

Posted by floater on January 10, 2013 at 7:01 PM

@11, I think the other poster (and I) just thought it was amusing that you thought to mention what time you read the article (ie: lunchtime). You stated it correctly. :)

Posted by g on January 10, 2013 at 6:49 PM

@12: Sounds like it is. Even the director, producer, and star (Lohan) hate the final cut, but that article was interesting.

Posted by Knat on January 10, 2013 at 5:46 PM

The sad thing is that the writer of "Taxi Driver" is now begging on Kickstarter, flogging his old Robert DeNiro memorabilia, working with Lindsey Lohan and Bret Easton Ellis on a semi-porno.

Posted by Fnarf

on January 10, 2013 at 3:57 PM

Read the piece earlier today. Weird. Lohan sounds like a wreck. Also, I didn't know Director Schader was married to actress Mary Beth Hurt.

Posted by lark on January 10, 2013 at 3:28 PM

I'm guessing this article is 20 times more entertaining than the movie.

Posted by monkey on January 10, 2013 at 3:08 PM

English is my second language. During lunch? Soderbergh edits would have been fun. Maybe an Oceans 11 style ending with a money shot instead of the water fountain at the Belagio?

Posted by SeMe on January 10, 2013 at 3:03 PM

@8, agreed. Soderbergh editing might have produced something watchable.

Posted by biffp on January 10, 2013 at 2:34 PM

@7: it was lunchtime. But we really can't know for sure. Could have just been over a snack.

Posted by g on January 10, 2013 at 2:12 PM

It was a decent read, but after watching that horrible trailer I'm not sure if the story and trailer are really for the same movie.

Posted by SPG on January 10, 2013 at 2:09 PM

@4
I'm sorry, I have a migraine, and my vision is blurry, not catching everything. Now when did you say that you read the article?

Posted by dnt trust me on January 10, 2013 at 2:09 PM

Never have Cdr. Taggert's words rung more true: "It doesn't take a great actor to recognize a bad one."

Posted by Knat on January 10, 2013 at 2:08 PM

Deen has had to publically say, on several occasions, that he never had sex with Lindsay. That says alot about you if a porn star goes out of his way to say that he didn't fuck you. Particularly with his high standards. *ahem*

Posted by Cato the Younger Younger on January 10, 2013 at 2:08 PM

I read the article at lunchtime, I agree David, it was a fascinating read. I liked how they described Schrader(sp?) and his tantrum at the end when they suggested he let Soderbergh edit his film. Lindsay was a bit of trainwreck, but they wrote it well with no cheap shots. Deen the porn actor sounds like he might have a future. Great read.

Posted by SeMe on January 10, 2013 at 1:57 PM